Enabling Persons with Multiple Disabilities to Choose among Environmental Stimuli and Request Stimulus Repetitions through Microswitch and Computer Technology
This study assessed microswitch and computer technology to enable two participants with multiple disabilities, 32 and 19 years of age, to choose among environmental stimuli and request their repetition whenever they so desired. Within each session, 18 stimuli (12 preferred and 6 nonpreferred) were a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Perceptual and motor skills 2006-10, Vol.103 (2), p.354-362 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 362 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 354 |
| container_title | Perceptual and motor skills |
| container_volume | 103 |
| creator | Lancioni, G. E. O'Reilly, M. F. Singh, N. N. Sigafoos, J. Oliva, D. Severini, L. |
| description | This study assessed microswitch and computer technology to enable two participants with multiple disabilities, 32 and 19 years of age, to choose among environmental stimuli and request their repetition whenever they so desired. Within each session, 18 stimuli (12 preferred and 6 nonpreferred) were available. For each stimulus, a computer system provided a sample of 3 sec. duration. During the intervention, participants' vocal responding in relation to a stimulus sample activated a microswitch and a computer system turned on that stimulus for 15–30 sec. When participants did not vocally respond, the computer system paused briefly and then presented the next scheduled stimulus sample. When participants vocally responded at the end of a stimulus presentation, the stimulus was repeated. Intervention data showed that the participants learned to choose preferred stimuli and bypass nonpreferred ones as well as to request repetitions of the preferred stimuli. This performance was maintained at a 1-mo. postintervention check and transferred to sets of stimuli not used in the intervention. The implications of these results were discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2466/pms.103.2.354-362 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68243479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_pms.103.2.354-362</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1194318461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b7329cabcf1d72f918d9b9f8487b11275d719e51dab91ebf7be51cb84f84e6f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG4kuHBXZd2kUj9LadsfGFF0BHchqbrVnSGVlElKmZfxWU1PNwwIrpJcvnPODYeQ51CVrG6a18scS6h4yUou6oI37AHZgBBd0XTdj4dkU1UcCgFMXJAnMd5UVdVAXT8mF9BCI3jfbcifnVPaGrenXzBE7yL9bdKBflptMotF-tZEpY01yWCkydPtwfuIVM0-S3bulwnezeiSsvRbMvNqDVVupF_x54oxnWdrzIMFU3Y5JqRD8Os-h5gh-JjzhsOdaOvnZU0Y6DUOB-et398-JY8mZSM-O5-X5Pu73fX2Q3H1-f3H7ZurYuCNSIVuOesHpYcJxpZNPXRjr_upq7tWA7BWjC30KGBUugfUU6vzY9BdnRFsJsYvyauT7xL83eZyNnFAa5VDv0bZdKzmddtn8OU_4I1fg8u7SQairpgAyBCcoOP_YsBJLsHMKtxKqOSxOZmby3cumczNydxc1rw4G696xvFeca4qA-UJiGqP96n_d_wLwPuoGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215402511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enabling Persons with Multiple Disabilities to Choose among Environmental Stimuli and Request Stimulus Repetitions through Microswitch and Computer Technology</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Lancioni, G. E. ; O'Reilly, M. F. ; Singh, N. N. ; Sigafoos, J. ; Oliva, D. ; Severini, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lancioni, G. E. ; O'Reilly, M. F. ; Singh, N. N. ; Sigafoos, J. ; Oliva, D. ; Severini, L.</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed microswitch and computer technology to enable two participants with multiple disabilities, 32 and 19 years of age, to choose among environmental stimuli and request their repetition whenever they so desired. Within each session, 18 stimuli (12 preferred and 6 nonpreferred) were available. For each stimulus, a computer system provided a sample of 3 sec. duration. During the intervention, participants' vocal responding in relation to a stimulus sample activated a microswitch and a computer system turned on that stimulus for 15–30 sec. When participants did not vocally respond, the computer system paused briefly and then presented the next scheduled stimulus sample. When participants vocally responded at the end of a stimulus presentation, the stimulus was repeated. Intervention data showed that the participants learned to choose preferred stimuli and bypass nonpreferred ones as well as to request repetitions of the preferred stimuli. This performance was maintained at a 1-mo. postintervention check and transferred to sets of stimuli not used in the intervention. The implications of these results were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-688X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/pms.103.2.354-362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17165398</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMOSAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Affect ; Association Learning ; Choice Behavior ; Communication Aids for Disabled ; Disabled Persons - psychology ; Disabled Persons - rehabilitation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Human-computer interaction ; Humans ; Information technology ; Male ; Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology ; Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation ; Microcomputers ; Motivation ; People with disabilities ; Social Environment ; Speech Recognition Software ; Transfer (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Perceptual and motor skills, 2006-10, Vol.103 (2), p.354-362</ispartof><rights>2006 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Southern Universities Press Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b7329cabcf1d72f918d9b9f8487b11275d719e51dab91ebf7be51cb84f84e6f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b7329cabcf1d72f918d9b9f8487b11275d719e51dab91ebf7be51cb84f84e6f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pms.103.2.354-362$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pms.103.2.354-362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17165398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lancioni, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, N. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigafoos, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severini, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Enabling Persons with Multiple Disabilities to Choose among Environmental Stimuli and Request Stimulus Repetitions through Microswitch and Computer Technology</title><title>Perceptual and motor skills</title><addtitle>Percept Mot Skills</addtitle><description>This study assessed microswitch and computer technology to enable two participants with multiple disabilities, 32 and 19 years of age, to choose among environmental stimuli and request their repetition whenever they so desired. Within each session, 18 stimuli (12 preferred and 6 nonpreferred) were available. For each stimulus, a computer system provided a sample of 3 sec. duration. During the intervention, participants' vocal responding in relation to a stimulus sample activated a microswitch and a computer system turned on that stimulus for 15–30 sec. When participants did not vocally respond, the computer system paused briefly and then presented the next scheduled stimulus sample. When participants vocally responded at the end of a stimulus presentation, the stimulus was repeated. Intervention data showed that the participants learned to choose preferred stimuli and bypass nonpreferred ones as well as to request repetitions of the preferred stimuli. This performance was maintained at a 1-mo. postintervention check and transferred to sets of stimuli not used in the intervention. The implications of these results were discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Association Learning</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Communication Aids for Disabled</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Human-computer interaction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Microcomputers</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Speech Recognition Software</subject><subject>Transfer (Psychology)</subject><issn>0031-5125</issn><issn>1558-688X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6AG4kuHBXZd2kUj9LadsfGFF0BHchqbrVnSGVlElKmZfxWU1PNwwIrpJcvnPODYeQ51CVrG6a18scS6h4yUou6oI37AHZgBBd0XTdj4dkU1UcCgFMXJAnMd5UVdVAXT8mF9BCI3jfbcifnVPaGrenXzBE7yL9bdKBflptMotF-tZEpY01yWCkydPtwfuIVM0-S3bulwnezeiSsvRbMvNqDVVupF_x54oxnWdrzIMFU3Y5JqRD8Os-h5gh-JjzhsOdaOvnZU0Y6DUOB-et398-JY8mZSM-O5-X5Pu73fX2Q3H1-f3H7ZurYuCNSIVuOesHpYcJxpZNPXRjr_upq7tWA7BWjC30KGBUugfUU6vzY9BdnRFsJsYvyauT7xL83eZyNnFAa5VDv0bZdKzmddtn8OU_4I1fg8u7SQairpgAyBCcoOP_YsBJLsHMKtxKqOSxOZmby3cumczNydxc1rw4G696xvFeca4qA-UJiGqP96n_d_wLwPuoGQ</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Lancioni, G. E.</creator><creator>O'Reilly, M. F.</creator><creator>Singh, N. N.</creator><creator>Sigafoos, J.</creator><creator>Oliva, D.</creator><creator>Severini, L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Enabling Persons with Multiple Disabilities to Choose among Environmental Stimuli and Request Stimulus Repetitions through Microswitch and Computer Technology</title><author>Lancioni, G. E. ; O'Reilly, M. F. ; Singh, N. N. ; Sigafoos, J. ; Oliva, D. ; Severini, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b7329cabcf1d72f918d9b9f8487b11275d719e51dab91ebf7be51cb84f84e6f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Association Learning</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Communication Aids for Disabled</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Human-computer interaction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Microcomputers</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Speech Recognition Software</topic><topic>Transfer (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lancioni, G. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Reilly, M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, N. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigafoos, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Severini, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Perceptual and motor skills</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lancioni, G. E.</au><au>O'Reilly, M. F.</au><au>Singh, N. N.</au><au>Sigafoos, J.</au><au>Oliva, D.</au><au>Severini, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enabling Persons with Multiple Disabilities to Choose among Environmental Stimuli and Request Stimulus Repetitions through Microswitch and Computer Technology</atitle><jtitle>Perceptual and motor skills</jtitle><addtitle>Percept Mot Skills</addtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>354-362</pages><issn>0031-5125</issn><eissn>1558-688X</eissn><coden>PMOSAZ</coden><abstract>This study assessed microswitch and computer technology to enable two participants with multiple disabilities, 32 and 19 years of age, to choose among environmental stimuli and request their repetition whenever they so desired. Within each session, 18 stimuli (12 preferred and 6 nonpreferred) were available. For each stimulus, a computer system provided a sample of 3 sec. duration. During the intervention, participants' vocal responding in relation to a stimulus sample activated a microswitch and a computer system turned on that stimulus for 15–30 sec. When participants did not vocally respond, the computer system paused briefly and then presented the next scheduled stimulus sample. When participants vocally responded at the end of a stimulus presentation, the stimulus was repeated. Intervention data showed that the participants learned to choose preferred stimuli and bypass nonpreferred ones as well as to request repetitions of the preferred stimuli. This performance was maintained at a 1-mo. postintervention check and transferred to sets of stimuli not used in the intervention. The implications of these results were discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17165398</pmid><doi>10.2466/pms.103.2.354-362</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-5125 |
| ispartof | Perceptual and motor skills, 2006-10, Vol.103 (2), p.354-362 |
| issn | 0031-5125 1558-688X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68243479 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adult Affect Association Learning Choice Behavior Communication Aids for Disabled Disabled Persons - psychology Disabled Persons - rehabilitation Follow-Up Studies Human-computer interaction Humans Information technology Male Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation Microcomputers Motivation People with disabilities Social Environment Speech Recognition Software Transfer (Psychology) |
| title | Enabling Persons with Multiple Disabilities to Choose among Environmental Stimuli and Request Stimulus Repetitions through Microswitch and Computer Technology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enabling%20Persons%20with%20Multiple%20Disabilities%20to%20Choose%20among%20Environmental%20Stimuli%20and%20Request%20Stimulus%20Repetitions%20through%20Microswitch%20and%20Computer%20Technology&rft.jtitle=Perceptual%20and%20motor%20skills&rft.au=Lancioni,%20G.%20E.&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=354-362&rft.issn=0031-5125&rft.eissn=1558-688X&rft.coden=PMOSAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/pms.103.2.354-362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1194318461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215402511&rft_id=info:pmid/17165398&rft_sage_id=10.2466_pms.103.2.354-362&rfr_iscdi=true |