Environmental trade-offs of biobased production
Various aspects related to the biobased products are discussed. The aim is to examine the inherent trade-offs of carbon and nitrogen cycles related to agriculture. Biobased products are considered environmentally preferable to petroleum alternative because they are derived from renewable materials....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2007-08, Vol.41 (15), p.5176-5182 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5182 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 15 |
| container_start_page | 5176 |
| container_title | Environmental science & technology |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | MILLER, Shelie A LANDIS, Amy E THEIS, Thomas L |
| description | Various aspects related to the biobased products are discussed. The aim is to examine the inherent trade-offs of carbon and nitrogen cycles related to agriculture. Biobased products are considered environmentally preferable to petroleum alternative because they are derived from renewable materials. To determine the potential benefits and consequences, a life-cycle analysis (LCA) of bioproduction systems is needed. The results of this analysis show that biobased products have lower fossil-fuel consumption and green house gases emissions. A relationship is revealed with eutrophication potential associated with bioproduct adoption versus the amount of climate-change benefit. Lower values indicate the smallest environmental impact, while the positive values indicate net positive carbon emissions. It is concluded that the trade-offs involved in bioproduction emphasize the need to analyze problems in a systematic and holistic manner. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es072581z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68242327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68242327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p270t-21deaf20fa7bdd582586e9af8287c18f2546e88f2296477510d7e625b15972ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0DtLxEAUBeBBFDeuFv4BSaNd3Lk3mVcpy_qABRsFuzDJ3IFIklkziaC_3ogrllan-Tj3chg7B34NHGFFkSsUGj4PWAICeSa0gEOWcA55ZnL5smAnMb5yzjHn-pgtQGlErmTCVpv-vRlC31E_2jYdB-soC97HNPi0akJlI7l0NwQ31WMT-lN25G0b6WyfS_Z8u3la32fbx7uH9c0226HiY4bgyHrk3qrKOaHn7yQZ6zVqVYP2KApJek40slBKAHeKJIoKhFFoKV-yq5_e-fTbRHEsuybW1La2pzDFUmosMEf1L4RCgzTFN7zYw6nqyJW7oens8FH-bjGDyz2wsbatH2xfN_HPaaMKQJN_ARPdazU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14816947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental trade-offs of biobased production</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>MILLER, Shelie A ; LANDIS, Amy E ; THEIS, Thomas L</creator><creatorcontrib>MILLER, Shelie A ; LANDIS, Amy E ; THEIS, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><description>Various aspects related to the biobased products are discussed. The aim is to examine the inherent trade-offs of carbon and nitrogen cycles related to agriculture. Biobased products are considered environmentally preferable to petroleum alternative because they are derived from renewable materials. To determine the potential benefits and consequences, a life-cycle analysis (LCA) of bioproduction systems is needed. The results of this analysis show that biobased products have lower fossil-fuel consumption and green house gases emissions. A relationship is revealed with eutrophication potential associated with bioproduct adoption versus the amount of climate-change benefit. Lower values indicate the smallest environmental impact, while the positive values indicate net positive carbon emissions. It is concluded that the trade-offs involved in bioproduction emphasize the need to analyze problems in a systematic and holistic manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es072581z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17822076</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bioelectric Energy Sources - adverse effects ; Carbon ; Environment ; Eutrophication ; Exact sciences and technology ; Global environmental pollution ; Greenhouse Effect ; Nitrogen ; Pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2007-08, Vol.41 (15), p.5176-5182</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18974129$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17822076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MILLER, Shelie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THEIS, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental trade-offs of biobased production</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Various aspects related to the biobased products are discussed. The aim is to examine the inherent trade-offs of carbon and nitrogen cycles related to agriculture. Biobased products are considered environmentally preferable to petroleum alternative because they are derived from renewable materials. To determine the potential benefits and consequences, a life-cycle analysis (LCA) of bioproduction systems is needed. The results of this analysis show that biobased products have lower fossil-fuel consumption and green house gases emissions. A relationship is revealed with eutrophication potential associated with bioproduct adoption versus the amount of climate-change benefit. Lower values indicate the smallest environmental impact, while the positive values indicate net positive carbon emissions. It is concluded that the trade-offs involved in bioproduction emphasize the need to analyze problems in a systematic and holistic manner.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bioelectric Energy Sources - adverse effects</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Global environmental pollution</subject><subject>Greenhouse Effect</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0DtLxEAUBeBBFDeuFv4BSaNd3Lk3mVcpy_qABRsFuzDJ3IFIklkziaC_3ogrllan-Tj3chg7B34NHGFFkSsUGj4PWAICeSa0gEOWcA55ZnL5smAnMb5yzjHn-pgtQGlErmTCVpv-vRlC31E_2jYdB-soC97HNPi0akJlI7l0NwQ31WMT-lN25G0b6WyfS_Z8u3la32fbx7uH9c0226HiY4bgyHrk3qrKOaHn7yQZ6zVqVYP2KApJek40slBKAHeKJIoKhFFoKV-yq5_e-fTbRHEsuybW1La2pzDFUmosMEf1L4RCgzTFN7zYw6nqyJW7oens8FH-bjGDyz2wsbatH2xfN_HPaaMKQJN_ARPdazU</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>MILLER, Shelie A</creator><creator>LANDIS, Amy E</creator><creator>THEIS, Thomas L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Environmental trade-offs of biobased production</title><author>MILLER, Shelie A ; LANDIS, Amy E ; THEIS, Thomas L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p270t-21deaf20fa7bdd582586e9af8287c18f2546e88f2296477510d7e625b15972ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bioelectric Energy Sources - adverse effects</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Global environmental pollution</topic><topic>Greenhouse Effect</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MILLER, Shelie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDIS, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THEIS, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MILLER, Shelie A</au><au>LANDIS, Amy E</au><au>THEIS, Thomas L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental trade-offs of biobased production</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>5176</spage><epage>5182</epage><pages>5176-5182</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Various aspects related to the biobased products are discussed. The aim is to examine the inherent trade-offs of carbon and nitrogen cycles related to agriculture. Biobased products are considered environmentally preferable to petroleum alternative because they are derived from renewable materials. To determine the potential benefits and consequences, a life-cycle analysis (LCA) of bioproduction systems is needed. The results of this analysis show that biobased products have lower fossil-fuel consumption and green house gases emissions. A relationship is revealed with eutrophication potential associated with bioproduct adoption versus the amount of climate-change benefit. Lower values indicate the smallest environmental impact, while the positive values indicate net positive carbon emissions. It is concluded that the trade-offs involved in bioproduction emphasize the need to analyze problems in a systematic and holistic manner.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>17822076</pmid><doi>10.1021/es072581z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
| ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2007-08, Vol.41 (15), p.5176-5182 |
| issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68242327 |
| source | ACS Publications; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Applied sciences Bioelectric Energy Sources - adverse effects Carbon Environment Eutrophication Exact sciences and technology Global environmental pollution Greenhouse Effect Nitrogen Pollution |
| title | Environmental trade-offs of biobased production |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A36%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20trade-offs%20of%20biobased%20production&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=MILLER,%20Shelie%20A&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=5176&rft.epage=5182&rft.pages=5176-5182&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es072581z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68242327%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14816947&rft_id=info:pmid/17822076&rfr_iscdi=true |