Methods for Measuring Denitrification: Diverse Approaches to a Difficult Problem
Denitrification, the reduction of the nitrogen (N) oxides, nitrate (NO₃⁺) and nitrite (NO₂⁺), to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and dinitrogen (N₂), is important to primary production, water quality, and the chemistry and physics of the atmosphere at ecosystem, landscape, regional...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2006-12, Vol.16 (6), p.2091-2122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2122 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2091 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Groffman, Peter M. Altabet, Mark A. Böhlke, J. K. Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus David, Mark B. Firestone, Mary K. Giblin, Anne E. Kana, Todd M. Nielsen, Lars Peter Voytek, Mary A. |
description | Denitrification, the reduction of the nitrogen (N) oxides, nitrate (NO₃⁺) and nitrite (NO₂⁺), to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and dinitrogen (N₂), is important to primary production, water quality, and the chemistry and physics of the atmosphere at ecosystem, landscape, regional, and global scales. Unfortunately, this process is very difficult to measure, and existing methods are problematic for different reasons in different places at different times. In this paper, we review the major approaches that have been taken to measure denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic environments and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and future prospects for the different methods. Methodological approaches covered include (1) acetylene-based methods, (2) ₁₅N tracers, (3) direct N₂ quantification, (4) N₂:Ar ratio quantification, (5) mass balance approaches, (6) stoichiometric approaches, (7) methods based on stable isotopes, (8) in situ gradients with atmospheric environmental tracers, and (9) molecular approaches. Our review makes it clear that the prospects for improved quantification of denitrification vary greatly in different environments and at different scales. While current methodology allows for the production of accurate estimates of denitrification at scales relevant to water and air quality and ecosystem fertility questions in some systems (e.g., aquatic sediments, well-defined aquifers), methodology for other systems, especially upland terrestrial areas, still needs development. Comparison of mass balance and stoichiometric approaches that constrain estimates of denitrification at large scales with point measurements (made using multiple methods), in multiple systems, is likely to propel more improvement in denitrification methods over the next few years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2091:MFMDDA]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68282741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40061945</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40061945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6121-4eed9e5536698211b386d8e4dbe5ac1c3239505ff8f582a378e1400c74aa6ab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkU9v1DAQxSMEon_gI4ByQuWQxTOJHbs9rXbbUqmrXQk4IWQ5yYS6yq63dkLVb4-jLHBEqi9jjX9-Y7-XJJ-AzUAqFiuHjJUCzpAx8ZGB-I5MwfnqarVczn_gjM0W6wt8kRyDylXGucSXcf_n1lFyEsI9iwsRXydHUCLjUsFxsllRf-eakLbOpysyYfB29zNd0s723ra2Nr11u_N0aX-RD5TO93vvTH1HIe1damK_jdDQ9enGu6qj7ZvkVWu6QG8P9TT5dnX5dfE5u11f3yzmt1ktACEriBpFnOdCKIkAVS5FI6loKuKmhjrHXHHG21a28S8mLyVBwVhdFsYIU6n8NPkw6cb3PAwUer21oaauMztyQ9BCosSygP-CoDgWHFkEryew9i4ET63ee7s1_kkD02MKevRTj37qMQUdU9BjCnpKQaNmerHWGJXeH0YO1ZaafzoH2yPwZQIebUdPz52jL-ebEQAhxuOo-m5SvQ-9839VixFRBc9_A9RApjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19524520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for Measuring Denitrification: Diverse Approaches to a Difficult Problem</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Groffman, Peter M. ; Altabet, Mark A. ; Böhlke, J. K. ; Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus ; David, Mark B. ; Firestone, Mary K. ; Giblin, Anne E. ; Kana, Todd M. ; Nielsen, Lars Peter ; Voytek, Mary A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Groffman, Peter M. ; Altabet, Mark A. ; Böhlke, J. K. ; Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus ; David, Mark B. ; Firestone, Mary K. ; Giblin, Anne E. ; Kana, Todd M. ; Nielsen, Lars Peter ; Voytek, Mary A.</creatorcontrib><description>Denitrification, the reduction of the nitrogen (N) oxides, nitrate (NO₃⁺) and nitrite (NO₂⁺), to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and dinitrogen (N₂), is important to primary production, water quality, and the chemistry and physics of the atmosphere at ecosystem, landscape, regional, and global scales. Unfortunately, this process is very difficult to measure, and existing methods are problematic for different reasons in different places at different times. In this paper, we review the major approaches that have been taken to measure denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic environments and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and future prospects for the different methods. Methodological approaches covered include (1) acetylene-based methods, (2) ₁₅N tracers, (3) direct N₂ quantification, (4) N₂:Ar ratio quantification, (5) mass balance approaches, (6) stoichiometric approaches, (7) methods based on stable isotopes, (8) in situ gradients with atmospheric environmental tracers, and (9) molecular approaches. Our review makes it clear that the prospects for improved quantification of denitrification vary greatly in different environments and at different scales. While current methodology allows for the production of accurate estimates of denitrification at scales relevant to