Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics

Super groups Many if not most predator and prey populations are puzzlingly stable, despite the fact that instability is expected based on the kinds of ecological interactions that typically occur. Fryxell et al . develop the hypothesis that one factor contributing to stability is reduced predator se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature 2007-10, Vol.449 (7165), p.1041-1043
Hauptverfasser: Fryxell, John M., Mosser, Anna, Sinclair, Anthony R. E., Packer, Craig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1043
container_issue 7165
container_start_page 1041
container_title Nature
container_volume 449
creator Fryxell, John M.
Mosser, Anna
Sinclair, Anthony R. E.
Packer, Craig
description Super groups Many if not most predator and prey populations are puzzlingly stable, despite the fact that instability is expected based on the kinds of ecological interactions that typically occur. Fryxell et al . develop the hypothesis that one factor contributing to stability is reduced predator search efficiency caused by group formation by both predators and prey. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both protagonists has an enormous impact on population dynamics, lending stability to what would otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Group formation by both predators and prey dramatically reduces predator search efficiency. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both predators and prey has an enormous impact on Serengeti population dynamics, lending a stabilizing influence to what would be otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Theoretical ecology is largely founded on the principle of mass action, in which uncoordinated populations of predators and prey move in a random and well-mixed fashion across a featureless landscape. The conceptual core of this body of theory is the functional response, predicting the rate of prey consumption by individual predators as a function of predator and/or prey densities 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 . This assumption is seriously violated in many ecosystems in which predators and/or prey form social groups. Here we develop a new set of group-dependent functional responses to consider the ecological implications of sociality and apply the model to the Serengeti ecosystem. All of the prey species typically captured by Serengeti lions ( Panthera leo ) are gregarious, exhibiting nonlinear relationships between prey-group density and population density. The observed patterns of group formation profoundly reduce food intake rates below the levels expected under random mixing, having as strong an impact on intake rates as the seasonal migratory behaviour of the herbivores. A dynamical system model parameterized for the Serengeti ecosystem (using wildebeest ( Connochaetes taurinus ) as a well-studied example) shows that grouping strongly stabilizes interactions between lions and wildebeest. Our results suggest that social groups rather than individuals are the basic building blocks around which predator–prey interactions should be modelled and that group formation may provide the underly
doi_str_mv 10.1038/nature06177
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68428958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A189748875</galeid><sourcerecordid>A189748875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-37aa39c1a3d2797f426ad12931ede48ffa8db7043ec0de90f26c2c7be221967c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0t1qFDEUB_Agil2rV97LIihIHc3X5ONyWbQtFAWteBnOZpJlykwyTTLgeuU7-IZ9ks7ShV2l4lUC50cO5_yD0HOC3xHM1PsAZUwOCyLlAzQjXIqKCyUfohnGVFVYMXGEnuR8hTGuieSP0RGRWmDK6Qyx0xTHYe5j6qG0McxzgVXbtT9dng_JNVBiuvn1e7pu5s0mQN_a_BQ98tBl92x3HqNvHz9cLs-qi8-n58vFRWVrrEvFJADTlgBrqNTScyqgIVQz4hrHlfegmpXEnDmLG6exp8JSK1eOUqKFtOwYvb57d0jxenS5mL7N1nUdBBfHbITiVOla_RdSzAnjZAtf_gWv4pjCNMTW1IJJcYDW0DnTBh9LAmuH9toQpSVXStYTevMHsjEU96OsYczZnH_9YhaH9uTfdnH5ffnpXm1TzDk5b4bU9pA2hmCzDdwcBD7pF7uJxlXvmr3dJTyBVzsA2ULnEwTb5r3TZPormk3u7Z3LUymsXdqv5r6-t2tiwIU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204563768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Fryxell, John M. ; Mosser, Anna ; Sinclair, Anthony R. E. ; Packer, Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Fryxell, John M. ; Mosser, Anna ; Sinclair, Anthony R. E. ; Packer, Craig</creatorcontrib><description>Super groups Many if not most predator and prey populations are puzzlingly stable, despite the fact that instability is expected based on the kinds of ecological interactions that typically occur. Fryxell et al . develop the hypothesis that one factor contributing to stability is reduced predator search efficiency caused by group formation by both predators and prey. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both protagonists has an enormous impact on population dynamics, lending stability to what would otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Group formation by both predators and prey dramatically reduces predator search efficiency. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both predators and prey has an enormous impact on Serengeti population dynamics, lending a stabilizing influence to what would be otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Theoretical ecology is largely founded on the principle of mass action, in which uncoordinated populations of predators and prey move in a random and well-mixed fashion across a featureless landscape. The conceptual core of this body of theory is the functional response, predicting the rate of prey consumption by individual predators as a function of predator and/or prey densities 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 . This assumption is seriously violated in many ecosystems in which predators and/or prey form social groups. Here we develop a new set of group-dependent functional responses to consider the ecological implications of sociality and apply the model to the Serengeti ecosystem. All of the prey species typically captured by Serengeti lions ( Panthera leo ) are gregarious, exhibiting nonlinear relationships