Automated Left Ventricular Capture Management

Background: The stimulation thresholds of left ventricular (LV) leads tend to be less reliable than conventional leads. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires continuous capture of both ventricles. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel algorithm for the automatic meas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2007-10, Vol.30 (10), p.1190-1200
Hauptverfasser: CROSSLEY, GEORGE H., MEAD, HARDWIN, KLECKNER, KAREN, SHELDON, TODD, DAVENPORT, LYNN, HARSCH, MANYA R., PARIKH, PURVEE, RAMZA, BRIAN, FISHEL, ROBERT, BAILEY, J. RUSSELL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1200
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1190
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 30
creator CROSSLEY, GEORGE H.
MEAD, HARDWIN
KLECKNER, KAREN
SHELDON, TODD
DAVENPORT, LYNN
HARSCH, MANYA R.
PARIKH, PURVEE
RAMZA, BRIAN
FISHEL, ROBERT
BAILEY, J. RUSSELL
description Background: The stimulation thresholds of left ventricular (LV) leads tend to be less reliable than conventional leads. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires continuous capture of both ventricles. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel algorithm for the automatic measurement of the stimulation threshold of LV leads in cardiac resynchronization systems. Methods: We enrolled 134 patients from 18 centers who had existing CRT‐D systems. Software capable of automatically executing LV threshold measurements was downloaded into the random access memory (RAM) of the device. The threshold was measured by pacing in the left ventricle and analyzing the interventricular conduction sensed in the right ventricle. Automatic LV threshold measurements were collected and compared with manual LV threshold tests at each follow‐up visit and using a Holter monitor system that recorded both the surface electrocardiograph (ECG) and continuous telemetry from the device. Results: The proportion of Left Ventricular Capture Management (LVCM) in‐office threshold tests within one programming step of the manual threshold test was 99.7% (306/307) with a two‐sided 95% confidence interval of (98.2%, 100.0%). The algorithm measured the threshold successfully in 96% and 97% of patients after 1 and 3 months respectively. Holter monitor analysis in a subset of patients revealed accurate performance of the algorithm. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the LVCM algorithm is safe, accurate, and highly reliable. LVCM worked with different types of leads and different lead locations. LVCM was demonstrated to be clinically equivalent to the manual LV threshold test. LVCM offers automatic measurement, output adaptation, and trends of the LV threshold and should result in improved ability to maintain LV capture without sacrificing device longevity.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00840.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68319250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68319250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-55076082fa922387a6b30ed33d4b23b0c4d4650c56db8b2ee3cf541d0b0ad9023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Pg0AQhjdGo7X6Fwwnb-DsFywHD5XUakL9SLR62yywGCqUugux_feCNPXqXGaSeZ-Z5EHIweDhrq6WHuYMXIF56BGAwAMQDLzNARrtF4doBJgFrqAiPEGn1i4BwAfGj9EJDkQYYIJHyJ20TV2pRmdOrPPGWehVY4q0LZVxIrVuWqOduVqpD111mzN0lKvS6vNdH6PX2-lLdOfGj7P7aBK7KQMOLucQ-CBIrkJCqAiUn1DQGaUZSwhNIGUZ8zmk3M8SkRCtaZpzhjNIQGUhEDpGl8Pdtam_Wm0bWRU21WWpVrpurfQFxSHh0AXFEExNba3RuVybolJmKzHIXpVcyt6I7I3IXpX8VSU3HXqx-9Emlc7-wJ2bLnA9BL6LUm__fVg-TaJpN3W8O_CFbfRmzyvzKf2ABly-PcxkfDN_xuKdywX9AeNChPI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68319250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated Left Ventricular Capture Management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>CROSSLEY, GEORGE H. ; MEAD, HARDWIN ; KLECKNER, KAREN ; SHELDON, TODD ; DAVENPORT, LYNN ; HARSCH, MANYA R. ; PARIKH, PURVEE ; RAMZA, BRIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT ; BAILEY, J. RUSSELL</creator><creatorcontrib>CROSSLEY, GEORGE H. ; MEAD, HARDWIN ; KLECKNER, KAREN ; SHELDON, TODD ; DAVENPORT, LYNN ; HARSCH, MANYA R. ; PARIKH, PURVEE ; RAMZA, BRIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT ; BAILEY, J. RUSSELL ; LVCM Study Investigators ; for the LVCM Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The stimulation thresholds of left ventricular (LV) leads tend to be less reliable than conventional leads. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires continuous capture of both ventricles. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel algorithm for the automatic measurement of the stimulation threshold of LV leads in cardiac resynchronization systems. Methods: We enrolled 134 patients from 18 centers who had existing CRT‐D systems. Software capable of automatically executing LV threshold measurements was downloaded into the random access memory (RAM) of the device. The threshold was measured by pacing in the left ventricle and analyzing the interventricular conduction sensed in the right ventricle. Automatic LV threshold measurements were collected and compared with manual LV threshold tests at each follow‐up visit and using a Holter monitor system that recorded both the surface electrocardiograph (ECG) and continuous telemetry from the device. Results: The proportion of Left Ventricular Capture Management (LVCM) in‐office threshold tests within one programming step of the manual threshold test was 99.7% (306/307) with a two‐sided 95% confidence interval of (98.2%, 100.0%). The algorithm measured the threshold successfully in 96% and 97% of patients after 1 and 3 months respectively. Holter monitor analysis in a subset of patients revealed accurate performance of the algorithm. