Perceived Barriers to Integrating Social Science and Conservation
Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation are discussed. The strongest barriers to integration of the social sciences are the lack of common vocabulary between biologists and social scientists and limited opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. Some other important...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2006-12, Vol.20 (6), p.1817-1820 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1820 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1817 |
| container_title | Conservation biology |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | FOX, HELEN E. CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE NORDBY, J. CULLY PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W. PETERSON, GARRY D. PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R. |
| description | Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation are discussed. The strongest barriers to integration of the social sciences are the lack of common vocabulary between biologists and social scientists and limited opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. Some other important barriers are the lack of funding for collaborative work and the fact that traditional academic reward systems discourage interdisciplinary collaboration and applied problem solving. Both social and natural scientists need to assume, from the start, that their colleagues 'on the other side' have approaches that are worth considering. Results indicate that natural and social scientists share broadly similar views about conservation problems. Results also indicate that as the biodiversity crisis continues conservation biologists and social scientists can make collaboration happen. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00598.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68263143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4124711</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4124711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5658-328b00114a365c5e4494b419ee92812eea19e8c3275ea1d0242fe4b09aa8f95e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCGyAUsWCX4OufxF6waCPojKhapBaxtDyeO1VCJm7tTJm-fR0yGiQ2xV74Suc758o6hGRAC0jnU1uAZDyHiuuCUVoWlEqtit0LMjsIL8mMKqVypTQ7IscxtpRSLUG8JkdQgUpXz8jpdwwOmwdcZWc2hAZDzAafLfoBb4Mdmv42u_ausV127RrsHWa2X2W17yOGh6T7_g15tbZdxLf794T8-Prlpp7nF1fni_r0IneylCrnTC0pBRCWl9JJFEKLpQCNqJkChmjTrBxnlUzjijLB1iiWVFur1loiPyEfp9y74O-3GAezaaLDrrM9-m00pWIlB8GfBUHLUmkpngdFpSUFncAP_4Ct34Y-_dYwCkJwxca1aoJc8DEGXJu70GxseDRAzdiaac1YjhnLMWNr5k9rZpes7_f52-UGV3-N-5oS8HkCfjcdPv53sKmvzhZpSv53k7-Ngw8HvwAmKoAk55PcxAF3B9mGX6aseCXNz8tzM6_VN3Z5MzeCPwGXsbvE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201443823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived Barriers to Integrating Social Science and Conservation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>FOX, HELEN E. ; CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE ; NORDBY, J. CULLY ; PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W. ; PETERSON, GARRY D. ; PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R.</creator><creatorcontrib>FOX, HELEN E. ; CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE ; NORDBY, J. CULLY ; PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W. ; PETERSON, GARRY D. ; PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><description>Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation are discussed. The strongest barriers to integration of the social sciences are the lack of common vocabulary between biologists and social scientists and limited opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. Some other important barriers are the lack of funding for collaborative work and the fact that traditional academic reward systems discourage interdisciplinary collaboration and applied problem solving. Both social and natural scientists need to assume, from the start, that their colleagues 'on the other side' have approaches that are worth considering. Results indicate that natural and social scientists share broadly similar views about conservation problems. Results also indicate that as the biodiversity crisis continues conservation biologists and social scientists can make collaboration happen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00598.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17181819</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; Collaboration ; Conservation biology ; Conservation education ; Conservation movement ; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Conservation of Natural Resources - trends ; Decision Making ; Diversity ; Environmental conservation ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Natural resources conservation ; Nature conservation ; Public Policy ; Social Sciences ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2006-12, Vol.20 (6), p.1817-1820</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2006 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5658-328b00114a365c5e4494b419ee92812eea19e8c3275ea1d0242fe4b09aa8f95e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5658-328b00114a365c5e4494b419ee92812eea19e8c3275ea1d0242fe4b09aa8f95e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4124711$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4124711$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17181819$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FOX, HELEN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NORDBY, J. CULLY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETERSON, GARRY