between prey-group density and population density. The observed patterns of group formation profoundly reduce food intake rates below the levels expected under random mixing, having as strong an impact on intake rates as the seasonal migratory behaviour of the herbivores. A dynamical system model parameterized for the Serengeti ecosystem (using wildebeest ( Connochaetes taurinus ) as a well-studied example) shows that grouping strongly stabilizes interactions between lions and wildebeest. Our results suggest that social groups rather than individuals are the basic building blocks around which predator–prey interactions should be modelled and that group formation may provide the underlying stability of many ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nature06177</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17960242</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Connochaetes taurinus ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Food and nutrition ; Food Chain ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Group dynamics ; Group Processes ; Herbivores ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; letter ; Lions ; Lions - physiology ; Mammals - physiology ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Models, Biological ; multidisciplinary ; Panthera leo ; Population Density ; Predation ; Predation (Biology) ; Predator-prey interactions ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior - physiology ; Prey ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Social Behavior ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Theory ; Time Factors ; Wildcats</subject><ispartof>Nature, 2007-10, Vol.449 (7165), p.1041-1043</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2007</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 25, 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-37aa39c1a3d2797f426ad12931ede48ffa8db7043ec0de90f26c2c7be221967c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-37aa39c1a3d2797f426ad12931ede48ffa8db7043ec0de90f26c2c7be221967c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nature06177$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nature06177$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19168793$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17960242$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fryxell, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosser, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Anthony R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics</title><title>Nature</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>Super groups Many if not most predator and prey populations are puzzlingly stable, despite the fact that instability is expected based on the kinds of ecological interactions that typically occur. Fryxell et al . develop the hypothesis that one factor contributing to stability is reduced predator search efficiency caused by group formation by both predators and prey. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both protagonists has an enormous impact on population dynamics, lending stability to what would otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Group formation by both predators and prey dramatically reduces predator search efficiency. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both predators and prey has an enormous impact on Serengeti population dynamics, lending a stabilizing influence to what would be otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Theoretical ecology is largely founded on the principle of mass action, in which uncoordinated populations of predators and prey move in a random and well-mixed fashion across a featureless landscape. The conceptual core of this body of theory is the functional response, predicting the rate of prey consumption by individual predators as a function of predator and/or prey densities 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 . This assumption is seriously violated in many ecosystems in which predators and/or prey form social groups. Here we develop a new set of group-dependent functional responses to consider the ecological implications of sociality and apply the model to the Serengeti ecosystem. All of the prey species typically captured by Serengeti lions ( Panthera leo ) are gregarious, exhibiting nonlinear relationships between prey-group density and population density. The observed patterns of group formation profoundly reduce food intake rates below the levels expected under random mixing, having as strong an impact on intake rates as the seasonal migratory behaviour of the herbivores. A dynamical system model parameterized for the Serengeti ecosystem (using wildebeest ( Connochaetes taurinus ) as a well-studied example) shows that grouping strongly stabilizes interactions between lions and wildebeest. Our results suggest that social groups rather than individuals are the basic building blocks around which predator–prey interactions should be modelled and that group formation may provide the underlying stability of many ecosystems.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Connochaetes taurinus</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Food and nutrition</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Lions</subject><subject>Lions - physiology</subject><subject>Mammals - physiology</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Panthera leo</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predation (Biology)</subject><subject>Predator-prey interactions</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wildcats</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><issn>1476-4679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0t1qFDEUB_Agil2rV97LIihIHc3X5ONyWbQtFAWteBnOZpJlykwyTTLgeuU7-IZ9ks7ShV2l4lUC50cO5_yD0HOC3xHM1PsAZUwOCyLlAzQjXIqKCyUfohnGVFVYMXGEnuR8hTGuieSP0RGRWmDK6Qyx0xTHYe5j6qG0McxzgVXbtT9dng_JNVBiuvn1e7pu5s0mQN_a_BQ98tBl92x3HqNvHz9cLs-qi8-n58vFRWVrrEvFJADTlgBrqNTScyqgIVQz4hrHlfegmpXEnDmLG6exp8JSK1eOUqKFtOwYvb57d0jxenS5mL7N1nUdBBfHbITiVOla_RdSzAnjZAtf_gWv4pjCNMTW1IJJcYDW0DnTBh9LAmuH9toQpSVXStYTevMHsjEU96OsYczZnH_9YhaH9uTfdnH5ffnpXm1TzDk5b4bU9pA2hmCzDdwcBD7pF7uJxlXvmr3dJTyBVzsA2ULnEwTb5r3TZPormk3u7Z3LUymsXdqv5r6-t2tiwIU</recordid><startdate>20071025</startdate><enddate>20071025</enddate><creator>Fryxell, John M.