Comparative Study of Urea and Betaine Solutions by Dielectric Spectroscopy:  Liquid Structures of a Protein Denaturant and Stabilizer

We performed dielectric spectroscopy measurements on aqueous solutions of glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine), which is known to be a strong stabilizer of globular proteins, over a wide concentration range (3−62 wt %) and compared the results with our previously published data for aqueous solut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of physical chemistry. B 2007-10, Vol.111 (40), p.11858-11863
Hauptverfasser: Hayashi, Yoshihito, Katsumoto, Yoichi, Oshige, Ikuya, Omori, Shinji, Yasuda, Akio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11863
container_issue 40
container_start_page 11858
container_title The journal of physical chemistry. B
container_volume 111
creator Hayashi, Yoshihito
Katsumoto, Yoichi
Oshige, Ikuya
Omori, Shinji
Yasuda, Akio
description We performed dielectric spectroscopy measurements on aqueous solutions of glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine), which is known to be a strong stabilizer of globular proteins, over a wide concentration range (3−62 wt %) and compared the results with our previously published data for aqueous solutions of urea, a representative protein denaturant. The hydration number of betaine (9), calculated on the basis of the reduction in the dielectric relaxation strength of bulk water with addition of betaine, is significantly larger than that of urea (2). Furthermore, the dielectric relaxation time increased with betaine concentration, while that remained nearly constant for the urea−water system over a wide concentration range. This difference between urea and betaine is probably related to their opposite effects on the protein stabilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jp073238j
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68341620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68341620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-5bd1f5086864bcafac20292db132de43dfdba2f48182349c90fb6e8fba8188e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9uEzEQh1cIREvhwAsgX0DqYcF_dr0ON0gggKJSkfZszXrHksNmvbW9qOHEDfGaPAkOicqFw2hGM58-y7-ieMroS0Y5e7UZaSO4UJt7xSmrOS1zNfePs2RUnhSPYtxQymuu5MPihDWqaYSSp8XPud-OECC5b0jWaep2xFtyHRAIDB15iwnckC--n5LzQyTtjiwc9mhScIasx_3go_Hj7vXvH7_Iyt1MrsumMJk0BYx7HZDL4BO6gSxwgLyGIf3VrxO0rnffMTwuHljoIz459rPi-v27q_mHcvV5-XH-ZlWCqFkq67ZjtqZKKlm1BiwYTvmMdy0TvMNKdLZrgdtKMcVFNTMzaluJyraQNwobcVa8OHjH4G8mjElvXTTY9zCgn6KWSlRMcprB8wNo8vdiQKvH4LYQdppRvU9d36We2WdH6dRusftHHmPOQHkAXEx4e3eH8FXLRjS1vrpc64tPyy-LZX2hV5l_fuDBRL3xUxhyJv95-A-UhZuk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68341620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Urea and Betaine Solutions by Dielectric Spectroscopy:  Liquid Structures of a Protein Denaturant and Stabilizer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Hayashi, Yoshihito ; Katsumoto, Yoichi ; Oshige, Ikuya ; Omori, Shinji ; Yasuda, Akio</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Yoshihito ; Katsumoto, Yoichi ; Oshige, Ikuya ; Omori, Shinji ; Yasuda, Akio</creatorcontrib><description>We performed dielectric spectroscopy measurements on aqueous solutions of glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine), which is known to be a strong stabilizer of globular proteins, over a wide concentration range (3−62 wt %) and compared the results with our previously published data for aqueous solutions of urea, a representative protein denaturant. The hydration number of betaine (9), calculated on the basis of the reduction in the dielectric relaxation strength of bulk water with addition of betaine, is significantly larger than that of urea (2). Furthermore, the dielectric relaxation time increased with betaine concentration, while that remained nearly constant for the urea−water system over a wide concentration range. This difference between urea and betaine is probably related to their opposite effects on the protein stabilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jp073238j</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17877386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Betaine - chemistry ; Electrochemistry ; Protein Denaturation ; Solutions ; Spectrum Analysis ; Urea - chemistry</subject><ispartof>The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2007-10, Vol.111 (40), p.11858-11863</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-5bd1f5086864bcafac20292db132de43dfdba2f48182349c90fb6e8fba8188e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-5bd1f5086864bcafac20292db132de43dfdba2f48182349c90fb6e8fba8188e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jp073238j$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp073238j$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27075,27923,27924,56737,56787</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17877386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Yoshihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsumoto, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshige, Ikuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omori, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Akio</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Urea and Betaine Solutions by Dielectric Spectroscopy:  Liquid Structures of a Protein Denaturant and Stabilizer</title><title>The journal of physical chemistry. B</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><description>We performed dielectric spectroscopy measurements on aqueous solutions of glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine), which is known to be a strong stabilizer of globular proteins, over a wide concentration range (3−62 wt %) and compared the results with our previously published data for aqueous solutions of urea, a representative protein denaturant. The hydration number of betaine (9), calculated on the basis of the reduction in the dielectric relaxation strength of bulk water with addition of betaine, is significantly larger than that of urea (2). Furthermore, the dielectric relaxation time increased with betaine concentration, while that remained nearly constant for the urea−water system over a wide concentration range. This difference between urea and betaine is probably related to their opposite effects on the protein stabilization.