The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket

ABSTRACT This study assessed whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest pocket (SDP) is the best technique to estimate amniotic fluid volume. The AFI and SDP were compared to a dye-determined or directly measured amniotic fluid volume. A PUBMED search from 1990 to 2006 was conducte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of perinatology 2007-10, Vol.24 (9), p.549-555
Hauptverfasser: Magann, Everett F, Chauhan, Suneet P, Doherty, Dorota A, Magann, Marcia I, Morrison, John C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 555
container_issue 9
container_start_page 549
container_title American journal of perinatology
container_volume 24
creator Magann, Everett F
Chauhan, Suneet P
Doherty, Dorota A
Magann, Marcia I
Morrison, John C
description ABSTRACT This study assessed whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest pocket (SDP) is the best technique to estimate amniotic fluid volume. The AFI and SDP were compared to a dye-determined or directly measured amniotic fluid volume. A PUBMED search from 1990 to 2006 was conducted using the search terms “single deepest pocket” or “largest vertical pocket” or “maximum vertical pocket” or “2X1 pocket” AND “amniotic fluid index”. One study compared the AFI and SDP to a dye-determined amniotic fluid volume. There were 1219 publications that used the search term SDP-LVP-MVP versus 4378 using AFI. Twenty publications contained both the AFI and SDP, but only six compared the AFI and SDP. Both the AFI and the SDP poorly identified abnormal amniotic fluid volumes, and neither technique was superior to the other. The AFI identifies a significantly greater number of women as having oligohydramnios versus the SDP but without any difference in perinatal outcomes. Compared with SDP, AFI excessively characterizes a greater number of pregnancies as having oligohydramnios leading to more interventions without improvement in perinatal outcome. The AFI should be abandoned and the SDP used to estimate amniotic fluid volume.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2007-986689
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68406933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68406933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2482c3bda3b0416cd9718ada5329eccbc92bf98c2936254a643f0bea7f5136563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DFPwzAQBWALgWgpjKzIExMBO04ce6xKC5UqgURZWCzHuVCXxC5xUsG_J6WVmJhuuE_vdA-hS0puKUnTuxDFhGSRFJwLeYSGlEgRiUykx2hIMpZGlDM6QGchrAmhsSDiFA1oJomUkgzR23IFeLq1BTgDuPQNHufaFd5Z947bfjeunfWtNXhWdbbAc1fAF7YOz_S2x778RS-9rgDfA2wgtPjZmw9oz9FJqasAF4c5Qq-z6XLyGC2eHuaT8SIyTCZtFCciNiwvNMtJQrkpZEaFLnTKYgnG5EbGeSmFiSXjcZponrCS5KCzMqWMp5yN0PU-d9P4z66_r2obDFSVduC7oLhICJeM9TDaQ9P4EBoo1aaxtW6-FSVqV6YKalem2pfZ-6tDcJfXUPzpQ3s9uNmDdmWhBrX2XeP6V__J-wHQQnxV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68406933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Magann, Everett F ; Chauhan, Suneet P ; Doherty, Dorota A ; Magann, Marcia I ; Morrison, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Magann, Everett F ; Chauhan, Suneet P ; Doherty, Dorota A ; Magann, Marcia I ; Morrison, John C</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT This study assessed whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest pocket (SDP) is the best technique to estimate amniotic fluid volume. The AFI and SDP were compared to a dye-determined or directly measured amniotic fluid volume. A PUBMED search from 1990 to 2006 was conducted using the search terms “single deepest pocket” or “largest vertical pocket” or “maximum vertical pocket” or “2X1 pocket” AND “amniotic fluid index”. One study compared the AFI and SDP to a dye-determined amniotic fluid volume. There were 1219 publications that used the search term SDP-LVP-MVP versus 4378 using AFI. Twenty publications contained both the AFI and SDP, but only six compared the AFI and SDP. Both the AFI and the SDP poorly identified abnormal amniotic fluid volumes, and neither technique was superior to the other. The AFI identifies a significantly greater number of women as having oligohydramnios versus the SDP but without any difference in perinatal outcomes. Compared with SDP, AFI excessively characterizes a greater number of pregnancies as having oligohydramnios leading to more interventions without improvement in perinatal outcome. The AFI should be abandoned and the SDP used to estimate amniotic fluid volume.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-8785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986689</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17909990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Amniotic Fluid - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Oligohydramnios - diagnostic imaging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>American journal of perinatology, 2007-10, Vol.24 (9), p.549-555</ispartof><rights>Thieme Medical Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2482c3bda3b0416cd9718ada5329eccbc92bf98c2936254a643f0bea7f5136563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2007-986689.