Nonconsecutive-versus consecutive-day high-intensity interval training in cyclists
We compared the effects of a high-intensity interval training (HIT) program completed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days per week for 3 wk on VO2peak, peak aerobic power output (PPOa), and 5-km time trial (TT5k) performance in trained cyclists. Fifteen trained cyclists completed a TT5k and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2007-09, Vol.39 (9), p.1666-1671 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1671 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1666 |
| container_title | Medicine and science in sports and exercise |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | GROSS, Micah SWENSEN, Thomas KING, Deborah |
| description | We compared the effects of a high-intensity interval training (HIT) program completed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days per week for 3 wk on VO2peak, peak aerobic power output (PPOa), and 5-km time trial (TT5k) performance in trained cyclists.
Fifteen trained cyclists completed a TT5k and an incremental test to exhaustion for VO2peak and PPOa determination before and after training. Pretraining TT5k times were used to form groups, one of which (N=9) performed three HIT sessions per week on consecutive days (CD), while the other (N=6) did so on nonconsecutive days (NCD). Each interval session consisted of up to eight 2.5-min intervals at 100% of PPOa, separated by 4 min of active recovery. Pre- and posttraining TT5k performance, VO2peak, and PPOa were compared using 2x2 (groupxtime) ANOVA with repeated measures on time.
HIT significantly improved VO2peak, PPOa, and TT5k performance in both groups across time (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180cac209 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68238436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20436493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-62b8b96b39149e02a1c6301e877efe1ba6c10e517babb2eb9d7db476f0880c093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5Fc9JY6k83XHkX8gqIgeg6720m7kiZ1Jynk35vSQsWLpxmG531hHiEuEaYYxep2xTwFAyhJYg5W2wjUkRhjIiEEicmxGAOqJFQocSTOmL8AIJMST8UIsxwSBByL99emtk3NZLvWbSjckOeOg9-nue6DpVssQ1e3VLNr-2C7-Y2ugtZrV7t6MVwC29vKccvn4qTUFdPFfk7E5-PDx_1zOHt7erm_m4U2xqgN08jkRqVGKowVQaTRphKQ8iyjktDo1CJQgpnRxkRk1DybmzhLS8iHd0HJibjZ9a59890Rt8XKsaWq0jU1HRdpHsk8lum_YAQDFSs5gPEOtL5h9lQWa-9W2vcFQrGVXgzSi7_Sh9jVvr8zK5ofQnvLA3C9BzRbXZVe19bxgVOQJLHM5A-VzY3D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20436493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonconsecutive-versus consecutive-day high-intensity interval training in cyclists</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>GROSS, Micah ; SWENSEN, Thomas ; KING, Deborah</creator><creatorcontrib>GROSS, Micah ; SWENSEN, Thomas ; KING, Deborah</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the effects of a high-intensity interval training (HIT) program completed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days per week for 3 wk on VO2peak, peak aerobic power output (PPOa), and 5-km time trial (TT5k) performance in trained cyclists.
Fifteen trained cyclists completed a TT5k and an incremental test to exhaustion for VO2peak and PPOa determination before and after training. Pretraining TT5k times were used to form groups, one of which (N=9) performed three HIT sessions per week on consecutive days (CD), while the other (N=6) did so on nonconsecutive days (NCD). Each interval session consisted of up to eight 2.5-min intervals at 100% of PPOa, separated by 4 min of active recovery. Pre- and posttraining TT5k performance, VO2peak, and PPOa were compared using 2x2 (groupxtime) ANOVA with repeated measures on time.
HIT significantly improved VO2peak, PPOa, and TT5k performance in both groups across time (P<0.05); there were no differences between groups. In both groups combined, VO2peak and PPOa increased by 0.2+/-0.2 L.min(-1) (5.7%) and 23+/-15 W (7.2%), respectively, and TT5k velocity and power output increased by 0.9+/-0.8 km.h(-1) (2.6%) and 17+/-19 W (6.9%), respectively. Despite comparable group changes, the individual response varied widely.
CD and NCD similarly improved TT5k performance, VO2peak, and PPOa, but the individual response varied widely in each group. Thus, athletes should experiment with both designs to discern which one optimizes their training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180cac209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17805101</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MSPEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anaerobic Threshold - physiology ; Bicycling - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Physical Fitness - physiology ; Space life sciences ; United States ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2007-09, Vol.39 (9), p.1666-1671</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-62b8b96b39149e02a1c6301e877efe1ba6c10e517babb2eb9d7db476f0880c093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-62b8b96b39149e02a1c6301e877efe1ba6c10e517babb2eb9d7db476f0880c093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19055437$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17805101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GROSS, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SWENSEN, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KING, Deborah</creatorcontrib><title>Nonconsecutive-versus consecutive-day high-intensity interval training in cyclists</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>We compared the effects of a high-intensity interval training (HIT) program completed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days per week for 3 wk on VO2peak, peak aerobic power output (PPOa), and 5-km time trial (TT5k) performance in trained cyclists.
