Harvesting of Cancellous Bone From the Proximal Tibia Under Local Anesthesia: Donor Site Morbidity and Patient Experience
Purpose The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity, risk of complications, and patient discomfort after ambulatory tibial bone harvesting procedures under local anesthesia. Patients and Methods Between 2000 and 2005, bone was harvested from the head of the tibi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2007-11, Vol.65 (11), p.2235-2241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2241 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2235 |
container_title | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Kirmeier, Robert, DMD Payer, Michael, MD, DMD Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD |
description | Purpose The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity, risk of complications, and patient discomfort after ambulatory tibial bone harvesting procedures under local anesthesia. Patients and Methods Between 2000 and 2005, bone was harvested from the head of the tibia for internal or external maxillary augmentation in 79 patients. A medial osteoplastic approach to the donor region was used. All patients’ records were reviewed. Forty-five of the 79 patients later came in for follow-up examination. A traumatologist examined the donor region both clinically and radiologically. Subjective disorders and experiences of the patients were documented using a standardized questionnaire. Results The patient records revealed that 80% did not report significant complaints or gait disturbances after bone harvesting, and only 5% reported postoperative complaints or gait disturbances lasting longer than 2 weeks. In 1 case, a nondisplaced fracture healed without further complications. Clinical and radiologic examinations of 45 patients revealed full regeneration of the donor region in all cases. Some 91% of the patients described the outpatient bone harvesting procedure under local anesthesia as “not distressing” and would undergo such an intervention again if required. Conclusions This study demonstrates that both complaints and risk of complications after outpatient bone harvesting from the proximal tibia under local anesthesia can be considered very low, especially as far as outpatient maxillary augmentation (eg, sinus floor elevation) is concerned. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68423951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0278239106022038</els_id><sourcerecordid>68423951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b82438b7394660dd96213374c1d202ddf188ab88abcb50c288573276ab3ddc0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFklFvFCEUhYnR2LX6B3wwvOjbjFwYmBljmtRta03W2KTtM2GAsYyzsMJs0_33ZdxNmvigDwRCvnO59xwQegukBALi41AOYZ1KSogoAUrCmmdoAZxBwQlnz9GC0LopKGvhCL1KaSAEgNfiJTqCuuUVg3aBdpcq3ts0Of8Thx4vldd2HMM24S_BW3wRwxpPdxZfxfDg1mrEN65zCt96YyNeBZ1vTn3W39nk1Cd8FnyI-NpNFn8PsXPGTTusvMFXanLWT_j8YWNjPmn7Gr3o1Zjsm8N-jG4vzm-Wl8Xqx9dvy9NVoauaTEXX0Io1Xc3aSghiTCsoMFZXGgwl1JgemkZ189IdJ5o2Da8ZrYXqmDGa9OwYfdjX3cTwe5tblWuX5iGVt3lOKZoqW8ThvyAlrG5ZPYN0D-oYUoq2l5uYvYk7CUTOychBzsnIORkJIHMyWfTuUH3bra15khyiyMD7A6BStrWPOQqXnriWQsO5yNznPWezaffORpn0H0ONi1ZP0gT37z5O_pLr0XmXX_xldzYNYRt9jkOCTFQSeT3_ofkLEUEonQs8AhiWwQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20379371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Harvesting of Cancellous Bone From the Proximal Tibia Under Local Anesthesia: Donor Site Morbidity and Patient Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kirmeier, Robert, DMD ; Payer, Michael, MD, DMD ; Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD ; Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD ; Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD ; Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirmeier, Robert, DMD ; Payer, Michael, MD, DMD ; Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD ; Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD ; Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD ; Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity, risk of complications, and patient discomfort after ambulatory tibial bone harvesting procedures under local anesthesia. Patients and Methods Between 2000 and 2005, bone was harvested from the head of the tibia for internal or external maxillary augmentation in 79 patients. A medial osteoplastic approach to the donor region was used. All patients’ records were reviewed. Forty-five of the 79 patients later came in for follow-up examination. A traumatologist examined the donor region both clinically and radiologically. Subjective disorders and experiences of the patients were documented using a standardized questionnaire. Results The patient records revealed that 