Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour

Abstract Objective To compare the effect of rectal misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage in a rural developing country. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed at two district hospitals in Ghana, West Africa. Four hundred fifty women in adva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada 2007-09, Vol.29 (9), p.711-718
Hauptverfasser: Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC, Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG, Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC, Matthews, Kay, RN, MN, Hutchens, Donna, BN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 718
container_issue 9
container_start_page 711
container_title Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada
container_volume 29
creator Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC
Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG
Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC
Matthews, Kay, RN, MN
Hutchens, Donna, BN
description Abstract Objective To compare the effect of rectal misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage in a rural developing country. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed at two district hospitals in Ghana, West Africa. Four hundred fifty women in advanced labour were enrolled. The only exclusion criterion was a known medical contraindication to prostaglandin administration. Women were randomized to receive rectal misoprostol 800 μg or intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU with delivery of the anterior shoulder. The main outcome measure was change in hemoglobin concentration from before to after delivery. Secondary outcomes included the need for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, transfusion, and medication side effects. Results Demographic characteristics were similar in each treatment group. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in hemoglobin (misoprostol 1.19 g/dL and oxytocin 1.16 g/dL; relative difference 2.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]-16.8% to 19.4%; P = 0.80). The only significant secondary outcome was shivering, which was more common in the misoprostol group (misoprostol 7.5% vs. oxytocin 0.9%; relative risk 8.0; 95% CI 1.86—34.36; P = 0.001). Conclusion Rectal misoprostol 800 μg is as effective as 10 IU intramuscular oxytocin in minimizing blood loss in the third stage of labour. Rectal misoprostol has a lower incidence of side effects than the equivalent oral dose. This confirms the utility of misoprostol as a safe and effective uterotonic for use in the rural and remote areas of developing nations where other pharmacologic agents may be less feasible.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32594-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68250012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1701216316325944</els_id><sourcerecordid>68250012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9d974a3020391e824c03ab898830190039cb2326906d0569b5726b564847d0083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhfOgeP8JSp9EH6qTS9PmRRHxBivi9TWk6axGu60mrbj_3nR3UfBFGAg5nDkz8xGyTeGAApWH9zQHmjIq-R6V-5xlSqRiiaz9yKtkPYRXgCznuVohqzQvWEZ5tkZu79B2pk6uXWjffRu6tk6e0Ic-JDdf0661rklidS-YXJvGPOMEmy5pxzPl4cX5KrnvojxII1O2vd8ky2NTB9xavBvk8fzs4fQyHd1cXJ2ejFIraNGlqlK5MBwYcEWxYMICN2WhioIDVRBVWzLOpAJZQSZVmeVMlpkUhcgrgIJvkN15blz7o8fQ6YkLFuvaNNj2Qct4IgBl0ZjNjTbeFzyO9bt3E-OnmoIe-OkZPz2A0vE346dF7NtZDOjLCVa_XQt40XA8N2A889Oh18E6bCxWzkequmrdvyOO_iTY2jXOmvoNpxheI84mMtRUB6ZhHjJkxBoSBP8GL7yTqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68250012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC ; Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG ; Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC ; Matthews, Kay, RN, MN ; Hutchens, Donna, BN</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC ; Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG ; Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC ; Matthews, Kay, RN, MN ; Hutchens, Donna, BN</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To compare the effect of rectal misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage in a rural developing country. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed at two district hospitals in Ghana, West Africa. Four hundred fifty women in advanced labour were enrolled. The only exclusion criterion was a known medical contraindication to prostaglandin administration. Women were randomized to receive rectal misoprostol 800 μg or intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU with delivery of the anterior shoulder. The main outcome measure was change in hemoglobin concentration from before to after delivery. Secondary outcomes included the need for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, transfusion, and medication side effects. Results Demographic characteristics were similar in each treatment group. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in hemoglobin (misoprostol 1.19 g/dL and oxytocin 1.16 g/dL; relative difference 2.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]-16.8% to 19.4%; P = 0.80). The only significant secondary outcome was shivering, which was more common in the misoprostol group (misoprostol 7.5% vs. oxytocin 0.9%; relative risk 8.0; 95% CI 1.86—34.36; P = 0.001). Conclusion Rectal misoprostol 800 μg is as effective as 10 IU intramuscular oxytocin in minimizing blood loss in the third stage of labour. Rectal misoprostol has a lower incidence of side effects than the equivalent oral dose. This confirms the utility of misoprostol as a safe and effective uterotonic for use in the rural and remote areas of developing nations where other pharmacologic agents may be less feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1701-2163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32594-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17825135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Rectal ; Adult ; Female ; Ghana ; Hospitals, District ; Humans ; Injections, Intramuscular ; Labor Stage, Third - drug effects ; Misoprostol ; Misoprostol - administration &amp; dosage ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Oxytocics - administration &amp; dosage ; Oxytocin - administration &amp; dosage ; postpartum hemorrhage ; Pregnancy ; randomized clinical trial ; rectal ; Rural Population ; third stage ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada, 2007-09, Vol.29 (9), p.711-718</ispartof><rights>Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada</rights><rights>2007 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9d974a3020391e824c03ab898830190039cb2326906d0569b5726b564847d0083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9d974a3020391e824c03ab898830190039cb2326906d0569b5726b564847d0083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17825135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Kay, RN, MN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchens, Donna, BN</creatorcontrib><title>Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Can</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To compare the effect of rectal misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage in a rural developing country. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed at two district hospitals in Ghana, West Africa. Four hundred fifty women in advanced labour were enrolled. The only exclusion criterion was a known medical contraindication to prostaglandin administration. Women were randomized to receive rectal misoprostol 800 μg or intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU with delivery of the anterior shoulder. The main outcome measure was change in hemoglobin concentration from before to after delivery. Secondary outcomes included the need for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, transfusion, and medication side effects. Results Demographic characteristics were similar in each treatment group. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in hemoglobin (misoprostol 1.19 g/dL and oxytocin 1.16 g/dL; relative difference 2.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]-16.8% to 19.4%; P = 0.80). The only significant secondary outcome was shivering, which was more common in the misoprostol group (misoprostol 7.5% vs. oxytocin 0.9%; relative risk 8.0; 95% CI 1.86—34.36; P = 0.001). Conclusion Rectal misoprostol 800 μg is as effective as 10 IU intramuscular oxytocin in minimizing blood loss in the third stage of labour. Rectal misoprostol has a lower incidence of side effects than the equivalent oral dose. This confirms the utility of misoprostol as a safe and effective uterotonic for use in the rural and remote areas of developing nations where other pharmacologic agents may be less feasible.</description><subject>Administration, Rectal</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ghana</subject><subject>Hospitals, District</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular</subject><subject>Labor Stage, Third - drug effects</subject><subject>Misoprostol</subject><subject>Misoprostol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Oxytocics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Oxytocin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>postpartum hemorrhage</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>randomized clinical trial</subject><subject>rectal</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>third stage</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1701-2163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhfOgeP8JSp9EH6qTS9PmRRHxBivi9TWk6axGu60mrbj_3nR3UfBFGAg5nDkz8xGyTeGAApWH9zQHmjIq-R6V-5xlSqRiiaz9yKtkPYRXgCznuVohqzQvWEZ5tkZu79B2pk6uXWjffRu6tk6e0Ic-JDdf0661rklidS-YXJvGPOMEmy5pxzPl4cX5KrnvojxII1O2vd8ky2NTB9xavBvk8fzs4fQyHd1cXJ2ejFIraNGlqlK5MBwYcEWxYMICN2WhioIDVRBVWzLOpAJZQSZVmeVMlpkUhcgrgIJvkN15blz7o8fQ6YkLFuvaNNj2Qct4IgBl0ZjNjTbeFzyO9bt3E-OnmoIe-OkZPz2A0vE346dF7NtZDOjLCVa_XQt40XA8N2A889Oh18E6bCxWzkequmrdvyOO_iTY2jXOmvoNpxheI84mMtRUB6ZhHjJkxBoSBP8GL7yTqQ</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC</creator><creator>Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG</creator><creator>Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC</creator><creator>Matthews, Kay, RN, MN</creator><creator>Hutchens, Donna, BN</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour</title><author>Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC ; Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG ; Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC ; Matthews, Kay, RN, MN ; Hutchens, Donna, BN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-9d974a3020391e824c03ab898830190039cb2326906d0569b5726b564847d0083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Administration, Rectal</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ghana</topic><topic>Hospitals, District</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular</topic><topic>Labor Stage, Third - drug effects</topic><topic>Misoprostol</topic><topic>Misoprostol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Oxytocics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Oxytocin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>postpartum hemorrhage</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>randomized clinical trial</topic><topic>rectal</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>third stage</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Kay, RN, MN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchens, Donna, BN</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsons, Steven M., MD, FRCSC</au><au>Walley, Robert L., MD, FRCSC, FRCOG</au><au>Crane, Joan M.G., MD, FRCSC</au><au>Matthews, Kay, RN, MN</au><au>Hutchens, Donna, BN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol Can</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>718</epage><pages>711-718</pages><issn>1701-2163</issn><abstract>Abstract Objective To compare the effect of rectal misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage in a rural developing country. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed at two district hospitals in Ghana, West Africa. Four hundred fifty women in advanced labour were enrolled. The only exclusion criterion was a known medical contraindication to prostaglandin administration. Women were randomized to receive rectal misoprostol 800 μg or intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU with delivery of the anterior shoulder. The main outcome measure was change in hemoglobin concentration from before to after delivery. Secondary outcomes included the need for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, transfusion, and medication side effects. Results Demographic characteristics were similar in each treatment group. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in hemoglobin (misoprostol 1.19 g/dL and oxytocin 1.16 g/dL; relative difference 2.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]-16.8% to 19.4%; P = 0.80). The only significant secondary outcome was shivering, which was more common in the misoprostol group (misoprostol 7.5% vs. oxytocin 0.9%; relative risk 8.0; 95% CI 1.86—34.36; P = 0.001). Conclusion Rectal misoprostol 800 μg is as effective as 10 IU intramuscular oxytocin in minimizing blood loss in the third stage of labour. Rectal misoprostol has a lower incidence of side effects than the equivalent oral dose. This confirms the utility of misoprostol as a safe and effective uterotonic for use in the rural and remote areas of developing nations where other pharmacologic agents may be less feasible.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17825135</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32594-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1701-2163
ispartof Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada, 2007-09, Vol.29 (9), p.711-718
issn 1701-2163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68250012
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Administration, Rectal
Adult
Female
Ghana
Hospitals, District
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Labor Stage, Third - drug effects
Misoprostol
Misoprostol - administration & dosage
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Oxytocics - administration & dosage
Oxytocin - administration & dosage
postpartum hemorrhage
Pregnancy
randomized clinical trial
rectal
Rural Population
third stage
Treatment Outcome
title Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T16%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rectal%20Misoprostol%20Versus%20Oxytocin%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20the%20Third%20Stage%20of%20Labour&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology%20Canada&rft.au=Parsons,%20Steven%20M.,%20MD,%20FRCSC&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=718&rft.pages=711-718&rft.issn=1701-2163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32594-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68250012%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68250012&rft_id=info:pmid/17825135&rft_els_id=S1701216316325944&rfr_iscdi=true