Fifteen trained cyclists completed a TT5k and an incremental test to exhaustion for VO2peak and PPOa determination before and after training. Pretraining TT5k times were used to form groups, one of which (N=9) performed three HIT sessions per week on consecutive days (CD), while the other (N=6) did so on nonconsecutive days (NCD). Each interval session consisted of up to eight 2.5-min intervals at 100% of PPOa, separated by 4 min of active recovery. Pre- and posttraining TT5k performance, VO2peak, and PPOa were compared using 2x2 (groupxtime) ANOVA with repeated measures on time.
HIT significantly improved VO2peak, PPOa, and TT5k performance in both groups across time (P<0.05); there were no differences between groups. In both groups combined, VO2peak and PPOa increased by 0.2+/-0.2 L.min(-1) (5.7%) and 23+/-15 W (7.2%), respectively, and TT5k velocity and power output increased by 0.9+/-0.8 km.h(-1) (2.6%) and 17+/-19 W (6.9%), respectively. Despite comparable group changes, the individual response varied widely.
CD and NCD similarly improved TT5k performance, VO2peak, and PPOa, but the individual response varied widely in each group. Thus, athletes should experiment with both designs to discern which one optimizes their training.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anaerobic Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Bicycling - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5Fc9JY6k83XHkX8gqIgeg6720m7kiZ1Jynk35vSQsWLpxmG531hHiEuEaYYxep2xTwFAyhJYg5W2wjUkRhjIiEEicmxGAOqJFQocSTOmL8AIJMST8UIsxwSBByL99emtk3NZLvWbSjckOeOg9-nue6DpVssQ1e3VLNr-2C7-Y2ugtZrV7t6MVwC29vKccvn4qTUFdPFfk7E5-PDx_1zOHt7erm_m4U2xqgN08jkRqVGKowVQaTRphKQ8iyjktDo1CJQgpnRxkRk1DybmzhLS8iHd0HJibjZ9a59890Rt8XKsaWq0jU1HRdpHsk8lum_YAQDFSs5gPEOtL5h9lQWa-9W2vcFQrGVXgzSi7_Sh9jVvr8zK5ofQnvLA3C9BzRbXZVe19bxgVOQJLHM5A-VzY3D</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>GROSS, Micah</creator><creator>SWENSEN, Thomas</creator><creator>KING, Deborah</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Nonconsecutive-versus consecutive-day high-intensity interval training in cyclists</title><author>GROSS, Micah ; SWENSEN, Thomas ; KING, Deborah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-62b8b96b39149e02a1c6301e877efe1ba6c10e517babb2eb9d7db476f0880c093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anaerobic Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Bicycling - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GROSS, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SWENSEN, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KING, Deborah</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GROSS, Micah</au><au>SWENSEN, Thomas</au><au>KING, Deborah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonconsecutive-versus consecutive-day high-intensity interval training in cyclists</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1666</spage><epage>1671</epage><pages>1666-1671</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><coden>MSPEDA</coden><abstract>We compared the effects of a high-intensity interval training (HIT) program completed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days per week for 3 wk on VO2peak, peak aerobic power output (PPOa), and 5-km time trial (TT5k) performance in trained cyclists.
Fifteen trained cyclists completed a TT5k and an incremental test to exhaustion for VO2peak and PPOa determination before and after training. Pretraining TT5k times were used to form groups, one of which (N=9) performed three HIT sessions per week on consecutive days (CD), while the other (N=6) did so on nonconsecutive days (NCD). Each interval session consisted of up to eight 2.5-min intervals at 100% of PPOa, separated by 4 min of active recovery. Pre- and posttraining TT5k performance, VO2peak, and PPOa were compared using 2x2 (groupxtime) ANOVA with repeated measures on time.
HIT significantly improved VO2peak, PPOa, and TT5k performance in both groups across time (P<0.05); there were no differences between groups. In both groups combined, VO2peak and PPOa increased by 0.2+/-0.2 L.min(-1) (5.7%) and 23+/-15 W (7.2%), respectively, and TT5k velocity and power output increased by 0.9+/-0.8 km.h(-1) (2.6%) and 17+/-19 W (6.9%), respectively. Despite comparable group changes, the individual response varied widely.
CD and NCD similarly improved TT5k performance, VO2peak, and PPOa, but the individual response varied widely in each group. Thus, athletes should experiment with both designs to discern which one optimizes their training.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>17805101</pmid><doi>10.1249/mss.0b013e3180cac209</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0195-9131 |
| ispartof | Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2007-09, Vol.39 (9), p.1666-1671 |
| issn | 0195-9131 1530-0315 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68238436 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Anaerobic Threshold - physiology Bicycling - physiology Biological and medical sciences Exercise Test - methods Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Physical Exertion - physiology Physical Fitness - physiology Space life sciences United States Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports |
| title | Nonconsecutive-versus consecutive-day high-intensity interval training in cyclists |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonconsecutive-versus%20consecutive-day%20high-intensity%20interval%20training%20in%20cyclists&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=GROSS,%20Micah&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1666&rft.epage=1671&rft.pages=1666-1671&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft.coden=MSPEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/mss.0b013e3180cac209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20436493%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20436493&rft_id=info:pmid/17805101&rfr_iscdi=true |