</creator><creator>Mosser, Anna</creator><creator>Sinclair, Anthony R. E.</creator><creator>Packer, Craig</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071025</creationdate><title>Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics</title><author>Fryxell, John M. ; Mosser, Anna ; Sinclair, Anthony R. E. ; Packer, Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-37aa39c1a3d2797f426ad12931ede48ffa8db7043ec0de90f26c2c7be221967c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Connochaetes taurinus</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Food and nutrition</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Lions</topic><topic>Lions - physiology</topic><topic>Mammals - physiology</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Panthera leo</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predation (Biology)</topic><topic>Predator-prey interactions</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wildcats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fryxell, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosser, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Anthony R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packer, Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fryxell, John M.</au><au>Mosser, Anna</au><au>Sinclair, Anthony R. E.</au><au>Packer, Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Nature</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2007-10-25</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>449</volume><issue>7165</issue><spage>1041</spage><epage>1043</epage><pages>1041-1043</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><eissn>1476-4679</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>Super groups Many if not most predator and prey populations are puzzlingly stable, despite the fact that instability is expected based on the kinds of ecological interactions that typically occur. Fryxell et al . develop the hypothesis that one factor contributing to stability is reduced predator search efficiency caused by group formation by both predators and prey. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both protagonists has an enormous impact on population dynamics, lending stability to what would otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Group formation by both predators and prey dramatically reduces predator search efficiency. Field data on lions and their large herbivore prey from Serengeti National Park suggest that group formation by both predators and prey has an enormous impact on Serengeti population dynamics, lending a stabilizing influence to what would be otherwise be a highly unstable situation. Theoretical ecology is largely founded on the principle of mass action, in which uncoordinated populations of predators and prey move in a random and well-mixed fashion across a featureless landscape. The conceptual core of this body of theory is the functional response, predicting the rate of prey consumption by individual predators as a function of predator and/or prey densities 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 . This assumption is seriously violated in many ecosystems in which predators and/or prey form social groups. Here we develop a new set of group-dependent functional responses to consider the ecological implications of sociality and apply the model to the Serengeti ecosystem. All of the prey species typically captured by Serengeti lions ( Panthera leo ) are gregarious, exhibiting nonlinear relationships between prey-group density and population density. The observed patterns of group formation profoundly reduce food intake rates below the levels expected under random mixing, having as strong an impact on intake rates as the seasonal migratory behaviour of the herbivores. A dynamical system model parameterized for the Serengeti ecosystem (using wildebeest ( Connochaetes taurinus ) as a well-studied example) shows that grouping strongly stabilizes interactions between lions and wildebeest. Our results suggest that social groups rather than individuals are the basic building blocks around which predator–prey interactions should be modelled and that group formation may provide the underlying stability of many ecosystems.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>17960242</pmid><doi>10.1038/nature06177</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0836
ispartof Nature, 2007-10, Vol.449 (7165), p.1041-1043
issn 0028-0836
1476-4687
1476-4679
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68428958
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Nature Journals Online
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal ecology
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Connochaetes taurinus
Ecology
Ecosystems
Food and nutrition
Food Chain
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
Group dynamics
Group Processes
Herbivores
Humanities and Social Sciences
letter
Lions
Lions - physiology
Mammals - physiology
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Models, Biological
multidisciplinary
Panthera leo
Population Density
Predation
Predation (Biology)
Predator-prey interactions
Predators
Predatory Behavior - physiology
Prey
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Social Behavior
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
Theory
Time Factors
Wildcats
title Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T14%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Group%20formation%20stabilizes%20predator%E2%80%93prey%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=Nature&rft.au=Fryxell,%20John%20M.&rft.date=2007-10-25&rft.volume=449&rft.issue=7165&rft.spage=1041&rft.epage=1043&rft.pages=1041-1043&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nature06177&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA189748875%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204563768&rft_id=info:pmid/17960242&rft_galeid=A189748875&rfr_iscdi=true