Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen
summary The aim of this study was to determine the compliance rates for women being offered routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis in two obstetric units in the UK. Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a potentially serious condition that can result in substantial morbidity and sometimes death....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2007-10, Vol.17 (5), p.399-403 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 403 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Chaffe, B. Ford, J. Bills, V. |
description | summary The aim of this study was to determine the compliance rates for women being offered routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis in two obstetric units in the UK. Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a potentially serious condition that can result in substantial morbidity and sometimes death. Current guidelines recommend that 500 IU anti‐D immunoglobulin G (IgG) should be offered to all non‐sensitized RhD‐negative women at 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation in order to prevent the risk of RhD sensitization in pregnancy. Implementing guidance, however, remains a challenge. We conducted a retrospective audit of 207 RhD‐negative, non‐sensitized pregnant women attending obstetric units during 2004 to assess compliance with national guidance on the provision of antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis. Informed consent for routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis was documented for 185 of these women. In total, 86·5% of women received the two doses of anti‐D IgG. The majority of women received their first and second doses within 1 week of 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation (87·0 and 86·0%, respectively). Accurate records of prophylactic anti‐D IgG were maintained and updated. This audit demonstrates that the level of patient compliance with the two‐dose regimen was high. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00777.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68327415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20599471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4357-4e3a95b4e913764728a4ed95c90679a7e5c1043af8fd01717241eaef77643c8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1v0zAUhq0JxMrgL0y-2l2CHds5sbSbaewDtA5pbII7y01OVpd8LXbV9t_j0GpcgiXLR_bznmM9hFDOUh7Xp1XKRa4SwWWRZoxBGjdAuj0is9eHN2TGtCoSUFAck_ferxjjItPZO3LMQbPI8Bl5eujXwXVIbRews8E2U-WSz3QY-2G5a-zW-XhV0cEGh12gZd8OjbNdiXTjwpKGJdKw6ZOq90hHfHYtdh_I29o2Hj8ezhPydH31eHmb3H27-XJ5cZeUUihIJAqr1UKi5gJyCVlhJVZalZrloC2gKjmTwtZFXTEOHDLJ0WINERZlsRAn5GzfN372ZY0-mNb5EpvGdtivvckLkYHk6p9gxpTWEngEiz1Yjr33I9ZmGF1rx53hzEzuzcpMis2k2EzuzR_3Zhujp4cZ60WL1d_gQXYEzvfAxjW4--_G5nF-FYsYT_Zx5wNuX-N2_GVyEKDMj_sbk8-_3v-cZw_mu_gND--hVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20599471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chaffe, B. ; Ford, J. ; Bills, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaffe, B. ; Ford, J. ; Bills, V.</creatorcontrib><description>summary The aim of this study was to determine the compliance rates for women being offered routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis in two obstetric units in the UK. Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a potentially serious condition that can result in substantial morbidity and sometimes death. Current guidelines recommend that 500 IU anti‐D immunoglobulin G (IgG) should be offered to all non‐sensitized RhD‐negative women at 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation in order to prevent the risk of RhD sensitization in pregnancy. Implementing guidance, however, remains a challenge. We conducted a retrospective audit of 207 RhD‐negative, non‐sensitized pregnant women attending obstetric units during 2004 to assess compliance with national guidance on the provision of antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis. Informed consent for routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis was documented for 185 of these women. In total, 86·5% of women received the two doses of anti‐D IgG. The majority of women received their first and second doses within 1 week of 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation (87·0 and 86·0%, respectively). Accurate records of prophylactic anti‐D IgG were maintained and updated. This audit demonstrates that the level of patient compliance with the two‐dose regimen was high.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00777.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17903141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>antenatal prophylaxis ; anti-D immunoglobulin ; compliance ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Erythroblastosis, Fetal - prevention & control ; Female ; haemolytic disease of the newborn ; Humans ; Medical Audit ; Patient Compliance ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic - drug therapy ; Pregnancy Trimester, Third ; Prenatal Care - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Rh Isoimmunization - prevention & control ; RhD sensitization ; Rho(D) Immune Globulin - administration & dosage ; two-dose regimen</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2007-10, Vol.17 (5), p.399-403</ispartof><rights>2007 British Blood Transfusion Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4357-4e3a95b4e913764728a4ed95c90679a7e5c1043af8fd01717241eaef77643c8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4357-4e3a95b4e913764728a4ed95c90679a7e5c1043af8fd01717241eaef77643c8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-3148.2007.00777.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-3148.2007.00777.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17903141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaffe, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bills, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen</title><title>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><description>summary The aim of this study was to determine the compliance rates for women being offered routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis in two obstetric units in the UK. Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a potentially serious condition that can result in substantial morbidity and sometimes death. Current guidelines recommend that 500 IU anti‐D immunoglobulin G (IgG) should be offered to all non‐sensitized RhD‐negative women at 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation in order to prevent the risk of RhD sensitization in pregnancy. Implementing guidance, however, remains a challenge. We conducted a retrospective audit of 207 RhD‐negative, non‐sensitized pregnant women attending obstetric units during 2004 to assess compliance with national guidance on the provision of antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis. Informed consent for routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis was documented for 185 of these women. In total, 86·5% of women received the two doses of anti‐D IgG. The majority of women received their first and second doses within 1 week of 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation (87·0 and 86·0%, respectively). Accurate records of prophylactic anti‐D IgG were maintained and updated. This audit demonstrates that the level of patient compliance with the two‐dose regimen was high.</description><subject>antenatal prophylaxis</subject><subject>anti-D immunoglobulin</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Erythroblastosis, Fetal - prevention & control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>haemolytic disease of the newborn</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</subject><subject>Prenatal Care - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rh Isoimmunization - prevention & control</subject><subject>RhD sensitization</subject><subject>Rho(D) Immune Globulin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>two-dose regimen</subject><issn>0958-7578</issn><issn>1365-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1v0zAUhq0JxMrgL0y-2l2CHds5sbSbaewDtA5pbII7y01OVpd8LXbV9t_j0GpcgiXLR_bznmM9hFDOUh7Xp1XKRa4SwWWRZoxBGjdAuj0is9eHN2TGtCoSUFAck_ferxjjItPZO3LMQbPI8Bl5eujXwXVIbRews8E2U-WSz3QY-2G5a-zW-XhV0cEGh12gZd8OjbNdiXTjwpKGJdKw6ZOq90hHfHYtdh_I29o2Hj8ezhPydH31eHmb3H27-XJ5cZeUUihIJAqr1UKi5gJyCVlhJVZalZrloC2gKjmTwtZFXTEOHDLJ0WINERZlsRAn5GzfN372ZY0-mNb5EpvGdtivvckLkYHk6p9gxpTWEngEiz1Yjr33I9ZmGF1rx53hzEzuzcpMis2k2EzuzR_3Zhujp4cZ60WL1d_gQXYEzvfAxjW4--_G5nF-FYsYT_Zx5wNuX-N2_GVyEKDMj_sbk8-_3v-cZw_mu_gND--hVw</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>Chaffe, B.</creator><creator>Ford, J.</creator><creator>Bills, V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen</title><author>Chaffe, B. ; Ford, J. ; Bills, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4357-4e3a95b4e913764728a4ed95c90679a7e5c1043af8fd01717241eaef77643c8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>antenatal prophylaxis</topic><topic>anti-D immunoglobulin</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Erythroblastosis, Fetal - prevention & control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>haemolytic disease of the newborn</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</topic><topic>Prenatal Care - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rh Isoimmunization - prevention & control</topic><topic>RhD sensitization</topic><topic>Rho(D) Immune Globulin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>two-dose regimen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaffe, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bills, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaffe, B.</au><au>Ford, J.</au><au>Bills, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>399-403</pages><issn>0958-7578</issn><eissn>1365-3148</eissn><abstract>summary The aim of this study was to determine the compliance rates for women being offered routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis in two obstetric units in the UK. Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is a potentially serious condition that can result in substantial morbidity and sometimes death. Current guidelines recommend that 500 IU anti‐D immunoglobulin G (IgG) should be offered to all non‐sensitized RhD‐negative women at 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation in order to prevent the risk of RhD sensitization in pregnancy. Implementing guidance, however, remains a challenge. We conducted a retrospective audit of 207 RhD‐negative, non‐sensitized pregnant women attending obstetric units during 2004 to assess compliance with national guidance on the provision of antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis. Informed consent for routine antenatal anti‐D prophylaxis was documented for 185 of these women. In total, 86·5% of women received the two doses of anti‐D IgG. The majority of women received their first and second doses within 1 week of 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation (87·0 and 86·0%, respectively). Accurate records of prophylactic anti‐D IgG were maintained and updated. This audit demonstrates that the level of patient compliance with the two‐dose regimen was high.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17903141</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00777.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-7578 |
ispartof | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2007-10, Vol.17 (5), p.399-403 |
issn | 0958-7578 1365-3148 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68327415 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | antenatal prophylaxis anti-D immunoglobulin compliance Drug Administration Schedule Erythroblastosis, Fetal - prevention & control Female haemolytic disease of the newborn Humans Medical Audit Patient Compliance Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic - drug therapy Pregnancy Trimester, Third Prenatal Care - methods Retrospective Studies Rh Isoimmunization - prevention & control RhD sensitization Rho(D) Immune Globulin - administration & dosage two-dose regimen |
title | Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis and patient compliance with the two-dose regimen |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A58%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20antenatal%20anti-D%20prophylaxis%20and%20patient%20compliance%20with%20the%20two-dose%20regimen&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Chaffe,%20B.&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=399-403&rft.issn=0958-7578&rft.eissn=1365-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00777.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20599471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20599471&rft_id=info:pmid/17903141&rfr_iscdi=true |