Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors
Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological science 2006-11, Vol.17 (11), p.973-980 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 980 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 973 |
container_title | Psychological science |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Eckstein, Miguel P. Drescher, Barbara A. Shimozaki, Steven S. |
description | Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68257699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40064490</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>40064490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PwjAchhujEUQ_gqYnT2y2a9c_RyQqJiQawXNT2o5sgQ3bkcC3txOCR_1dmrbP-7Z5AIAYpTjOQ5ViyngiM4HSDCGWIixwnu7OQP90cQ76SOYs4ZKzHrgKoUJxOGGXoIc55owS1AeTUdu6ui2bWq_geOsCLGv44eJmZlztwhDOtDHalgbOtV-6tqyXQ6hrCx_13oVS1_Ddl40P1-Ci0Kvgbo7rAHw-P83Hk2T69vI6Hk0TQ3HWJgIZWuCCUsotXlhLmSZU4wWV0hKdM6Yd4ZYvWGaEyE2EhGSFIN0JwsySAbg_9G588xX_26p1GYxbrXTtmm1QTGQ5Z1L-CRLGhMgwiaA4gMY3IXhXqI0v19rvFUaq060q1VlVnVXV6VY_utUuRu-Ob2wXa2d_g0e_EcgPQNBLp6pm66Pn8J_i20OuCm3jT700MpRKRL4B6uOTuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36688213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Eckstein, Miguel P. ; Drescher, Barbara A. ; Shimozaki, Steven S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Miguel P. ; Drescher, Barbara A. ; Shimozaki, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><description>Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17176430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Attention ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian method ; Chimneys ; Cues ; Discrimination Learning ; Experimental psychology ; Eye movements ; Geodetic position ; Humans ; Likelihood Functions ; Modeling ; Orientation ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; Perceptual localization ; Probability Learning ; Ratios ; Reaction Time ; Saccades ; Set (Psychology) ; Sight ; Term weighting ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2006-11, Vol.17 (11), p.973-980</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>2006 Association for Psychological Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40064490$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40064490$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17176430$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Miguel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drescher, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><title>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian method</subject><subject>Chimneys</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Geodetic position</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual localization</subject><subject>Probability Learning</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Saccades</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sight</subject><subject>Term weighting</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9PwjAchhujEUQ_gqYnT2y2a9c_RyQqJiQawXNT2o5sgQ3bkcC3txOCR_1dmrbP-7Z5AIAYpTjOQ5ViyngiM4HSDCGWIixwnu7OQP90cQ76SOYs4ZKzHrgKoUJxOGGXoIc55owS1AeTUdu6ui2bWq_geOsCLGv44eJmZlztwhDOtDHalgbOtV-6tqyXQ6hrCx_13oVS1_Ddl40P1-Ci0Kvgbo7rAHw-P83Hk2T69vI6Hk0TQ3HWJgIZWuCCUsotXlhLmSZU4wWV0hKdM6Yd4ZYvWGaEyE2EhGSFIN0JwsySAbg_9G588xX_26p1GYxbrXTtmm1QTGQ5Z1L-CRLGhMgwiaA4gMY3IXhXqI0v19rvFUaq060q1VlVnVXV6VY_utUuRu-Ob2wXa2d_g0e_EcgPQNBLp6pm66Pn8J_i20OuCm3jT700MpRKRL4B6uOTuA</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Eckstein, Miguel P.</creator><creator>Drescher, Barbara A.</creator><creator>Shimozaki, Steven S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</title><author>Eckstein, Miguel P. ; Drescher, Barbara A. ; Shimozaki, Steven S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-80c4f1f4447d1bdd46a34a1b499d3a566ae37d7b62c885c7d1896f837b62016d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian method</topic><topic>Chimneys</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Geodetic position</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual localization</topic><topic>Probability Learning</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Saccades</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sight</topic><topic>Term weighting</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Miguel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drescher, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eckstein, Miguel P.</au><au>Drescher, Barbara A.</au><au>Shimozaki, Steven S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>973</spage><epage>980</epage><pages>973-980</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><abstract>Performance finding a target improves when artificial cues direct covert attention to the target's probable location or locations, but how do predictive cues help observers search for objects in real scenes? Controlling for target detectability and retinal eccentricity, we recorded observers' first saccades during search for objects that appeared in expected and unexpected locations within real scenes. As has been found with synthetic images and cues, accuracy of first saccades was significantly higher when the target appeared at an expected location rather than an unexpected location. Observers' saccades with target-absent images make it possible to distinguish two mechanisms that might mediate this effect: limited attentional resources versus differential weighting of information (Bayesian priors), Endpoints of first saccades in target-absent images were significantly closer to the expected than the unexpected locations, a result consistent with the differential-weighting model and inconsistent with limited resources being the sole mechanism underlying the effect.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><pmid>17176430</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-7976 |
ispartof | Psychological science, 2006-11, Vol.17 (11), p.973-980 |
issn | 0956-7976 1467-9280 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68257699 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Attention Bayes Theorem Bayesian method Chimneys Cues Discrimination Learning Experimental psychology Eye movements Geodetic position Humans Likelihood Functions Modeling Orientation Pattern Recognition, Visual Perception Perceptual localization Probability Learning Ratios Reaction Time Saccades Set (Psychology) Sight Term weighting Visual perception |
title | Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attentional%20Cues%20in%20Real%20Scenes,%20Saccadic%20Targeting,%20and%20Bayesian%20Priors&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Eckstein,%20Miguel%20P.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=973&rft.epage=980&rft.pages=973-980&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40064490%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36688213&rft_id=info:pmid/17176430&rft_jstor_id=40064490&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x&rfr_iscdi=true |