Treatment of Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia in Children Three to Less Than 10 Years of Age

Purpose To determine the amount and time course of binocular visual acuity improvement during treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children three to less than 10 years of age. Design Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative intervention. Methods One hundred and thirteen children (mean age,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2007-10, Vol.144 (4), p.487-496
Hauptverfasser: Wallace, David K, Chandler, Danielle L, Beck, Roy W, Arnold, Robert W, Bacal, Darron A, Birch, Eileen E, Felius, Joost, Frazier, Marcela, Holmes, Jonathan M, Hoover, Darren, Klimek, Deborah A, Lorenzana, Ingryd, Quinn, Graham E, Repka, Michael X, Suh, Donny W, Tamkins, Susanna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 496
container_issue 4
container_start_page 487
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 144
creator Wallace, David K
Chandler, Danielle L
Beck, Roy W
Arnold, Robert W
Bacal, Darron A
Birch, Eileen E
Felius, Joost
Frazier, Marcela
Holmes, Jonathan M
Hoover, Darren
Klimek, Deborah A
Lorenzana, Ingryd
Quinn, Graham E
Repka, Michael X
Suh, Donny W
Tamkins, Susanna
description Purpose To determine the amount and time course of binocular visual acuity improvement during treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children three to less than 10 years of age. Design Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative intervention. Methods One hundred and thirteen children (mean age, 5.1 years) with previously untreated bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled at 27 community- and university-based sites and were provided with optimal spectacle correction. Bilateral refractive amblyopia was defined as 20/40 to 20/400 best-corrected binocular visual acuity in the presence of 4.00 diopters (D) or more of hypermetropia by spherical equivalent, 2.00 D or more of astigmatism, or both in each eye. Best-corrected binocular and monocular visual acuities were measured at baseline and at five, 13, 26, and 52 weeks. The primary study outcome was binocular acuity at one year. Results Mean binocular visual acuity improved from 0.50 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units (20/63) at baseline to 0.11 logMAR units (20/25) at one year (mean improvement, 3.9 lines; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5 to 4.2). Mean improvement at one year for the 84 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/40 to 20/80 was 3.4 lines (95% CI, 3.2 to 3.7) and for the 16 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/100 to 20/320 was 6.3 lines (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5). The cumulative probability of binocular visual acuity of 20/25 or better was 21% at five weeks, 46% at 13 weeks, 59% at 26 weeks, and 74% at 52 weeks. Conclusions Treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia with spectacle correction improves binocular visual acuity in children three to less than 10 years of age, with most improving to 20/25 or better within one year.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68314422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002939407005259</els_id><sourcerecordid>68314422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-d2ba90dffee01a8984bf2a2bbe53079ca68de7218a3c3cbcccaddf753eee28063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt-L1DAQx4Mo3t7pH-CLBETfWidJ2zQIB-ty_oAFQdcHfQlpOvVS23RNugf735uyiwf34FMY-Mx3Jh-GkBcMcgasetvnpp9yDiBzKHMo4BFZsVqqjNWKPSYrAOCZEqq4IJcx9qmsZCGfkgsmJUghYEV-7gKaeUQ_06mj791gZgxmoF-xC8bO7g7pemyG47R3hjpPN7duaAN6ursNiHSe6BZjTJXxlAH9gSbEJWn9C5-RJ50ZIj4_v1fk-4eb3eZTtv3y8fNmvc1sKcWctbwxCtquQwRmalUXTccNbxosBUhlTVW3KDmrjbDCNtZa07adLAUi8hoqcUXenHL3YfpzwDjr0UWLw2A8Toeoq1qwouA8ga8egP10CD7tpllVFEpWsiwSxU6UDVOMATu9D2404agZ6EW77nXSrhftGkqdtKeel-fkQzNie99x9pyA12fARGuG5NZbF_9xKatUdVUm7t2JwyTszmHQ0Tr0FlsX0M66ndx_17h-0G0H510a-BuPGO9_qyPXoL8t97GcB8g0n5dK_AXMqrOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1644976754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia in Children Three to Less Than 10 Years of Age</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wallace, David K ; Chandler, Danielle L ; Beck, Roy W ; Arnold, Robert W ; Bacal, Darron A ; Birch, Eileen E ; Felius, Joost ; Frazier, Marcela ; Holmes, Jonathan M ; Hoover, Darren ; Klimek, Deborah A ; Lorenzana, Ingryd ; Quinn, Graham E ; Repka, Michael X ; Suh, Donny W ; Tamkins, Susanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David K ; Chandler, Danielle L ; Beck, Roy W ; Arnold, Robert W ; Bacal, Darron A ; Birch, Eileen E ; Felius, Joost ; Frazier, Marcela ; Holmes, Jonathan M ; Hoover, Darren ; Klimek, Deborah A ; Lorenzana, Ingryd ; Quinn, Graham E ; Repka, Michael X ; Suh, Donny W ; Tamkins, Susanna ; The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group ; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine the amount and time course of binocular visual acuity improvement during treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children three to less than 10 years of age. Design Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative intervention. Methods One hundred and thirteen children (mean age, 5.1 years) with previously untreated bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled at 27 community- and university-based sites and were provided with optimal spectacle correction. Bilateral refractive amblyopia was defined as 20/40 to 20/400 best-corrected binocular visual acuity in the presence of 4.00 diopters (D) or more of hypermetropia by spherical equivalent, 2.00 D or more of astigmatism, or both in each eye. Best-corrected binocular and monocular visual acuities were measured at baseline and at five, 13, 26, and 52 weeks. The primary study outcome was binocular acuity at one year. Results Mean binocular visual acuity improved from 0.50 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units (20/63) at baseline to 0.11 logMAR units (20/25) at one year (mean improvement, 3.9 lines; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5 to 4.2). Mean improvement at one year for