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the LVCM algorithm is safe, accurate, and highly reliable. LVCM worked with different types of leads and different lead locations. LVCM was demonstrated to be clinically equivalent to the manual LV threshold test. LVCM offers automatic measurement, output adaptation, and trends of the LV threshold and should result in improved ability to maintain LV capture without sacrificing device longevity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00840.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17897121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy ; automatic threshold measurement ; capture management ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; cardiac resynchronization therapy ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory ; Female ; Humans ; left ventricular lead ; Male ; Software ; Ventricular Function</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2007-10, Vol.30 (10), p.1190-1200</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-55076082fa922387a6b30ed33d4b23b0c4d4650c56db8b2ee3cf541d0b0ad9023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-55076082fa922387a6b30ed33d4b23b0c4d4650c56db8b2ee3cf541d0b0ad9023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2007.00840.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2007.00840.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CROSSLEY, GEORGE H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEAD, HARDWIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLECKNER, KAREN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHELDON, TODD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVENPORT, LYNN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARSCH, MANYA R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARIKH, PURVEE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMZA, BRIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHEL, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILEY, J. RUSSELL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LVCM Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the LVCM Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Automated Left Ventricular Capture Management</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Background: The stimulation thresholds of left ventricular (LV) leads tend to be less reliable than conventional leads. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires continuous capture of both ventricles. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel algorithm for the automatic measurement of the stimulation threshold of LV leads in cardiac resynchronization systems. Methods: We enrolled 134 patients from 18 centers who had existing CRT‐D systems. Software capable of automatically executing LV threshold measurements was downloaded into the random access memory (RAM) of the device. The threshold was measured by pacing in the left ventricle and analyzing the interventricular conduction sensed in the right ventricle. Automatic LV threshold measurements were collected and compared with manual LV threshold tests at each follow‐up visit and using a Holter monitor system that recorded both the surface electrocardiograph (ECG) and continuous telemetry from the device. Results: The proportion of Left Ventricular Capture Management (LVCM) in‐office threshold tests within one programming step of the manual threshold test was 99.7% (306/307) with a two‐sided 95% confidence interval of (98.2%, 100.0%). The algorithm measured the threshold successfully in 96% and 97% of patients after 1 and 3 months respectively. Holter monitor analysis in a subset of patients revealed accurate performance of the algorithm. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the LVCM algorithm is safe, accurate, and highly reliable. LVCM worked with different types of leads and different lead locations. LVCM was demonstrated to be clinically equivalent to the manual LV threshold test. LVCM offers automatic measurement, output adaptation, and trends of the LV threshold and should result in improved ability to maintain LV capture without sacrificing device longevity.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</subject><subject>automatic threshold measurement</subject><subject>capture management</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>cardiac resynchronization therapy</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Electrocardiography, Ambulatory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>left ventricular lead</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Ventricular Function</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Pg0AQhjdGo7X6Fwwnb-DsFywHD5XUakL9SLR62yywGCqUugux_feCNPXqXGaSeZ-Z5EHIweDhrq6WHuYMXIF56BGAwAMQDLzNARrtF4doBJgFrqAiPEGn1i4BwAfGj9EJDkQYYIJHyJ20TV2pRmdOrPPGWehVY4q0LZVxIrVuWqOduVqpD111mzN0lKvS6vNdH6PX2-lLdOfGj7P7aBK7KQMOLucQ-CBIrkJCqAiUn1DQGaUZSwhNIGUZ8zmk3M8SkRCtaZpzhjNIQGUhEDpGl8Pdtam_Wm0bWRU21WWpVrpurfQFxSHh0AXFEExNba3RuVybolJmKzHIXpVcyt6I7I3IXpX8VSU3HXqx-9Emlc7-wJ2bLnA9BL6LUm__fVg-TaJpN3W8O_CFbfRmzyvzKf2ABly-PcxkfDN_xuKdywX9AeNChPI</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>CROSSLEY, GEORGE H.</creator><creator>MEAD, HARDWIN</creator><creator>KLECKNER, KAREN</creator><creator>SHELDON, TODD</creator><creator>DAVENPORT, LYNN</creator><creator>HARSCH, MANYA R.