water and air quality and ecosystem fertility questions in some systems (e.g., aquatic sediments, well-defined aquifers), methodology for other systems, especially upland terrestrial areas, still needs development. Comparison of mass balance and stoichiometric approaches that constrain estimates of denitrification at large scales with point measurements (made using multiple methods), in multiple systems, is likely to propel more improvement in denitrification methods over the next few years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2091:MFMDDA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17205891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Acetylene ; Argon ; denitrification ; greenhouse effect ; Groundwater ; Invited Feature: Denitrification across Landscapes and Waterscapes ; Isotopes ; Mass balance ; nitrate ; Nitrates ; Nitrates - metabolism ; nitric oxide ; Nitrites - metabolism ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Nitrogen Isotopes ; Nitrogen Oxides - metabolism ; Nitrous oxide ; Sea water ; Sedimentary soils ; Sediments ; Soil - analysis ; Soil water ; stable isotopes ; Water - analysis ; water quality</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2006-12, Vol.16 (6), p.2091-2122</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2006 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6121-4eed9e5536698211b386d8e4dbe5ac1c3239505ff8f582a378e1400c74aa6ab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6121-4eed9e5536698211b386d8e4dbe5ac1c3239505ff8f582a378e1400c74aa6ab93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40061945$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40061945$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17205891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Groffman, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altabet, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhlke, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giblin, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kana, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Lars Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voytek, Mary A.</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for Measuring Denitrification: Diverse Approaches to a Difficult Problem</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Denitrification, the reduction of the nitrogen (N) oxides, nitrate (NO₃⁺) and nitrite (NO₂⁺), to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and dinitrogen (N₂), is important to primary production, water quality, and the chemistry and physics of the atmosphere at ecosystem, landscape, regional, and global scales. Unfortunately, this process is very difficult to measure, and existing methods are problematic for different reasons in different places at different times. In this paper, we review the major approaches that have been taken to measure denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic environments and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and future prospects for the different methods. Methodological approaches covered include (1) acetylene-based methods, (2) ₁₅N tracers, (3) direct N₂ quantification, (4) N₂:Ar ratio quantification, (5) mass balance approaches, (6) stoichiometric approaches, (7) methods based on stable isotopes, (8) in situ gradients with atmospheric environmental tracers, and (9) molecular approaches. Our review makes it clear that the prospects for improved quantification of denitrification vary greatly in different environments and at different scales. While current methodology allows for the production of accurate estimates of denitrification at scales relevant to water and air quality and ecosystem fertility questions in some systems (e.g., aquatic sediments, well-defined aquifers), methodology for other systems, especially upland terrestrial areas, still needs development. Comparison of mass balance and stoichiometric approaches that constrain estimates of denitrification at large scales with point measurements (made using multiple methods), in multiple systems, is likely to propel more improvement in denitrification methods over the next few years.</description><subject>Acetylene</subject><subject>Argon</subject><subject>denitrification</subject><subject>greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Invited Feature: Denitrification across Landscapes and Waterscapes</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Mass balance</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrates - metabolism</subject><subject>nitric oxide</subject><subject>Nitrites - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen Isotopes</subject><subject>Nitrogen Oxides - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Sea water</subject><subject>Sedimentary soils</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>stable isotopes</subject><subject>Water - analysis</subject><subject>water quality</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkU9v1DAQxSMEon_gI4ByQuWQxTOJHbs9rXbbUqmrXQk4IWQ5yYS6yq63dkLVb4-jLHBEqi9jjX9-Y7-XJJ-AzUAqFiuHjJUCzpAx8ZGB-I5MwfnqarVczn_gjM0W6wt8kRyDylXGucSXcf_n1lFyEsI9iwsRXydHUCLjUsFxsllRf-eakLbOpysyYfB29zNd0s723ra2Nr11u_N0aX-RD5TO93vvTH1HIe1damK_jdDQ9enGu6qj7ZvkVWu6QG8P9TT5dnX5dfE5u11f3yzmt1ktACEriBpFnOdCKIkAVS5FI6loKuKmhjrHXHHG21a28S8mLyVBwVhdFsYIU6n8NPkw6cb3PAwUer21oaauMztyQ9BCosSygP-CoDgWHFkEryew9i4ET63ee7s1_kkD02MKevRTj37qMQUdU9BjCnpKQaNmerHWGJXeH0YO1ZaafzoH2yPwZQIebUdPz52jL-ebEQAhxuOo-m5SvQ-9839VixFRBc9_A9RApjY</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Groffman, Peter M.</creator><creator>Altabet, Mark A.</creator><creator>Böhlke, J. K.</creator><creator>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</creator><creator>David, Mark B.