the 84 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/40 to 20/80 was 3.4 lines (95% CI, 3.2 to 3.7) and for the 16 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/100 to 20/320 was 6.3 lines (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5). The cumulative probability of binocular visual acuity of 20/25 or better was 21% at five weeks, 46% at 13 weeks, 59% at 26 weeks, and 74% at 52 weeks. Conclusions Treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia with spectacle correction improves binocular visual acuity in children three to less than 10 years of age, with most improving to 20/25 or better within one year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17707330</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Amblyopia - physiopathology ; Amblyopia - therapy ; Astigmatism ; Astigmatism - physiopathology ; Astigmatism - therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Confidence intervals ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Eyeglasses ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hyperopia - physiopathology ; Hyperopia - therapy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Miscellaneous ; Myopia ; Ophthalmology ; Prospective Studies ; Statistical methods ; Traffic accidents &amp; safety ; Treatment Outcome ; Vision disorders ; Vision, Binocular - physiology ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2007-10, Vol.144 (4), p.487-496</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-d2ba90dffee01a8984bf2a2bbe53079ca68de7218a3c3cbcccaddf753eee28063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-d2ba90dffee01a8984bf2a2bbe53079ca68de7218a3c3cbcccaddf753eee28063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20059865$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17707330$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, Danielle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Roy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacal, Darron A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birch, Eileen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felius, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Jonathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimek, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzana, Ingryd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Graham E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repka, Michael X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Donny W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamkins, Susanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia in Children Three to Less Than 10 Years of Age</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine the amount and time course of binocular visual acuity improvement during treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children three to less than 10 years of age. Design Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative intervention. Methods One hundred and thirteen children (mean age, 5.1 years) with previously untreated bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled at 27 community- and university-based sites and were provided with optimal spectacle correction. Bilateral refractive amblyopia was defined as 20/40 to 20/400 best-corrected binocular visual acuity in the presence of 4.00 diopters (D) or more of hypermetropia by spherical equivalent, 2.00 D or more of astigmatism, or both in each eye. Best-corrected binocular and monocular visual acuities were measured at baseline and at five, 13, 26, and 52 weeks. The primary study outcome was binocular acuity at one year. Results Mean binocular visual acuity improved from 0.50 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units (20/63) at baseline to 0.11 logMAR units (20/25) at one year (mean improvement, 3.9 lines; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5 to 4.2). Mean improvement at one year for the 84 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/40 to 20/80 was 3.4 lines (95% CI, 3.2 to 3.7) and for the 16 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/100 to 20/320 was 6.3 lines (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5). The cumulative probability of binocular visual acuity of 20/25 or better was 21% at five weeks, 46% at 13 weeks, 59% at 26 weeks, and 74% at 52 weeks. Conclusions Treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia with spectacle correction improves binocular visual acuity in children three to less than 10 years of age, with most improving to 20/25 or better within one year.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Amblyopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Amblyopia - therapy</subject><subject>Astigmatism</subject><subject>Astigmatism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Astigmatism - therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Eyeglasses</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hyperopia - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vision disorders</subject><subject>Vision, Binocular - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt-L1DAQx4Mo3t7pH-CLBETfWidJ2zQIB-ty_oAFQdcHfQlpOvVS23RNugf735uyiwf34FMY-Mx3Jh-GkBcMcgasetvnpp9yDiBzKHMo4BFZsVqqjNWKPSYrAOCZEqq4IJcx9qmsZCGfkgsmJUghYEV-7gKaeUQ_06mj791gZgxmoF-xC8bO7g7pemyG47R3hjpPN7duaAN6ursNiHSe6BZjTJXxlAH9gSbEJWn9C5-RJ50ZIj4_v1fk-4eb3eZTtv3y8fNmvc1sKcWctbwxCtquQwRmalUXTccNbxosBUhlTVW3KDmrjbDCNtZa07adLAUi8hoqcUXenHL3YfpzwDjr0UWLw2A8Toeoq1qwouA8ga8egP10CD7tpllVFEpWsiwSxU6UDVOMATu9D2404agZ6EW77nXSrhftGkqdtKeel-fkQzNie99x9pyA12fARGuG5NZbF_9xKatUdVUm7t2JwyTszmHQ0Tr0FlsX0M66ndx_17h-0G0H510a-BuPGO9_qyPXoL8t97GcB8g0n5dK_AXMqrOI</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Wallace, David K</creator><creator>Chandler, Danielle L</creator><creator>Beck, Roy W</creator><creator>Arnold, Robert W</creator><creator>Bacal, Darron A</creator><creator>Birch, Eileen E</creator><creator>Felius, Joost</creator><creator>Frazier, Marcela</creator><creator>Holmes, Jonathan M</creator><creator>Hoover, Darren</creator><creator>Klimek, Deborah A</creator><creator>Lorenzana, Ingryd</creator><creator>Quinn, Graham E</creator><creator>Repka, Michael