Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour

Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2007-01 (4), p.CD006167-CD006167
Hauptverfasser: Smyth, R M D, Alldred, S K, Markham, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page CD006167
container_issue 4
container_start_page CD006167
container_title Cochrane database of systematic reviews
container_volume
creator Smyth, R M D
Alldred, S K
Markham, C
description Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby. To determine the effectiveness and safety of amniotomy alone for (1) routinely shortening all labours that start spontaneously, and (2) shortening labours that have started spontaneously, but have become prolonged. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 March 2007). Randomised controlled trials comparing amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes. We excluded quasi-randomised trials. Two authors assessed identified studies for inclusion. Both authors extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. We have included 14 studies in this review, involving 4893 women. There was no evidence of any statistical difference in length of first stage of labour (weighted mean difference -20.43 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -95.93 to 55.06), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (standardised mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.49 to 1.04) or low Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.05). Amniotomy was associated with an increased risk of delivery by caesarean section compared to women in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.62). There was no consistency between papers regarding the timing of amniotomy during labour in terms of cervical dilatation. On the basis of the findings of this review, we cannot recommend that amniotomy should be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care. We do recommend that the evidence presented in this review should be made available to women offered an amniotomy and may be useful as a foundation for discussion and any resulting decisions made between women and their caregivers.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68406157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68406157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-faf1250737e4afd274fd1278591933f16f0c9e963c3882a023d9901b6260ed793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LxDAURYMgzjj6F4au3EhrXl6aj-VQHRUG3Ci4K2mbaKVtatIu5t9bmHF1F_dwuYeQLdAMKGUPwEUOKldZ8UipACGzca7YBVkvhU65xs8VuY7xh1LUAOqKrEBqjkrDmtzv-qH1k--PifMhid8-THZoh68kjn6YzGD9HJPOVH4ON-TSmS7a23NuyMf-6b14SQ9vz6_F7pDWiGxKnXHAcipRWm5cwyR3DTCpcg0a0YFwtNZWC6xRKWYow0ZrCpVggtpGatyQu9PuGPzvbONU9m2sbded3pRC8UUzlwu4PYNz1dumHEPbm3As__XwD6hoUJU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68406157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smyth, R M D ; Alldred, S K ; Markham, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Smyth, R M D ; Alldred, S K ; Markham, C</creatorcontrib><description>Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby. To determine the effectiveness and safety of amniotomy alone for (1) routinely shortening all labours that start spontaneously, and (2) shortening labours that have started spontaneously, but have become prolonged. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 March 2007). Randomised controlled trials comparing amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes. We excluded quasi-randomised trials. Two authors assessed identified studies for inclusion. Both authors extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. We have included 14 studies in this review, involving 4893 women. There was no evidence of any statistical difference in length of first stage of labour (weighted mean difference -20.43 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -95.93 to 55.06), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (standardised mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.49 to 1.04) or low Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.05). Amniotomy was associated with an increased risk of delivery by caesarean section compared to women in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.62). There was no consistency between papers regarding the timing of amniotomy during labour in terms of cervical dilatation. On the basis of the findings of this review, we cannot recommend that amniotomy should be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care. We do recommend that the evidence presented in this review should be made available to women offered an amniotomy and may be useful as a foundation for discussion and any resulting decisions made between women and their caregivers.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17943891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Amnion - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Labor Stage, First - physiology ; Labor, Induced - methods ; Pregnancy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007-01 (4), p.CD006167-CD006167</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-faf1250737e4afd274fd1278591933f16f0c9e963c3882a023d9901b6260ed793</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17943891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smyth, R M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alldred, S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markham, C</creatorcontrib><title>Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby. To determine the effectiveness and safety of amniotomy alone for (1) routinely shortening all labours that start spontaneously, and (2) shortening labours that have started spontaneously, but have become prolonged. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 March 2007). Randomised controlled trials comparing amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes. We excluded quasi-randomised trials. Two authors assessed identified studies for inclusion. Both authors extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. We have included 14 studies in this review, involving 4893 women. There was no evidence of any statistical difference in length of first stage of labour (weighted mean difference -20.43 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -95.93 to 55.06), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (standardised mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.49 to 1.04) or low Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.05). Amniotomy was associated with an increased risk of delivery by caesarean section compared to women in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.62). There was no consistency between papers regarding the timing of amniotomy during labour in terms of cervical dilatation. On the basis of the findings of this review, we cannot recommend that amniotomy should be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care. We do recommend that the evidence presented in this review should be made available to women offered an amniotomy and may be useful as a foundation for discussion and any resulting decisions made between women and their caregivers.</description><subject>Amnion - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor Stage, First - physiology</subject><subject>Labor, Induced - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j01LxDAURYMgzjj6F4au3EhrXl6aj-VQHRUG3Ci4K2mbaKVtatIu5t9bmHF1F_dwuYeQLdAMKGUPwEUOKldZ8UipACGzca7YBVkvhU65xs8VuY7xh1LUAOqKrEBqjkrDmtzv-qH1k--PifMhid8-THZoh68kjn6YzGD9HJPOVH4ON-TSmS7a23NuyMf-6b14SQ9vz6_F7pDWiGxKnXHAcipRWm5cwyR3DTCpcg0a0YFwtNZWC6xRKWYow0ZrCpVggtpGatyQu9PuGPzvbONU9m2sbded3pRC8UUzlwu4PYNz1dumHEPbm3As__XwD6hoUJU</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Smyth, R M D</creator><creator>Alldred, S K</creator><creator>Markham, C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour</title><author>Smyth, R M D ; Alldred, S K ; Markham, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-faf1250737e4afd274fd1278591933f16f0c9e963c3882a023d9901b6260ed793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Amnion - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor Stage, First - physiology</topic><topic>Labor, Induced - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smyth, R M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alldred, S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markham, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smyth, R M D</au><au>Alldred, S K</au><au>Markham, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><issue>4</issue><spage>CD006167</spage><epage>CD006167</epage><pages>CD006167-CD006167</pages><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Intentional artificial rupture of the amniotic membranes during labour, sometimes called amniotomy or 'breaking of the waters', is one of the most commonly performed procedures in modern obstetric and midwifery practice. The primary aim of amniotomy is to speed up contractions and, therefore, shorten the length of labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the woman and baby. To determine the effectiveness and safety of amniotomy alone for (1) routinely shortening all labours that start spontaneously, and (2) shortening labours that have started spontaneously, but have become prolonged. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 March 2007). Randomised controlled trials comparing amniotomy alone versus intention to preserve the membranes. We excluded quasi-randomised trials. Two authors assessed identified studies for inclusion. Both authors extracted data. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. We have included 14 studies in this review, involving 4893 women. There was no evidence of any statistical difference in length of first stage of labour (weighted mean difference -20.43 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) -95.93 to 55.06), maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience (standardised mean difference 0.27, 95% CI -0.49 to 1.04) or low Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.05). Amniotomy was associated with an increased risk of delivery by caesarean section compared to women in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.62). There was no consistency between papers regarding the timing of amniotomy during labour in terms of cervical dilatation. On the basis of the findings of this review, we cannot recommend that amniotomy should be introduced routinely as part of standard labour management and care. We do recommend that the evidence presented in this review should be made available to women offered an amniotomy and may be useful as a foundation for discussion and any resulting decisions made between women and their caregivers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>17943891</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1469-493X
ispartof Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007-01 (4), p.CD006167-CD006167
issn 1469-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68406157
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Amnion - surgery
Female
Humans
Labor Stage, First - physiology
Labor, Induced - methods
Pregnancy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Time Factors
title Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T07%3A20%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amniotomy%20for%20shortening%20spontaneous%20labour&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Smyth,%20R%20M%20D&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=CD006167&rft.epage=CD006167&rft.pages=CD006167-CD006167&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68406157%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68406157&rft_id=info:pmid/17943891&rfr_iscdi=true