</creator><creator>Firestone, Mary K.</creator><creator>Giblin, Anne E.</creator><creator>Kana, Todd M.</creator><creator>Nielsen, Lars Peter</creator><creator>Voytek, Mary A.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Methods for Measuring Denitrification: Diverse Approaches to a Difficult Problem</title><author>Groffman, Peter M. ; Altabet, Mark A. ; Böhlke, J. K. ; Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus ; David, Mark B. ; Firestone, Mary K. ; Giblin, Anne E. ; Kana, Todd M. ; Nielsen, Lars Peter ; Voytek, Mary A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6121-4eed9e5536698211b386d8e4dbe5ac1c3239505ff8f582a378e1400c74aa6ab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Acetylene</topic><topic>Argon</topic><topic>denitrification</topic><topic>greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Invited Feature: Denitrification across Landscapes and Waterscapes</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Mass balance</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrates - metabolism</topic><topic>nitric oxide</topic><topic>Nitrites - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen Isotopes</topic><topic>Nitrogen Oxides - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Sea water</topic><topic>Sedimentary soils</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>stable isotopes</topic><topic>Water - analysis</topic><topic>water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Groffman, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altabet, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhlke, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giblin, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kana, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Lars Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voytek, Mary A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Groffman, Peter M.</au><au>Altabet, Mark A.</au><au>Böhlke, J. K.</au><au>Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus</au><au>David, Mark B.</au><au>Firestone, Mary K.</au><au>Giblin, Anne E.</au><au>Kana, Todd M.</au><au>Nielsen, Lars Peter</au><au>Voytek, Mary A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for Measuring Denitrification: Diverse Approaches to a Difficult Problem</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2091</spage><epage>2122</epage><pages>2091-2122</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Denitrification, the reduction of the nitrogen (N) oxides, nitrate (NO₃⁺) and nitrite (NO₂⁺), to the gases nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N₂O), and dinitrogen (N₂), is important to primary production, water quality, and the chemistry and physics of the atmosphere at ecosystem, landscape, regional, and global scales. Unfortunately, this process is very difficult to measure, and existing methods are problematic for different reasons in different places at different times. In this paper, we review the major approaches that have been taken to measure denitrification in terrestrial and aquatic environments and discuss the strengths, weaknesses, and future prospects for the different methods. Methodological approaches covered include (1) acetylene-based methods, (2) ₁₅N tracers, (3) direct N₂ quantification, (4) N₂:Ar ratio quantification, (5) mass balance approaches, (6) stoichiometric approaches, (7) methods based on stable isotopes, (8) in situ gradients with atmospheric environmental tracers, and (9) molecular approaches. Our review makes it clear that the prospects for improved quantification of denitrification vary greatly in different environments and at different scales. While current methodology allows for the production of accurate estimates of denitrification at scales relevant to water and air quality and ecosystem fertility questions in some systems (e.g., aquatic sediments, well-defined aquifers), methodology for other systems, especially upland terrestrial areas, still needs development. Comparison of mass balance and stoichiometric approaches that constrain estimates of denitrification at large scales with point measurements (made using multiple methods), in multiple systems, is likely to propel more improvement in denitrification methods over the next few years.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>17205891</pmid><doi>10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2091:MFMDDA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2006-12, Vol.16 (6), p.2091-2122 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68282741 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Acetylene Argon denitrification greenhouse effect Groundwater Invited Feature: Denitrification across Landscapes and Waterscapes Isotopes Mass balance nitrate Nitrates Nitrates - metabolism nitric oxide Nitrites - metabolism Nitrogen Nitrogen - analysis Nitrogen - metabolism Nitrogen Isotopes Nitrogen Oxides - metabolism Nitrous oxide Sea water Sedimentary soils Sediments Soil - analysis Soil water stable isotopes Water - analysis water quality |
title | Methods for Measuring Denitrification: Diverse Approaches to a Difficult Problem |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20Measuring%20Denitrification:%20Diverse%20Approaches%20to%20a%20Difficult%20Problem&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Groffman,%20Peter%20M.&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2091&rft.epage=2122&rft.pages=2091-2122&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016%5B2091:MFMDDA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40061945%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19524520&rft_id=info:pmid/17205891&rft_jstor_id=40061945&rfr_iscdi=true |