Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task

Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2006-08, Vol.13 (4), p.581-587
Hauptverfasser: GAJEWSKI, Daniel A, BROCKMOLE, James R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 587
container_issue 4
container_start_page 581
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 13
creator GAJEWSKI, Daniel A
BROCKMOLE, James R
description Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/bf03193966
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68280106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1168621561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EtLHTEUwPFQKr43_QAlFHQhjOY9SXdV7lXhQrto10MmOdPGzs3cJhkf396ItwiucgI_Doc_Qp8oOeet1Bf9QDg13Cj1Ae1TyWkjOSMf60yUaQzXYg8d5HxHCJHKqF20R1tGKJdyH_1Ygi1zAtyH6EP8nTFE__J_COXPNBdsS4FYwhS_4sV98BAd4CFNa2wjhsfNGFwoOIGz44iLzX-P0M5gxwzH2_cQ_Voufl7dNKvv17dX31aNE0KUxrgeGHNag_e9bbkQSgAD6YhqYfAeJHNUQk-MpN7o3nqrPBjWWme46wU_RKevezdp-jdDLt06ZAfjaCNMc-6UZprUABV-eQfvpjnFelvHiNBMMtZWdPaKXJpyTjB0mxTWNj11lHQvkbvL5f_IFX_ebpz7Nfg3uq1awckW2FzDDMlGF_Kb05zX0zR_BhcThE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204825227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A ; BROCKMOLE, James R</creator><creatorcontrib>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A ; BROCKMOLE, James R</creatorcontrib><description>Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/bf03193966</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17201355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Experimental psychology ; Eyes &amp; eyesight ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Models, Statistical ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2006-08, Vol.13 (4), p.581-587</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Aug 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18330108$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17201355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKMOLE, James R</creatorcontrib><title>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Eyes &amp; eyesight</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0EtLHTEUwPFQKr43_QAlFHQhjOY9SXdV7lXhQrto10MmOdPGzs3cJhkf396ItwiucgI_Doc_Qp8oOeet1Bf9QDg13Cj1Ae1TyWkjOSMf60yUaQzXYg8d5HxHCJHKqF20R1tGKJdyH_1Ygi1zAtyH6EP8nTFE__J_COXPNBdsS4FYwhS_4sV98BAd4CFNa2wjhsfNGFwoOIGz44iLzX-P0M5gxwzH2_cQ_Voufl7dNKvv17dX31aNE0KUxrgeGHNag_e9bbkQSgAD6YhqYfAeJHNUQk-MpN7o3nqrPBjWWme46wU_RKevezdp-jdDLt06ZAfjaCNMc-6UZprUABV-eQfvpjnFelvHiNBMMtZWdPaKXJpyTjB0mxTWNj11lHQvkbvL5f_IFX_ebpz7Nfg3uq1awckW2FzDDMlGF_Kb05zX0zR_BhcThE0</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</creator><creator>BROCKMOLE, James R</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</title><author>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A ; BROCKMOLE, James R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-9cbe22c88eddba734464e2e5c067efdde52c15eb0951d98bada6de927ac93cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Eyes &amp; eyesight</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROCKMOLE, James R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GAJEWSKI, Daniel A</au><au>BROCKMOLE, James R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>581-587</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Are integrated objects the unit of capacity of visual working memory, or is continued attention needed to maintain bindings between independently stored features? In a delayed recall task, participants reported the color and shape of a probed item from a memory array. During the delay, attention was manipulated with an exogenous cue. Recall was elevated at validly cued positions, indicating that the cue affected item memory. On invalid trials, participants most frequently recalled either both features (perfect object memory) or neither of the two features (no object memory); the frequency with which only one feature was recalled was significantly lower than predicted by feature independence as determined in a single-feature recall task. These data do not support the view that features are remembered independently when attention is withdrawn. Instead, integrated objects are stored in visual working memory without need for continued attention.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>17201355</pmid><doi>10.3758/bf03193966</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2006-08, Vol.13 (4), p.581-587
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68280106
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Experimental psychology
Eyes & eyesight
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Learning. Memory
Memory
Mental Recall
Models, Statistical
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recall
title Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feature%20bindings%20endure%20without%20attention:%20Evidence%20from%20an%20explicit%20recall%20task&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=GAJEWSKI,%20Daniel%20A&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=581-587&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/bf03193966&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1168621561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204825227&rft_id=info:pmid/17201355&rfr_iscdi=true