Chemokine Profile of Different Inflammatory Myopathies Reflects Humoral versus Cytotoxic Immune Responses
: The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IM) are subdivided into dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM). These autoimmune muscle diseases represent different immunopathological entities. DM is a humoral endotheliopathy initiated by complement deposition...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007-08, Vol.1109 (1), p.441-453 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 453 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 441 |
container_title | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |
container_volume | 1109 |
creator | De PAEPE, BOEL CREUS, KIM K. De BLEECKER, JAN L. |
description | : The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IM) are subdivided into dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM). These autoimmune muscle diseases represent different immunopathological entities. DM is a humoral endotheliopathy initiated by complement deposition in intramuscular blood vessels, and characterized by perimysial inflammation and muscle fiber atrophy in perifascicular regions. In PM and IBM, nonnecrotic muscle fibers are actively invaded by autoaggressive macrophages and cytotoxic T cells. Chemokines are key mediators of inflammatory disease as they regulate leukocyte recruitment to tissue target sites. We studied a large selection of α/β‐chemokines and receptors in normal controls and in the IM using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, in situ hybridization, and Western blotting. We showed that the chemokine array of normal myocytes was limited, while the blood vessels in normal skeletal muscle tissue displayed a broad chemokine profile. The IM were characterized by a general increase of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors, while chemokine distribution reflected the two different immune responses represented within these muscle diseases. In DM, endothelial expression of CCL2 and CXCL12β was highly increased. In PM and IBM, macrophages and cytotoxic T cells actively invading nonnecrotic muscle fibers expressed highest levels of CXCL10 and CCL2. Some chemokines were selectively expressed by different IM infiltrates: CCL4 was present only in the perimysial inflammatory foci of a subset of DM biopsies, while CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, and CCL7‐positive cells were exclusively detected in endomysial infiltrates of a number of PM and IBM samples. The chemokine receptor profile of the IM indicated the predominance of Th1‐mediated immune responses in all three IM. Our studies identified three ligand‐receptor pairs, namely CXCL10/CXCR3, CXCL12/CXCR4, and CCL2/CCR2, as potential targets for chemokine‐based therapy in IM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1196/annals.1398.050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68234810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68234810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-4954bb2748cbd7094a3d3a453787983883fbfb39cf6cc4f3d8580bc7ae1e2d553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAURS0EotPCmh3yCrHJ1I4_s6wG6IxUSlVAwMpynGc1NI4HO6HNvyclI9jB6m3OPXq6F6EXlKwpreSp7Xvb5TVllV4TQR6hFVW8KqRk5WO0IkSpQlclO0LHOX8nhJaaq6foiCqlBWNshdrNDYR42_aAr1L0bQc4evym9R4S9APe9b6zIdghpgm_n-LeDjctZHwNvgM3ZLwdQ0y2wz8h5THjzTTEId63Du9CGGfrNeR97DPkZ-iJn3-F54d7gj6_e_tpsy0uPpzvNmcXheNKkoJXgtd1qbh2daNIxS1rmOWCKa0qzbRmvvY1q5yXznHPGi00qZ2yQKFshGAn6NXi3af4Y4Q8mNBmB11ne4hjNlKXjGtKZvD1P0FaCqXnmmQ5o6cL6lLMOYE3-9QGmyZDiXkYwixDmIchzDzEnHh5kI91gOYvf2h-BtgC3M2dT__zmctvZx9_a4sl1eYB7v-kbLo1UjElzJfLc_NVlpXayiuzZb8ANqCmLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1257885362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemokine Profile of Different Inflammatory Myopathies Reflects Humoral versus Cytotoxic Immune Responses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>De PAEPE, BOEL ; CREUS, KIM K. ; De BLEECKER, JAN L.</creator><creatorcontrib>De PAEPE, BOEL ; CREUS, KIM K. ; De BLEECKER, JAN L.</creatorcontrib><description>: The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IM) are subdivided into dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM). These autoimmune muscle diseases represent different immunopathological entities. DM is a humoral endotheliopathy initiated by complement deposition in intramuscular blood vessels, and characterized by perimysial inflammation and muscle fiber atrophy in perifascicular regions. In PM and IBM, nonnecrotic muscle fibers are actively invaded by autoaggressive macrophages and cytotoxic T cells. Chemokines are key mediators of inflammatory disease as they regulate leukocyte recruitment to tissue target sites. We studied a large selection of α/β‐chemokines and receptors in normal controls and in the IM using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, in situ hybridization, and Western blotting. We showed that the chemokine array of normal myocytes was limited, while the blood vessels in normal skeletal muscle tissue displayed a broad chemokine profile. The IM were characterized by a general increase of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors, while chemokine distribution reflected the two different immune responses represented within these muscle diseases. In DM, endothelial expression of CCL2 and CXCL12β was highly increased. In PM and IBM, macrophages and cytotoxic T cells actively invading nonnecrotic muscle fibers expressed highest levels of CXCL10 and CCL2. Some chemokines were selectively expressed by different IM infiltrates: CCL4 was present only in the perimysial inflammatory foci of a subset of DM biopsies, while CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, and CCL7‐positive cells were exclusively detected in endomysial infiltrates of a number of PM and IBM samples. The chemokine receptor profile of the IM indicated the predominance of Th1‐mediated immune responses in all three IM. Our studies identified three ligand‐receptor pairs, namely CXCL10/CXCR3, CXCL12/CXCR4, and CCL2/CCR2, as potential targets for chemokine‐based therapy in IM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-6547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1196/annals.1398.