Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: A systematic literature review
Abstract Adult burn patients experience pain during wound care despite pharmacological interventions. Additional nursing interventions are needed to improve pain management. A systematic review was undertaken in order to examine the implications of previous research for evidence based decisions conc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2007-11, Vol.33 (7), p.811-827 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 827 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 811 |
container_title | Burns |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | de Jong, A.E.E Middelkoop, E Faber, A.W Van Loey, N.E.E |
description | Abstract Adult burn patients experience pain during wound care despite pharmacological interventions. Additional nursing interventions are needed to improve pain management. A systematic review was undertaken in order to examine the implications of previous research for evidence based decisions concerning the use of non-pharmacological nursing interventions and for future research. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were discussed. The majority of the included studies concerned behavioural nursing interventions and focussed on promotion of psychological comfort. Although 17 studies showed that the intervention had a positive effect on pain outcomes and no adverse effects of the reviewed interventions were reported, the best available evidence was found for active hypnosis, rapid induction analgesia and distraction relaxation. However, in order to reduce methodological limitations, further research is needed before well-founded evidence based decisions for nursing practice can be made. Aspects that seem important for future research, like the type of the intervention, theoretical framework, manner of giving instruction and guidance, cost, outcomes, measurement instruments and data collection points are considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.burns.2007.01.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68274305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0305417907000241</els_id><sourcerecordid>68274305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e2ee6fbdda0625ce4fcffe06d1acdf40dc1a9125927b846a524eb5173f8d0d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1rFTEUhoMo9rb6CwTJRncznmQyX4JCKVaFogt1HTLJSZvrTHJNZlruvzdz74WCG7PJ5nlfTp4cQl4xKBmw5t22HJboU8kB2hJYCVA_IRvWtX3BBPRPyQYqqAvB2v6MnKe0hXzqDp6TM9Y20FS82ZD9t-CL3Z2Kk9JhDLdOq5H6JSbnb6nzM8Z79LMLPlEbIt3FoNEsMUM75TyNODq0GaTKLOOc6IOb7-hhrvf0kqZ9mnFSs9N0dLlLzUvEHLp3-PCCPLNqTPjydF-QX9effl59KW6-f_56dXlTaCH4XNTIERs7GKOg4bVGYbW1CI1hShsrwGimesbrnrdDJxpVc4FDzdrKdgZMU12Qt8fePPufBdMsJ5c0jqPyGJYkm463IovKYHUEdQwpRbRyF92k4l4ykKtxuZWHl8nVuAQm4ZB6fapfhgnNY-akOANvToBKWa6NymuXHrmeQd_yPnMfjhxmGVlQlEk79Fm3i6hnaYL7zyAf_8nr0fn1P3_jHtM25ET2LJlMXIL8sS7HuhvQ5rXgglV_AaJcuKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68274305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: A systematic literature review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>de Jong, A.E.E ; Middelkoop, E ; Faber, A.W ; Van Loey, N.E.E</creator><creatorcontrib>de Jong, A.E.E ; Middelkoop, E ; Faber, A.W ; Van Loey, N.E.E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Adult burn patients experience pain during wound care despite pharmacological interventions. Additional nursing interventions are needed to improve pain management. A systematic review was undertaken in order to examine the implications of previous research for evidence based decisions concerning the use of non-pharmacological nursing interventions and for future research. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were discussed. The majority of the included studies concerned behavioural nursing interventions and focussed on promotion of psychological comfort. Although 17 studies showed that the intervention had a positive effect on pain outcomes and no adverse effects of the reviewed interventions were reported, the best available evidence was found for active hypnosis, rapid induction analgesia and distraction relaxation. However, in order to reduce methodological limitations, further research is needed before well-founded evidence based decisions for nursing practice can be made. Aspects that seem important for future research, like the type of the intervention, theoretical framework, manner of giving instruction and guidance, cost, outcomes, measurement instruments and data collection points are considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.01.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17606326</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BURND8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burns ; Burns - nursing ; Critical Care ; Feasibility Studies ; Forecasting ; Health participants ; Humans ; Literature review ; Medical sciences ; Nursing ; Pain ; Pain - nursing ; Pain management ; Patient Satisfaction ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Wound care</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2007-11, Vol.33 (7), p.811-827</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e2ee6fbdda0625ce4fcffe06d1acdf40dc1a9125927b846a524eb5173f8d0d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e2ee6fbdda0625ce4fcffe06d1acdf40dc1a9125927b846a524eb5173f8d0d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417907000241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19109729$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17606326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Jong, A.E.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middelkoop, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, A.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Loey, N.E.E</creatorcontrib><title>Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: A systematic literature review</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>Abstract Adult burn patients experience pain during wound care despite pharmacological interventions. Additional nursing interventions are needed to improve pain management. A systematic review was undertaken in order to examine the implications of previous research for evidence based decisions concerning the use of non-pharmacological nursing interventions and for future research. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were discussed. The majority of the included studies concerned behavioural nursing interventions and focussed on promotion of psychological comfort. Although 17 studies showed that the intervention had a positive effect on pain outcomes and no adverse effects of the reviewed interventions were reported, the best available evidence was found for active hypnosis, rapid induction analgesia and distraction relaxation. However, in order to reduce methodological limitations, further research is needed before well-founded evidence based decisions for nursing practice can be made. Aspects that seem important for future research, like the type of the intervention, theoretical framework, manner of giving instruction and guidance, cost, outcomes, measurement instruments and data collection points are considered.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - nursing</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature review</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - nursing</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Wound care</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1rFTEUhoMo9rb6CwTJRncznmQyX4JCKVaFogt1HTLJSZvrTHJNZlruvzdz74WCG7PJ5nlfTp4cQl4xKBmw5t22HJboU8kB2hJYCVA_IRvWtX3BBPRPyQYqqAvB2v6MnKe0hXzqDp6TM9Y20FS82ZD9t-CL3Z2Kk9JhDLdOq5H6JSbnb6nzM8Z79LMLPlEbIt3FoNEsMUM75TyNODq0GaTKLOOc6IOb7-hhrvf0kqZ9mnFSs9N0dLlLzUvEHLp3-PCCPLNqTPjydF-QX9effl59KW6-f_56dXlTaCH4XNTIERs7GKOg4bVGYbW1CI1hShsrwGimesbrnrdDJxpVc4FDzdrKdgZMU12Qt8fePPufBdMsJ5c0jqPyGJYkm463IovKYHUEdQwpRbRyF92k4l4ykKtxuZWHl8nVuAQm4ZB6fapfhgnNY-akOANvToBKWa6NymuXHrmeQd_yPnMfjhxmGVlQlEk79Fm3i6hnaYL7zyAf_8nr0fn1P3_jHtM25ET2LJlMXIL8sS7HuhvQ5rXgglV_AaJcuKM</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>de Jong, A.E.E</creator><creator>Middelkoop, E</creator><creator>Faber, A.W</creator><creator>Van Loey, N.E.E</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: A systematic literature review</title><author>de Jong, A.E.E ; Middelkoop, E ; Faber, A.W ; Van Loey, N.E.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5e2ee6fbdda0625ce4fcffe06d1acdf40dc1a9125927b846a524eb5173f8d0d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - nursing</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature review</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - nursing</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Wound care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Jong, A.E.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middelkoop, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, A.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Loey, N.E.E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Jong, A.E.E</au><au>Middelkoop, E</au><au>Faber, A.W</au><au>Van Loey, N.E.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: A systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>811</spage><epage>827</epage><pages>811-827</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><coden>BURND8</coden><abstract>Abstract Adult burn patients experience pain during wound care despite pharmacological interventions. Additional nursing interventions are needed to improve pain management. A systematic review was undertaken in order to examine the implications of previous research for evidence based decisions concerning the use of non-pharmacological nursing interventions and for future research. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were discussed. The majority of the included studies concerned behavioural nursing interventions and focussed on promotion of psychological comfort. Although 17 studies showed that the intervention had a positive effect on pain outcomes and no adverse effects of the reviewed interventions were reported, the best available evidence was found for active hypnosis, rapid induction analgesia and distraction relaxation. However, in order to reduce methodological limitations, further research is needed before well-founded evidence based decisions for nursing practice can be made. Aspects that seem important for future research, like the type of the intervention, theoretical framework, manner of giving instruction and guidance, cost, outcomes, measurement instruments and data collection points are considered.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17606326</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2007.01.005</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
ispartof | Burns, 2007-11, Vol.33 (7), p.811-827 |
issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68274305 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Burns Burns - nursing Critical Care Feasibility Studies Forecasting Health participants Humans Literature review Medical sciences Nursing Pain Pain - nursing Pain management Patient Satisfaction Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents Wound care |
title | Non-pharmacological nursing interventions for procedural pain relief in adults with burns: A systematic literature review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A22%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-pharmacological%20nursing%20interventions%20for%20procedural%20pain%20relief%20in%20adults%20with%20burns:%20A%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=de%20Jong,%20A.E.E&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=811&rft.epage=827&rft.pages=811-827&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft.coden=BURND8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2007.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68274305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68274305&rft_id=info:pmid/17606326&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0305417907000241&rfr_iscdi=true |