Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause

Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with poster...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN) MN), 2007-10, Vol.114 (10), p.1893-1897
Hauptverfasser: Margolis, Ron, MD, Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD, Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD, Singh, Rishi P., MD, Kaiser, Peter K., MD, Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH, Perez, Victor L., MD, Sonnie, Christine, RN, Sears, Jonathan E., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1897
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1893
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)
container_volume 114
creator Margolis, Ron, MD
Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD
Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD
Singh, Rishi P., MD
Kaiser, Peter K., MD
Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH
Perez, Victor L., MD
Sonnie, Christine, RN
Sears, Jonathan E., MD
description Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68342990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0161642007002114</els_id><sourcerecordid>68342990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEokvhDRDKBW4JM7ETxxcktIWCVMQBytVynEnX28Re7KRo3x5Hu1IlLpw8kr_5Z_RNlr1GKBGweb8v_WE373RZAYgSsATWPsk2WHNZcIHsabZJGBYNr-AiexHjHgCahvHn2QWKGmTTik12_cvOgczsp2M--JDPO8qvrL5zPtqYa9fn37TTdzSRm3M_5LcPZOf0s5bu3vk_Lt_qJdLL7Nmgx0ivzu9ldvv508_tl-Lm-_XX7cebwtSIc6G54IxL1jGmB24MN2JgRoiGEEnIiglqhcGukYJ1dd23vObEamjaWkJXCXaZvTvlHoL_vVCc1WSjoXHUjvwSVdMyXkkJCeQn0AQfY6BBHYKddDgqBLUKVHt1EqhWgQpQJYGp7c05f-km6h-bzsYS8PYM6Gj0OATtjI2PnERkkteJ-3DiKNl4sBRUNJacod6uvlXv7f82-TfAjNbZNPOejhT3fgkumVaoYqVA_ViPvd4aBECFyNlf7Uyjbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68342990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Margolis, Ron, MD ; Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD ; Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD ; Singh, Rishi P., MD ; Kaiser, Peter K., MD ; Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH ; Perez, Victor L., MD ; Sonnie, Christine, RN ; Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Ron, MD ; Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD ; Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD ; Singh, Rishi P., MD ; Kaiser, Peter K., MD ; Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH ; Perez, Victor L., MD ; Sonnie, Christine, RN ; Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17509687</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacteriological Techniques ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Cytological Techniques ; Eye Infections - diagnosis ; Eye Infections - microbiology ; Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Flow Cytometry ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Uvea diseases ; Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis ; Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy ; Vitreous Body - microbiology ; Vitreous Body - pathology</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN), 2007-10, Vol.114 (10), p.1893-1897</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2007 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642007002114$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19113945$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17509687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Ron, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rishi P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Victor L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnie, Christine, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cytological Techniques</subject><subject>Eye Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Eye Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Uvea diseases</subject><subject>Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Vitrectomy</subject><subject>Vitreous Body - microbiology</subject><subject>Vitreous Body - pathology</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEokvhDRDKBW4JM7ETxxcktIWCVMQBytVynEnX28Re7KRo3x5Hu1IlLpw8kr_5Z_RNlr1GKBGweb8v_WE373RZAYgSsATWPsk2WHNZcIHsabZJGBYNr-AiexHjHgCahvHn2QWKGmTTik12_cvOgczsp2M--JDPO8qvrL5zPtqYa9fn37TTdzSRm3M_5LcPZOf0s5bu3vk_Lt_qJdLL7Nmgx0ivzu9ldvv508_tl-Lm-_XX7cebwtSIc6G54IxL1jGmB24MN2JgRoiGEEnIiglqhcGukYJ1dd23vObEamjaWkJXCXaZvTvlHoL_vVCc1WSjoXHUjvwSVdMyXkkJCeQn0AQfY6BBHYKddDgqBLUKVHt1EqhWgQpQJYGp7c05f-km6h-bzsYS8PYM6Gj0OATtjI2PnERkkteJ-3DiKNl4sBRUNJacod6uvlXv7f82-TfAjNbZNPOejhT3fgkumVaoYqVA_ViPvd4aBECFyNlf7Uyjbg</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Margolis, Ron, MD</creator><creator>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</creator><creator>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Singh, Rishi P., MD</creator><creator>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</creator><creator>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Perez, Victor L., MD</creator><creator>Sonnie, Christine, RN</creator><creator>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</title><author>Margolis, Ron, MD ; Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD ; Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD ; Singh, Rishi P., MD ; Kaiser, Peter K., MD ; Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH ; Perez, Victor L., MD ; Sonnie, Christine, RN ; Sears, Jonathan E., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cytological Techniques</topic><topic>Eye Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Eye Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Uvea diseases</topic><topic>Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Vitrectomy</topic><topic>Vitreous Body - microbiology</topic><topic>Vitreous Body - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Ron, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rishi P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Victor L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnie, Christine, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margolis, Ron, MD</au><au>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</au><au>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</au><au>Singh, Rishi P., MD</au><au>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</au><au>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</au><au>Perez, Victor L., MD</au><au>Sonnie, Christine, RN</au><au>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1893</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1893-1897</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17509687</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN), 2007-10, Vol.114 (10), p.1893-1897
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68342990
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bacteriological Techniques
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Cytological Techniques
Eye Infections - diagnosis
Eye Infections - microbiology
Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis
False Positive Reactions
Female
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Ophthalmology
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Uvea diseases
Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis
Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology
Visual Acuity
Vitrectomy
Vitreous Body - microbiology
Vitreous Body - pathology
title Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A38%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vitrectomy%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20and%20Management%20of%20Uveitis%20of%20Unknown%20Cause&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20MN)&rft.au=Margolis,%20Ron,%20MD&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1893&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1893-1897&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68342990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68342990&rft_id=info:pmid/17509687&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0161642007002114&rfr_iscdi=true