Differentiation of Blue Ballpoint Pen Inks by Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography
The differentiation of inks on a questioned document can highlight a fraudulent insertion and is usually carried out by optical comparison and thin‐layer chromatography (TLC). Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LDI‐MS) may also be used for the analysis of dyes from ink. This analytical t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of forensic sciences 2007-01, Vol.52 (1), p.216-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 216 |
container_title | Journal of forensic sciences |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Weyermann, Céline Marquis, Raymond Mazzella, Williams Spengler, Bernhard |
description | The differentiation of inks on a questioned document can highlight a fraudulent insertion and is usually carried out by optical comparison and thin‐layer chromatography (TLC). Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LDI‐MS) may also be used for the analysis of dyes from ink. This analytical technique was compared with a standard method of high‐performance TLC (HPTLC) according to their capacity to differentiate blue ballpoint inks. Ink entries on paper from 31 blue ballpoint pens have been analyzed and their dye ink formulations compared. The pens were classified into 26 classes by LDI‐MS against 18 for HPTLC. LDI‐MS proved to be a more powerful method for differentiating ink formulations because it provides information about dye structures (molecular weights) and relative quantification of dye classes (peak areas). Sample preparation was minimal and analysis time was short in contrast to the more complex extraction, application, and development steps of the HPTLC method. However, only basic dyes and pigments were identified using positive mode LDI‐MS, while HPTLC did yield additional information about acid dyes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00303.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68411816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68411816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4973-bf48acdb2d3ad4bf62776fe52b18aee5242f76626b0e279c4fe9e4c440f5c1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdFu0zAUhiMEYmXwCsjigrsE23GcROKGdmwr6lilVULixnLS49VdYgc7EQ2PwFPjLtWQuMI3x9L5_l9H-qIIEZyQ8D7sE5JlPGaYlgnFmCcYpzhNDs-i2dPieTTDmNKYkLI4i155v8eBJJy8jM5ITnFZMjKLfl9opcCB6bXstTXIKjRvBkBz2TSd1aZHazBoaR48qka0kh4cugBvXfeIL63Rv6bkjfQe3XVQ98620LsRSbNF1_p-F6_BKetaaWpAm5028UqOoWexC6Ts7b2T3W58Hb1QsvHw5jTPo83l583iOl7dXi0Xn1Zxzco8jSvFCllvK7pN5ZZVitM85woyWpFCQpiMqpxzyisMNC9rpqAEVjOGVVYTmZ5H76faztkfA_hetNrX0DTSgB284AUjpCA8gO_-Afd2cCacJigpeYnDNQEqJqh21nsHSnROt9KNgmBxdCX24qhEHJWIoyvx6EocQvTtqX-oWtj-DZ7kBODjBPzUDYz_XSy-XN6GT4jHU1z7Hg5PcekeBM_TPBPfvl6J7-ubgq3v5qJI_wCaRLOV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219690973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiation of Blue Ballpoint Pen Inks by Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Weyermann, Céline ; Marquis, Raymond ; Mazzella, Williams ; Spengler, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Weyermann, Céline ; Marquis, Raymond ; Mazzella, Williams ; Spengler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><description>The differentiation of inks on a questioned document can highlight a fraudulent insertion and is usually carried out by optical comparison and thin‐layer chromatography (TLC). Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LDI‐MS) may also be used for the analysis of dyes from ink. This analytical technique was compared with a standard method of high‐performance TLC (HPTLC) according to their capacity to differentiate blue ballpoint inks. Ink entries on paper from 31 blue ballpoint pens have been analyzed and their dye ink formulations compared. The pens were classified into 26 classes by LDI‐MS against 18 for HPTLC. LDI‐MS proved to be a more powerful method for differentiating ink formulations because it provides information about dye structures (molecular weights) and relative quantification of dye classes (peak areas). Sample preparation was minimal and analysis time was short in contrast to the more complex extraction, application, and development steps of the HPTLC method. However, only basic dyes and pigments were identified using positive mode LDI‐MS, while HPTLC did yield additional information about acid dyes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00303.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17209941</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFSCAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>ballpoint ink ; Chromatography ; discriminating power ; forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; high-performance thin-layer chromatography ; Ink analysis ; laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry ; questioned document ; Spectrum analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2007-01, Vol.52 (1), p.216-220</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society for Testing and Materials Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4973-bf48acdb2d3ad4bf62776fe52b18aee5242f76626b0e279c4fe9e4c440f5c1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4973-bf48acdb2d3ad4bf62776fe52b18aee5242f76626b0e279c4fe9e4c440f5c1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1556-4029.2006.00303.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1556-4029.2006.00303.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17209941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weyermann, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquis, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzella, Williams</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spengler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiation of Blue Ballpoint Pen Inks by Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>The differentiation of inks on a questioned document can highlight a fraudulent insertion and is usually carried out by optical comparison and thin‐layer chromatography (TLC). Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LDI‐MS) may also be used for the analysis of dyes from ink. This analytical technique was compared with a standard method of high‐performance TLC (HPTLC) according to their capacity to differentiate blue ballpoint inks. Ink entries on paper from 31 blue ballpoint pens have been analyzed and their dye ink formulations compared. The pens were classified into 26 classes by LDI‐MS against 18 for HPTLC. LDI‐MS proved to be a more powerful method for differentiating ink formulations because it provides information about dye structures (molecular weights) and relative quantification of dye classes (peak areas). Sample preparation was minimal and analysis time was short in contrast to the more complex extraction, application, and development steps of the HPTLC method. However, only basic dyes and pigments were identified using positive mode LDI‐MS, while HPTLC did yield additional information about acid dyes.</description><subject>ballpoint ink</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>discriminating power</subject><subject>forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>high-performance thin-layer chromatography</subject><subject>Ink analysis</subject><subject>laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry</subject><subject>questioned document</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkdFu0zAUhiMEYmXwCsjigrsE23GcROKGdmwr6lilVULixnLS49VdYgc7EQ2PwFPjLtWQuMI3x9L5_l9H-qIIEZyQ8D7sE5JlPGaYlgnFmCcYpzhNDs-i2dPieTTDmNKYkLI4i155v8eBJJy8jM5ITnFZMjKLfl9opcCB6bXstTXIKjRvBkBz2TSd1aZHazBoaR48qka0kh4cugBvXfeIL63Rv6bkjfQe3XVQ98620LsRSbNF1_p-F6_BKetaaWpAm5028UqOoWexC6Ts7b2T3W58Hb1QsvHw5jTPo83l583iOl7dXi0Xn1Zxzco8jSvFCllvK7pN5ZZVitM85woyWpFCQpiMqpxzyisMNC9rpqAEVjOGVVYTmZ5H76faztkfA_hetNrX0DTSgB284AUjpCA8gO_-Afd2cCacJigpeYnDNQEqJqh21nsHSnROt9KNgmBxdCX24qhEHJWIoyvx6EocQvTtqX-oWtj-DZ7kBODjBPzUDYz_XSy-XN6GT4jHU1z7Hg5PcekeBM_TPBPfvl6J7-ubgq3v5qJI_wCaRLOV</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Weyermann, Céline</creator><creator>Marquis, Raymond</creator><creator>Mazzella, Williams</creator><creator>Spengler, Bernhard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Differentiation of Blue Ballpoint Pen Inks by Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography</title><author>Weyermann, Céline ; Marquis, Raymond ; Mazzella, Williams ; Spengler, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4973-bf48acdb2d3ad4bf62776fe52b18aee5242f76626b0e279c4fe9e4c440f5c1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>ballpoint ink</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>discriminating power</topic><topic>forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>high-performance thin-layer chromatography</topic><topic>Ink analysis</topic><topic>laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry</topic><topic>questioned document</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weyermann, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquis, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzella, Williams</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spengler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weyermann, Céline</au><au>Marquis, Raymond</au><au>Mazzella, Williams</au><au>Spengler, Bernhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiation of Blue Ballpoint Pen Inks by Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>216-220</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><coden>JFSCAS</coden><abstract>The differentiation of inks on a questioned document can highlight a fraudulent insertion and is usually carried out by optical comparison and thin‐layer chromatography (TLC). Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LDI‐MS) may also be used for the analysis of dyes from ink. This analytical technique was compared with a standard method of high‐performance TLC (HPTLC) according to their capacity to differentiate blue ballpoint inks. Ink entries on paper from 31 blue ballpoint pens have been analyzed and their dye ink formulations compared. The pens were classified into 26 classes by LDI‐MS against 18 for HPTLC. LDI‐MS proved to be a more powerful method for differentiating ink formulations because it provides information about dye structures (molecular weights) and relative quantification of dye classes (peak areas). Sample preparation was minimal and analysis time was short in contrast to the more complex extraction, application, and development steps of the HPTLC method. However, only basic dyes and pigments were identified using positive mode LDI‐MS, while HPTLC did yield additional information about acid dyes.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17209941</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00303.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1198 |
ispartof | Journal of forensic sciences, 2007-01, Vol.52 (1), p.216-220 |
issn | 0022-1198 1556-4029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68411816 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | ballpoint ink Chromatography discriminating power forensic science Forensic sciences high-performance thin-layer chromatography Ink analysis laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry questioned document Spectrum analysis |
title | Differentiation of Blue Ballpoint Pen Inks by Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A01%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiation%20of%20Blue%20Ballpoint%20Pen%20Inks%20by%20Laser%20Desorption%20Ionization%20Mass%20Spectrometry%20and%20High-Performance%20Thin-Layer%20Chromatography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Weyermann,%20C%C3%A9line&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=216-220&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft.coden=JFSCAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00303.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68411816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219690973&rft_id=info:pmid/17209941&rfr_iscdi=true |