Simultaneous analysis of nitrate and nitrite in a microfluidic device with a Cu-complex-modified electrode

A CE microsystem coupled with a microchip and a copper–(3‐mercaptopropyl) trimethoxysilane (Cu–MPS) complex‐modified carbon paste electrode (CPE) was developed for the simultaneous analysis of nitrite and nitrate. The method is based on the electrocatalytic reduction of both analytes with the modifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electrophoresis 2006-11, Vol.27 (22), p.4545-4554
Hauptverfasser: Shiddiky, Muhammad J. A., Won, Mi-Sook, Shim, Yoon-Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A CE microsystem coupled with a microchip and a copper–(3‐mercaptopropyl) trimethoxysilane (Cu–MPS) complex‐modified carbon paste electrode (CPE) was developed for the simultaneous analysis of nitrite and nitrate. The method is based on the electrocatalytic reduction of both analytes with the modified electrode. The Cu–MPS complex was characterized by voltammetric, XPS, and FT‐IR analyses. Experimental parameters affecting the sensitivity of the modified electrode were assessed and optimized. The best separation was achieved in a 60 mm separation channel filled with a 20 mM acetate buffer of pH 5.0 containing 3.0 mM CTAB at separation field strength of −250 V/cm within 90 s. The detection potential for the simultaneous analysis of nitrite and nitrate was found to be −225 mV versus Ag/AgCl. A reproducible response (RSD of 3.2% (nitrite) and 2.8% (nitrate), n = 8) for repetitive sample injections reflected the negligible electrode fouling at the modified CPE. The interference effect was examined for other inorganic ions and biological compounds. A wide hydrodynamic range between 0.25 and 120 µM was observed for analyzing nitrite and nitrate with the sensitivities of 0.069 ± 0.003 and 0.065 ± 0.002 nA/µM, and the detection limits, based on S/N = 3, were found to be 0.09 ± 0.007 and 0.08 ± 0.009 µM, respectively. The applicability of the method to water and urine samples analyses was demonstrated.
ISSN:0173-0835
1522-2683
DOI:10.1002/elps.200600240