Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You
Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care techn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1105-1106 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1106 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 1105 |
container_title | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Levy, Isra G |
description | Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jnci/dji243 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68443018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68443018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctvEzEQxi0EoqHlxB1ZHLi0S_2KveZWpS9Q1SIeKnCxZr3eZtONndpeRPjrcZQIpM5lpJmfPs18H0KvKHlHiebHC2_743bRM8GfoAkVklSMkulTNCGEqaquldhDL1JakFKaiedoj0qiFJFsgv5cuzGGZoCUwxKO8K0bhurUpf7Ouxaf_YJhhNwHn44w-BbnucM3q9wvYejzGocOf3bJQbRzfD76tvd37_FJusfXIePbOWT8I4wRz8Loc1zjGXh8GnAX4mZ-gJ51MCT3ctf30bfzs6-zy-rq5uLD7OSqspzqXDHVKQId41MKQBXjrrayEVI6SxqwXLcNF13nJAdqKSXKtTVY5kBOWWNbwvfR263uKoaH0aVsln2y5U_wLozJyFoITmhdwDePwEW53pfbDCuOMi21LtDhFrIxpBRdZ1ax2BHXhhKzycNs8jDbPAr9eic5NkvX_md3ARSg2gJ9yu73vz3EeyMVV1Nz-f2n-ajlFy0-cXPB_wJ8cpaN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221029699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Levy, Isra G</creator><creatorcontrib>Levy, Isra G</creatorcontrib><description>Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2105</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16077062</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNCIEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biomedical Technology - economics ; Cancer ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Developed Countries ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Funding ; Health care expenditures ; Health Services Research - economics ; Humans ; Mass Screening - economics ; Nervous system ; Neuroblastoma - diagnosis ; Neuroblastoma - economics ; Neuroblastoma - prevention & control ; Research Support as Topic ; United States</subject><ispartof>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1105-1106</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Aug 3, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16077062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levy, Isra G</creatorcontrib><title>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</title><title>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</title><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><description>Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective.</description><subject>Biomedical Technology - economics</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Developed Countries</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Services Research - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma - economics</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma - prevention & control</subject><subject>Research Support as Topic</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0027-8874</issn><issn>1460-2105</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctvEzEQxi0EoqHlxB1ZHLi0S_2KveZWpS9Q1SIeKnCxZr3eZtONndpeRPjrcZQIpM5lpJmfPs18H0KvKHlHiebHC2_743bRM8GfoAkVklSMkulTNCGEqaquldhDL1JakFKaiedoj0qiFJFsgv5cuzGGZoCUwxKO8K0bhurUpf7Ouxaf_YJhhNwHn44w-BbnucM3q9wvYejzGocOf3bJQbRzfD76tvd37_FJusfXIePbOWT8I4wRz8Loc1zjGXh8GnAX4mZ-gJ51MCT3ctf30bfzs6-zy-rq5uLD7OSqspzqXDHVKQId41MKQBXjrrayEVI6SxqwXLcNF13nJAdqKSXKtTVY5kBOWWNbwvfR263uKoaH0aVsln2y5U_wLozJyFoITmhdwDePwEW53pfbDCuOMi21LtDhFrIxpBRdZ1ax2BHXhhKzycNs8jDbPAr9eic5NkvX_md3ARSg2gJ9yu73vz3EeyMVV1Nz-f2n-ajlFy0-cXPB_wJ8cpaN</recordid><startdate>20050803</startdate><enddate>20050803</enddate><creator>Levy, Isra G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050803</creationdate><title>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</title><author>Levy, Isra G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Technology - economics</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Developed Countries</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Services Research - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma - economics</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma - prevention & control</topic><topic>Research Support as Topic</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levy, Isra G</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levy, Isra G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</atitle><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><date>2005-08-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1105</spage><epage>1106</epage><pages>1105-1106</pages><issn>0027-8874</issn><eissn>1460-2105</eissn><coden>JNCIEQ</coden><abstract>Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16077062</pmid><doi>10.1093/jnci/dji243</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8874 |
ispartof | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1105-1106 |
issn | 0027-8874 1460-2105 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68443018 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Biomedical Technology - economics Cancer Cost-Benefit Analysis Developed Countries Evaluation Studies as Topic Funding Health care expenditures Health Services Research - economics Humans Mass Screening - economics Nervous system Neuroblastoma - diagnosis Neuroblastoma - economics Neuroblastoma - prevention & control Research Support as Topic United States |
title | Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuroblastoma,%20Well-Designed%20Evaluations,%20and%20the%20Optimality%20of%20Research%20Funding:%20Ask%20Not%20What%20Your%20Country%20Can%20Do%20for%20You&rft.jtitle=JNCI%20:%20Journal%20of%20the%20National%20Cancer%20Institute&rft.au=Levy,%20Isra%20G&rft.date=2005-08-03&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1105&rft.epage=1106&rft.pages=1105-1106&rft.issn=0027-8874&rft.eissn=1460-2105&rft.coden=JNCIEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jnci/dji243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68443018%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221029699&rft_id=info:pmid/16077062&rfr_iscdi=true |