How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP educ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 2007-01, Vol.19 (1), p.35-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Hart, Ann Marie Macnee, Carol L. |
description | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education.
Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis.
Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important.
Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68419274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68419274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9rFDEUxYMotla_ggQffJsxyUz-jODDUrRV2yqlsiDIJZO5gVlnZ9Zkht399ma6SwWfmpfccH_ncHIIoZzlPJ13q5zrUmZaVlUuGFM5Y7zi-e4JOX1YPE0zK3kmKi1OyIsYVwmSgvPn5IRrwUuj1Cn5dTls6Ra7jtqAtJ9CRLoJ1o3t2A49hpheuEm7hvohHFcO39NbjFM3Rjp4amnKUNI_E8ZZ1Ns2WcVxavYvyTNvu4ivjvcZ-fHp4935ZXb17eLz-eIqc2UheKZqVtWy8ILpujBaS--4Qa81NnXDmXVaCXSqcBqlqrWsG2WwaSrjvSykNcUZeXvw3YThPgas2-jSr2yPwxRBmZJXQpcJfPMfuBqm0KdsILgwPHUpEmQOkAtDjAE9bEK7tmEPnMHcP6xgrhnmmmHuH-77h12Svj76T_Uam3_CY-EJ-HAAtm2H-0cbw5fF4iZNSZ8d9G0ccfegt-E3KF1oCcubC1iWy5_fGfsK18VfqJ-i7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212810062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hart, Ann Marie ; Macnee, Carol L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hart, Ann Marie ; Macnee, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education.
Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis.
Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important.
Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1041-2972</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2327-6886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-7599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17214866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Colorado ; competencies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; education ; Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards ; Faculty, Nursing - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Internship, Nonmedical ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Needs Assessment - organization & administration ; Nurse practitioner ; Nurse Practitioners - education ; Nurse Practitioners - psychology ; Nurse's Role ; Nursing ; Nursing Education Research ; Nursing Methodology Research ; Organizational Innovation ; preparedness ; Professional Autonomy ; residency ; Self Efficacy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Wyoming</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2007-01, Vol.19 (1), p.35-42</ispartof><rights>2007 American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Nurse Practitioners Jan 2007</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2006.00191.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-7599.2006.00191.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17214866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hart, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macnee, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><title>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Nurse Pract</addtitle><description>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education.
Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis.
Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important.
Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>competencies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</subject><subject>Faculty, Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship, Nonmedical</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needs Assessment - organization & administration</subject><subject>Nurse practitioner</subject><subject>Nurse Practitioners - education</subject><subject>Nurse Practitioners - psychology</subject><subject>Nurse's Role</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Education Research</subject><subject>Nursing Methodology Research</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>preparedness</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>residency</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Wyoming</subject><issn>1041-2972</issn><issn>2327-6886</issn><issn>1745-7599</issn><issn>2327-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF9rFDEUxYMotla_ggQffJsxyUz-jODDUrRV2yqlsiDIJZO5gVlnZ9Zkht399ma6SwWfmpfccH_ncHIIoZzlPJ13q5zrUmZaVlUuGFM5Y7zi-e4JOX1YPE0zK3kmKi1OyIsYVwmSgvPn5IRrwUuj1Cn5dTls6Ra7jtqAtJ9CRLoJ1o3t2A49hpheuEm7hvohHFcO39NbjFM3Rjp4amnKUNI_E8ZZ1Ns2WcVxavYvyTNvu4ivjvcZ-fHp4935ZXb17eLz-eIqc2UheKZqVtWy8ILpujBaS--4Qa81NnXDmXVaCXSqcBqlqrWsG2WwaSrjvSykNcUZeXvw3YThPgas2-jSr2yPwxRBmZJXQpcJfPMfuBqm0KdsILgwPHUpEmQOkAtDjAE9bEK7tmEPnMHcP6xgrhnmmmHuH-77h12Svj76T_Uam3_CY-EJ-HAAtm2H-0cbw5fF4iZNSZ8d9G0ccfegt-E3KF1oCcubC1iWy5_fGfsK18VfqJ-i7Q</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Hart, Ann Marie</creator><creator>Macnee, Carol L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</title><author>Hart, Ann Marie ; Macnee, Carol L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-6b09b53f207b38775fc18ef77edbd10ac762ec63c7e56b75bd68edd98ff535a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>competencies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards</topic><topic>Faculty, Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship, Nonmedical</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needs Assessment - organization & administration</topic><topic>Nurse practitioner</topic><topic>Nurse Practitioners - education</topic><topic>Nurse Practitioners - psychology</topic><topic>Nurse's Role</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Education Research</topic><topic>Nursing Methodology Research</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>preparedness</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>residency</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Wyoming</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hart, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macnee, Carol L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hart, Ann Marie</au><au>Macnee, Carol L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Nurse Pract</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>35-42</pages><issn>1041-2972</issn><issn>2327-6886</issn><eissn>1745-7599</eissn><eissn>2327-6924</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceived preparedness of nurse practitioners (NPs) for practice after completing their basic NP educational programs and to evaluate NPs’ perceived preparedness in and their perceived importance of select clinical content areas basic to NP education.
Data sources: This cross‐sectional descriptive study used a written questionnaire consisting of 32 items, two of which contained 25 subitems. Subjects were asked to rate their overall level of preparedness when they completed their NP program and both their level of preparation in and the importance of 25 clinical content areas. The questionnaires were administered to attendees at two large national NP conferences in 2004; a total of 562 questionnaires were completed and used in the analysis.
Conclusions: Ten percent of the sample perceived that they were very well prepared for practice as an NP after completing their basic NP education. Fifty‐one percent perceived that they were only somewhat or minimally prepared. Current age, years since graduation from an NP program, and age when attending the NP program did not differ significantly for those who felt prepared versus those who did not. For a number of content areas, subjects did not perceive that they were well prepared in the same areas that they perceived were very important.
Implications for practice: Our results indicate that formal NP education is not preparing new NPs to feel ready for practice and suggests several areas where NP educational programs need to be strengthened. Practicing NPs are the basis of the NP profession, and their views need to be sought, listened to, and reflected upon as we advance toward expanded preparation at the doctoral level.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17214866</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1041-2972 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2007-01, Vol.19 (1), p.35-42 |
issn | 1041-2972 2327-6886 1745-7599 2327-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68419274 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Attitude of Health Personnel Clinical Competence - standards Colorado competencies Cross-Sectional Studies education Education, Nursing, Graduate - standards Faculty, Nursing - standards Female Humans Internship, Nonmedical Male Middle Aged Needs Assessment - organization & administration Nurse practitioner Nurse Practitioners - education Nurse Practitioners - psychology Nurse's Role Nursing Nursing Education Research Nursing Methodology Research Organizational Innovation preparedness Professional Autonomy residency Self Efficacy Surveys and Questionnaires Wyoming |
title | How well are nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20well%20are%20nurse%20practitioners%20prepared%20for%20practice:%20Results%20of%20a%202004%20questionnaire%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Nurse%20Practitioners&rft.au=Hart,%20Ann%20Marie&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=35-42&rft.issn=1041-2972&rft.eissn=1745-7599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00191.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68419274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212810062&rft_id=info:pmid/17214866&rfr_iscdi=true |