</description><subject>Betaine - chemistry</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Protein Denaturation</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><subject>Urea - chemistry</subject><issn>1520-6106</issn><issn>1520-5207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9uEzEQh1cIREvhwAsgX0DqYcF_dr0ON0gggKJSkfZszXrHksNmvbW9qOHEDfGaPAkOicqFw2hGM58-y7-ieMroS0Y5e7UZaSO4UJt7xSmrOS1zNfePs2RUnhSPYtxQymuu5MPihDWqaYSSp8XPud-OECC5b0jWaep2xFtyHRAIDB15iwnckC--n5LzQyTtjiwc9mhScIasx_3go_Hj7vXvH7_Iyt1MrsumMJk0BYx7HZDL4BO6gSxwgLyGIf3VrxO0rnffMTwuHljoIz459rPi-v27q_mHcvV5-XH-ZlWCqFkq67ZjtqZKKlm1BiwYTvmMdy0TvMNKdLZrgdtKMcVFNTMzaluJyraQNwobcVa8OHjH4G8mjElvXTTY9zCgn6KWSlRMcprB8wNo8vdiQKvH4LYQdppRvU9d36We2WdH6dRusftHHmPOQHkAXEx4e3eH8FXLRjS1vrpc64tPyy-LZX2hV5l_fuDBRL3xUxhyJv95-A-UhZuk</recordid><startdate>20071011</startdate><enddate>20071011</enddate><creator>Hayashi, Yoshihito</creator><creator>Katsumoto, Yoichi</creator><creator>Oshige, Ikuya</creator><creator>Omori, Shinji</creator><creator>Yasuda, Akio</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071011</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Urea and Betaine Solutions by Dielectric Spectroscopy:  Liquid Structures of a Protein Denaturant and Stabilizer</title><author>Hayashi, Yoshihito ; Katsumoto, Yoichi ; Oshige, Ikuya ; Omori, Shinji ; Yasuda, Akio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-5bd1f5086864bcafac20292db132de43dfdba2f48182349c90fb6e8fba8188e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Betaine - chemistry</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Protein Denaturation</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><topic>Urea - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Yoshihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsumoto, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshige, Ikuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omori, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Akio</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayashi, Yoshihito</au><au>Katsumoto, Yoichi</au><au>Oshige, Ikuya</au><au>Omori, Shinji</au><au>Yasuda, Akio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Urea and Betaine Solutions by Dielectric Spectroscopy:  Liquid Structures of a Protein Denaturant and Stabilizer</atitle><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><date>2007-10-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>40</issue><spage>11858</spage><epage>11863</epage><pages>11858-11863</pages><issn>1520-6106</issn><eissn>1520-5207</eissn><abstract>We performed dielectric spectroscopy measurements on aqueous solutions of glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine), which is known to be a strong stabilizer of globular proteins, over a wide concentration range (3−62 wt %) and compared the results with our previously published data for aqueous solutions of urea, a representative protein denaturant. The hydration number of betaine (9), calculated on the basis of the reduction in the dielectric relaxation strength of bulk water with addition of betaine, is significantly larger than that of urea (2). Furthermore, the dielectric relaxation time increased with betaine concentration, while that remained nearly constant for the urea−water system over a wide concentration range. This difference between urea and betaine is probably related to their opposite effects on the protein stabilization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>17877386</pmid><doi>10.1021/jp073238j</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-6106
ispartof The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2007-10, Vol.111 (40), p.11858-11863
issn 1520-6106
1520-5207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68341620
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Betaine - chemistry
Electrochemistry
Protein Denaturation
Solutions
Spectrum Analysis
Urea - chemistry
title Comparative Study of Urea and Betaine Solutions by Dielectric Spectroscopy:  Liquid Structures of a Protein Denaturant and Stabilizer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Urea%20and%20Betaine%20Solutions%20by%20Dielectric%20Spectroscopy:%E2%80%89%20Liquid%20Structures%20of%20a%20Protein%20Denaturant%20and%20Stabilizer&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20B&rft.au=Hayashi,%20Yoshihito&rft.date=2007-10-11&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=40&rft.spage=11858&rft.epage=11863&rft.pages=11858-11863&rft.issn=1520-6106&rft.eissn=1520-5207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jp073238j&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68341620%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68341620&rft_id=info:pmid/17877386&rfr_iscdi=true