80% did not report significant complaints or gait disturbances after bone harvesting, and only 5% reported postoperative complaints or gait disturbances lasting longer than 2 weeks. In 1 case, a nondisplaced fracture healed without further complications. Clinical and radiologic examinations of 45 patients revealed full regeneration of the donor region in all cases. Some 91% of the patients described the outpatient bone harvesting procedure under local anesthesia as “not distressing” and would undergo such an intervention again if required. Conclusions This study demonstrates that both complaints and risk of complications after outpatient bone harvesting from the proximal tibia under local anesthesia can be considered very low, especially as far as outpatient maxillary augmentation (eg, sinus floor elevation) is concerned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17954319</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Local ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Attitude to Health ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Regeneration - physiology ; Bone Transplantation ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gait - physiology ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Tibia - pathology ; Tibia - surgery ; Tibial Fractures - etiology ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2007-11, Vol.65 (11), p.2235-2241</ispartof><rights>American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b82438b7394660dd96213374c1d202ddf188ab88abcb50c288573276ab3ddc0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b82438b7394660dd96213374c1d202ddf188ab88abcb50c288573276ab3ddc0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19218556$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17954319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirmeier, Robert, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payer, Michael, MD, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Harvesting of Cancellous Bone From the Proximal Tibia Under Local Anesthesia: Donor Site Morbidity and Patient Experience</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity, risk of complications, and patient discomfort after ambulatory tibial bone harvesting procedures under local anesthesia. Patients and Methods Between 2000 and 2005, bone was harvested from the head of the tibia for internal or external maxillary augmentation in 79 patients. A medial osteoplastic approach to the donor region was used. All patients’ records were reviewed. Forty-five of the 79 patients later came in for follow-up examination. A traumatologist examined the donor region both clinically and radiologically. Subjective disorders and experiences of the patients were documented using a standardized questionnaire. Results The patient records revealed that 80% did not report significant complaints or gait disturbances after bone harvesting, and only 5% reported postoperative complaints or gait disturbances lasting longer than 2 weeks. In 1 case, a nondisplaced fracture healed without further complications. Clinical and radiologic examinations of 45 patients revealed full regeneration of the donor region in all cases. Some 91% of the patients described the outpatient bone harvesting procedure under local anesthesia as “not distressing” and would undergo such an intervention again if required. Conclusions This study demonstrates that both complaints and risk of complications after outpatient bone harvesting from the proximal tibia under local anesthesia can be considered very low, especially as far as outpatient maxillary augmentation (eg, sinus floor elevation) is concerned.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tibia - pathology</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFklFvFCEUhYnR2LX6B3wwvOjbjFwYmBljmtRta03W2KTtM2GAsYyzsMJs0_33ZdxNmvigDwRCvnO59xwQegukBALi41AOYZ1KSogoAUrCmmdoAZxBwQlnz9GC0LopKGvhCL1KaSAEgNfiJTqCuuUVg3aBdpcq3ts0Of8Thx4vldd2HMM24S_BW3wRwxpPdxZfxfDg1mrEN65zCt96YyNeBZ1vTn3W39nk1Cd8FnyI-NpNFn8PsXPGTTusvMFXanLWT_j8YWNjPmn7Gr3o1Zjsm8N-jG4vzm-Wl8Xqx9dvy9NVoauaTEXX0Io1Xc3aSghiTCsoMFZXGgwl1JgemkZ189IdJ5o2Da8ZrYXqmDGa9OwYfdjX3cTwe5tblWuX5iGVt3lOKZoqW8ThvyAlrG5ZPYN0D-oYUoq2l5uYvYk7CUTOychBzsnIORkJIHMyWfTuUH3bra15khyiyMD7A6BStrWPOQqXnriWQsO5yNznPWezaffORpn0H0ONi1ZP0gT37z5O_pLr0XmXX_xldzYNYRt9jkOCTFQSeT3_ofkLEUEonQs8AhiWwQI</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Kirmeier, Robert, DMD</creator><creator>Payer, Michael, MD, DMD</creator><creator>Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD</creator><creator>Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD</creator><creator>Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Harvesting of Cancellous Bone From the Proximal Tibia Under Local