THE EFFECTS OF SPRINT RUNNING TRAINING ON SLOPING SURFACES
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of sprint running training on sloping surfaces (3°) on selected kinematic and physiological variables. Thirty-five sport and physical education students were randomized into 4 training groups (uphill-downhill, downhill, uphill, and horizontal) and a c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2006-11, Vol.20 (4), p.767-777 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 777 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 767 |
container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | PARADISIS, GIORGOS P COOKE, CARLTON B |
description | The aim of this study was to examine the effects of sprint running training on sloping surfaces (3°) on selected kinematic and physiological variables. Thirty-five sport and physical education students were randomized into 4 training groups (uphill-downhill, downhill, uphill, and horizontal) and a control group, with 7 participants in each group. Pre- and posttraining tests were performed to examine the effects of 6 weeks of training on the maximum running speed at 35 m, step rate, step length, step time, contact time, eccentric and concentric phase of contact time, flight time, selected posture characteristics of the step cycle, and peak anaerobic power performance. Maximum running speed and step rate were increased significantly (p < 0.05) in a 35-m running test after training by 0.29 m·s (3.5%) and 0.14 Hz (3.4%) for the combined uphill-downhill group and by 0.09 m·s (1.1%) and 0.03 Hz (2.4%) for the downhill group, whereas flight time shortened only for the combined uphill-downhill training group by 6 milliseconds (4.3%). There were no significant changes in the horizontal and control groups. Overall, the posture characteristics and the peak anaerobic power performance did not change with training. It can be suggested that the novel combined uphill-downhill training method is significantly more effective in improving the maximum running velocity at 35 m and the associated horizontal kinematic characteristics of sprint running than the other training methods are. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1519/00124278-200611000-00008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68279309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1178914531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4318-9194634055a71e9f92c9307624c7d550482917707af60e68afd3385b4d89a9493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1PwjAUhhujEUT_glm88G56-rW23hGyAQkZZBvXzdi6AA6GKwvx3zs-1MTEi6bvxXPenjxFyMHwgjlWrwCYMCKkSwA8jAHAbQ_IK9TFnFKXESmu2wwecyVg3EF31q4BCOec3qIOFlgxQlQXvSUj3_GDwB8ksTMNnHgWjcPEieZhOA6HThL1x6cwDZ14Mp0dYzyPgv7Aj-_RTZGW1jxc7h6aB34yGLmT6XA86E_cjFEsXdU-5VEGnKcCG1UokikKwiMsEznnwCRRWAgQaeGB8WRa5JRKvmC5VKliivbQ87l3V1cfjbF7vVnZzJRlujVVY7UniWgbj-DTH3BdNfW23U0TTMGjqnXTQ_IMZXVlbW0KvatXm7T-1Bj0Ua7-lqt_5OqT3Hb08dLfLDYm_x282GwBdgYOVbk3tX0vm4Op9dKk5X6p__s0-gViGHrl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213063953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE EFFECTS OF SPRINT RUNNING TRAINING ON SLOPING SURFACES</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>PARADISIS, GIORGOS P ; COOKE, CARLTON B</creator><creatorcontrib>PARADISIS, GIORGOS P ; COOKE, CARLTON B</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to examine the effects of sprint running training on sloping surfaces (3°) on selected kinematic and physiological variables. Thirty-five sport and physical education students were randomized into 4 training groups (uphill-downhill, downhill, uphill, and horizontal) and a control group, with 7 participants in each group. Pre- and posttraining tests were performed to examine the effects of 6 weeks of training on the maximum running speed at 35 m, step rate, step length, step time, contact time, eccentric and concentric phase of contact time, flight time, selected posture characteristics of the step cycle, and peak anaerobic power performance. Maximum running speed and step rate were increased significantly (p < 0.05) in a 35-m running test after training by 0.29 m·s (3.5%) and 0.14 Hz (3.4%) for the combined uphill-downhill group and by 0.09 m·s (1.1%) and 0.03 Hz (2.4%) for the downhill group, whereas flight time shortened only for the combined uphill-downhill training group by 6 milliseconds (4.3%). There were no significant changes in the horizontal and control groups. Overall, the posture characteristics and the peak anaerobic power performance did not change with training. It can be suggested that the novel combined uphill-downhill training method is significantly more effective in improving the maximum running velocity at 35 m and the associated horizontal kinematic characteristics of sprint running than the other training methods are.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/00124278-200611000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17194229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Environment ; Exercise ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Male ; Physical Education and Training ; Posture - physiology ; Running ; Running - physiology ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2006-11, Vol.20 (4), p.767-777</ispartof><rights>2006 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4318-9194634055a71e9f92c9307624c7d550482917707af60e68afd3385b4d89a9493</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PARADISIS, GIORGOS P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOKE, CARLTON B</creatorcontrib><title>THE EFFECTS OF SPRINT RUNNING TRAINING ON SLOPING SURFACES</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to