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17785333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Antibody Formation - immunology ; Atrophy ; chemokine receptors ; chemokines ; Chemokines - immunology ; Chemokines - metabolism ; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - immunology ; dermatomyositis ; Humans ; inclusion body myositis ; inflammatory myopathy ; Muscle, Skeletal - immunology ; Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism ; Myositis - immunology ; Myositis - metabolism ; Myositis - pathology ; Myositis - therapy ; polymyositis</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007-08, Vol.1109 (1), p.441-453</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-4954bb2748cbd7094a3d3a453787983883fbfb39cf6cc4f3d8580bc7ae1e2d553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-4954bb2748cbd7094a3d3a453787983883fbfb39cf6cc4f3d8580bc7ae1e2d553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1196%2Fannals.1398.050$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1196%2Fannals.1398.050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17785333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De PAEPE, BOEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREUS, KIM K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De BLEECKER, JAN L.</creatorcontrib><title>Chemokine Profile of Different Inflammatory Myopathies Reflects Humoral versus Cytotoxic Immune Responses</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><description>: The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IM) are subdivided into dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM). These autoimmune muscle diseases represent different immunopathological entities. DM is a humoral endotheliopathy initiated by complement deposition in intramuscular blood vessels, and characterized by perimysial inflammation and muscle fiber atrophy in perifascicular regions. In PM and IBM, nonnecrotic muscle fibers are actively invaded by autoaggressive macrophages and cytotoxic T cells. Chemokines are key mediators of inflammatory disease as they regulate leukocyte recruitment to tissue target sites. We studied a large selection of α/β‐chemokines and receptors in normal controls and in the IM using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, in situ hybridization, and Western blotting. We showed that the chemokine array of normal myocytes was limited, while the blood vessels in normal skeletal muscle tissue displayed a broad chemokine profile. The IM were characterized by a general increase of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors, while chemokine distribution reflected the two different immune responses represented within these muscle diseases. In DM, endothelial expression of CCL2 and CXCL12β was highly increased. In PM and IBM, macrophages and cytotoxic T cells actively invading nonnecrotic muscle fibers expressed highest levels of CXCL10 and CCL2. Some chemokines were selectively expressed by different IM infiltrates: CCL4 was present only in the perimysial inflammatory foci of a subset of DM biopsies, while CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, and CCL7‐positive cells were exclusively detected in endomysial infiltrates of a number of PM and IBM samples. The chemokine receptor profile of the IM indicated the predominance of Th1‐mediated immune responses in all three IM. Our studies identified three ligand‐receptor pairs, namely CXCL10/CXCR3, CXCL12/CXCR4, and CCL2/CCR2, as potential targets for chemokine‐based therapy in IM.</description><subject>Antibody Formation - immunology</subject><subject>Atrophy</subject><subject>chemokine receptors</subject><subject>chemokines</subject><subject>Chemokines - immunology</subject><subject>Chemokines - metabolism</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - immunology</subject><subject>dermatomyositis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inclusion body myositis</subject><subject>inflammatory myopathy</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - immunology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</subject><subject>Myositis - immunology</subject><subject>Myositis - metabolism</subject><subject>Myositis - pathology</subject><subject>Myositis - therapy</subject><subject>polymyositis</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><issn>1930-6547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAURS0EotPCmh3yCrHJ1I4_s6wG6IxUSlVAwMpynGc1NI4HO6HNvyclI9jB6m3OPXq6F6EXlKwpreSp7Xvb5TVllV4TQR6hFVW8KqRk5WO0IkSpQlclO0LHOX8nhJaaq6foiCqlBWNshdrNDYR42_aAr1L0bQc4evym9R4S9APe9b6zIdghpgm_n-LeDjctZHwNvgM3ZLwdQ0y2wz8h5THjzTTEId63Du9CGGfrNeR97DPkZ-iJn3-F54d7gj6_e_tpsy0uPpzvNmcXheNKkoJXgtd1qbh2daNIxS1rmOWCKa0qzbRmvvY1q5yXznHPGi00qZ2yQKFshGAn6NXi3af4Y4Q8mNBmB11ne4hjNlKXjGtKZvD1P0FaCqXnmmQ5o6cL6lLMOYE3-9QGmyZDiXkYwixDmIchzDzEnHh5kI91gOYvf2h-BtgC3M2dT__zmctvZx9_a4sl1eYB7v-kbLo1UjElzJfLc_NVlpXayiuzZb8ANqCmLA</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>De PAEPE, BOEL</creator><creator>CREUS, KIM K.