Anesthesia: Donor Site Morbidity and Patient Experience</title><author>Kirmeier, Robert, DMD ; Payer, Michael, MD, DMD ; Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD ; Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD ; Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD ; Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-b82438b7394660dd96213374c1d202ddf188ab88abcb50c288573276ab3ddc0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tibia - pathology</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirmeier, Robert, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payer, Michael, MD, DMD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirmeier, Robert, DMD</au><au>Payer, Michael, MD, DMD</au><au>Lorenzoni, Martin, MD, DMD, PhD</au><au>Wegscheider, Walther A., MD, DMD, PhD</au><au>Seibert, Franz Josef, MD, PhD</au><au>Jakse, Norbert, MD, DMD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Harvesting of Cancellous Bone From the Proximal Tibia Under Local Anesthesia: Donor Site Morbidity and Patient Experience</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2235</spage><epage>2241</epage><pages>2235-2241</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><coden>JOMSDA</coden><abstract>Purpose The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate postoperative morbidity, risk of complications, and patient discomfort after ambulatory tibial bone harvesting procedures under local anesthesia. Patients and Methods Between 2000 and 2005, bone was harvested from the head of the tibia for internal or external maxillary augmentation in 79 patients. A medial osteoplastic approach to the donor region was used. All patients’ records were reviewed. Forty-five of the 79 patients later came in for follow-up examination. A traumatologist examined the donor region both clinically and radiologically. Subjective disorders and experiences of the patients were documented using a standardized questionnaire. Results The patient records revealed that 80% did not report significant complaints or gait disturbances after bone harvesting, and only 5% reported postoperative complaints or gait disturbances lasting longer than 2 weeks. In 1 case, a nondisplaced fracture healed without further complications. Clinical and radiologic examinations of 45 patients revealed full regeneration of the donor region in all cases. Some 91% of the patients described the outpatient bone harvesting procedure under local anesthesia as “not distressing” and would undergo such an intervention again if required. Conclusions This study demonstrates that both complaints and risk of complications after outpatient bone harvesting from the proximal tibia under local anesthesia can be considered very low, especially as far as outpatient maxillary augmentation (eg, sinus floor elevation) is concerned.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17954319</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.038</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2391 |
ispartof | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2007-11, Vol.65 (11), p.2235-2241 |
issn | 0278-2391 1531-5053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68423951 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Aged Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Ambulatory Surgical Procedures Anesthesia Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Attitude to Health Biological and medical sciences Bone Regeneration - physiology Bone Transplantation Dentistry Female Follow-Up Studies Gait - physiology General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Pain, Postoperative - etiology Patient Satisfaction Postoperative Complications Retrospective Studies Surgery Tibia - pathology Tibia - surgery Tibial Fractures - etiology Tissue and Organ Harvesting - adverse effects Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods |
title | Harvesting of Cancellous Bone From the Proximal Tibia Under Local Anesthesia: Donor Site Morbidity and Patient Experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A35%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Harvesting%20of%20Cancellous%20Bone%20From%20the%20Proximal%20Tibia%20Under%20Local%20Anesthesia:%20Donor%20Site%20Morbidity%20and%20Patient%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Kirmeier,%20Robert,%20DMD&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2235&rft.epage=2241&rft.pages=2235-2241&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft.coden=JOMSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68423951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20379371&rft_id=info:pmid/17954319&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0278239106022038&rfr_iscdi=true |