Trends in Hemodialysis Vascular Access From the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005

Background Australia historically has been recognized for its high fistula use. Study Design Observational study using registry data. Setting & Participants Adult patients registered in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry on hemodialysis in Australia. Predi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of kidney diseases 2007-10, Vol.50 (4), p.612-621
Hauptverfasser: Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc, Chang, Sean H., MD, Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi, McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 621
container_issue 4
container_start_page 612
container_title American journal of kidney diseases
container_volume 50
creator Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc
Chang, Sean H., MD
Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi
McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD
description Background Australia historically has been recognized for its high fistula use. Study Design Observational study using registry data. Setting & Participants Adult patients registered in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry on hemodialysis in Australia. Predictor Cohort year. Outcomes & Measurement Hemodialysis access trends were examined from 2000 to 2005 for incident patients (within 60 days of hemodialysis therapy start), patients on hemodialysis therapy for 6 to 8 months, and prevalent hemodialysis patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine the relationship between access type and cohort year for each group, with adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, late referral, smoking status, cause of end-stage renal disease, comorbidities, and dialysis vintage. Results During 2000 to 2005, catheter use increased from 39% to 53% in incident patients, 10% to 22% in the 6- to 8-month groups, and 6% to 13% in prevalent patients. Fistula use decreased from 56% to 43% in incident patients and 78% to 67% in the 6- to 8-month group and remained at 73% to 75% in prevalent patients. Graft use decreased in all groups. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly change these results. Limitations The registry collects only the access in use at the end of the survey period; thus, it was not possible to determine whether another access had failed or was present, but not in use. The small number of incident numbers prevented separate analysis of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts. Conclusion Incident use of fistulas and grafts decreased, with an unexpected increase in both incident and prevalent catheters between 2000 and 2005. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly alter the trends. Changes in unidentified practice patterns, attitudes, or preferences are contributing to these trends. Ongoing evaluation of data and investigation into processes of care are required to increase functioning fistulas, together with reevaluation of the role of grafts in patients without a fistula.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68329549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272638607010451</els_id><sourcerecordid>68329549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-afd2c1663da8a01d8d17c823df2633142345272a47042e9c3a078ac37eb30b083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqH_AguSh66LGSdKe7YRGaXdcVlhV09LCXkEmqNbP9MSbdK3P0n5s4o4IHoaCS8L5VlYci5AmDJYNCvNos9ebWLjlAuUzB5D2yYAUXmaxEdZ8sgJc8k6KSR-Q4hA0A1ELKh-SIlTVALtmC_Fh5HGygbqCX2I_W6W4XXKCfdTBzpz1tjMEQ6IUfezp9RdrMYfK6c5rqwdJr_E5vUHfpfP7bmy4rr4ewje8T_YBfXPTs6Ivm-ua8WTUvaRwZ6DSmXDwiD1rdBXx8yCfk08Wb1dlldvX-7buz5iozuainTLeWGyalsLrSwGxlWWkqLmzLpRAs5yIv4nd1XkLOsTZCQ1lpI0pcC1hDJU7I833drR-_zRgm1btgsIsz4jgHFZnxusjrKOR7ofFjCB5btfWu136nGKgEXm1UAq8SeJWCyWh6eqg-r3u0fy0H0lHw7CCIZHXXRj7GhT-6WIsV9a_up3sdRhZ3Dr0KxuFg0DqPZlJ2dP-f4_U_dtO5wcWOt7jDsBlnP0TKiqnAFaiPaUXShkAJDPKCiZ-wT7Nl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68329549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in Hemodialysis Vascular Access From the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc ; Chang, Sean H., MD ; Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi ; McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc ; Chang, Sean H., MD ; Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi ; McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD ; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA)</creatorcontrib><description>Background Australia historically has been recognized for its high fistula use. Study Design Observational study using registry data. Setting &amp; Participants Adult patients registered in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry on hemodialysis in Australia. Predictor Cohort year. Outcomes &amp; Measurement Hemodialysis access trends were examined from 2000 to 2005 for incident patients (within 60 days of hemodialysis therapy start), patients on hemodialysis therapy for 6 to 8 months, and prevalent hemodialysis patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine the relationship between access type and cohort year for each group, with adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, late referral, smoking status, cause of end-stage renal disease, comorbidities, and dialysis vintage. Results During 2000 to 2005, catheter use increased from 39% to 53% in incident patients, 10% to 22% in the 6- to 8-month groups, and 6% to 13% in prevalent patients. Fistula use decreased from 56% to 43% in incident patients and 78% to 67% in the 6- to 8-month group and remained at 73% to 75% in prevalent patients. Graft use decreased in all groups. