The hand knows something that the eye does not: Reaching movements resist the Müller–Lyer illusion whether or not the target is foveated
Previous reports suggest that saccades are affected by the Müller–Lyer (ML) pictorial illusion, whereas reaching movements are not. It is unclear if the resistance of reaching to illusions depends on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Here we show that the endpoints and kinematics o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroscience letters 2007-10, Vol.426 (2), p.111-116 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 116 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 111 |
| container_title | Neuroscience letters |
| container_volume | 426 |
| creator | Thompson, Aidan A. Westwood, David A. |
| description | Previous reports suggest that saccades are affected by the Müller–Lyer (ML) pictorial illusion, whereas reaching movements are not. It is unclear if the resistance of reaching to illusions depends on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Here we show that the endpoints and kinematics of reaching movements were unaffected by a peripherally viewed ML stimulus regardless of whether or not a concurrent saccade was carried out. Primary saccade endpoints were affected by the ML stimulus but secondary saccades were not. Perceptual judgments of target location were influenced by the ML stimulus in the expected direction. The resistance of reaching movements to pictorial illusions does not appear to depend on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Implications for models of oculomotor and upper limb control are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.09.006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68329140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304394007009512</els_id><sourcerecordid>68329140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d4ed682b8ca8b60a27329aa51dbbad0ac0d5a40ea689b1fe51f7bbb0fe3b2173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEokPhDRDyBnYJx7k5YYFUVdykQUho9pYvJ42HxC6202p27FnyOux4E54ETzNSd2xs2f7Od6zzZ9lzCgUF2r7eFxaXCWNRArAC-gKgfZBtaMfKnPWsfJhtoII6r_oazrInIewBoKFN_Tg7o6zr06naZD93I5JRWE2-WXcbSHAzxtHYKxJHEdOCBA9ItMNArItvyFcU6u59djc4o42BeAwmrOznP7-nCf3fH7-2B_TETNMSjLPkdkzWdOH80XKHRuGvMBITyJBMIqJ-mj0axBTw2Wk_z3bv3-0uP-bbLx8-XV5sc1X1EHNdo267UnZKdLIFUbKq7IVoqJZSaBAKdCNqQNF2vaQDNnRgUkoYsJIlZdV59mrVXnv3fcEQ-WyCwmkSFt0SeNslH60hgfUKKu9C8Djwa29m4Q-cAj9mwPd8zYAfM-DQ85RBKntx8i9yRn1fdBp6Al6eABGUmAYvrDLhnkvNWcto4t6uHKZh3Bj0PCiDVqE2HlXk2pn__-QfbgmsGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68329140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The hand knows something that the eye does not: Reaching movements resist the Müller–Lyer illusion whether or not the target is foveated</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thompson, Aidan A. ; Westwood, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Aidan A. ; Westwood, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous reports suggest that saccades are affected by the Müller–Lyer (ML) pictorial illusion, whereas reaching movements are not. It is unclear if the resistance of reaching to illusions depends on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Here we show that the endpoints and kinematics of reaching movements were unaffected by a peripherally viewed ML stimulus regardless of whether or not a concurrent saccade was carried out. Primary saccade endpoints were affected by the ML stimulus but secondary saccades were not. Perceptual judgments of target location were influenced by the ML stimulus in the expected direction. The resistance of reaching movements to pictorial illusions does not appear to depend on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Implications for models of oculomotor and upper limb control are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.09.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17890003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NELED5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Action ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hand ; Humans ; Illusion ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Movement - physiology ; Optical Illusions - physiology ; Perception ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaching ; Saccade ; Saccades - physiology ; Space Perception - physiology ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience letters, 2007-10, Vol.426 (2), p.111-116</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d4ed682b8ca8b60a27329aa51dbbad0ac0d5a40ea689b1fe51f7bbb0fe3b2173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d4ed682b8ca8b60a27329aa51dbbad0ac0d5a40ea689b1fe51f7bbb0fe3b2173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394007009512$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19147671$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17890003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Aidan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>The hand knows something that the eye does not: Reaching movements resist the Müller–Lyer illusion whether or not the target is foveated</title><title>Neuroscience letters</title><addtitle>Neurosci Lett</addtitle><description>Previous reports suggest that saccades are affected by the Müller–Lyer (ML) pictorial illusion, whereas reaching movements are not. It is unclear if the resistance of reaching to illusions depends on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Here we show that the endpoints and kinematics of reaching movements were unaffected by a peripherally viewed ML stimulus regardless of whether or not a concurrent saccade was carried out. Primary saccade endpoints were affected by the ML stimulus but secondary saccades were not. Perceptual judgments of target location were influenced by the ML stimulus in the expected direction. The resistance of reaching movements to pictorial illusions does not appear to depend on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Implications for models of oculomotor and upper limb control are discussed.