D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived Barriers to Integrating Social Science and Conservation</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation are discussed. The strongest barriers to integration of the social sciences are the lack of common vocabulary between biologists and social scientists and limited opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. Some other important barriers are the lack of funding for collaborative work and the fact that traditional academic reward systems discourage interdisciplinary collaboration and applied problem solving. Both social and natural scientists need to assume, from the start, that their colleagues 'on the other side' have approaches that are worth considering. Results indicate that natural and social scientists share broadly similar views about conservation problems. Results also indicate that as the biodiversity crisis continues conservation biologists and social scientists can make collaboration happen.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation education</subject><subject>Conservation movement</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - trends</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Diversity</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCGyAUsWCX4OufxF6waCPojKhapBaxtDyeO1VCJm7tTJm-fR0yGiQ2xV74Suc758o6hGRAC0jnU1uAZDyHiuuCUVoWlEqtit0LMjsIL8mMKqVypTQ7IscxtpRSLUG8JkdQgUpXz8jpdwwOmwdcZWc2hAZDzAafLfoBb4Mdmv42u_ausV127RrsHWa2X2W17yOGh6T7_g15tbZdxLf794T8-Prlpp7nF1fni_r0IneylCrnTC0pBRCWl9JJFEKLpQCNqJkChmjTrBxnlUzjijLB1iiWVFur1loiPyEfp9y74O-3GAezaaLDrrM9-m00pWIlB8GfBUHLUmkpngdFpSUFncAP_4Ct34Y-_dYwCkJwxca1aoJc8DEGXJu70GxseDRAzdiaac1YjhnLMWNr5k9rZpes7_f52-UGV3-N-5oS8HkCfjcdPv53sKmvzhZpSv53k7-Ngw8HvwAmKoAk55PcxAF3B9mGX6aseCXNz8tzM6_VN3Z5MzeCPwGXsbvE</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>FOX, HELEN E.</creator><creator>CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE</creator><creator>NORDBY, J. CULLY</creator><creator>PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W.</creator><creator>PETERSON, GARRY D.</creator><creator>PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Perceived Barriers to Integrating Social Science and Conservation</title><author>FOX, HELEN E. ; CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE ; NORDBY, J. CULLY ; PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W. ; PETERSON, GARRY D. ; PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5658-328b00114a365c5e4494b419ee92812eea19e8c3275ea1d0242fe4b09aa8f95e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation education</topic><topic>Conservation movement</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - trends</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Diversity</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FOX, HELEN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NORDBY, J. CULLY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PETERSON, GARRY D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FOX, HELEN E.</au><au>CHRISTIAN, CAROLINE</au><au>NORDBY, J. CULLY</au><au>PERGAMS, OLIVER R. W.</au><au>PETERSON, GARRY D.</au><au>PYKE, CHRISTOPHER R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived Barriers to Integrating Social Science and Conservation</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1817</spage><epage>1820</epage><pages>1817-1820</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation are discussed. The strongest barriers to integration of the social sciences are the lack of common vocabulary between biologists and social scientists and limited opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. Some other important barriers are the lack of funding for collaborative work and the fact that traditional academic reward systems discourage interdisciplinary collaboration and applied problem solving. Both social and natural scientists need to assume, from the start, that their colleagues 'on the other side' have approaches that are worth considering. Results indicate that natural and social scientists share broadly similar views about conservation problems. Results also indicate that as the biodiversity crisis continues conservation biologists and social scientists can make collaboration happen.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17181819</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00598.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
| ispartof | Conservation biology, 2006-12, Vol.20 (6), p.1817-1820 |
| issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68263143 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Biodiversity Biodiversity conservation Collaboration Conservation biology Conservation education Conservation movement Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Conservation of Natural Resources - trends Decision Making Diversity Environmental conservation Humans Interdisciplinary Communication Natural resources conservation Nature conservation Public Policy Social Sciences Wildlife conservation |
| title | Perceived Barriers to Integrating Social Science and Conservation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20Barriers%20to%20Integrating%20Social%20Science%20and%20Conservation&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=FOX,%20HELEN%20E.&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1817&rft.epage=1820&rft.pages=1817-1820&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00598.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4124711%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201443823&rft_id=info:pmid/17181819&rft_jstor_id=4124711&rfr_iscdi=true |