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly change these results. Limitations The registry collects only the access in use at the end of the survey period; thus, it was not possible to determine whether another access had failed or was present, but not in use. The small number of incident numbers prevented separate analysis of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts. Conclusion Incident use of fistulas and grafts decreased, with an unexpected increase in both incident and prevalent catheters between 2000 and 2005. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly alter the trends. Changes in unidentified practice patterns, attitudes, or preferences are contributing to these trends. Ongoing evaluation of data and investigation into processes of care are required to increase functioning fistulas, together with reevaluation of the role of grafts in patients without a fistula.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-6386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17900461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Orlando, FL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; ANZDATA ; Australia - epidemiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; catheter ; Cohort Studies ; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management ; Female ; fistula ; graft ; Hemodialysis ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Kidney Transplantation - trends ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; New Zealand - epidemiology ; Registries ; Renal Dialysis - adverse effects ; Renal Dialysis - trends ; vascular access</subject><ispartof>American journal of kidney diseases, 2007-10, Vol.50 (4), p.612-621</ispartof><rights>National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-afd2c1663da8a01d8d17c823df2633142345272a47042e9c3a078ac37eb30b083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-afd2c1663da8a01d8d17c823df2633142345272a47042e9c3a078ac37eb30b083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20015949$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17900461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sean H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA)</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in Hemodialysis Vascular Access From the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005</title><title>American journal of kidney diseases</title><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><description>Background Australia historically has been recognized for its high fistula use. Study Design Observational study using registry data. Setting &amp; Participants Adult patients registered in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry on hemodialysis in Australia. Predictor Cohort year. Outcomes &amp; Measurement Hemodialysis access trends were examined from 2000 to 2005 for incident patients (within 60 days of hemodialysis therapy start), patients on hemodialysis therapy for 6 to 8 months, and prevalent hemodialysis patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine the relationship between access type and cohort year for each group, with adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, late referral, smoking status, cause of end-stage renal disease, comorbidities, and dialysis vintage. Results During 2000 to 2005, catheter use increased from 39% to 53% in incident patients, 10% to 22% in the 6- to 8-month groups, and 6% to 13% in prevalent patients. Fistula use decreased from 56% to 43% in incident patients and 78% to 67% in the 6- to 8-month group and remained at 73% to 75% in prevalent patients. Graft use decreased in all groups. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly change these results. Limitations The registry collects only the access in use at the end of the survey period; thus, it was not possible to determine whether another access had failed or was present, but not in use. The small number of incident numbers prevented separate analysis of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts. Conclusion Incident use of fistulas and grafts decreased, with an unexpected increase in both incident and prevalent catheters between 2000 and 2005. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly alter the trends. Changes in unidentified practice patterns, attitudes, or preferences are contributing to these trends. Ongoing evaluation of data and investigation into processes of care are required to increase functioning fistulas, together with reevaluation of the role of grafts in patients without a fistula.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>ANZDATA</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>catheter</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fistula</subject><subject>graft</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - trends</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>New Zealand - epidemiology</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - trends</subject><subject>vascular access</subject><issn>0272-6386</issn><issn>1523-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqH_AguSh66LGSdKe7YRGaXdcVlhV09LCXkEmqNbP9MSbdK3P0n5s4o4IHoaCS8L5VlYci5AmDJYNCvNos9ebWLjlAuUzB5D2yYAUXmaxEdZ8sgJc8k6KSR-Q4hA0A1ELKh-SIlTVALtmC_Fh5HGygbqCX2I_W6W4XXKCfdTBzpz1tjMEQ6IUfezp9RdrMYfK6c5rqwdJr_E5vUHfpfP7bmy4rr4ewje8T_YBfXPTs6Ivm-ua8WTUvaRwZ6DSmXDwiD1rdBXx8yCfk08Wb1dlldvX-7buz5iozuainTLeWGyalsLrSwGxlWWkqLmzLpRAs5yIv4nd1XkLOsTZCQ1lpI0pcC1hDJU7I833drR-_zRgm1btgsIsz4jgHFZnxusjrKOR7ofFjCB5btfWu136nGKgEXm1UAq8SeJWCyWh6eqg-r3u0fy0H0lHw7CCIZHXXRj7GhT-6WIsV9a_up3sdRhZ3Dr0KxuFg0DqPZlJ2dP-f4_U_dtO5wcWOt7jDsBlnP0TKiqnAFaiPaUXShkAJDPKCiZ-wT7Nl</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Chang, Sean