Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause
Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with poster...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN) MN), 2007-10, Vol.114 (10), p.1893-1897 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1897 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1893 |
container_title | Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN) |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Margolis, Ron, MD Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD Singh, Rishi P., MD Kaiser, Peter K., MD Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH Perez, Victor L., MD Sonnie, Christine, RN Sears, Jonathan E., MD |
description | Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68342990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0161642007002114</els_id><sourcerecordid>68342990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEokvhDRDKBW4JM7ETxxcktIWCVMQBytVynEnX28Re7KRo3x5Hu1IlLpw8kr_5Z_RNlr1GKBGweb8v_WE373RZAYgSsATWPsk2WHNZcIHsabZJGBYNr-AiexHjHgCahvHn2QWKGmTTik12_cvOgczsp2M--JDPO8qvrL5zPtqYa9fn37TTdzSRm3M_5LcPZOf0s5bu3vk_Lt_qJdLL7Nmgx0ivzu9ldvv508_tl-Lm-_XX7cebwtSIc6G54IxL1jGmB24MN2JgRoiGEEnIiglqhcGukYJ1dd23vObEamjaWkJXCXaZvTvlHoL_vVCc1WSjoXHUjvwSVdMyXkkJCeQn0AQfY6BBHYKddDgqBLUKVHt1EqhWgQpQJYGp7c05f-km6h-bzsYS8PYM6Gj0OATtjI2PnERkkteJ-3DiKNl4sBRUNJacod6uvlXv7f82-TfAjNbZNPOejhT3fgkumVaoYqVA_ViPvd4aBECFyNlf7Uyjbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68342990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Margolis, Ron, MD ; Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD ; Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD ; Singh, Rishi P., MD ; Kaiser, Peter K., MD ; Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH ; Perez, Victor L., MD ; Sonnie, Christine, RN ; Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Ron, MD ; Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD ; Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD ; Singh, Rishi P., MD ; Kaiser, Peter K., MD ; Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH ; Perez, Victor L., MD ; Sonnie, Christine, RN ; Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17509687</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacteriological Techniques ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Cytological Techniques ; Eye Infections - diagnosis ; Eye Infections - microbiology ; Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Flow Cytometry ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Uvea diseases ; Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis ; Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy ; Vitreous Body - microbiology ; Vitreous Body - pathology</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN), 2007-10, Vol.114 (10), p.1893-1897</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2007 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642007002114$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19113945$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17509687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Ron, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rishi P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Victor L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnie, Christine, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cytological Techniques</subject><subject>Eye Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Eye Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Uvea diseases</subject><subject>Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Vitrectomy</subject><subject>Vitreous Body - microbiology</subject><subject>Vitreous Body - pathology</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEokvhDRDKBW4JM7ETxxcktIWCVMQBytVynEnX28Re7KRo3x5Hu1IlLpw8kr_5Z_RNlr1GKBGweb8v_WE373RZAYgSsATWPsk2WHNZcIHsabZJGBYNr-AiexHjHgCahvHn2QWKGmTTik12_cvOgczsp2M--JDPO8qvrL5zPtqYa9fn37TTdzSRm3M_5LcPZOf0s5bu3vk_Lt_qJdLL7Nmgx0ivzu9ldvv508_tl-Lm-_XX7cebwtSIc6G54IxL1jGmB24MN2JgRoiGEEnIiglqhcGukYJ1dd23vObEamjaWkJXCXaZvTvlHoL_vVCc1WSjoXHUjvwSVdMyXkkJCeQn0AQfY6BBHYKddDgqBLUKVHt1EqhWgQpQJYGp7c05f-km6h-bzsYS8PYM6Gj0OATtjI2PnERkkteJ-3DiKNl4sBRUNJacod6uvlXv7f82-TfAjNbZNPOejhT3fgkumVaoYqVA_ViPvd4aBECFyNlf7Uyjbg</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Margolis, Ron, MD</creator><creator>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</creator><creator>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Singh, Rishi P., MD</creator><creator>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</creator><creator>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Perez, Victor L., MD</creator><creator>Sonnie, Christine, RN</creator><creator>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</title><author>Margolis, Ron, MD ; Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD ; Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD ; Singh, Rishi P., MD ; Kaiser, Peter K., MD ; Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH ; Perez, Victor L., MD ; Sonnie, Christine, RN ; Sears, Jonathan E., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-a4743493b33af4cc4c7f3c776e11e79237e87c1b6973b55d8454e35068590b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cytological Techniques</topic><topic>Eye Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Eye Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Uvea diseases</topic><topic>Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Vitrectomy</topic><topic>Vitreous Body - microbiology</topic><topic>Vitreous Body - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Ron, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rishi P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Victor L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnie, Christine, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margolis, Ron, MD</au><au>Brasil, Oswaldo F.M., MD</au><au>Lowder, Careen Y., MD, PhD</au><au>Singh, Rishi P., MD</au><au>Kaiser, Peter K., MD</au><au>Smith, Scott D., MD, MPH</au><au>Perez, Victor L., MD</au><au>Sonnie, Christine, RN</au><au>Sears, Jonathan E., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1893</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1893-1897</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used for vitreous fluid analysis in eyes with suspected intraocular infection or malignancy. Design Noncomparative interventional case series. Participants Forty-four consecutive patients (45 eyes) treated from 1998 through 2006 with posterior segment inflammation who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for diagnostic purposes. Intervention Vitreous specimens obtained via pars plana vitrectomy were analyzed by microbiologic culture, cytologic analysis, and flow cytometry. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and sensitivity of each test performed on vitreous specimens and visual outcomes of eyes that underwent diagnostic vitrectomy (DVx). Results Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 15 eyes and malignancy in 30 eyes. Overall, vitreous analysis identified a specific cause in 9 (20%) of 45 eyes. The overall sensitivity of DVx was 63.6%. The sensitivities of individual tests were: culture, 50%; cytologic analysis, 66.7%; and flow cytometry, 83.3%. The yields of diagnostic tests were: culture, 5.7%; cytologic analysis, 14.3%; and flow cytometry, 20.6%. Final diagnoses were infection in 6 eyes, malignancy in 9 eyes, and idiopathic in 30 eyes. Mean visual acuity improved significantly in the first 6 months after DVx. Visual acuity improved in 60% of eyes, with 37.8% of eyes improving by 3 lines or more. Conclusions Analysis of vitreous fluid by widely available tests is useful in identifying intraocular infection or malignancy. Most patients experienced a substantial improvement in vision.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17509687</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-6420 |
ispartof | Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN), 2007-10, Vol.114 (10), p.1893-1897 |
issn | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68342990 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bacteriological Techniques Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Cytological Techniques Eye Infections - diagnosis Eye Infections - microbiology Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis False Positive Reactions Female Flow Cytometry Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ophthalmology Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Uvea diseases Uveitis, Posterior - diagnosis Uveitis, Posterior - microbiology Visual Acuity Vitrectomy Vitreous Body - microbiology Vitreous Body - pathology |
title | Vitrectomy for the Diagnosis and Management of Uveitis of Unknown Cause |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A38%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vitrectomy%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20and%20Management%20of%20Uveitis%20of%20Unknown%20Cause&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20MN)&rft.au=Margolis,%20Ron,%20MD&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1893&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1893-1897&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68342990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68342990&rft_id=info:pmid/17509687&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0161642007002114&rfr_iscdi=true |