examine the effects of sprint running training on sloping surfaces (3°) on selected kinematic and physiological variables. Thirty-five sport and physical education students were randomized into 4 training groups (uphill-downhill, downhill, uphill, and horizontal) and a control group, with 7 participants in each group. Pre- and posttraining tests were performed to examine the effects of 6 weeks of training on the maximum running speed at 35 m, step rate, step length, step time, contact time, eccentric and concentric phase of contact time, flight time, selected posture characteristics of the step cycle, and peak anaerobic power performance. Maximum running speed and step rate were increased significantly (p < 0.05) in a 35-m running test after training by 0.29 m·s (3.5%) and 0.14 Hz (3.4%) for the combined uphill-downhill group and by 0.09 m·s (1.1%) and 0.03 Hz (2.4%) for the downhill group, whereas flight time shortened only for the combined uphill-downhill training group by 6 milliseconds (4.3%). There were no significant changes in the horizontal and control groups. Overall, the posture characteristics and the peak anaerobic power performance did not change with training. It can be suggested that the novel combined uphill-downhill training method is significantly more effective in improving the maximum running velocity at 35 m and the associated horizontal kinematic characteristics of sprint running than the other training methods are.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physical Education and Training</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1PwjAUhhujEUT_glm88G56-rW23hGyAQkZZBvXzdi6AA6GKwvx3zs-1MTEi6bvxXPenjxFyMHwgjlWrwCYMCKkSwA8jAHAbQ_IK9TFnFKXESmu2wwecyVg3EF31q4BCOec3qIOFlgxQlQXvSUj3_GDwB8ksTMNnHgWjcPEieZhOA6HThL1x6cwDZ14Mp0dYzyPgv7Aj-_RTZGW1jxc7h6aB34yGLmT6XA86E_cjFEsXdU-5VEGnKcCG1UokikKwiMsEznnwCRRWAgQaeGB8WRa5JRKvmC5VKliivbQ87l3V1cfjbF7vVnZzJRlujVVY7UniWgbj-DTH3BdNfW23U0TTMGjqnXTQ_IMZXVlbW0KvatXm7T-1Bj0Ua7-lqt_5OqT3Hb08dLfLDYm_x282GwBdgYOVbk3tX0vm4Op9dKk5X6p__s0-gViGHrl</recordid><startdate>200611</startdate><enddate>200611</enddate><creator>PARADISIS, GIORGOS P</creator><creator>COOKE, CARLTON B</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200611</creationdate><title>THE EFFECTS OF SPRINT RUNNING TRAINING ON SLOPING SURFACES</title><author>PARADISIS, GIORGOS P ; COOKE, CARLTON B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4318-9194634055a71e9f92c9307624c7d550482917707af60e68afd3385b4d89a9493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physical Education and Training</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PARADISIS, GIORGOS P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOKE, CARLTON B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PARADISIS, GIORGOS P</au><au>COOKE, CARLTON B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE EFFECTS OF SPRINT RUNNING TRAINING ON SLOPING SURFACES</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2006-11</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>767-777</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to examine the effects of sprint running training on sloping surfaces (3°) on selected kinematic and physiological variables. Thirty-five sport and physical education students were randomized into 4 training groups (uphill-downhill, downhill, uphill, and horizontal) and a control group, with 7 participants in each group. Pre- and posttraining tests were performed to examine the effects of 6 weeks of training on the maximum running speed at 35 m, step rate, step length, step time, contact time, eccentric and concentric phase of contact time, flight time, selected posture characteristics of the step cycle, and peak anaerobic power performance. Maximum running speed and step rate were increased significantly (p < 0.05) in a 35-m running test after training by 0.29 m·s (3.5%) and 0.14 Hz (3.4%) for the combined uphill-downhill group and by 0.09 m·s (1.1%) and 0.03 Hz (2.4%) for the downhill group, whereas flight time shortened only for the combined uphill-downhill training group by 6 milliseconds (4.3%). There were no significant changes in the horizontal and control groups. Overall, the posture characteristics and the peak anaerobic power performance did not change with training. It can be suggested that the novel combined uphill-downhill training method is significantly more effective in improving the maximum running velocity at 35 m and the associated horizontal kinematic characteristics of sprint running than the other training methods are.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>17194229</pmid><doi>10.1519/00124278-200611000-00008</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2006-11, Vol.20 (4), p.767-777 |
issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68279309 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Biomechanical Phenomena Environment Exercise Humans Kinematics Male Physical Education and Training Posture - physiology Running Running - physiology Space life sciences |
title | THE EFFECTS OF SPRINT RUNNING TRAINING ON SLOPING SURFACES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A54%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20EFFECTS%20OF%20SPRINT%20RUNNING%20TRAINING%20ON%20SLOPING%20SURFACES&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=PARADISIS,%20GIORGOS%20P&rft.date=2006-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=767-777&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/00124278-200611000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1178914531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213063953&rft_id=info:pmid/17194229&rfr_iscdi=true |