H., MD</creator><creator>Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi</creator><creator>McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Trends in Hemodialysis Vascular Access From the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005</title><author>Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc ; Chang, Sean H., MD ; Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi ; McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-afd2c1663da8a01d8d17c823df2633142345272a47042e9c3a078ac37eb30b083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>ANZDATA</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>catheter</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fistula</topic><topic>graft</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - trends</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>New Zealand - epidemiology</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - trends</topic><topic>vascular access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sean H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moist, Louise M., MD, MSc</au><au>Chang, Sean H., MD</au><au>Polkinghorne, Kevan R., MBChB, MClinEpi</au><au>McDonald, Stephen P., MD, PhD</au><aucorp>Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in Hemodialysis Vascular Access From the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005</atitle><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>612</spage><epage>621</epage><pages>612-621</pages><issn>0272-6386</issn><eissn>1523-6838</eissn><abstract>Background Australia historically has been recognized for its high fistula use. Study Design Observational study using registry data. Setting &amp; Participants Adult patients registered in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry on hemodialysis in Australia. Predictor Cohort year. Outcomes &amp; Measurement Hemodialysis access trends were examined from 2000 to 2005 for incident patients (within 60 days of hemodialysis therapy start), patients on hemodialysis therapy for 6 to 8 months, and prevalent hemodialysis patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine the relationship between access type and cohort year for each group, with adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, late referral, smoking status, cause of end-stage renal disease, comorbidities, and dialysis vintage. Results During 2000 to 2005, catheter use increased from 39% to 53% in incident patients, 10% to 22% in the 6- to 8-month groups, and 6% to 13% in prevalent patients. Fistula use decreased from 56% to 43% in incident patients and 78% to 67% in the 6- to 8-month group and remained at 73% to 75% in prevalent patients. Graft use decreased in all groups. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly change these results. Limitations The registry collects only the access in use at the end of the survey period; thus, it was not possible to determine whether another access had failed or was present, but not in use. The small number of incident numbers prevented separate analysis of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts. Conclusion Incident use of fistulas and grafts decreased, with an unexpected increase in both incident and prevalent catheters between 2000 and 2005. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly alter the trends. Changes in unidentified practice patterns, attitudes, or preferences are contributing to these trends. Ongoing evaluation of data and investigation into processes of care are required to increase functioning fistulas, together with reevaluation of the role of grafts in patients without a fistula.</abstract><cop>Orlando, FL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17900461</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.016</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-6386
ispartof American journal of kidney diseases, 2007-10, Vol.50 (4), p.612-621
issn 0272-6386
1523-6838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68329549
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
ANZDATA
Australia - epidemiology
Biological and medical sciences
catheter
Cohort Studies
Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management
Female
fistula
graft
Hemodialysis
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Kidney Transplantation - trends
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
New Zealand - epidemiology
Registries
Renal Dialysis - adverse effects
Renal Dialysis - trends
vascular access
title Trends in Hemodialysis Vascular Access From the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T04%3A34%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20Hemodialysis%20Vascular%20Access%20From%20the%20Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%20Dialysis%20and%20Transplant%20Registry%20(ANZDATA)%202000%20to%202005&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20kidney%20diseases&rft.au=Moist,%20Louise%20M.,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.aucorp=Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%20Dialysis%20and%20Transplant%20Registry%20(ANZDATA)&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=612&rft.epage=621&rft.pages=612-621&rft.issn=0272-6386&rft.eissn=1523-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68329549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68329549&rft_id=info:pmid/17900461&rft_els_id=S0272638607010451&rfr_iscdi=true