</creator><creator>De BLEECKER, JAN L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Chemokine Profile of Different Inflammatory Myopathies Reflects Humoral versus Cytotoxic Immune Responses</title><author>De PAEPE, BOEL ; CREUS, KIM K. ; De BLEECKER, JAN L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-4954bb2748cbd7094a3d3a453787983883fbfb39cf6cc4f3d8580bc7ae1e2d553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Antibody Formation - immunology</topic><topic>Atrophy</topic><topic>chemokine receptors</topic><topic>chemokines</topic><topic>Chemokines - immunology</topic><topic>Chemokines - metabolism</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - immunology</topic><topic>dermatomyositis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inclusion body myositis</topic><topic>inflammatory myopathy</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - immunology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</topic><topic>Myositis - immunology</topic><topic>Myositis - metabolism</topic><topic>Myositis - pathology</topic><topic>Myositis - therapy</topic><topic>polymyositis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De PAEPE, BOEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CREUS, KIM K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De BLEECKER, JAN L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De PAEPE, BOEL</au><au>CREUS, KIM K.</au><au>De BLEECKER, JAN L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemokine Profile of Different Inflammatory Myopathies Reflects Humoral versus Cytotoxic Immune Responses</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>1109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>441-453</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><eissn>1930-6547</eissn><abstract>: The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IM) are subdivided into dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM). These autoimmune muscle diseases represent different immunopathological entities. DM is a humoral endotheliopathy initiated by complement deposition in intramuscular blood vessels, and characterized by perimysial inflammation and muscle fiber atrophy in perifascicular regions. In PM and IBM, nonnecrotic muscle fibers are actively invaded by autoaggressive macrophages and cytotoxic T cells. Chemokines are key mediators of inflammatory disease as they regulate leukocyte recruitment to tissue target sites. We studied a large selection of α/β‐chemokines and receptors in normal controls and in the IM using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, in situ hybridization, and Western blotting. We showed that the chemokine array of normal myocytes was limited, while the blood vessels in normal skeletal muscle tissue displayed a broad chemokine profile. The IM were characterized by a general increase of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors, while chemokine distribution reflected the two different immune responses represented within these muscle diseases. In DM, endothelial expression of CCL2 and CXCL12β was highly increased. In PM and IBM, macrophages and cytotoxic T cells actively invading nonnecrotic muscle fibers expressed highest levels of CXCL10 and CCL2. Some chemokines were selectively expressed by different IM infiltrates: CCL4 was present only in the perimysial inflammatory foci of a subset of DM biopsies, while CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, and CCL7‐positive cells were exclusively detected in endomysial infiltrates of a number of PM and IBM samples. The chemokine receptor profile of the IM indicated the predominance of Th1‐mediated immune responses in all three IM. Our studies identified three ligand‐receptor pairs, namely CXCL10/CXCR3, CXCL12/CXCR4, and CCL2/CCR2, as potential targets for chemokine‐based therapy in IM.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17785333</pmid><doi>10.1196/annals.1398.050</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0077-8923 |
ispartof | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007-08, Vol.1109 (1), p.441-453 |
issn | 0077-8923 1749-6632 1930-6547 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68234810 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Antibody Formation - immunology Atrophy chemokine receptors chemokines Chemokines - immunology Chemokines - metabolism Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - immunology dermatomyositis Humans inclusion body myositis inflammatory myopathy Muscle, Skeletal - immunology Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism Myositis - immunology Myositis - metabolism Myositis - pathology Myositis - therapy polymyositis |
title | Chemokine Profile of Different Inflammatory Myopathies Reflects Humoral versus Cytotoxic Immune Responses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A38%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemokine%20Profile%20of%20Different%20Inflammatory%20Myopathies%20Reflects%20Humoral%20versus%20Cytotoxic%20Immune%20Responses&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=De%20PAEPE,%20BOEL&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=1109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=441-453&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1196/annals.1398.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68234810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1257885362&rft_id=info:pmid/17785333&rfr_iscdi=true |