Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI

An ongoing controversy concerns whether executive control mechanisms can actively reconfigure the cognitive system in preparation for switching to a new task set. To address this question, we recorded brain activity from 14 healthy participants, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2006-09, Vol.6 (3), p.175-189
Hauptverfasser: SLAGTER, H. A, WEISSMAN, D. H, GIESBRECHT, B, KENEMANS, J. L, MANGUN, G. R, KOK, A, WOLDORFF, M. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 189
container_issue 3
container_start_page 175
container_title Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience
container_volume 6
creator SLAGTER, H. A
WEISSMAN, D. H
GIESBRECHT, B
KENEMANS, J. L
MANGUN, G. R
KOK, A
WOLDORFF, M. G
description An ongoing controversy concerns whether executive control mechanisms can actively reconfigure the cognitive system in preparation for switching to a new task set. To address this question, we recorded brain activity from 14 healthy participants, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, while they performed a cued attention task. Critically, in any particular trial, the cued task set was either the same as that in the previous trial or switched. As was hypothesized, cue-related, switch-specific preparatory activity was observed in a network of dorsal frontal and parietal brain areas that are typically associated with cognitive control processes. Moreover, the magnitude of switch-specific preparatory activity varied with the number of possible task sets that could be presented in a given trial block. These findings provide compelling support for the existence of top-down, preparatory control processes that enable set switching. Furthermore, they demonstrate that global task structure is a critical determinant of whether switch-specific preparatory activity is observed.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/CABN.6.3.175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68300869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20305909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3305-6248b48c7bda63e494415c3e6ad8030d676af27d80bbb0904077e824e6b663813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_Agiu-bZ1kEPbk1yeS1x1p8gQ8oCt5Cdne2rmx3a7IV-u1NbaHgxVMm8JuZhD8hJ4wOQEtzNRpePw_UAAZMyy2yzySwlIF83_6taaopV3vkIIRPSqnggu-SPaa5AJBin4yvvavbxOOk7tqQuKKvv12PZZIvEmzLboJtNw_JzOPMedd3fpEE7JPwUVd93U4SF2LvN7pm1VI9jR-OyE7lmoDH6_OQvN3evI7u08eXu4fR8DEtAKhMFRcmF6bQeekUoMiEYLIAVK40FGiptHIV1_GS5znNqKBao-ECVa4UGAaH5GI1d-a7rzmG3k7rUGDTuBbjm60yQKlR2b-Qx3Uyo0t49gd-dnPfxk9EI4TgIFVElytU-C4Ej5Wd-Xrq_MIyapeJ2GUiVlmwMZHIT9cz5_kUyw1eRxDB-Rq4ULim8q4t6rBxBhRIncEPQIORNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204442356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>SLAGTER, H. A ; WEISSMAN, D. H ; GIESBRECHT, B ; KENEMANS, J. L ; MANGUN, G. R ; KOK, A ; WOLDORFF, M. G</creator><creatorcontrib>SLAGTER, H. A ; WEISSMAN, D. H ; GIESBRECHT, B ; KENEMANS, J. L ; MANGUN, G. R ; KOK, A ; WOLDORFF, M. G</creatorcontrib><description>An ongoing controversy concerns whether executive control mechanisms can actively reconfigure the cognitive system in preparation for switching to a new task set. To address this question, we recorded brain activity from 14 healthy participants, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, while they performed a cued attention task. Critically, in any particular trial, the cued task set was either the same as that in the previous trial or switched. As was hypothesized, cue-related, switch-specific preparatory activity was observed in a network of dorsal frontal and parietal brain areas that are typically associated with cognitive control processes. Moreover, the magnitude of switch-specific preparatory activity varied with the number of possible task sets that could be presented in a given trial block. These findings provide compelling support for the existence of top-down, preparatory control processes that enable set switching. Furthermore, they demonstrate that global task structure is a critical determinant of whether switch-specific preparatory activity is observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-135X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/CABN.6.3.175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17243354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Anatomical correlates of behavior ; Attention - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - blood supply ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Cognition - physiology ; Cues ; Female ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Oxygen - blood ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Set (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience, 2006-09, Vol.6 (3), p.175-189</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3305-6248b48c7bda63e494415c3e6ad8030d676af27d80bbb0904077e824e6b663813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18363579$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17243354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SLAGTER, H. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEISSMAN, D. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIESBRECHT, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KENEMANS, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANGUN, G. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLDORFF, M. G</creatorcontrib><title>Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI</title><title>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</title><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><description>An ongoing controversy concerns whether executive control mechanisms can actively reconfigure the cognitive system in preparation for switching to a new task set. To address this question, we recorded brain activity from 14 healthy participants, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, while they performed a cued attention task. Critically, in any particular trial, the cued task set was either the same as that in the previous trial or switched. As was hypothesized, cue-related, switch-specific preparatory activity was observed in a network of dorsal frontal and parietal brain areas that are typically associated with cognitive control processes. Moreover, the magnitude of switch-specific preparatory activity varied with the number of possible task sets that could be presented in a given trial block. These findings provide compelling support for the existence of top-down, preparatory control processes that enable set switching. Furthermore, they demonstrate that global task structure is a critical determinant of whether switch-specific preparatory activity is observed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anatomical correlates of behavior</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - blood supply</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><issn>1530-7026</issn><issn>1531-135X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_Agiu-bZ1kEPbk1yeS1x1p8gQ8oCt5Cdne2rmx3a7IV-u1NbaHgxVMm8JuZhD8hJ4wOQEtzNRpePw_UAAZMyy2yzySwlIF83_6taaopV3vkIIRPSqnggu-SPaa5AJBin4yvvavbxOOk7tqQuKKvv12PZZIvEmzLboJtNw_JzOPMedd3fpEE7JPwUVd93U4SF2LvN7pm1VI9jR-OyE7lmoDH6_OQvN3evI7u08eXu4fR8DEtAKhMFRcmF6bQeekUoMiEYLIAVK40FGiptHIV1_GS5znNqKBao-ECVa4UGAaH5GI1d-a7rzmG3k7rUGDTuBbjm60yQKlR2b-Qx3Uyo0t49gd-dnPfxk9EI4TgIFVElytU-C4Ej5Wd-Xrq_MIyapeJ2GUiVlmwMZHIT9cz5_kUyw1eRxDB-Rq4ULim8q4t6rBxBhRIncEPQIORNQ</recordid><startdate>200609</startdate><enddate>200609</enddate><creator>SLAGTER, H. A</creator><creator>WEISSMAN, D. H</creator><creator>GIESBRECHT, B</creator><creator>KENEMANS, J. L</creator><creator>MANGUN, G. R</creator><creator>KOK, A</creator><creator>WOLDORFF, M. G</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200609</creationdate><title>Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI</title><author>SLAGTER, H. A ; WEISSMAN, D. H ; GIESBRECHT, B ; KENEMANS, J. L ; MANGUN, G. R ; KOK, A ; WOLDORFF, M. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3305-6248b48c7bda63e494415c3e6ad8030d676af27d80bbb0904077e824e6b663813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anatomical correlates of behavior</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - blood supply</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SLAGTER, H. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEISSMAN, D. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIESBRECHT, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KENEMANS, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANGUN, G. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOK, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLDORFF, M. G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SLAGTER, H. A</au><au>WEISSMAN, D. H</au><au>GIESBRECHT, B</au><au>KENEMANS, J. L</au><au>MANGUN, G. R</au><au>KOK, A</au><au>WOLDORFF, M. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><date>2006-09</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>175-189</pages><issn>1530-7026</issn><eissn>1531-135X</eissn><abstract>An ongoing controversy concerns whether executive control mechanisms can actively reconfigure the cognitive system in preparation for switching to a new task set. To address this question, we recorded brain activity from 14 healthy participants, using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging, while they performed a cued attention task. Critically, in any particular trial, the cued task set was either the same as that in the previous trial or switched. As was hypothesized, cue-related, switch-specific preparatory activity was observed in a network of dorsal frontal and parietal brain areas that are typically associated with cognitive control processes. Moreover, the magnitude of switch-specific preparatory activity varied with the number of possible task sets that could be presented in a given trial block. These findings provide compelling support for the existence of top-down, preparatory control processes that enable set switching. Furthermore, they demonstrate that global task structure is a critical determinant of whether switch-specific preparatory activity is observed.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>17243354</pmid><doi>10.3758/CABN.6.3.175</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-7026
ispartof Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2006-09, Vol.6 (3), p.175-189
issn 1530-7026
1531-135X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68300869
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Anatomical correlates of behavior
Attention - physiology
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - blood supply
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
Cognition - physiology
Cues
Female
Functional Laterality - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Oxygen - blood
Photic Stimulation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Set (Psychology)
title Brain regions activated by endogenous preparatory set shifting as revealed by fMRI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brain%20regions%20activated%20by%20endogenous%20preparatory%20set%20shifting%20as%20revealed%20by%20fMRI&rft.jtitle=Cognitive,%20affective,%20&%20behavioral%20neuroscience&rft.au=SLAGTER,%20H.%20A&rft.date=2006-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=175-189&rft.issn=1530-7026&rft.eissn=1531-135X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/CABN.6.3.175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20305909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204442356&rft_id=info:pmid/17243354&rfr_iscdi=true