Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre

Abstract Background: To evaluate the calibration errors of all Goldmann applanation tonometers used clinically in the Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia (VGH/UBC) Eye Care Centre. Methods: All Goldmann tonometers used for patient care in the VGH/UBC Eye Care Centre were indivi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of ophthalmology 2007-10, Vol.42 (5), p.712-714
Hauptverfasser: Chuo, J.Y., MD, Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 714
container_issue 5
container_start_page 712
container_title Canadian journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 42
creator Chuo, J.Y., MD
Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC
description Abstract Background: To evaluate the calibration errors of all Goldmann applanation tonometers used clinically in the Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia (VGH/UBC) Eye Care Centre. Methods: All Goldmann tonometers used for patient care in the VGH/UBC Eye Care Centre were individually assessed for calibration errors.The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration weight bar at 3 pressure levels (0, 20, 60 mm Hg). Calibration errors were classified into 3 categories: ±0.5 mm Hg, ±1.0 mm Hg, or ±1.5 mm Hg or more. Ophthalmologists using tonometers with calibration errors >±1.0 mm Hg were notified, with the suggestion that the tonometers be returned to the manufacturer for recalibration. Results: A total of 25 tonometers were evaluated. At the 20 mm Hg level, 17 (68%) fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of ±0.5 mm Hg, and 2 (8%) had errors of ±1.0 mm Hg, resulting in 19 tonometers (76%) with errors of ±1.0 mm Hg. Six tonometers (24%) were identified as having calibration errors greater than ±1.0 mm Hg. Interpretation: Calibration error of ±1.0 mm Hg or less is clinically acceptable. Seventy-six percent of the Goldmann applanation tonometers in the Eye Care Centre were in the acceptable calibration range. As the number of acceptably calibrated tonometers was high, despite the infrequency of recent calibration, we feel that monthly evaluation of Goldmann tonometers is suitable.
doi_str_mv 10.3129/i07-142
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68308455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0008418207800123</els_id><sourcerecordid>68308455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-40de5d5c12b99c92d9a8c4f823074a786d5dad43c643d9f026c99498311ea9c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LxDAQhoMoun7gP5Ce9FSdfLRNLoIsugqCB_UcsskUom2iSVfw35tlFwTxkgnhmZfJM4ScUrjklKkrD11NBdshM9rRpua8hV0yAwBZCyrZATnM-Q2A8060--SAdlJRquSMLOZm8MtkJh9DhSnFlKvYV4s4uNGEUE0xxBEnLM8-VKYqt8mb9F3hN1bWpHJgmBIek73eDBlPtvWIvN7dvszv68enxcP85rG2vGunWoDDxjWWsqVSVjGnjLSil4xDJ0wnW9c44wS3reBO9cBaq5RQklOKRtmWH5HzTe5Hip8rzJMefbY4DCZgXGXdSg5SNE0BLzagTTHnhL3-SH4sk2sKeu1MF2e6OCvk2TZytRzR_XJbSQWgGwDLx748Jp2tx2DR-YR20i76f0Kv__TYwQdvzfBezOW3uEqheNJUZ6ZBP69Xtd4UdBKAMs5_AEJuizA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68308455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chuo, J.Y., MD ; Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuo, J.Y., MD ; Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background: To evaluate the calibration errors of all Goldmann applanation tonometers used clinically in the Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia (VGH/UBC) Eye Care Centre. Methods: All Goldmann tonometers used for patient care in the VGH/UBC Eye Care Centre were individually assessed for calibration errors.The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration weight bar at 3 pressure levels (0, 20, 60 mm Hg). Calibration errors were classified into 3 categories: ±0.5 mm Hg, ±1.0 mm Hg, or ±1.5 mm Hg or more. Ophthalmologists using tonometers with calibration errors &gt;±1.0 mm Hg were notified, with the suggestion that the tonometers be returned to the manufacturer for recalibration. Results: A total of 25 tonometers were evaluated. At the 20 mm Hg level, 17 (68%) fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of ±0.5 mm Hg, and 2 (8%) had errors of ±1.0 mm Hg, resulting in 19 tonometers (76%) with errors of ±1.0 mm Hg. Six tonometers (24%) were identified as having calibration errors greater than ±1.0 mm Hg. Interpretation: Calibration error of ±1.0 mm Hg or less is clinically acceptable. Seventy-six percent of the Goldmann applanation tonometers in the Eye Care Centre were in the acceptable calibration range. As the number of acceptably calibrated tonometers was high, despite the infrequency of recent calibration, we feel that monthly evaluation of Goldmann tonometers is suitable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-3360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3129/i07-142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17891198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>British Columbia ; Calibration - standards ; calibration error ; Goldmann ; Health Facilities ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Intraocular Pressure ; Ophthalmology ; Quality Control ; Reproducibility of Results ; tonometer ; Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation ; Tonometry, Ocular - standards</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2007-10, Vol.42 (5), p.712-714</ispartof><rights>Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><rights>2007 Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-40de5d5c12b99c92d9a8c4f823074a786d5dad43c643d9f026c99498311ea9c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-40de5d5c12b99c92d9a8c4f823074a786d5dad43c643d9f026c99498311ea9c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008418207800123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17891198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuo, J.Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><title>Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre</title><title>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background: To evaluate the calibration errors of all Goldmann applanation tonometers used clinically in the Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia (VGH/UBC) Eye Care Centre. Methods: All Goldmann tonometers used for patient care in the VGH/UBC Eye Care Centre were individually assessed for calibration errors.The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration weight bar at 3 pressure levels (0, 20, 60 mm Hg). Calibration errors were classified into 3 categories: ±0.5 mm Hg, ±1.0 mm Hg, or ±1.5 mm Hg or more. Ophthalmologists using tonometers with calibration errors &gt;±1.0 mm Hg were notified, with the suggestion that the tonometers be returned to the manufacturer for recalibration. Results: A total of 25 tonometers were evaluated. At the 20 mm Hg level, 17 (68%) fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of ±0.5 mm Hg, and 2 (8%) had errors of ±1.0 mm Hg, resulting in 19 tonometers (76%) with errors of ±1.0 mm Hg. Six tonometers (24%) were identified as having calibration errors greater than ±1.0 mm Hg. Interpretation: Calibration error of ±1.0 mm Hg or less is clinically acceptable. Seventy-six percent of the Goldmann applanation tonometers in the Eye Care Centre were in the acceptable calibration range. As the number of acceptably calibrated tonometers was high, despite the infrequency of recent calibration, we feel that monthly evaluation of Goldmann tonometers is suitable.</description><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Calibration - standards</subject><subject>calibration error</subject><subject>Goldmann</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>tonometer</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - standards</subject><issn>0008-4182</issn><issn>1715-3360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1LxDAQhoMoun7gP5Ce9FSdfLRNLoIsugqCB_UcsskUom2iSVfw35tlFwTxkgnhmZfJM4ScUrjklKkrD11NBdshM9rRpua8hV0yAwBZCyrZATnM-Q2A8060--SAdlJRquSMLOZm8MtkJh9DhSnFlKvYV4s4uNGEUE0xxBEnLM8-VKYqt8mb9F3hN1bWpHJgmBIek73eDBlPtvWIvN7dvszv68enxcP85rG2vGunWoDDxjWWsqVSVjGnjLSil4xDJ0wnW9c44wS3reBO9cBaq5RQklOKRtmWH5HzTe5Hip8rzJMefbY4DCZgXGXdSg5SNE0BLzagTTHnhL3-SH4sk2sKeu1MF2e6OCvk2TZytRzR_XJbSQWgGwDLx748Jp2tx2DR-YR20i76f0Kv__TYwQdvzfBezOW3uEqheNJUZ6ZBP69Xtd4UdBKAMs5_AEJuizA</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Chuo, J.Y., MD</creator><creator>Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre</title><author>Chuo, J.Y., MD ; Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-40de5d5c12b99c92d9a8c4f823074a786d5dad43c643d9f026c99498311ea9c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Calibration - standards</topic><topic>calibration error</topic><topic>Goldmann</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>tonometer</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuo, J.Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuo, J.Y., MD</au><au>Mikelberg, F.S., MD, CM, FRCSC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>712</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>712-714</pages><issn>0008-4182</issn><eissn>1715-3360</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background: To evaluate the calibration errors of all Goldmann applanation tonometers used clinically in the Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia (VGH/UBC) Eye Care Centre. Methods: All Goldmann tonometers used for patient care in the VGH/UBC Eye Care Centre were individually assessed for calibration errors.The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration weight bar at 3 pressure levels (0, 20, 60 mm Hg). Calibration errors were classified into 3 categories: ±0.5 mm Hg, ±1.0 mm Hg, or ±1.5 mm Hg or more. Ophthalmologists using tonometers with calibration errors &gt;±1.0 mm Hg were notified, with the suggestion that the tonometers be returned to the manufacturer for recalibration. Results: A total of 25 tonometers were evaluated. At the 20 mm Hg level, 17 (68%) fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of ±0.5 mm Hg, and 2 (8%) had errors of ±1.0 mm Hg, resulting in 19 tonometers (76%) with errors of ±1.0 mm Hg. Six tonometers (24%) were identified as having calibration errors greater than ±1.0 mm Hg. Interpretation: Calibration error of ±1.0 mm Hg or less is clinically acceptable. Seventy-six percent of the Goldmann applanation tonometers in the Eye Care Centre were in the acceptable calibration range. As the number of acceptably calibrated tonometers was high, despite the infrequency of recent calibration, we feel that monthly evaluation of Goldmann tonometers is suitable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17891198</pmid><doi>10.3129/i07-142</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4182
ispartof Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2007-10, Vol.42 (5), p.712-714
issn 0008-4182
1715-3360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68308455
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects British Columbia
Calibration - standards
calibration error
Goldmann
Health Facilities
Humans
Internal Medicine
Intraocular Pressure
Ophthalmology
Quality Control
Reproducibility of Results
tonometer
Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation
Tonometry, Ocular - standards
title Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A30%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibration%20errors%20of%20Goldmann%20tonometers%20in%20a%20tertiary%20eye%20care%20centre&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Chuo,%20J.Y.,%20MD&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=712&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=712-714&rft.issn=0008-4182&rft.eissn=1715-3360&rft_id=info:doi/10.3129/i07-142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68308455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68308455&rft_id=info:pmid/17891198&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0008418207800123&rfr_iscdi=true