Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner

The microPET Focus 120 scanner is a third-generation animal PET scanner dedicated to rodent imaging. Here, we report the results of scanner performance testing. A (68)Ge point source was used to measure energy resolution, which was determined for each crystal and averaged. Spatial resolution was mea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 2007-09, Vol.48 (9), p.1527-1535
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Jin Su, Lee, Jae Sung, Im, Ki Chun, Kim, Su Jin, Kim, Seog-Young, Lee, Dong Soo, Moon, Dae Hyuk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1535
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1527
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 48
creator Kim, Jin Su
Lee, Jae Sung
Im, Ki Chun
Kim, Su Jin
Kim, Seog-Young
Lee, Dong Soo
Moon, Dae Hyuk
description The microPET Focus 120 scanner is a third-generation animal PET scanner dedicated to rodent imaging. Here, we report the results of scanner performance testing. A (68)Ge point source was used to measure energy resolution, which was determined for each crystal and averaged. Spatial resolution was measured using a (22)Na point source with a nominal size of 0.25 mm at the system center and various off-center positions. Absolute sensitivity without attenuation was determined by extrapolating the data measured using an (18)F line source and multiple layers of absorbers. Scatter fraction and counting rate performance were measured using 2 different cylindric phantoms simulating rat and mouse bodies. Sensitivity, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent counting rate (NECR) experiments were repeated under 4 different conditions (energy window, 250 approximately 750 keV or 350 approximately 650 keV; coincidence window, 6 or 10 ns). A performance phantom with hot-rod inserts of various sizes was scanned, and several animal studies were also performed. Energy resolution at a 511-keV photopeak was 18.3% on average. Radial, tangential, and axial resolution of images reconstructed with the Fourier rebinning (FORE) and filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithms were 1.18 (radial), 1.13 (tangential), and 1.45 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) (axial) at center and 2.35 (radial), 1.66 (tangential), and 2.00 mm FWHM (axial) at a radial offset of 2 cm. Absolute sensitivities at transaxial and axial centers were 7.0% (250 approximately 750 keV, 10 ns), 6.7% (250 approximately 750 keV, 6 ns), 4.0% (350 approximately 650 keV, 10 ns), and 3.8% (350 approximately 650 keV, 6 ns). Scatter fractions were 15.9% (mouse phantom) and 35.0% (rat phantom) for 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Peak NECR was 869 kcps at 3,242 kBq/mL (mouse phantom) and 228 kcps at 290 kBq/mL (rat phantom) at 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Hot-rod inserts of 1.6-mm diameter were clearly identified, and animal studies illustrated the feasibility of this system for studies of whole rodents and mid-sized animal brains. The results of this independent field test showed the improved physical characteristics of the F120 scanner over the previous microPET series systems. This system will be useful for imaging studies on small rodents and brains of larger animals.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.107.040550
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68241313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1386570201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-58b5453ff726ca0f34febb76049afdab20ffe7d16d9683be048ab886b5551d823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1KAzEYRYMotlYfwI0MLtzN-OXnSzJLKfUHCnZR10Myk2BLZ1KTycK3d8C6cXXhcLhcLiG3FCpWS_W4H3LvuoqCqkAAIpyROUWOJUqpzskcqKTlhHFGrlLaA4DUWl-SGVUKBBN6TuqNiz7E3gytK3pnUo6ud8NYBF-MnxPatTFsVtvChzangjIoUmuGwcVrcuHNIbmbUy7Ix_Nqu3wt1-8vb8undXlkXI4laosCufeKydaA58I7a5UEURvfGcvAe6c6Krtaam4dCG2s1tIiIu004wvy8Nt7jOEruzQ2_S617nAwgws5NVIzQTnlk3j_T9yHHIdpW8NoTbFWqCbp7iRlO33XHOOuN_G7-XuE_wCCi2JA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219159757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kim, Jin Su ; Lee, Jae Sung ; Im, Ki Chun ; Kim, Su Jin ; Kim, Seog-Young ; Lee, Dong Soo ; Moon, Dae Hyuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Su ; Lee, Jae Sung ; Im, Ki Chun ; Kim, Su Jin ; Kim, Seog-Young ; Lee, Dong Soo ; Moon, Dae Hyuk</creatorcontrib><description>The microPET Focus 120 scanner is a third-generation animal PET scanner dedicated to rodent imaging. Here, we report the results of scanner performance testing. A (68)Ge point source was used to measure energy resolution, which was determined for each crystal and averaged. Spatial resolution was measured using a (22)Na point source with a nominal size of 0.25 mm at the system center and various off-center positions. Absolute sensitivity without attenuation was determined by extrapolating the data measured using an (18)F line source and multiple layers of absorbers. Scatter fraction and counting rate performance were measured using 2 different cylindric phantoms simulating rat and mouse bodies. Sensitivity, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent counting rate (NECR) experiments were repeated under 4 different conditions (energy window, 250 approximately 750 keV or 350 approximately 650 keV; coincidence window, 6 or 10 ns). A performance phantom with hot-rod inserts of various sizes was scanned, and several animal studies were also performed. Energy resolution at a 511-keV photopeak was 18.3% on average. Radial, tangential, and axial resolution of images reconstructed with the Fourier rebinning (FORE) and filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithms were 1.18 (radial), 1.13 (tangential), and 1.45 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) (axial) at center and 2.35 (radial), 1.66 (tangential), and 2.00 mm FWHM (axial) at a radial offset of 2 cm. Absolute sensitivities at transaxial and axial centers were 7.0% (250 approximately 750 keV, 10 ns), 6.7% (250 approximately 750 keV, 6 ns), 4.0% (350 approximately 650 keV, 10 ns), and 3.8% (350 approximately 650 keV, 6 ns). Scatter fractions were 15.9% (mouse phantom) and 35.0% (rat phantom) for 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Peak NECR was 869 kcps at 3,242 kBq/mL (mouse phantom) and 228 kcps at 290 kBq/mL (rat phantom) at 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Hot-rod inserts of 1.6-mm diameter were clearly identified, and animal studies illustrated the feasibility of this system for studies of whole rodents and mid-sized animal brains. The results of this independent field test showed the improved physical characteristics of the F120 scanner over the previous microPET series systems. This system will be useful for imaging studies on small rodents and brains of larger animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.040550</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17704248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Cats ; Feasibility Studies ; Field study ; Fluorine Radioisotopes ; Germanium ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Human subjects ; Mice ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation ; Radioisotopes ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2007-09, Vol.48 (9), p.1527-1535</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17704248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jae Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, Ki Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seog-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Dae Hyuk</creatorcontrib><title>Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>The microPET Focus 120 scanner is a third-generation animal PET scanner dedicated to rodent imaging. Here, we report the results of scanner performance testing. A (68)Ge point source was used to measure energy resolution, which was determined for each crystal and averaged. Spatial resolution was measured using a (22)Na point source with a nominal size of 0.25 mm at the system center and various off-center positions. Absolute sensitivity without attenuation was determined by extrapolating the data measured using an (18)F line source and multiple layers of absorbers. Scatter fraction and counting rate performance were measured using 2 different cylindric phantoms simulating rat and mouse bodies. Sensitivity, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent counting rate (NECR) experiments were repeated under 4 different conditions (energy window, 250 approximately 750 keV or 350 approximately 650 keV; coincidence window, 6 or 10 ns). A performance phantom with hot-rod inserts of various sizes was scanned, and several animal studies were also performed. Energy resolution at a 511-keV photopeak was 18.3% on average. Radial, tangential, and axial resolution of images reconstructed with the Fourier rebinning (FORE) and filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithms were 1.18 (radial), 1.13 (tangential), and 1.45 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) (axial) at center and 2.35 (radial), 1.66 (tangential), and 2.00 mm FWHM (axial) at a radial offset of 2 cm. Absolute sensitivities at transaxial and axial centers were 7.0% (250 approximately 750 keV, 10 ns), 6.7% (250 approximately 750 keV, 6 ns), 4.0% (350 approximately 650 keV, 10 ns), and 3.8% (350 approximately 650 keV, 6 ns). Scatter fractions were 15.9% (mouse phantom) and 35.0% (rat phantom) for 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Peak NECR was 869 kcps at 3,242 kBq/mL (mouse phantom) and 228 kcps at 290 kBq/mL (rat phantom) at 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Hot-rod inserts of 1.6-mm diameter were clearly identified, and animal studies illustrated the feasibility of this system for studies of whole rodents and mid-sized animal brains. The results of this independent field test showed the improved physical characteristics of the F120 scanner over the previous microPET series systems. This system will be useful for imaging studies on small rodents and brains of larger animals.