How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP educ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2007-01, Vol.19 (1), p.35-42
Hauptverfasser: Hart, Ann Marie, Macnee, Carol L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
container_volume 19
creator Hart, Ann Marie
Macnee, Carol L.
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education. Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis. Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important. Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68419274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68419274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9rFDEUxYMotla_ggQffJsxyUz-jODDUrRV2yqlsiDIJZO5gVlnZ9Zkht399ma6SwWfmpfccH_ncHIIoZzlPJ13q5zrUmZaVlUuGFM5Y7zi-e4JOX1YPE0zK3kmKi1OyIsYVwmSgvPn5IRrwUuj1Cn5dTls6Ra7jtqAtJ9CRLoJ1o3t2A49hpheuEm7hvohHFcO39NbjFM3Rjp4amnKUNI_E8ZZ1Ns2WcVxavYvyTNvu4ivjvcZ-fHp4935ZXb17eLz-eIqc2UheKZqVtWy8ILpujBaS--4Qa81NnXDmXVaCXSqcBqlqrWsG2WwaSrjvSykNcUZeXvw3YThPgas2-jSr2yPwxRBmZJXQpcJfPMfuBqm0KdsILgwPHUpEmQOkAtDjAE9bEK7tmEPnMHcP6xgrhnmmmHuH-77h12Svj76T_Uam3_CY-EJ-HAAtm2H-0cbw5fF4iZNSZ8d9G0ccfegt-E3KF1oCcubC1iWy5_fGfsK18VfqJ-i7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212810062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hart, Ann Marie ; Macnee, Carol L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hart, Ann Marie ; Macnee, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education. Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis. Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important. Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1041-2972</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2327-6886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-7599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17214866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Colorado ; competencies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; education ; Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards ; Faculty, Nursing - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Internship, Nonmedical ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Needs Assessment - organization &amp; administration ; Nurse practitioner ; Nurse Practitioners - education ; Nurse Practitioners - psychology ; Nurse's Role ; Nursing ; Nursing Education Research ; Nursing Methodology Research ; Organizational Innovation ; preparedness ; Professional Autonomy ; residency ; Self Efficacy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Wyoming</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2007-01, Vol.19 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>2007 American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Nurse Practitioners Jan 2007</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2006.00191.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2006.00191.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17214866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hart, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macnee, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><title>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Nurse Pract</addtitle><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education. Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis. Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important. Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>competencies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</subject><subject>Faculty, Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship, Nonmedical</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needs Assessment - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Nurse practitioner</subject><subject>Nurse Practitioners - education</subject><subject>Nurse Practitioners - psychology</subject><subject>Nurse's Role</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Education Research</subject><subject>Nursing Methodology Research</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>preparedness</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>residency</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Wyoming</subject><issn>1041-2972</issn><issn>2327-6886</issn><issn>1745-7599</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF9rFDEUxYMotla_ggQffJsxyUz-jODDUrRV2yqlsiDIJZO5gVlnZ9Zkht399ma6SwWfmpfccH_ncHIIoZzlPJ13q5zrUmZaVlUuGFM5Y7zi-e4JOX1YPE0zK3kmKi1OyIsYVwmSgvPn5IRrwUuj1Cn5dTls6Ra7jtqAtJ9CRLoJ1o3t2A49hpheuEm7hvohHFcO39NbjFM3Rjp4amnKUNI_E8ZZ1Ns2WcVxavYvyTNvu4ivjvcZ-fHp4935ZXb17eLz-eIqc2UheKZqVtWy8ILpujBaS--4Qa81NnXDmXVaCXSqcBqlqrWsG2WwaSrjvSykNcUZeXvw3YThPgas2-jSr2yPwxRBmZJXQpcJfPMfuBqm0KdsILgwPHUpEmQOkAtDjAE9bEK7tmEPnMHcP6xgrhnmmmHuH-77h12Svj76T_Uam3_CY-EJ-HAAtm2H-0cbw5fF4iZNSZ8d9G0ccfegt-E3KF1oCcubC1iWy5_fGfsK18VfqJ-i7Q</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Hart, Ann Marie</creator><creator>Macnee, Carol L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</title><author>Hart, Ann Marie ; Macnee, Carol L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>competencies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</topic><topic>Faculty, Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship, Nonmedical</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needs Assessment - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Nurse practitioner</topic><topic>Nurse Practitioners - education</topic><topic>Nurse Practitioners - psychology</topic><topic>Nurse's Role</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Education Research</topic><topic>Nursing Methodology Research</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>preparedness</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>residency</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Wyoming</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hart, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macnee, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hart, Ann Marie</au><au>Macnee, Carol L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Nurse Pract</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>1041-2972</issn><issn>2327-6886</issn><eissn>1745-7599</eissn><eissn>2327-6924</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education. Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis. Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important. Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17214866</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1041-2972
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2007-01, Vol.19 (1), p.35-42
issn 1041-2972
2327-6886
1745-7599
2327-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68419274
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence - standards
Colorado
competencies
Cross-Sectional Studies
education
Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards
Faculty, Nursing - standards
Female
Humans
Internship, Nonmedical
Male
Middle Aged
Needs Assessment - organization & administration
Nurse practitioner
Nurse Practitioners - education
Nurse Practitioners - psychology
Nurse's Role
Nursing
Nursing Education Research
Nursing Methodology Research
Organizational Innovation
preparedness
Professional Autonomy
residency
Self Efficacy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Wyoming
title How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20well%20are%20nurse%20practitioners%20prepared%20for%20practice:%20Results%20of%20a%202004%20questionnaire%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Nurse%20Practitioners&rft.au=Hart,%20Ann%20Marie&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=1041-2972&rft.eissn=1745-7599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68419274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212810062&rft_id=info:pmid/17214866&rfr_iscdi=true