</creator><creator>PARIKH, PURVEE</creator><creator>RAMZA, BRIAN</creator><creator>FISHEL, ROBERT</creator><creator>BAILEY, J. RUSSELL</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>Automated Left Ventricular Capture Management</title><author>CROSSLEY, GEORGE H. ; MEAD, HARDWIN ; KLECKNER, KAREN ; SHELDON, TODD ; DAVENPORT, LYNN ; HARSCH, MANYA R. ; PARIKH, PURVEE ; RAMZA, BRIAN ; FISHEL, ROBERT ; BAILEY, J. RUSSELL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4050-55076082fa922387a6b30ed33d4b23b0c4d4650c56db8b2ee3cf541d0b0ad9023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</topic><topic>automatic threshold measurement</topic><topic>capture management</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>cardiac resynchronization therapy</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Electrocardiography, Ambulatory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>left ventricular lead</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Ventricular Function</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CROSSLEY, GEORGE H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEAD, HARDWIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLECKNER, KAREN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHELDON, TODD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVENPORT, LYNN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARSCH, MANYA R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARIKH, PURVEE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMZA, BRIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHEL, ROBERT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILEY, J. RUSSELL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LVCM Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the LVCM Study Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CROSSLEY, GEORGE H.</au><au>MEAD, HARDWIN</au><au>KLECKNER, KAREN</au><au>SHELDON, TODD</au><au>DAVENPORT, LYNN</au><au>HARSCH, MANYA R.</au><au>PARIKH, PURVEE</au><au>RAMZA, BRIAN</au><au>FISHEL, ROBERT</au><au>BAILEY, J. RUSSELL</au><aucorp>LVCM Study Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>for the LVCM Study Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated Left Ventricular Capture Management</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1190</spage><epage>1200</epage><pages>1190-1200</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Background: The stimulation thresholds of left ventricular (LV) leads tend to be less reliable than conventional leads. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires continuous capture of both ventricles. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel algorithm for the automatic measurement of the stimulation threshold of LV leads in cardiac resynchronization systems. Methods: We enrolled 134 patients from 18 centers who had existing CRT‐D systems. Software capable of automatically executing LV threshold measurements was downloaded into the random access memory (RAM) of the device. The threshold was measured by pacing in the left ventricle and analyzing the interventricular conduction sensed in the right ventricle. Automatic LV threshold measurements were collected and compared with manual LV threshold tests at each follow‐up visit and using a Holter monitor system that recorded both the surface electrocardiograph (ECG) and continuous telemetry from the device. Results: The proportion of Left Ventricular Capture Management (LVCM) in‐office threshold tests within one programming step of the manual threshold test was 99.7% (306/307) with a two‐sided 95% confidence interval of (98.2%, 100.0%). The algorithm measured the threshold successfully in 96% and 97% of patients after 1 and 3 months respectively. Holter monitor analysis in a subset of patients revealed accurate performance of the algorithm. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the LVCM algorithm is safe, accurate, and highly reliable. LVCM worked with different types of leads and different lead locations. LVCM was demonstrated to be clinically equivalent to the manual LV threshold test. LVCM offers automatic measurement, output adaptation, and trends of the LV threshold and should result in improved ability to maintain LV capture without sacrificing device longevity.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17897121</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00840.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2007-10, Vol.30 (10), p.1190-1200
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68319250
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy
automatic threshold measurement
capture management
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
cardiac resynchronization therapy
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electrocardiography, Ambulatory
Female
Humans
left ventricular lead
Male
Software
Ventricular Function
title Automated Left Ventricular Capture Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T23%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20Left%20Ventricular%20Capture%20Management&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=CROSSLEY,%20GEORGE%20H.&rft.aucorp=LVCM%20Study%20Investigators&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1190&rft.epage=1200&rft.pages=1190-1200&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00840.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68319250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68319250&rft_id=info:pmid/17897121&rfr_iscdi=true