Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management

An increasing number of applied disciplines are utilizing evidence-based frameworks to review and disseminate the effectiveness of management and policy interventions. The rationale is that increased accessibility of the best available evidence will provide a more efficient and less biased platform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2006-12, Vol.20 (6), p.1647-1656
Hauptverfasser: PULLIN, ANDREW S., STEWART, GAVIN B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1656
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1647
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 20
creator PULLIN, ANDREW S.
STEWART, GAVIN B.
description An increasing number of applied disciplines are utilizing evidence-based frameworks to review and disseminate the effectiveness of management and policy interventions. The rationale is that increased accessibility of the best available evidence will provide a more efficient and less biased platform for decision making. We argue that there are significant benefits for conservation in using such a framework, but the scientific community needs to undertake and disseminate more systematic reviews before the full benefit can be realized. We devised a set of guidelines for undertaking formalized systematic review, based on a health services model. The guideline stages include planning and conducting a review, including protocol formation, search strategy, data inclusion, data extraction, and analysis. Review dissemination is addressed in terms of current developments and future plans for a Web-based open-access library. By the use of case studies we highlight critical modifications to guidelines for protocol formulation, data-quality assessment, data extraction, and data synthesis for conservation and environmental management. Ecological data presented significant but soluble challenges for the systematic review process, particularly in terms of the quantity, accessibility, and diverse quality of available data. In the field of conservation and environmental management there needs to be further engagement of scientists and practitioners to develop and take ownership of an evidence-based framework.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68262628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4124692</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4124692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6115-b940649f975b62f7e361bf2e785cf1b501bbbedbd8fac71208a83831ff0efb113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhi0EokPhDRCKkGCX4BM7jrNgUaIyLepQiavExnISGzkkTrGT6czb45DRVGJT7IUv5_uPj_0boQhwAqG9aRPIUhJDTookxZglGFOeJbsHaHUMPEQrzDmPOS_SE_TE-xZjXGRAH6MTyIEDx3iFNuvJNKozVvlIDy76vPej6uVo6uiT2hp1GxkblYP1ym3D7mAjaZvo3G6NG2yv7Ci7aCOt_KnmxVP0SMvOq2eH8RR9fX_-pbyIr67Xl-XZVVwzgCyuCooZLXSRZxVLda4Ig0qnKudZraHKMFRVpZqq4VrWOaSYS044Aa2x0hUAOUWvl7w3bvg9KT-K3vhadZ20api8YDxlofN7QSgyxorwXPeCNC9CBSyAL_8B22FyNtxWpBgoYQTmY_kC1W7w3iktbpzppdsLwGJ2ULRiNkrMRonZQfHXQbEL0heH_FPVq-ZOeLAsAK8OgPS17LSTtjb-juM0VElJ4N4u3K3p1P6_CxDl9bvLMAv654u-9ePgjnoKKWVFGsLxEjbhw-yOYel-CZaTPBPfP67FpvwAF_TbD4HJH51nzls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201436318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>PULLIN, ANDREW S. ; STEWART, GAVIN B.</creator><creatorcontrib>PULLIN, ANDREW S. ; STEWART, GAVIN B.</creatorcontrib><description>An increasing number of applied disciplines are utilizing evidence-based frameworks to review and disseminate the effectiveness of management and policy interventions. The rationale is that increased accessibility of the best available evidence will provide a more efficient and less biased platform for decision making. We argue that there are significant benefits for conservation in using such a framework, but the scientific community needs to undertake and disseminate more systematic reviews before the full benefit can be realized. We devised a set of guidelines for undertaking formalized systematic review, based on a health services model. The guideline stages include planning and conducting a review, including protocol formation, search strategy, data inclusion, data extraction, and analysis. Review dissemination is addressed in terms of current developments and future plans for a Web-based open-access library. By the use of case studies we highlight critical modifications to guidelines for protocol formulation, data-quality assessment, data extraction, and data synthesis for conservation and environmental management. Ecological data presented significant but soluble challenges for the systematic review process, particularly in terms of the quantity, accessibility, and diverse quality of available data. In the field of conservation and environmental management there needs to be further engagement of scientists and practitioners to develop and take ownership of an evidence-based framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17181800</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>A priori knowledge ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; conservation policy ; conservation practice ; Conservation practices ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Decision Making ; Ecological modeling ; Ecology ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental management ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; evidence-based knowledge transfer ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Guidelines ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Meta analysis ; Online searching ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; política de la conservación ; práctica de la conservación ; Research Design ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; toma de decisiones ; transferencia de conocimiento basado en evidencia</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2006-12, Vol.20 (6), p.1647-1656</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2006 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6115-b940649f975b62f7e361bf2e785cf1b501bbbedbd8fac71208a83831ff0efb113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6115-b940649f975b62f7e361bf2e785cf1b501bbbedbd8fac71208a83831ff0efb113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4124692$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4124692$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18416343$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17181800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PULLIN, ANDREW S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, GAVIN B.