Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task
Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2006-08, Vol.13 (4), p.581-587 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 587 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 581 |
container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | GAJEWSKI, Daniel A BROCKMOLE, James R |
description | Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/bf03193966 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68280106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1168621561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EtLHTEUwPFQKr43_QAlFHQhjOY9SXdV7lXhQrto10MmOdPGzs3cJhkf396ItwiucgI_Doc_Qp8oOeet1Bf9QDg13Cj1Ae1TyWkjOSMf60yUaQzXYg8d5HxHCJHKqF20R1tGKJdyH_1Ygi1zAtyH6EP8nTFE__J_COXPNBdsS4FYwhS_4sV98BAd4CFNa2wjhsfNGFwoOIGz44iLzX-P0M5gxwzH2_cQ_Voufl7dNKvv17dX31aNE0KUxrgeGHNag_e9bbkQSgAD6YhqYfAeJHNUQk-MpN7o3nqrPBjWWme46wU_RKevezdp-jdDLt06ZAfjaCNMc-6UZprUABV-eQfvpjnFelvHiNBMMtZWdPaKXJpyTjB0mxTWNj11lHQvkbvL5f_IFX_ebpz7Nfg3uq1awckW2FzDDMlGF_Kb05zX0zR_BhcThE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204825227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A ; BROCKMOLE, James R</creator><creatorcontrib>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A ; BROCKMOLE, James R</creatorcontrib><description>Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/bf03193966</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17201355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Experimental psychology ; Eyes & eyesight ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Models, Statistical ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2006-08, Vol.13 (4), p.581-587</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Aug 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18330108$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17201355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKMOLE, James R</creatorcontrib><title>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0EtLHTEUwPFQKr43_QAlFHQhjOY9SXdV7lXhQrto10MmOdPGzs3cJhkf396ItwiucgI_Doc_Qp8oOeet1Bf9QDg13Cj1Ae1TyWkjOSMf60yUaQzXYg8d5HxHCJHKqF20R1tGKJdyH_1Ygi1zAtyH6EP8nTFE__J_COXPNBdsS4FYwhS_4sV98BAd4CFNa2wjhsfNGFwoOIGz44iLzX-P0M5gxwzH2_cQ_Voufl7dNKvv17dX31aNE0KUxrgeGHNag_e9bbkQSgAD6YhqYfAeJHNUQk-MpN7o3nqrPBjWWme46wU_RKevezdp-jdDLt06ZAfjaCNMc-6UZprUABV-eQfvpjnFelvHiNBMMtZWdPaKXJpyTjB0mxTWNj11lHQvkbvL5f_IFX_ebpz7Nfg3uq1awckW2FzDDMlGF_Kb05zX0zR_BhcThE0</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</creator><creator>BROCKMOLE, James R</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</title><author>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A ; BROCKMOLE, James R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKMOLE, James R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</au><au>BROCKMOLE, James R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>581-587</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>17201355</pmid><doi>10.3758/bf03193966</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2006-08, Vol.13 (4), p.581-587 |
issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68280106 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Attention Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Experimental psychology Eyes & eyesight Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Learning. Memory Memory Mental Recall Models, Statistical Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recall |
title | Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feature%20bindings%20endure%20without%20attention:%20Evidence%20from%20an%20explicit%20recall%20task&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=GAJEWSKI,%20Daniel%20A&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=581-587&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/bf03193966&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1168621561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204825227&rft_id=info:pmid/17201355&rfr_iscdi=true |