Additional Surgical Intervention after Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, or Watchful Waiting

Abstract Objectives The amount of additional surgical procedures that cancer patients undergo following their initial treatment is one means of measuring the impact that cancer and cancer treatment has on their quality of life. In this study we looked for treatment-related differences in the need fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2007-10, Vol.52 (4), p.1036-1043
Hauptverfasser: Berge, Viktor, Thompson, Trevor, Blackman, Donald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1043
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1036
container_title European urology
container_volume 52
creator Berge, Viktor
Thompson, Trevor
Blackman, Donald
description Abstract Objectives The amount of additional surgical procedures that cancer patients undergo following their initial treatment is one means of measuring the impact that cancer and cancer treatment has on their quality of life. In this study we looked for treatment-related differences in the need for additional surgical intervention among men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer within 66 mo of their initial treatment. Methods Data for this study were from the National Cancer Institutes Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and from the Medicare claims database. We searched the claims database for procedure codes indicating artificial urinary sphincter procedures, cystoscopy, urethral dilation, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and bladder-neck incision, bladder irrigation/cystotomy, or nephrostomy. Results Of the 12,711 patients in our study, 3940 (31.0%) were initially treated by radical prostatectomy (RP), 3950 (31.1%) by radiation therapy (RT), 1209 (9.5%) by androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and 3612 (28.4%) by watchful waiting (WW). The percentage of patients who underwent cystoscopy 6–66 mo after their initial treatment ranged narrowly from 22% to 24% among members of the four treatment groups. In the RP group, 5.2% had artificial urinary sphincter procedures; 6.8% of the RT group, 8.2% of the ADT group, and 10.1% of the WW group had TURP/bladder-neck procedures compared with 3.7% of the RP group; and 12.5–16.2% of members in the four groups had urethral dilation procedures. Conclusions Over one third of prostate cancer patients needed surgical intervention within 66 mo of their initial treatment despite the type of initial treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68226954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0302283806015831</els_id><sourcerecordid>68226954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4498eea980799ee9d928112ca9bd520550d591f40e62cd119ce42a42ab31fc703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUcFqGzEQ1aElSdP8QQk-5dTdzEi7a-kSMGmbBAINSUqPQpZmnXXWK1faNfjaL4_WNgQCAo1m3jzx3mPsG0KOgNXlMqchDMHnHKDKkeeA_BM7AQE841LIY_YlxiUAiFKJI3aMU5xKlPKE_Z851_SN70w7eRrCorGpuOt6Chvqxv7E1OkxeTRuN3oIPvamJ9v71fb7rm12sOcXCmadWrPOBb-gLvtB69BsPkx9mPw1vX2phzYV6edu8ZV9rk0b6exwn7I_v34-X99m979v7q5n95kVFfRZUShJZJSEqVJEyikuEbk1au5KDmUJrlRYF0AVtw5RWSq4SWcusLZTEKfsYs-7Dv7fQLHXqyZaalvTkR-iriTnlSqLBCz2QJvExkC1TkJWJmw1gh791ku991uPfmvkOvmd1s4P_MN8Re596WB2AlztAZRUbhoK2rZNN9r6SluKSz-EFEPUqGNi1E9jfGN6UAGWUqB4A2sYly8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68226954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Additional Surgical Intervention after Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, or Watchful Waiting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Berge, Viktor ; Thompson, Trevor ; Blackman, Donald</creator><creatorcontrib>Berge, Viktor ; Thompson, Trevor ; Blackman, Donald</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The amount of additional surgical procedures that cancer patients undergo following their initial treatment is one means of measuring the impact that cancer and cancer treatment has on their quality of life. In this study we looked for treatment-related differences in the need for additional surgical intervention among men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer within 66 mo of their initial treatment. Methods Data for this study were from the National Cancer Institutes Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and from the Medicare claims database. We searched the claims database for procedure codes indicating artificial urinary sphincter procedures, cystoscopy, urethral dilation, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and bladder-neck incision, bladder irrigation/cystotomy, or nephrostomy. Results Of the 12,711 patients in our study, 3940 (31.0%) were initially treated by radical prostatectomy (RP), 3950 (31.1%) by radiation therapy (RT), 1209 (9.5%) by androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and 3612 (28.4%) by watchful waiting (WW). The percentage of patients who underwent cystoscopy 6–66 mo after their initial treatment ranged narrowly from 22% to 24% among members of the four treatment groups. In the RP group, 5.2% had artificial urinary sphincter procedures; 6.8% of the RT group, 8.2% of the ADT group, and 10.1% of the WW group had TURP/bladder-neck procedures compared with 3.7% of the RP group; and 12.5–16.2% of members in the four groups had urethral dilation procedures. Conclusions Over one third of prostate cancer patients needed surgical intervention within 66 mo of their initial treatment despite the type of initial treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17178188</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland</publisher><subject>Aged ; Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Cohort Studies ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Comorbidity ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; National Cancer Institute (U.S.) ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; United States ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2007-10, Vol.52 (4), p.1036-1043</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4498eea980799ee9d928112ca9bd520550d591f40e62cd119ce42a42ab31fc703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4498eea980799ee9d928112ca9bd520550d591f40e62cd119ce42a42ab31fc703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17178188$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berge, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackman, Donald</creatorcontrib><title>Additional Surgical Intervention after Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, or Watchful Waiting</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The amount of additional surgical procedures that cancer patients undergo following their initial treatment is one means of measuring the impact that cancer and cancer treatment has on their quality of life. In this study we looked for treatment-related differences in the need for additional surgical intervention among men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer within 66 mo of their initial treatment. Methods Data for this study were from the National Cancer Institutes Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and from the Medicare claims database. We searched the claims database for procedure codes indicating artificial urinary sphincter procedures, cystoscopy, urethral dilation, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and bladder-neck incision, bladder irrigation/cystotomy, or nephrostomy. Results Of the 12,711 patients in our study, 3940 (31.0%) were initially treated by radical prostatectomy (RP), 3950 (31.1%) by radiation therapy (RT), 1209 (9.5%) by androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and 3612 (28.4%) by watchful waiting (WW). The percentage of patients who underwent cystoscopy 6–66 mo after their initial treatment ranged narrowly from 22% to 24% among members of the four treatment groups. In the RP group, 5.2% had artificial urinary sphincter procedures; 6.8% of the RT group, 8.2% of the ADT group, and 10.1% of the WW group had TURP/bladder-neck procedures compared with 3.7% of the RP group; and 12.5–16.2% of members in the four groups had urethral dilation procedures. Conclusions Over one third of prostate cancer patients needed surgical intervention within 66 mo of their initial treatment despite the type of initial treatment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUcFqGzEQ1aElSdP8QQk-5dTdzEi7a-kSMGmbBAINSUqPQpZmnXXWK1faNfjaL4_WNgQCAo1m3jzx3mPsG0KOgNXlMqchDMHnHKDKkeeA_BM7AQE841LIY_YlxiUAiFKJI3aMU5xKlPKE_Z851_SN70w7eRrCorGpuOt6Chvqxv7E1OkxeTRuN3oIPvamJ9v71fb7rm12sOcXCmadWrPOBb-gLvtB69BsPkx9mPw1vX2phzYV6edu8ZV9rk0b6exwn7I_v34-X99m979v7q5n95kVFfRZUShJZJSEqVJEyikuEbk1au5KDmUJrlRYF0AVtw5RWSq4SWcusLZTEKfsYs-7Dv7fQLHXqyZaalvTkR-iriTnlSqLBCz2QJvExkC1TkJWJmw1gh791ku991uPfmvkOvmd1s4P_MN8Re596WB2AlztAZRUbhoK2rZNN9r6SluKSz-EFEPUqGNi1E9jfGN6UAGWUqB4A2sYly8</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Berge, Viktor</creator><creator>Thompson, Trevor</creator><creator>Blackman, Donald</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Additional Surgical Intervention after Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, or Watchful Waiting</title><author>Berge, Viktor ; Thompson, Trevor ; Blackman, Donald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-4498eea980799ee9d928112ca9bd520550d591f40e62cd119ce42a42ab31fc703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berge, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackman, Donald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berge, Viktor</au><au>Thompson, Trevor</au><au>Blackman, Donald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Additional Surgical Intervention after Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, or Watchful Waiting</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1036</spage><epage>1043</epage><pages>1036-1043</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The amount of additional surgical procedures that cancer patients undergo following their initial treatment is one means of measuring the impact that cancer and cancer treatment has on their quality of life. In this study we looked for treatment-related differences in the need for additional surgical intervention among men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer within 66 mo of their initial treatment. Methods Data for this study were from the National Cancer Institutes Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and from the Medicare claims database. We searched the claims database for procedure codes indicating artificial urinary sphincter procedures, cystoscopy, urethral dilation, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and bladder-neck incision, bladder irrigation/cystotomy, or nephrostomy. Results Of the 12,711 patients in our study, 3940 (31.0%) were initially treated by radical prostatectomy (RP), 3950 (31.1%) by radiation therapy (RT), 1209 (9.5%) by androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and 3612 (28.4%) by watchful waiting (WW). The percentage of patients who underwent cystoscopy 6–66 mo after their initial treatment ranged narrowly from 22% to 24% among members of the four treatment groups. In the RP group, 5.2% had artificial urinary sphincter procedures; 6.8% of the RT group, 8.2% of the ADT group, and 10.1% of the WW group had TURP/bladder-neck procedures compared with 3.7% of the RP group; and 12.5–16.2% of members in the four groups had urethral dilation procedures. Conclusions Over one third of prostate cancer patients needed surgical intervention within 66 mo of their initial treatment despite the type of initial treatment.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pmid>17178188</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2007-10, Vol.52 (4), p.1036-1043
issn 0302-2838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68226954
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Combined Modality Therapy
Comorbidity
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Neoplasm Staging
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
United States
Urology
title Additional Surgical Intervention after Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, or Watchful Waiting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Additional%20Surgical%20Intervention%20after%20Radical%20Prostatectomy,%20Radiation%20Therapy,%20Androgen-Deprivation%20Therapy,%20or%20Watchful%20Waiting&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Berge,%20Viktor&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1036&rft.epage=1043&rft.pages=1036-1043&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68226954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68226954&rft_id=info:pmid/17178188&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0302283806015831&rfr_iscdi=true