</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>An increasing number of applied disciplines are utilizing evidence-based frameworks to review and disseminate the effectiveness of management and policy interventions. The rationale is that increased accessibility of the best available evidence will provide a more efficient and less biased platform for decision making. We argue that there are significant benefits for conservation in using such a framework, but the scientific community needs to undertake and disseminate more systematic reviews before the full benefit can be realized. We devised a set of guidelines for undertaking formalized systematic review, based on a health services model. The guideline stages include planning and conducting a review, including protocol formation, search strategy, data inclusion, data extraction, and analysis. Review dissemination is addressed in terms of current developments and future plans for a Web-based open-access library. By the use of case studies we highlight critical modifications to guidelines for protocol formulation, data-quality assessment, data extraction, and data synthesis for conservation and environmental management. Ecological data presented significant but soluble challenges for the systematic review process, particularly in terms of the quantity, accessibility, and diverse quality of available data. In the field of conservation and environmental management there needs to be further engagement of scientists and practitioners to develop and take ownership of an evidence-based framework.</description><subject>A priori knowledge</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>conservation policy</subject><subject>conservation practice</subject><subject>Conservation practices</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>evidence-based knowledge transfer</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta analysis</subject><subject>Online searching</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>política de la conservación</subject><subject>práctica de la conservación</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>toma de decisiones</subject><subject>transferencia de conocimiento basado en evidencia</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhi0EokPhDRCKkGCX4BM7jrNgUaIyLepQiavExnISGzkkTrGT6czb45DRVGJT7IUv5_uPj_0boQhwAqG9aRPIUhJDTookxZglGFOeJbsHaHUMPEQrzDmPOS_SE_TE-xZjXGRAH6MTyIEDx3iFNuvJNKozVvlIDy76vPej6uVo6uiT2hp1GxkblYP1ym3D7mAjaZvo3G6NG2yv7Ci7aCOt_KnmxVP0SMvOq2eH8RR9fX_-pbyIr67Xl-XZVVwzgCyuCooZLXSRZxVLda4Ig0qnKudZraHKMFRVpZqq4VrWOaSYS044Aa2x0hUAOUWvl7w3bvg9KT-K3vhadZ20api8YDxlofN7QSgyxorwXPeCNC9CBSyAL_8B22FyNtxWpBgoYQTmY_kC1W7w3iktbpzppdsLwGJ2ULRiNkrMRonZQfHXQbEL0heH_FPVq-ZOeLAsAK8OgPS17LSTtjb-juM0VElJ4N4u3K3p1P6_CxDl9bvLMAv654u-9ePgjnoKKWVFGsLxEjbhw-yOYel-CZaTPBPfP67FpvwAF_TbD4HJH51nzls</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>PULLIN, ANDREW S.</creator><creator>STEWART, GAVIN B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management</title><author>PULLIN, ANDREW S. ; STEWART, GAVIN B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6115-b940649f975b62f7e361bf2e785cf1b501bbbedbd8fac71208a83831ff0efb113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>A priori knowledge</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>conservation policy</topic><topic>conservation practice</topic><topic>Conservation practices</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>evidence-based knowledge transfer</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta analysis</topic><topic>Online searching</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>política de la conservación</topic><topic>práctica de la conservación</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>toma de decisiones</topic><topic>transferencia de conocimiento basado en evidencia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PULLIN, ANDREW S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, GAVIN B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PULLIN, ANDREW S.</au><au>STEWART, GAVIN B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1647</spage><epage>1656</epage><pages>1647-1656</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>An increasing number of applied disciplines are utilizing evidence-based frameworks to review and disseminate the effectiveness of management and policy interventions. The rationale is that increased accessibility of the best available evidence will provide a more efficient and less biased platform for decision making. We argue that there are significant benefits for conservation in using such a framework, but the scientific community needs to undertake and disseminate more systematic reviews before the full benefit can be realized. We devised a set of guidelines for undertaking formalized systematic review, based on a health services model. The guideline stages include planning and conducting a review, including protocol formation, search strategy, data inclusion, data extraction, and analysis. Review dissemination is addressed in terms of current developments and future plans for a Web-based open-access library. By the use of case studies we highlight critical modifications to guidelines for protocol formulation, data-quality assessment, data extraction, and data synthesis for conservation and environmental management. Ecological data presented significant but soluble challenges for the systematic review process, particularly in terms of the quantity, accessibility, and diverse quality of available data. In the field of conservation and environmental management there needs to be further engagement of scientists and practitioners to develop and take ownership of an evidence-based framework.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17181800</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2006-12, Vol.20 (6), p.1647-1656
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68262628
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects A priori knowledge
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation
Conservation biology
Conservation of Natural Resources
conservation policy
conservation practice
Conservation practices
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Decision Making
Ecological modeling
Ecology
Environmental assessment
Environmental conservation
Environmental management
Environmental Monitoring - methods
evidence-based knowledge transfer
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Guidelines
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Meta analysis
Online searching
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
política de la conservación
práctica de la conservación
Research Design
Systematic Reviews as Topic
toma de decisiones
transferencia de conocimiento basado en evidencia
title Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20for%20Systematic%20Review%20in%20Conservation%20and%20Environmental%20Management&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=PULLIN,%20ANDREW%20S.&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1647&rft.epage=1656&rft.pages=1647-1656&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4124692%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201436318&rft_id=info:pmid/17181800&rft_jstor_id=4124692&rfr_iscdi=true