Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND. Triple‐negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor‐negative, progesterone receptor‐negative, and HER2‐negative) is a high risk breast cancer that lacks the benefit of specific therapy that targets these proteins. METHODS. In this study, the authors examined a large and well characterized s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2007-01, Vol.109 (1), p.25-32
Hauptverfasser: Rakha, Emad A., El‐Sayed, Maysa E., Green, Andrew R., Lee, Andrew H. S., Robertson, John F., Ellis, Ian O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Cancer
container_volume 109
creator Rakha, Emad A.
El‐Sayed, Maysa E.
Green, Andrew R.
Lee, Andrew H. S.
Robertson, John F.
Ellis, Ian O.
description BACKGROUND. Triple‐negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor‐negative, progesterone receptor‐negative, and HER2‐negative) is a high risk breast cancer that lacks the benefit of specific therapy that targets these proteins. METHODS. In this study, the authors examined a large and well characterized series of invasive breast carcinoma (n = 1944) with a long‐term clinical follow‐up (median, 56 months) by using tissue microarray. The series were also stained with concurrent immunohistochemical prognostic panels (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER‐2, androgen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), P‐cadherin, E‐cadherin, and basal (CK5/6, CK14), and p53), to characterize this specific subgroup of breast cancer and to identify prognostic markers that can identify tumors with more aggressive behavior. RESULTS. Of informative cases, 16.3% were of the triple‐negative phenotype. The majority of these tumors were grade 3, ductal/no‐specific‐type carcinomas. There were positive associations with larger size, pushing margins, poorer Nottingham Prognostic Index, development of recurrence and distant metastasis, and poorer outcome. In addition, associations were found with loss of expression of androgen receptor and E‐cadherin, and positive expression of basal cytokeratins (basal phenotype), P‐cadherin, p53, and EGFR. In all tumors, tumor size, lymph node stage, and androgen receptor were the most useful prognostic markers. In the lymph node‐positive subgroup, both size and androgen receptor retained their prognostic significance. However, in the lymph node‐negative tumors, basal phenotype was the sole prognostic marker identified in this subgroup. Other parameters including age, histological grade, tumor size, vascular invasion or other biomarkers included in the current study were not significant. CONCLUSIONS. The authors concluded that assessment of androgen receptor and basal phenotype, in addition to the established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high‐risk and low‐risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information on treatment options in these triple‐negative tumors. Cancer 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society Triple‐negative phenotype is a specific subgroup of breast cancer associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcome. Assessment of androgen and basal cytokeratins, in addition to established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tum
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.22381
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68387986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68387986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4591-569b505b096deef62eacb875b65bbf69e58812777d50096e21fee6e8383da5d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgijOObnwA6UYXQsckbS5dSvEGg4oouAtJejpUO-2YdJTZ-Qg-o09ixhbcuToc-PgP50fokOApwZie2ca6KaWJJFtoTHAmYkxSuo3GGGMZszR5HqE971_CKihLdtGICJJyIekYsXvXzpvWd5WNFtq9gvNR1USdq5Y1fH9-NTDXXfUOkXGgfRdZ3Vhw-2in1LWHg2FO0NPlxWN-Hc_urm7y81lsU5aRmPHMMMwMzngBUHIK2hopmOHMmJJnwKQkVAhRMBwMUFICcJCJTArNCppM0Emfu3Tt2wp8pxaVt1DXuoF25RUPVGSSB3jaQ-ta7x2Uaumq8M9aEaw2JalNSeq3pICPhtSVWUDxR4dWAjgegPZW16ULT1f-z8mUkwSz4EjvPqoa1v-cVPlt_tAf_wG0N38n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68387986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rakha, Emad A. ; El‐Sayed, Maysa E. ; Green, Andrew R. ; Lee, Andrew H. S. ; Robertson, John F. ; Ellis, Ian O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rakha, Emad A. ; El‐Sayed, Maysa E. ; Green, Andrew R. ; Lee, Andrew H. S. ; Robertson, John F. ; Ellis, Ian O.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND. Triple‐negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor‐negative, progesterone receptor‐negative, and HER2‐negative) is a high risk breast cancer that lacks the benefit of specific therapy that targets these proteins. METHODS. In this study, the authors examined a large and well characterized series of invasive breast carcinoma (n = 1944) with a long‐term clinical follow‐up (median, 56 months) by using tissue microarray. The series were also stained with concurrent immunohistochemical prognostic panels (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER‐2, androgen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), P‐cadherin, E‐cadherin, and basal (CK5/6, CK14), and p53), to characterize this specific subgroup of breast cancer and to identify prognostic markers that can identify tumors with more aggressive behavior. RESULTS. Of informative cases, 16.3% were of the triple‐negative phenotype. The majority of these tumors were grade 3, ductal/no‐specific‐type carcinomas. There were positive associations with larger size, pushing margins, poorer Nottingham Prognostic Index, development of recurrence and distant metastasis, and poorer outcome. In addition, associations were found with loss of expression of androgen receptor and E‐cadherin, and positive expression of basal cytokeratins (basal phenotype), P‐cadherin, p53, and EGFR. In all tumors, tumor size, lymph node stage, and androgen receptor were the most useful prognostic markers. In the lymph node‐positive subgroup, both size and androgen receptor retained their prognostic significance. However, in the lymph node‐negative tumors, basal phenotype was the sole prognostic marker identified in this subgroup. Other parameters including age, histological grade, tumor size, vascular invasion or other biomarkers included in the current study were not significant. CONCLUSIONS. The authors concluded that assessment of androgen receptor and basal phenotype, in addition to the established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high‐risk and low‐risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information on treatment options in these triple‐negative tumors. Cancer 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society Triple‐negative phenotype is a specific subgroup of breast cancer associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcome. Assessment of androgen and basal cytokeratins, in addition to established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high‐risk and low‐risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information for treatment option decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22381</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17146782</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; breast carcinoma ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Cadherins - analysis ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genes, erbB-2 ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Microarray Analysis ; Middle Aged ; Phenotype ; Prognosis ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis ; Receptors, Androgen - analysis ; Receptors, Estrogen - analysis ; Receptors, Progesterone - analysis ; triple‐negative phenotype ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2007-01, Vol.109 (1), p.25-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2006 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4591-569b505b096deef62eacb875b65bbf69e58812777d50096e21fee6e8383da5d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4591-569b505b096deef62eacb875b65bbf69e58812777d50096e21fee6e8383da5d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.22381$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.22381$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18461305$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17146782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rakha, Emad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sayed, Maysa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Andrew H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Ian O.</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND. Triple‐negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor‐negative, progesterone receptor‐negative, and HER2‐negative) is a high risk breast cancer that lacks the benefit of specific therapy that targets these proteins. METHODS. In this study, the authors examined a large and well characterized series of invasive breast carcinoma (n = 1944) with a long‐term clinical follow‐up (median, 56 months) by using tissue microarray. The series were also stained with concurrent immunohistochemical prognostic panels (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER‐2, androgen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), P‐cadherin, E‐cadherin, and basal (CK5/6, CK14), and p53), to characterize this specific subgroup of breast cancer and to identify prognostic markers that can identify tumors with more aggressive behavior. RESULTS. Of informative cases, 16.3% were of the triple‐negative phenotype. The majority of these tumors were grade 3, ductal/no‐specific‐type carcinomas. There were positive associations with larger size, pushing margins, poorer Nottingham Prognostic Index, development of recurrence and distant metastasis, and poorer outcome. In addition, associations were found with loss of expression of androgen receptor and E‐cadherin, and positive expression of basal cytokeratins (basal phenotype), P‐cadherin, p53, and EGFR. In all tumors, tumor size, lymph node stage, and androgen receptor were the most useful prognostic markers. In the lymph node‐positive subgroup, both size and androgen receptor retained their prognostic significance. However, in the lymph node‐negative tumors, basal phenotype was the sole prognostic marker identified in this subgroup. Other parameters including age, histological grade, tumor size, vascular invasion or other biomarkers included in the current study were not significant. CONCLUSIONS. The authors concluded that assessment of androgen receptor and basal phenotype, in addition to the established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high‐risk and low‐risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information on treatment options in these triple‐negative tumors. Cancer 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society Triple‐negative phenotype is a specific subgroup of breast cancer associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcome. Assessment of androgen and basal cytokeratins, in addition to established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high‐risk and low‐risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information for treatment option decisions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cadherins - analysis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genes, erbB-2</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Androgen - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - analysis</subject><subject>triple‐negative phenotype</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgijOObnwA6UYXQsckbS5dSvEGg4oouAtJejpUO-2YdJTZ-Qg-o09ixhbcuToc-PgP50fokOApwZie2ca6KaWJJFtoTHAmYkxSuo3GGGMZszR5HqE971_CKihLdtGICJJyIekYsXvXzpvWd5WNFtq9gvNR1USdq5Y1fH9-NTDXXfUOkXGgfRdZ3Vhw-2in1LWHg2FO0NPlxWN-Hc_urm7y81lsU5aRmPHMMMwMzngBUHIK2hopmOHMmJJnwKQkVAhRMBwMUFICcJCJTArNCppM0Emfu3Tt2wp8pxaVt1DXuoF25RUPVGSSB3jaQ-ta7x2Uaumq8M9aEaw2JalNSeq3pICPhtSVWUDxR4dWAjgegPZW16ULT1f-z8mUkwSz4EjvPqoa1v-cVPlt_tAf_wG0N38n</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Rakha, Emad A.