Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer

The issue facing clinicians managing ovarian cancer has evolved over the past three decades from treatment for cure and subsequently palliation, to prolongation of survival for most patients. The purpose of this paper is to review the data, rationale, and issues surrounding cytoreductive surgery in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 2007-02, Vol.19 (1), p.15-21
Hauptverfasser: Hauspy, Jan, Covens, Allan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 19
creator Hauspy, Jan
Covens, Allan
description The issue facing clinicians managing ovarian cancer has evolved over the past three decades from treatment for cure and subsequently palliation, to prolongation of survival for most patients. The purpose of this paper is to review the data, rationale, and issues surrounding cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer and its potential role in this new paradigm shift. Abundant retrospective series report prolongation of survival with secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer. Selection bias, publication bias, and subsequent therapies, however, are confounding factors for survival. As management of ovarian cancer has recently evolved to a treatment of a 'chronic disease', surgery (which has a definite role in primary therapy) should be considered. No prospective randomized studies have been performed to date, and therefore adoption of this method of management has been limited. The absence of good data leaves clinicians without clear direction on how to best manage patients. Patients with favorable characteristics such as a long disease-free interval, good performance status, a single or few small intra-abdominal recurrences may benefit from secondary cytoreduction. A prospective randomized study is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280115f40
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68421214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68421214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-4a9f9daab9acf9caef65fd7b58e4138697102f0ebb6a6bd9cfa34b4cbb4f154f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLwzAYhnNQ3Jz-A5GevHV-X5K2yVGKTmGwi4K3kKRfpLK1M2kH-_dubCB4ei_P-xwexu4Q5gi6elzUqzk4QEGCK0AsgoQLNkWQkKuKf07YdUrfAMg1qCs2wYqjUrKcMl7vhz5SM_qh3VGWxvhFcZ-FPmaR_BgjdUPW72xsbZd523mKN-wy2HWi2_PO2MfL83v9mi9Xi7f6aZl7AcWQS6uDbqx12vqgvaVQFqGpXKFIolClrhB4AHKutKVrtA9WSCe9czJgIYOYsYeTdxv7n5HSYDZt8rRe2476MZlSSY4c5QGUJ9DHPqVIwWxju7FxbxDMsY859DH_-xxu92f_6DbU_J3OccQvBdJlSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68421214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Hauspy, Jan ; Covens, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauspy, Jan ; Covens, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>The issue facing clinicians managing ovarian cancer has evolved over the past three decades from treatment for cure and subsequently palliation, to prolongation of survival for most patients. The purpose of this paper is to review the data, rationale, and issues surrounding cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer and its potential role in this new paradigm shift. Abundant retrospective series report prolongation of survival with secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer. Selection bias, publication bias, and subsequent therapies, however, are confounding factors for survival. As management of ovarian cancer has recently evolved to a treatment of a 'chronic disease', surgery (which has a definite role in primary therapy) should be considered. No prospective randomized studies have been performed to date, and therefore adoption of this method of management has been limited. The absence of good data leaves clinicians without clear direction on how to best manage patients. Patients with favorable characteristics such as a long disease-free interval, good performance status, a single or few small intra-abdominal recurrences may benefit from secondary cytoreduction. A prospective randomized study is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-872X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280115f40</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17218846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Female ; Humans ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery ; Neoplasm, Residual - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery ; Prognosis ; Quality of Life ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2007-02, Vol.19 (1), p.15-21</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-4a9f9daab9acf9caef65fd7b58e4138697102f0ebb6a6bd9cfa34b4cbb4f154f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-4a9f9daab9acf9caef65fd7b58e4138697102f0ebb6a6bd9cfa34b4cbb4f154f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17218846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauspy, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covens, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer</title><title>Current opinion in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>The issue facing clinicians managing ovarian cancer has evolved over the past three decades from treatment for cure and subsequently palliation, to prolongation of survival for most patients. The purpose of this paper is to review the data, rationale, and issues surrounding cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer and its potential role in this new paradigm shift. Abundant retrospective series report prolongation of survival with secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer. Selection bias, publication bias, and subsequent therapies, however, are confounding factors for survival. As management of ovarian cancer has recently evolved to a treatment of a 'chronic disease', surgery (which has a definite role in primary therapy) should be considered. No prospective randomized studies have been performed to date, and therefore adoption of this method of management has been limited. The absence of good data leaves clinicians without clear direction on how to best manage patients. Patients with favorable characteristics such as a long disease-free interval, good performance status, a single or few small intra-abdominal recurrences may benefit from secondary cytoreduction. A prospective randomized study is needed.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1040-872X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEFLwzAYhnNQ3Jz-A5GevHV-X5K2yVGKTmGwi4K3kKRfpLK1M2kH-_dubCB4ei_P-xwexu4Q5gi6elzUqzk4QEGCK0AsgoQLNkWQkKuKf07YdUrfAMg1qCs2wYqjUrKcMl7vhz5SM_qh3VGWxvhFcZ-FPmaR_BgjdUPW72xsbZd523mKN-wy2HWi2_PO2MfL83v9mi9Xi7f6aZl7AcWQS6uDbqx12vqgvaVQFqGpXKFIolClrhB4AHKutKVrtA9WSCe9czJgIYOYsYeTdxv7n5HSYDZt8rRe2476MZlSSY4c5QGUJ9DHPqVIwWxju7FxbxDMsY859DH_-xxu92f_6DbU_J3OccQvBdJlSg</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Hauspy, Jan</creator><creator>Covens, Allan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer</title><author>Hauspy, Jan ; Covens, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-4a9f9daab9acf9caef65fd7b58e4138697102f0ebb6a6bd9cfa34b4cbb4f154f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauspy, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covens, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauspy, Jan</au><au>Covens, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>15-21</pages><issn>1040-872X</issn><abstract>The issue facing clinicians managing ovarian cancer has evolved over the past three decades from treatment for cure and subsequently palliation, to prolongation of survival for most patients. The purpose of this paper is to review the data, rationale, and issues surrounding cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer and its potential role in this new paradigm shift. Abundant retrospective series report prolongation of survival with secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer. Selection bias, publication bias, and subsequent therapies, however, are confounding factors for survival. As management of ovarian cancer has recently evolved to a treatment of a 'chronic disease', surgery (which has a definite role in primary therapy) should be considered. No prospective randomized studies have been performed to date, and therefore adoption of this method of management has been limited. The absence of good data leaves clinicians without clear direction on how to best manage patients. Patients with favorable characteristics such as a long disease-free interval, good performance status, a single or few small intra-abdominal recurrences may benefit from secondary cytoreduction. A prospective randomized study is needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>17218846</pmid><doi>10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280115f40</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-872X
ispartof Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2007-02, Vol.19 (1), p.15-21
issn 1040-872X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68421214
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Female
Humans
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery
Neoplasm, Residual - pathology
Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery
Prognosis
Quality of Life
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
title Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A42%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cytoreductive%20surgery%20for%20recurrent%20ovarian%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Hauspy,%20Jan&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=15-21&rft.issn=1040-872X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280115f40&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68421214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68421214&rft_id=info:pmid/17218846&rfr_iscdi=true