Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors

Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers�...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological science 2006-11, Vol.17 (11), p.973-980
Hauptverfasser: Eckstein, Miguel P., Drescher, Barbara A., Shimozaki, Steven S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 980
container_issue 11
container_start_page 973
container_title Psychological science
container_volume 17
creator Eckstein, Miguel P.
Drescher, Barbara A.
Shimozaki, Steven S.
description Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68257699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40064490</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>40064490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PwjAchhujEUQ_gqYnT2y2a9c_RyQqJiQawXNT2o5sgQ3bkcC3txOCR_1dmrbP-7Z5AIAYpTjOQ5ViyngiM4HSDCGWIixwnu7OQP90cQ76SOYs4ZKzHrgKoUJxOGGXoIc55owS1AeTUdu6ui2bWq_geOsCLGv44eJmZlztwhDOtDHalgbOtV-6tqyXQ6hrCx_13oVS1_Ddl40P1-Ci0Kvgbo7rAHw-P83Hk2T69vI6Hk0TQ3HWJgIZWuCCUsotXlhLmSZU4wWV0hKdM6Yd4ZYvWGaEyE2EhGSFIN0JwsySAbg_9G588xX_26p1GYxbrXTtmm1QTGQ5Z1L-CRLGhMgwiaA4gMY3IXhXqI0v19rvFUaq060q1VlVnVXV6VY_utUuRu-Ob2wXa2d_g0e_EcgPQNBLp6pm66Pn8J_i20OuCm3jT700MpRKRL4B6uOTuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36688213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Eckstein, Miguel P. ; Drescher, Barbara A. ; Shimozaki, Steven S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Miguel P. ; Drescher, Barbara A. ; Shimozaki, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><description>Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17176430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Attention ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian method ; Chimneys ; Cues ; Discrimination Learning ; Experimental psychology ; Eye movements ; Geodetic position ; Humans ; Likelihood Functions ; Modeling ; Orientation ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; Perceptual localization ; Probability Learning ; Ratios ; Reaction Time ; Saccades ; Set (Psychology) ; Sight ; Term weighting ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2006-11, Vol.17 (11), p.973-980</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>2006 Association for Psychological Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40064490$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40064490$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17176430$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Miguel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drescher, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><title>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian method</subject><subject>Chimneys</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Geodetic position</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual localization</subject><subject>Probability Learning</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Saccades</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sight</subject><subject>Term weighting</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9PwjAchhujEUQ_gqYnT2y2a9c_RyQqJiQawXNT2o5sgQ3bkcC3txOCR_1dmrbP-7Z5AIAYpTjOQ5ViyngiM4HSDCGWIixwnu7OQP90cQ76SOYs4ZKzHrgKoUJxOGGXoIc55owS1AeTUdu6ui2bWq_geOsCLGv44eJmZlztwhDOtDHalgbOtV-6tqyXQ6hrCx_13oVS1_Ddl40P1-Ci0Kvgbo7rAHw-P83Hk2T69vI6Hk0TQ3HWJgIZWuCCUsotXlhLmSZU4wWV0hKdM6Yd4ZYvWGaEyE2EhGSFIN0JwsySAbg_9G588xX_26p1GYxbrXTtmm1QTGQ5Z1L-CRLGhMgwiaA4gMY3IXhXqI0v19rvFUaq060q1VlVnVXV6VY_utUuRu-Ob2wXa2d_g0e_EcgPQNBLp6pm66Pn8J_i20OuCm3jT700MpRKRL4B6uOTuA</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Eckstein, Miguel P.</creator><creator>Drescher, Barbara A.</creator><creator>Shimozaki, Steven S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</title><author>Eckstein, Miguel P. ; Drescher, Barbara A. ; Shimozaki, Steven S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian method</topic><topic>Chimneys</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Geodetic position</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual localization</topic><topic>Probability Learning</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Saccades</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sight</topic><topic>Term weighting</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Miguel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drescher, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eckstein, Miguel P.</au><au>Drescher, Barbara A.</au><au>Shimozaki, Steven S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>973</spage><epage>980</epage><pages>973-980</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><abstract>Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><pmid>17176430</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7976
ispartof Psychological science, 2006-11, Vol.17 (11), p.973-980
issn 0956-7976
1467-9280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68257699
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Attention
Bayes Theorem
Bayesian method
Chimneys
Cues
Discrimination Learning
Experimental psychology
Eye movements
Geodetic position
Humans
Likelihood Functions
Modeling
Orientation
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perception
Perceptual localization
Probability Learning
Ratios
Reaction Time
Saccades
Set (Psychology)
Sight
Term weighting
Visual perception
title Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attentional%20Cues%20in%20Real%20Scenes,%20Saccadic%20Targeting,%20and%20Bayesian%20Priors&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Eckstein,%20Miguel%20P.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=973&rft.epage=980&rft.pages=973-980&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40064490%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36688213&rft_id=info:pmid/17176430&rft_jstor_id=40064490&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x&rfr_iscdi=true