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Fluorine Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Germanium</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1KAzEYRYMotlYfwI0MLtzN-OXnSzJLKfUHCnZR10Myk2BLZ1KTycK3d8C6cXXhcLhcLiG3FCpWS_W4H3LvuoqCqkAAIpyROUWOJUqpzskcqKTlhHFGrlLaA4DUWl-SGVUKBBN6TuqNiz7E3gytK3pnUo6ud8NYBF-MnxPatTFsVtvChzangjIoUmuGwcVrcuHNIbmbUy7Ix_Nqu3wt1-8vb8undXlkXI4laosCufeKydaA58I7a5UEURvfGcvAe6c6Krtaam4dCG2s1tIiIu004wvy8Nt7jOEruzQ2_S617nAwgws5NVIzQTnlk3j_T9yHHIdpW8NoTbFWqCbp7iRlO33XHOOuN_G7-XuE_wCCi2JA</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Kim, Jin Su</creator><creator>Lee, Jae Sung</creator><creator>Im, Ki Chun</creator><creator>Kim, Su Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Seog-Young</creator><creator>Lee, Dong Soo</creator><creator>Moon, Dae Hyuk</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner</title><author>Kim, Jin Su ; Lee, Jae Sung ; Im, Ki Chun ; Kim, Su Jin ; Kim, Seog-Young ; Lee, Dong Soo ; Moon, Dae Hyuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-58b5453ff726ca0f34febb76049afdab20ffe7d16d9683be048ab886b5551d823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Fluorine Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Germanium</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jae Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, Ki Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seog-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dong Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Dae Hyuk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Jin Su</au><au>Lee, Jae Sung</au><au>Im, Ki Chun</au><au>Kim, Su Jin</au><au>Kim, Seog-Young</au><au>Lee, Dong Soo</au><au>Moon, Dae Hyuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1527</spage><epage>1535</epage><pages>1527-1535</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>The microPET Focus 120 scanner is a third-generation animal PET scanner dedicated to rodent imaging. Here, we report the results of scanner performance testing. A (68)Ge point source was used to measure energy resolution, which was determined for each crystal and averaged. Spatial resolution was measured using a (22)Na point source with a nominal size of 0.25 mm at the system center and various off-center positions. Absolute sensitivity without attenuation was determined by extrapolating the data measured using an (18)F line source and multiple layers of absorbers. Scatter fraction and counting rate performance were measured using 2 different cylindric phantoms simulating rat and mouse bodies. Sensitivity, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent counting rate (NECR) experiments were repeated under 4 different conditions (energy window, 250 approximately 750 keV or 350 approximately 650 keV; coincidence window, 6 or 10 ns). A performance phantom with hot-rod inserts of various sizes was scanned, and several animal studies were also performed. Energy resolution at a 511-keV photopeak was 18.3% on average. Radial, tangential, and axial resolution of images reconstructed with the Fourier rebinning (FORE) and filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithms were 1.18 (radial), 1.13 (tangential), and 1.45 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) (axial) at center and 2.35 (radial), 1.66 (tangential), and 2.00 mm FWHM (axial) at a radial offset of 2 cm. Absolute sensitivities at transaxial and axial centers were 7.0% (250 approximately 750 keV, 10 ns), 6.7% (250 approximately 750 keV, 6 ns), 4.0% (350 approximately 650 keV, 10 ns), and 3.8% (350 approximately 650 keV, 6 ns). Scatter fractions were 15.9% (mouse phantom) and 35.0% (rat phantom) for 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Peak NECR was 869 kcps at 3,242 kBq/mL (mouse phantom) and 228 kcps at 290 kBq/mL (rat phantom) at 250 approximately 750 keV and 6 ns. Hot-rod inserts of 1.6-mm diameter were clearly identified, and animal studies illustrated the feasibility of this system for studies of whole rodents and mid-sized animal brains. The results of this independent field test showed the improved physical characteristics of the F120 scanner over the previous microPET series systems. This system will be useful for imaging studies on small rodents and brains of larger animals.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>17704248</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.107.040550</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2007-09, Vol.48 (9), p.1527-1535
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68241313
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animals
Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Cats
Feasibility Studies
Field study
Fluorine Radioisotopes
Germanium
Heart - diagnostic imaging
Human subjects
Mice
Phantoms, Imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation
Radioisotopes
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
title Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A55%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20measurement%20of%20the%20microPET%20focus%20120%20scanner&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Kim,%20Jin%20Su&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1527&rft.epage=1535&rft.pages=1527-1535&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.107.040550&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1386570201%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219159757&rft_id=info:pmid/17704248&rfr_iscdi=true