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2007-986689$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3004,3005,27901,27902,54534,54535</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17909990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magann, Everett F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauhan, Suneet P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Dorota A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magann, Marcia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, John C</creatorcontrib><title>The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket</title><title>American journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT This study assessed whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest pocket (SDP) is the best technique to estimate amniotic fluid volume. The AFI and SDP were compared to a dye-determined or directly measured amniotic fluid volume. A PUBMED search from 1990 to 2006 was conducted using the search terms “single deepest pocket” or “largest vertical pocket” or “maximum vertical pocket” or “2X1 pocket” AND “amniotic fluid index”. One study compared the AFI and SDP to a dye-determined amniotic fluid volume. There were 1219 publications that used the search term SDP-LVP-MVP versus 4378 using AFI. Twenty publications contained both the AFI and SDP, but only six compared the AFI and SDP. Both the AFI and the SDP poorly identified abnormal amniotic fluid volumes, and neither technique was superior to the other. The AFI identifies a significantly greater number of women as having oligohydramnios versus the SDP but without any difference in perinatal outcomes. Compared with SDP, AFI excessively characterizes a greater number of pregnancies as having oligohydramnios leading to more interventions without improvement in perinatal outcome. The AFI should be abandoned and the SDP used to estimate amniotic fluid volume.</description><subject>Amniotic Fluid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oligohydramnios - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0735-1631</issn><issn>1098-8785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10DFPwzAQBWALgWgpjKzIExMBO04ce6xKC5UqgURZWCzHuVCXxC5xUsG_J6WVmJhuuE_vdA-hS0puKUnTuxDFhGSRFJwLeYSGlEgRiUykx2hIMpZGlDM6QGchrAmhsSDiFA1oJomUkgzR23IFeLq1BTgDuPQNHufaFd5Z947bfjeunfWtNXhWdbbAc1fAF7YOz_S2x778RS-9rgDfA2wgtPjZmw9oz9FJqasAF4c5Qq-z6XLyGC2eHuaT8SIyTCZtFCciNiwvNMtJQrkpZEaFLnTKYgnG5EbGeSmFiSXjcZponrCS5KCzMqWMp5yN0PU-d9P4z66_r2obDFSVduC7oLhICJeM9TDaQ9P4EBoo1aaxtW6-FSVqV6YKalem2pfZ-6tDcJfXUPzpQ3s9uNmDdmWhBrX2XeP6V__J-wHQQnxV</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Magann, Everett F</creator><creator>Chauhan, Suneet P</creator><creator>Doherty, Dorota A</creator><creator>Magann, Marcia I</creator><creator>Morrison, John C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket</title><author>Magann, Everett F ; Chauhan, Suneet P ; Doherty, Dorota A ; Magann, Marcia I ; Morrison, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-2482c3bda3b0416cd9718ada5329eccbc92bf98c2936254a643f0bea7f5136563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Amniotic Fluid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oligohydramnios - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magann, Everett F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauhan, Suneet P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Dorota A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magann, Marcia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magann, Everett F</au><au>Chauhan, Suneet P</au><au>Doherty, Dorota A</au><au>Magann, Marcia I</au><au>Morrison, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket</atitle><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>549-555</pages><issn>0735-1631</issn><eissn>1098-8785</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT This study assessed whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest pocket (SDP) is the best technique to estimate amniotic fluid volume. The AFI and SDP were compared to a dye-determined or directly measured amniotic fluid volume. A PUBMED search from 1990 to 2006 was conducted using the search terms “single deepest pocket” or “largest vertical pocket” or “maximum vertical pocket” or “2X1 pocket” AND “amniotic fluid index”. One study compared the AFI and SDP to a dye-determined amniotic fluid volume. There were 1219 publications that used the search term SDP-LVP-MVP versus 4378 using AFI. Twenty publications contained both the AFI and SDP, but only six compared the AFI and SDP. Both the AFI and the SDP poorly identified abnormal amniotic fluid volumes, and neither technique was superior to the other. The AFI identifies a significantly greater number of women as having oligohydramnios versus the SDP but without any difference in perinatal outcomes. Compared with SDP, AFI excessively characterizes a greater number of pregnancies as having oligohydramnios leading to more interventions without improvement in perinatal outcome. The AFI should be abandoned and the SDP used to estimate amniotic fluid volume.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>17909990</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2007-986689</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1631
ispartof American journal of perinatology, 2007-10, Vol.24 (9), p.549-555
issn 0735-1631
1098-8785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68406933
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Amniotic Fluid - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Oligohydramnios - diagnostic imaging
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
title The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Evidence%20for%20Abandoning%20the%20Amniotic%20Fluid%20Index%20in%20Favor%20of%20the%20Single%20Deepest%20Pocket&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Magann,%20Everett%20F&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=549-555&rft.issn=0735-1631&rft.eissn=1098-8785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2007-986689&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68406933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68406933&rft_id=info:pmid/17909990&rfr_iscdi=true