Rating Perceived Exertion during Short Duration, Very High Intensity Cycle Exercise

This study compared undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during short duration, very high intensity cycle exercise using high and low resistance. 30 recreationally trained males (24.2 ± 2.4 yr.) were memory-anchored to the Borg 15-category scale. The high and low resistance exercises...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perceptual and motor skills 2005-06, Vol.100 (3), p.767-773
Hauptverfasser: Gearhart, Randall F., Becque, M. Daniel, Palm, Chad M., Hutchins, Matthew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 773
container_issue 3
container_start_page 767
container_title Perceptual and motor skills
container_volume 100
creator Gearhart, Randall F.
Becque, M. Daniel
Palm, Chad M.
Hutchins, Matthew D.
description This study compared undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during short duration, very high intensity cycle exercise using high and low resistance. 30 recreationally trained males (24.2 ± 2.4 yr.) were memory-anchored to the Borg 15-category scale. The high and low resistance exercises were defined by 30-sec. maximum tests assigned in counterbalanced order, with resistances set before testing during an orientation session. High resistance was 10% of body mass. Low resistance resulted in the same total work as the high resistance over the 30-sec. sessions (± 5%) but increased pedal rate. RPE was taken at 8, 13, 18, 23, and 28 sec. during the high and the low resistance exercises. Measurements were compared using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RPE was significantly greater (p = .005) for the high than the low resistance exercise at each interval. RPE increased when the subjects were required to pedal against a greater resistance and produce the highest forces. These RPE data are consistent with data from both aerobic cycle and resistance exercise. The data suggest that instantaneous force production, not summed work, is a primary determinant of RPE. All of these observations support Cafarelli's theoretical model of effort sense. In conclusion, as an individual generates more force during high resistance exercise than in light resistance exercise, a potential explanation of our results is that the increased motor outflow and corollary sensory signal lead to a greater sense of effort.
doi_str_mv 10.2466/pms.100.3.767-773
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68434663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_pms.100.3.767-773</sage_id><sourcerecordid>19623046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5653a0878bff15394b5860736ddb16b8a491af4afc7e054bc04cef4a909386853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtLwzAYhoMoOg8_wBspXnhl65fm0PRS5mkwUDzhXUjTr7OytTNpxf17MzcQBPEqp-d9Q_IQckghSbmUZ_OZTyhAwpJMZnGWsQ0yoEKoWCr1skkGAIzGgqZih-x6_wYAknK-TXaoBAmcw4A83JuubibRHTqL9QeW0eUnuq5um6js3fLk4bV1XXTRO7PcPY2e0S2im3ryGo2aDhtfd4touLBT_E7a2uM-2arM1OPBetwjT1eXj8ObeHx7PRqej2PLctnFQgpmQGWqqCoqWM4LoSRkTJZlQWWhDM-pqbipbIYgeGGBWwzrHHKmpBJsj5yseueufe_Rd3pWe4vTqWmw7b2WirPwTexfkOYyZcBlAI9_gW9t75rwCJ1SwSFP1bKNriDrWu8dVnru6plxC01BL73o4CXMQTMdvOjgJWSO1sV9McPyJ7EWEYBkBXgzwZ9b_278Aghsls4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215409283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rating Perceived Exertion during Short Duration, Very High Intensity Cycle Exercise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Gearhart, Randall F. ; Becque, M. Daniel ; Palm, Chad M. ; Hutchins, Matthew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gearhart, Randall F. ; Becque, M. Daniel ; Palm, Chad M. ; Hutchins, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during short duration, very high intensity cycle exercise using high and low resistance. 30 recreationally trained males (24.2 ± 2.4 yr.) were memory-anchored to the Borg 15-category scale. The high and low resistance exercises were defined by 30-sec. maximum tests assigned in counterbalanced order, with resistances set before testing during an orientation session. High resistance was 10% of body mass. Low resistance resulted in the same total work as the high resistance over the 30-sec. sessions (± 5%) but increased pedal rate. RPE was taken at 8, 13, 18, 23, and 28 sec. during the high and the low resistance exercises. Measurements were compared using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RPE was significantly greater (p = .005) for the high than the low resistance exercise at each interval. RPE increased when the subjects were required to pedal against a greater resistance and produce the highest forces. These RPE data are consistent with data from both aerobic cycle and resistance exercise. The data suggest that instantaneous force production, not summed work, is a primary determinant of RPE. All of these observations support Cafarelli's theoretical model of effort sense. In conclusion, as an individual generates more force during high resistance exercise than in light resistance exercise, a potential explanation of our results is that the increased motor outflow and corollary sensory signal lead to a greater sense of effort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-688X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/pms.100.3.767-773</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16060440</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMOSAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Bicycling ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Comparative studies ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise Test - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Measurement techniques ; Perception - physiology ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Sensory perception</subject><ispartof>Perceptual and motor skills, 2005-06, Vol.100 (3), p.767-773</ispartof><rights>2005 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Southern Universities Press Jun 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5653a0878bff15394b5860736ddb16b8a491af4afc7e054bc04cef4a909386853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5653a0878bff15394b5860736ddb16b8a491af4afc7e054bc04cef4a909386853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pms.100.3.767-773$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pms.100.3.767-773$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16060440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gearhart, Randall F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becque, M. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palm, Chad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchins, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><title>Rating Perceived Exertion during Short Duration, Very High Intensity Cycle Exercise</title><title>Perceptual and motor skills</title><addtitle>Percept Mot Skills</addtitle><description>This study compared undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during short duration, very high intensity cycle exercise using high and low resistance. 30 recreationally trained males (24.2 ± 2.4 yr.) were memory-anchored to the Borg 15-category scale. The high and low resistance exercises were defined by 30-sec. maximum tests assigned in counterbalanced order, with resistances set before testing during an orientation session. High resistance was 10% of body mass. Low resistance resulted in the same total work as the high resistance over the 30-sec. sessions (± 5%) but increased pedal rate. RPE was taken at 8, 13, 18, 23, and 28 sec. during the high and the low resistance exercises. Measurements were compared using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RPE was significantly greater (p = .005) for the high than the low resistance exercise at each interval. RPE increased when the subjects were required to pedal against a greater resistance and produce the highest forces. These RPE data are consistent with data from both aerobic cycle and resistance exercise. The data suggest that instantaneous force production, not summed work, is a primary determinant of RPE. All of these observations support Cafarelli's theoretical model of effort sense. In conclusion, as an individual generates more force during high resistance exercise than in light resistance exercise, a potential explanation of our results is that the increased motor outflow and corollary sensory signal lead to a greater sense of effort.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise Test - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><issn>0031-5125</issn><issn>1558-688X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtLwzAYhoMoOg8_wBspXnhl65fm0PRS5mkwUDzhXUjTr7OytTNpxf17MzcQBPEqp-d9Q_IQckghSbmUZ_OZTyhAwpJMZnGWsQ0yoEKoWCr1skkGAIzGgqZih-x6_wYAknK-TXaoBAmcw4A83JuubibRHTqL9QeW0eUnuq5um6js3fLk4bV1XXTRO7PcPY2e0S2im3ryGo2aDhtfd4touLBT_E7a2uM-2arM1OPBetwjT1eXj8ObeHx7PRqej2PLctnFQgpmQGWqqCoqWM4LoSRkTJZlQWWhDM-pqbipbIYgeGGBWwzrHHKmpBJsj5yseueufe_Rd3pWe4vTqWmw7b2WirPwTexfkOYyZcBlAI9_gW9t75rwCJ1SwSFP1bKNriDrWu8dVnru6plxC01BL73o4CXMQTMdvOjgJWSO1sV9McPyJ7EWEYBkBXgzwZ9b_278Aghsls4</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Gearhart, Randall F.</creator><creator>Becque, M. Daniel</creator><creator>Palm, Chad M.</creator><creator>Hutchins, Matthew D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>Rating Perceived Exertion during Short Duration, Very High Intensity Cycle Exercise</title><author>Gearhart, Randall F. ; Becque, M. Daniel ; Palm, Chad M. ; Hutchins, Matthew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-5653a0878bff15394b5860736ddb16b8a491af4afc7e054bc04cef4a909386853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise Test - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gearhart, Randall F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becque, M. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palm, Chad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchins, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Perceptual and motor skills</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gearhart, Randall F.</au><au>Becque, M. Daniel</au><au>Palm, Chad M.</au><au>Hutchins, Matthew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rating Perceived Exertion during Short Duration, Very High Intensity Cycle Exercise</atitle><jtitle>Perceptual and motor skills</jtitle><addtitle>Percept Mot Skills</addtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>773</epage><pages>767-773</pages><issn>0031-5125</issn><eissn>1558-688X</eissn><coden>PMOSAZ</coden><abstract>This study compared undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during short duration, very high intensity cycle exercise using high and low resistance. 30 recreationally trained males (24.2 ± 2.4 yr.) were memory-anchored to the Borg 15-category scale. The high and low resistance exercises were defined by 30-sec. maximum tests assigned in counterbalanced order, with resistances set before testing during an orientation session. High resistance was 10% of body mass. Low resistance resulted in the same total work as the high resistance over the 30-sec. sessions (± 5%) but increased pedal rate. RPE was taken at 8, 13, 18, 23, and 28 sec. during the high and the low resistance exercises. Measurements were compared using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. RPE was significantly greater (p = .005) for the high than the low resistance exercise at each interval. RPE increased when the subjects were required to pedal against a greater resistance and produce the highest forces. These RPE data are consistent with data from both aerobic cycle and resistance exercise. The data suggest that instantaneous force production, not summed work, is a primary determinant of RPE. All of these observations support Cafarelli's theoretical model of effort sense. In conclusion, as an individual generates more force during high resistance exercise than in light resistance exercise, a potential explanation of our results is that the increased motor outflow and corollary sensory signal lead to a greater sense of effort.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16060440</pmid><doi>10.2466/pms.100.3.767-773</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-5125
ispartof Perceptual and motor skills, 2005-06, Vol.100 (3), p.767-773
issn 0031-5125
1558-688X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68434663
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Bicycling
Biomechanical Phenomena
Comparative studies
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exercise Test - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Measurement techniques
Perception - physiology
Physical Exertion - physiology
Sensory perception
title Rating Perceived Exertion during Short Duration, Very High Intensity Cycle Exercise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rating%20Perceived%20Exertion%20during%20Short%20Duration,%20Very%20High%20Intensity%20Cycle%20Exercise&rft.jtitle=Perceptual%20and%20motor%20skills&rft.au=Gearhart,%20Randall%20F.&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=773&rft.pages=767-773&rft.issn=0031-5125&rft.eissn=1558-688X&rft.coden=PMOSAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/pms.100.3.767-773&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19623046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215409283&rft_id=info:pmid/16060440&rft_sage_id=10.2466_pms.100.3.767-773&rfr_iscdi=true