Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You

Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care techn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1105-1106
1. Verfasser: Levy, Isra G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1106
container_issue 15
container_start_page 1105
container_title JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute
container_volume 97
creator Levy, Isra G
description Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jnci/dji243
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68443018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68443018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctvEzEQxi0EoqHlxB1ZHLi0S_2KveZWpS9Q1SIeKnCxZr3eZtONndpeRPjrcZQIpM5lpJmfPs18H0KvKHlHiebHC2_743bRM8GfoAkVklSMkulTNCGEqaquldhDL1JakFKaiedoj0qiFJFsgv5cuzGGZoCUwxKO8K0bhurUpf7Ouxaf_YJhhNwHn44w-BbnucM3q9wvYejzGocOf3bJQbRzfD76tvd37_FJusfXIePbOWT8I4wRz8Loc1zjGXh8GnAX4mZ-gJ51MCT3ctf30bfzs6-zy-rq5uLD7OSqspzqXDHVKQId41MKQBXjrrayEVI6SxqwXLcNF13nJAdqKSXKtTVY5kBOWWNbwvfR263uKoaH0aVsln2y5U_wLozJyFoITmhdwDePwEW53pfbDCuOMi21LtDhFrIxpBRdZ1ax2BHXhhKzycNs8jDbPAr9eic5NkvX_md3ARSg2gJ9yu73vz3EeyMVV1Nz-f2n-ajlFy0-cXPB_wJ8cpaN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221029699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Levy, Isra G</creator><creatorcontrib>Levy, Isra G</creatorcontrib><description>Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2105</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16077062</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNCIEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biomedical Technology - economics ; Cancer ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Developed Countries ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Funding ; Health care expenditures ; Health Services Research - economics ; Humans ; Mass Screening - economics ; Nervous system ; Neuroblastoma - diagnosis ; Neuroblastoma - economics ; Neuroblastoma - prevention &amp; control ; Research Support as Topic ; United States</subject><ispartof>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1105-1106</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Aug 3, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16077062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levy, Isra G</creatorcontrib><title>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</title><title>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</title><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><description>Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective.</description><subject>Biomedical Technology - economics</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Developed Countries</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health Services Research - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma - economics</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Research Support as Topic</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0027-8874</issn><issn>1460-2105</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctvEzEQxi0EoqHlxB1ZHLi0S_2KveZWpS9Q1SIeKnCxZr3eZtONndpeRPjrcZQIpM5lpJmfPs18H0KvKHlHiebHC2_743bRM8GfoAkVklSMkulTNCGEqaquldhDL1JakFKaiedoj0qiFJFsgv5cuzGGZoCUwxKO8K0bhurUpf7Ouxaf_YJhhNwHn44w-BbnucM3q9wvYejzGocOf3bJQbRzfD76tvd37_FJusfXIePbOWT8I4wRz8Loc1zjGXh8GnAX4mZ-gJ51MCT3ctf30bfzs6-zy-rq5uLD7OSqspzqXDHVKQId41MKQBXjrrayEVI6SxqwXLcNF13nJAdqKSXKtTVY5kBOWWNbwvfR263uKoaH0aVsln2y5U_wLozJyFoITmhdwDePwEW53pfbDCuOMi21LtDhFrIxpBRdZ1ax2BHXhhKzycNs8jDbPAr9eic5NkvX_md3ARSg2gJ9yu73vz3EeyMVV1Nz-f2n-ajlFy0-cXPB_wJ8cpaN</recordid><startdate>20050803</startdate><enddate>20050803</enddate><creator>Levy, Isra G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050803</creationdate><title>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</title><author>Levy, Isra G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-27f70af2351aa1723e8c6b466ec0bac39db34ffe63a1c1107ed8ac2ea652bcd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Technology - economics</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Developed Countries</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health Services Research - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma - economics</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Research Support as Topic</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levy, Isra G</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levy, Isra G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You</atitle><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><date>2005-08-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1105</spage><epage>1106</epage><pages>1105-1106</pages><issn>0027-8874</issn><eissn>1460-2105</eissn><coden>JNCIEQ</coden><abstract>Health care technology assessment (HTA) has garnered the attention of policy makers over the past 20 years because the introduction of new technologies is widely believed to have been a major driver of increased health care expenditures in developed countries. Careful evaluation of health care technology prior to widespread introduction and diffusion has become a priority for policy makers who are committed to evidence-based decision making, and those involved with HTA have argued the merits of including economic evaluations alongside clinical effectiveness evaluations. It has been recognized that rigorous economic evaluations of new technologies may not always be feasible, and even if feasible the evaluation itself may not be cost-effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16077062</pmid><doi>10.1093/jnci/dji243</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8874
ispartof JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005-08, Vol.97 (15), p.1105-1106
issn 0027-8874
1460-2105
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68443018
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Biomedical Technology - economics
Cancer
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Developed Countries
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Funding
Health care expenditures
Health Services Research - economics
Humans
Mass Screening - economics
Nervous system
Neuroblastoma - diagnosis
Neuroblastoma - economics
Neuroblastoma - prevention & control
Research Support as Topic
United States
title Neuroblastoma, Well-Designed Evaluations, and the Optimality of Research Funding: Ask Not What Your Country Can Do for You
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuroblastoma,%20Well-Designed%20Evaluations,%20and%20the%20Optimality%20of%20Research%20Funding:%20Ask%20Not%20What%20Your%20Country%20Can%20Do%20for%20You&rft.jtitle=JNCI%20:%20Journal%20of%20the%20National%20Cancer%20Institute&rft.au=Levy,%20Isra%20G&rft.date=2005-08-03&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1105&rft.epage=1106&rft.pages=1105-1106&rft.issn=0027-8874&rft.eissn=1460-2105&rft.coden=JNCIEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jnci/dji243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68443018%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221029699&rft_id=info:pmid/16077062&rfr_iscdi=true