</creator><creator>El‐Sayed, Maysa E.</creator><creator>Green, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Lee, Andrew H. S.</creator><creator>Robertson, John F.</creator><creator>Ellis, Ian O.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer</title><author>Rakha, Emad A. ; El‐Sayed, Maysa E. ; Green, Andrew R. ; Lee, Andrew H. S. ; Robertson, John F. ; Ellis, Ian O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4591-569b505b096deef62eacb875b65bbf69e58812777d50096e21fee6e8383da5d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cadherins - analysis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genes, erbB-2</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Androgen - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - analysis</topic><topic>triple‐negative phenotype</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rakha, Emad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sayed, Maysa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Andrew H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Ian O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rakha, Emad A.</au><au>El‐Sayed, Maysa E.</au><au>Green, Andrew R.</au><au>Lee, Andrew H. S.</au><au>Robertson, John F.</au><au>Ellis, Ian O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>25-32</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND. Triple‐negative breast cancer (estrogen receptor‐negative, progesterone receptor‐negative, and HER2‐negative) is a high risk breast cancer that lacks the benefit of specific therapy that targets these proteins. METHODS. In this study, the authors examined a large and well characterized series of invasive breast carcinoma (n = 1944) with a long‐term clinical follow‐up (median, 56 months) by using tissue microarray. The series were also stained with concurrent immunohistochemical prognostic panels (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER‐2, androgen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), P‐cadherin, E‐cadherin, and basal (CK5/6, CK14), and p53), to characterize this specific subgroup of breast cancer and to identify prognostic markers that can identify tumors with more aggressive behavior. RESULTS. Of informative cases, 16.3% were of the triple‐negative phenotype. The majority of these tumors were grade 3, ductal/no‐specific‐type carcinomas. There were positive associations with larger size, pushing margins, poorer Nottingham Prognostic Index, development of recurrence and distant metastasis, and poorer outcome. In addition, associations were found with loss of expression of androgen receptor and E‐cadherin, and positive expression of basal cytokeratins (basal phenotype), P‐cadherin, p53, and EGFR. In all tumors, tumor size, lymph node stage, and androgen receptor were the most useful prognostic markers. In the lymph node‐positive subgroup, both size and androgen receptor retained their prognostic significance. However, in the lymph node‐negative tumors, basal phenotype was the sole prognostic marker identified in this subgroup. Other parameters including age, histological grade, tumor size, vascular invasion or other biomarkers included in the current study were not significant. CONCLUSIONS. The authors concluded that assessment of androgen receptor and basal phenotype, in addition to the established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high‐risk and low‐risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information on treatment options in these triple‐negative tumors. Cancer 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society Triple‐negative phenotype is a specific subgroup of breast cancer associated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcome. Assessment of androgen and basal cytokeratins, in addition to established pathologic variables, mainly lymph node status and tumor size, can be used to select high‐risk and low‐risk patients at the time of primary surgery and can provide valuable information for treatment option decisions.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>17146782</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.22381</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2007-01, Vol.109 (1), p.25-32
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68387986
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
breast carcinoma
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Cadherins - analysis
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnosis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genes, erbB-2
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Microarray Analysis
Middle Aged
Phenotype
Prognosis
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - analysis
Receptors, Androgen - analysis
Receptors, Estrogen - analysis
Receptors, Progesterone - analysis
triple‐negative phenotype
Tumors
title Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20markers%20in%20triple%E2%80%90negative%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Rakha,%20Emad%20A.&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=25-32&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.22381&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68387986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68387986&rft_id=info:pmid/17146782&rfr_iscdi=true