X</creator><creator>Suh, Donny W</creator><creator>Tamkins, Susanna</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Treatment of Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia in Children Three to Less Than 10 Years of Age</title><author>Wallace, David K ; Chandler, Danielle L ; Beck, Roy W ; Arnold, Robert W ; Bacal, Darron A ; Birch, Eileen E ; Felius, Joost ; Frazier, Marcela ; Holmes, Jonathan M ; Hoover, Darren ; Klimek, Deborah A ; Lorenzana, Ingryd ; Quinn, Graham E ; Repka, Michael X ; Suh, Donny W ; Tamkins, Susanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-d2ba90dffee01a8984bf2a2bbe53079ca68de7218a3c3cbcccaddf753eee28063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Amblyopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Amblyopia - therapy</topic><topic>Astigmatism</topic><topic>Astigmatism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Astigmatism - therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Eyeglasses</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hyperopia - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vision disorders</topic><topic>Vision, Binocular - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, Danielle L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Roy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacal, Darron A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birch, Eileen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felius, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Marcela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Jonathan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimek, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzana, Ingryd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Graham E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repka, Michael X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Donny W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamkins, Susanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wallace, David K</au><au>Chandler, Danielle L</au><au>Beck, Roy W</au><au>Arnold, Robert W</au><au>Bacal, Darron A</au><au>Birch, Eileen E</au><au>Felius, Joost</au><au>Frazier, Marcela</au><au>Holmes, Jonathan M</au><au>Hoover, Darren</au><au>Klimek, Deborah A</au><au>Lorenzana, Ingryd</au><au>Quinn, Graham E</au><au>Repka, Michael X</au><au>Suh, Donny W</au><au>Tamkins, Susanna</au><aucorp>The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group</aucorp><aucorp>Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia in Children Three to Less Than 10 Years of Age</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>487-496</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>Purpose To determine the amount and time course of binocular visual acuity improvement during treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia in children three to less than 10 years of age. Design Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative intervention. Methods One hundred and thirteen children (mean age, 5.1 years) with previously untreated bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled at 27 community- and university-based sites and were provided with optimal spectacle correction. Bilateral refractive amblyopia was defined as 20/40 to 20/400 best-corrected binocular visual acuity in the presence of 4.00 diopters (D) or more of hypermetropia by spherical equivalent, 2.00 D or more of astigmatism, or both in each eye. Best-corrected binocular and monocular visual acuities were measured at baseline and at five, 13, 26, and 52 weeks. The primary study outcome was binocular acuity at one year. Results Mean binocular visual acuity improved from 0.50 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units (20/63) at baseline to 0.11 logMAR units (20/25) at one year (mean improvement, 3.9 lines; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5 to 4.2). Mean improvement at one year for the 84 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/40 to 20/80 was 3.4 lines (95% CI, 3.2 to 3.7) and for the 16 children with baseline binocular acuity of 20/100 to 20/320 was 6.3 lines (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.5). The cumulative probability of binocular visual acuity of 20/25 or better was 21% at five weeks, 46% at 13 weeks, 59% at 26 weeks, and 74% at 52 weeks. Conclusions Treatment of bilateral refractive amblyopia with spectacle correction improves binocular visual acuity in children three to less than 10 years of age, with most improving to 20/25 or better within one year.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17707330</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.040</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2007-10, Vol.144 (4), p.487-496
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68314422
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Age
Amblyopia - physiopathology
Amblyopia - therapy
Astigmatism
Astigmatism - physiopathology
Astigmatism - therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
Confidence intervals
Diabetic retinopathy
Eyeglasses
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hyperopia - physiopathology
Hyperopia - therapy
Male
Medical sciences
Medical treatment
Miscellaneous
Myopia
Ophthalmology
Prospective Studies
Statistical methods
Traffic accidents & safety
Treatment Outcome
Vision disorders
Vision, Binocular - physiology
Visual Acuity - physiology
title Treatment of Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia in Children Three to Less Than 10 Years of Age
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A48%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Bilateral%20Refractive%20Amblyopia%20in%20Children%20Three%20to%20Less%20Than%2010%20Years%20of%20Age&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Wallace,%20David%20K&rft.aucorp=The%20Pediatric%20Eye%20Disease%20Investigator%20Group&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=487-496&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68314422%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1644976754&rft_id=info:pmid/17707330&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002939407005259&rfr_iscdi=true