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illusion</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Optical Illusions - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaching</subject><subject>Saccade</subject><subject>Saccades - physiology</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0304-3940</issn><issn>1872-7972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEokPhDRDyBnYJx7k5YYFUVdykQUho9pYvJ42HxC6202p27FnyOux4E54ETzNSd2xs2f7Od6zzZ9lzCgUF2r7eFxaXCWNRArAC-gKgfZBtaMfKnPWsfJhtoII6r_oazrInIewBoKFN_Tg7o6zr06naZD93I5JRWE2-WXcbSHAzxtHYKxJHEdOCBA9ItMNArItvyFcU6u59djc4o42BeAwmrOznP7-nCf3fH7-2B_TETNMSjLPkdkzWdOH80XKHRuGvMBITyJBMIqJ-mj0axBTw2Wk_z3bv3-0uP-bbLx8-XV5sc1X1EHNdo267UnZKdLIFUbKq7IVoqJZSaBAKdCNqQNF2vaQDNnRgUkoYsJIlZdV59mrVXnv3fcEQ-WyCwmkSFt0SeNslH60hgfUKKu9C8Djwa29m4Q-cAj9mwPd8zYAfM-DQ85RBKntx8i9yRn1fdBp6Al6eABGUmAYvrDLhnkvNWcto4t6uHKZh3Bj0PCiDVqE2HlXk2pn__-QfbgmsGg</recordid><startdate>20071016</startdate><enddate>20071016</enddate><creator>Thompson, Aidan A.</creator><creator>Westwood, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071016</creationdate><title>The hand knows something that the eye does not: Reaching movements resist the Müller–Lyer illusion whether or not the target is foveated</title><author>Thompson, Aidan A. ; Westwood, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-d4ed682b8ca8b60a27329aa51dbbad0ac0d5a40ea689b1fe51f7bbb0fe3b2173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illusion</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Optical Illusions - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaching</topic><topic>Saccade</topic><topic>Saccades - physiology</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Aidan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Aidan A.</au><au>Westwood, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The hand knows something that the eye does not: Reaching movements resist the Müller–Lyer illusion whether or not the target is foveated</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience letters</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Lett</addtitle><date>2007-10-16</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>426</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>111-116</pages><issn>0304-3940</issn><eissn>1872-7972</eissn><coden>NELED5</coden><abstract>Previous reports suggest that saccades are affected by the Müller–Lyer (ML) pictorial illusion, whereas reaching movements are not. It is unclear if the resistance of reaching to illusions depends on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Here we show that the endpoints and kinematics of reaching movements were unaffected by a peripherally viewed ML stimulus regardless of whether or not a concurrent saccade was carried out. Primary saccade endpoints were affected by the ML stimulus but secondary saccades were not. Perceptual judgments of target location were influenced by the ML stimulus in the expected direction. The resistance of reaching movements to pictorial illusions does not appear to depend on the concurrent engagement of the oculomotor system. Implications for models of oculomotor and upper limb control are discussed.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>17890003</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neulet.2007.09.006</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0304-3940 |
| ispartof | Neuroscience letters, 2007-10, Vol.426 (2), p.111-116 |
| issn | 0304-3940 1872-7972 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68329140 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Action Adult Biological and medical sciences Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hand Humans Illusion Male Middle Aged Movement - physiology Optical Illusions - physiology Perception Photic Stimulation - methods Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaching Saccade Saccades - physiology Space Perception - physiology Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs Vision |
| title | The hand knows something that the eye does not: Reaching movements resist the Müller–Lyer illusion whether or not the target is foveated |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20hand%20knows%20something%20that%20the%20eye%20does%20not:%20Reaching%20movements%20resist%20the%20M%C3%BCller%E2%80%93Lyer%20illusion%20whether%20or%20not%20the%20target%20is%20foveated&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20letters&rft.au=Thompson,%20Aidan%20A.&rft.date=2007-10-16&rft.volume=426&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=111-116&rft.issn=0304-3940&rft.eissn=1872-7972&rft.coden=NELED5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.09.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68329140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68329140&rft_id=info:pmid/17890003&rft_els_id=S0304394007009512&rfr_iscdi=true |