Animal cloning and the FDA-the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny
The evidence gathered thus far—ultimately to be published in the Draft Risk Assessment on Animal Cloning—indicates that there are no unique risks associated with animal cloning.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nature biotechnology 2007-01, Vol.25 (1), p.39-43 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 43 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 39 |
| container_title | Nature biotechnology |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Rudenko, Larisa Matheson, John C Sundlof, Stephen F |
| description | The evidence gathered thus far—ultimately to be published in the Draft Risk Assessment on Animal Cloning—indicates that there are no unique risks associated with animal cloning. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nbt0107-39 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68413525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A192622614</galeid><sourcerecordid>A192622614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-3097e3887760b9e9f40d6da89fd628bdeb226c6bb529e614a7602af0a1737f163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ktrFTEUAOAgiq3VjT9AgguhytQ8ZjKT5aW1WqgUfG1DJjkzps5krnmA_femzMVLSxdyFgnJdw4nnCD0kpITSnj33veJUNJWXD5Ch7SpRUWFFI_LnnRtRWgjDtCzGK8JIaIW4ik6oC2jlEt2iD5vvJv1hM20eOdHrL3F6Sfg87NNdbsGF39hHSPEOINPeKuDtm6ccfYWAt7mfnIGRxNycv7mOXoy6CnCi916hL6ff_h2-qm6vPp4cbq5rEzdkVRxIlvgXde2gvQS5FATK6zu5GAF63oLPWPCiL5vmARBa10c0wPRtOXtQAU_Qm_Wutuw_M4Qk5pdNDBN2sOSoxJdTXnDmgJf34PXSw6-9KYYY5x0JQo6WdGoJ1DOD0sK2pSwMDuzeBhcOd9QyUTpi9Yl4fhOQjEJ_qRR5xjVxdcv_2-vfty1b1drwhJjgEFtQ5lOuFGUqNtRq92oFZcFv9o9Lfcz2D3dzbaAdyuI5cqPEPZvf7AcXrXXKQf4V27_ufhf5X65lQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222308080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animal cloning and the FDA-the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rudenko, Larisa ; Matheson, John C ; Sundlof, Stephen F</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudenko, Larisa ; Matheson, John C ; Sundlof, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><description>The evidence gathered thus far—ultimately to be published in the Draft Risk Assessment on Animal Cloning—indicates that there are no unique risks associated with animal cloning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-0156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-1696</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nbt0107-39</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17211392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animals ; Bioinformatics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Cloning ; Cloning, Organism ; commentary ; Consumer Product Safety ; Food, Genetically Modified ; Government Regulation ; Life Sciences ; Organisms, Genetically Modified ; Public Opinion ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>Nature biotechnology, 2007-01, Vol.25 (1), p.39-43</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature America, Inc. 2007</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-3097e3887760b9e9f40d6da89fd628bdeb226c6bb529e614a7602af0a1737f163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-3097e3887760b9e9f40d6da89fd628bdeb226c6bb529e614a7602af0a1737f163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17211392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudenko, Larisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheson, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundlof, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><title>Animal cloning and the FDA-the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny</title><title>Nature biotechnology</title><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><description>The evidence gathered thus far—ultimately to be published in the Draft Risk Assessment on Animal Cloning—indicates that there are no unique risks associated with animal cloning.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Cloning, Organism</subject><subject>commentary</subject><subject>Consumer Product Safety</subject><subject>Food, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Organisms, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>1087-0156</issn><issn>1546-1696</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ktrFTEUAOAgiq3VjT9AgguhytQ8ZjKT5aW1WqgUfG1DJjkzps5krnmA_femzMVLSxdyFgnJdw4nnCD0kpITSnj33veJUNJWXD5Ch7SpRUWFFI_LnnRtRWgjDtCzGK8JIaIW4ik6oC2jlEt2iD5vvJv1hM20eOdHrL3F6Sfg87NNdbsGF39hHSPEOINPeKuDtm6ccfYWAt7mfnIGRxNycv7mOXoy6CnCi916hL6ff_h2-qm6vPp4cbq5rEzdkVRxIlvgXde2gvQS5FATK6zu5GAF63oLPWPCiL5vmARBa10c0wPRtOXtQAU_Qm_Wutuw_M4Qk5pdNDBN2sOSoxJdTXnDmgJf34PXSw6-9KYYY5x0JQo6WdGoJ1DOD0sK2pSwMDuzeBhcOd9QyUTpi9Yl4fhOQjEJ_qRR5xjVxdcv_2-vfty1b1drwhJjgEFtQ5lOuFGUqNtRq92oFZcFv9o9Lfcz2D3dzbaAdyuI5cqPEPZvf7AcXrXXKQf4V27_ufhf5X65lQ</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Rudenko, Larisa</creator><creator>Matheson, John C</creator><creator>Sundlof, Stephen F</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Animal cloning and the FDA-the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny</title><author>Rudenko, Larisa ; Matheson, John C ; Sundlof, Stephen F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-3097e3887760b9e9f40d6da89fd628bdeb226c6bb529e614a7602af0a1737f163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Cloning, Organism</topic><topic>commentary</topic><topic>Consumer Product Safety</topic><topic>Food, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Organisms, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudenko, Larisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheson, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundlof, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudenko, Larisa</au><au>Matheson, John C</au><au>Sundlof, Stephen F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Animal cloning and the FDA-the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny</atitle><jtitle>Nature biotechnology</jtitle><stitle>Nat Biotechnol</stitle><addtitle>Nat Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>39-43</pages><issn>1087-0156</issn><eissn>1546-1696</eissn><abstract>The evidence gathered thus far—ultimately to be published in the Draft Risk Assessment on Animal Cloning—indicates that there are no unique risks associated with animal cloning.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>17211392</pmid><doi>10.1038/nbt0107-39</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1087-0156 |
| ispartof | Nature biotechnology, 2007-01, Vol.25 (1), p.39-43 |
| issn | 1087-0156 1546-1696 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68413525 |
| source | MEDLINE; Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Agriculture Animals Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology Biomedicine Biotechnology Cloning Cloning, Organism commentary Consumer Product Safety Food, Genetically Modified Government Regulation Life Sciences Organisms, Genetically Modified Public Opinion Risk assessment Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors United States United States Food and Drug Administration |
| title | Animal cloning and the FDA-the risk assessment paradigm under public scrutiny |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animal%20cloning%20and%20the%20FDA-the%20risk%20assessment%20paradigm%20under%20public%20scrutiny&rft.jtitle=Nature%20biotechnology&rft.au=Rudenko,%20Larisa&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=39-43&rft.issn=1087-0156&rft.eissn=1546-1696&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nbt0107-39&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA192622614%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222308080&rft_id=info:pmid/17211392&rft_galeid=A192622614&rfr_iscdi=true |