Quantitative structure–pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships

Quantitative structure–activity relationships have long been considered a vital component of drug discovery and development, providing insight into the role of molecular properties in the biological activity of similar and unrelated compounds. Recognition that in vitro bioassay and/or pre-clinical a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advanced drug delivery reviews 2006-11, Vol.58 (12), p.1326-1356
1. Verfasser: Mager, Donald E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1356
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1326
container_title Advanced drug delivery reviews
container_volume 58
creator Mager, Donald E.
description Quantitative structure–activity relationships have long been considered a vital component of drug discovery and development, providing insight into the role of molecular properties in the biological activity of similar and unrelated compounds. Recognition that in vitro bioassay and/or pre-clinical activity are insufficient for anticipating which compounds are suitable leads for further development has shifted the focus toward integrated pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) processes. Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made in constructing empirical and mechanistic quantitative structure–PK relationships (QSPKR), as well as diverse mechanism-based pharmacodynamic models of drug effects. In this review, traditional and contemporary approaches to developing QSPKR models are discussed, along with selected examples of attempts to couple QSPKR and pharmacodynamic models to anticipate the intensity and time-course of the pharmacological effects of new or related compounds, or quantitative structure–pharmacodynamic relationships modeling. Such models are in accordance with the goals of systems biology and the ideal of designing drugs and delivery systems from first principles.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.addr.2006.08.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68186391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169409X06001670</els_id><sourcerecordid>20243276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1062d129b48cf1c21515459aabfc7e3f116506ae0fe83fd793e1ab9950430aa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFq3DAURUVJaKZpf6CLkFV2dt6TbFmCbkpI2sJACKTQndDIz4ymY3siyQPZ5R_6h_mSaJgp2SWrx4Nz7-Iexr4ilAgoL1elbdtQcgBZgioB-Ac2Q9XwQnFdHbFZhnRRgf5zwj7FuAJA3kj4yE6wAc0lwIzd3E12SD7Z5Ld0HlOYXJoCPT_92yxt6K0b__qBkneX___2cbC9d-eB1jk0DnHpN_EzO-7sOtKXwz1lv2-u769-FvPbH7-uvs8LVymeCgTJW-R6USnXoeNYY13V2tpF5xoSHaKsQVqCjpTo2kYLQrvQuoZKgLVKnLKLfe8mjA8TxWR6Hx2t13agcYpGKlRSaHwXFAI56sy-B3LglcizZZDvQRfGGAN1ZhN8b8OjQTA7H2Zldj7MzocBZbKPHDo7tE-LntrXyEFABr7tAcqrbT0FE52nwVHrA7lk2tG_1f8CQ52dxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20243276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative structure–pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mager, Donald E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mager, Donald E.</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative structure–activity relationships have long been considered a vital component of drug discovery and development, providing insight into the role of molecular properties in the biological activity of similar and unrelated compounds. Recognition that in vitro bioassay and/or pre-clinical activity are insufficient for anticipating which compounds are suitable leads for further development has shifted the focus toward integrated pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) processes. Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made in constructing empirical and mechanistic quantitative structure–PK relationships (QSPKR), as well as diverse mechanism-based pharmacodynamic models of drug effects. In this review, traditional and contemporary approaches to developing QSPKR models are discussed, along with selected examples of attempts to couple QSPKR and pharmacodynamic models to anticipate the intensity and time-course of the pharmacological effects of new or related compounds, or quantitative structure–pharmacodynamic relationships modeling. Such models are in accordance with the goals of systems biology and the ideal of designing drugs and delivery systems from first principles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-409X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8294</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.08.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17092600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Area Under Curve ; Biological Availability ; Distribution ; Drug Delivery Systems - trends ; Excretion ; Humans ; Intestinal Absorption ; Metabolism ; Models, Biological ; Models, Molecular ; Molecular modeling ; Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology ; Protein binding ; QSAR ; QSPR ; Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><ispartof>Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2006-11, Vol.58 (12), p.1326-1356</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1062d129b48cf1c21515459aabfc7e3f116506ae0fe83fd793e1ab9950430aa83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1062d129b48cf1c21515459aabfc7e3f116506ae0fe83fd793e1ab9950430aa83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2006.08.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17092600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mager, Donald E.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative structure–pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships</title><title>Advanced drug delivery reviews</title><addtitle>Adv Drug Deliv Rev</addtitle><description>Quantitative structure–activity relationships have long been considered a vital component of drug discovery and development, providing insight into the role of molecular properties in the biological activity of similar and unrelated compounds. Recognition that in vitro bioassay and/or pre-clinical activity are insufficient for anticipating which compounds are suitable leads for further development has shifted the focus toward integrated pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) processes. Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made in constructing empirical and mechanistic quantitative structure–PK relationships (QSPKR), as well as diverse mechanism-based pharmacodynamic models of drug effects. In this review, traditional and contemporary approaches to developing QSPKR models are discussed, along with selected examples of attempts to couple QSPKR and pharmacodynamic models to anticipate the intensity and time-course of the pharmacological effects of new or related compounds, or quantitative structure–pharmacodynamic relationships modeling. Such models are in accordance with the goals of systems biology and the ideal of designing drugs and delivery systems from first principles.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems - trends</subject><subject>Excretion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Absorption</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Molecular modeling</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>QSAR</subject><subject>QSPR</subject><subject>Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><issn>0169-409X</issn><issn>1872-8294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFq3DAURUVJaKZpf6CLkFV2dt6TbFmCbkpI2sJACKTQndDIz4ymY3siyQPZ5R_6h_mSaJgp2SWrx4Nz7-Iexr4ilAgoL1elbdtQcgBZgioB-Ac2Q9XwQnFdHbFZhnRRgf5zwj7FuAJA3kj4yE6wAc0lwIzd3E12SD7Z5Ld0HlOYXJoCPT_92yxt6K0b__qBkneX___2cbC9d-eB1jk0DnHpN_EzO-7sOtKXwz1lv2-u769-FvPbH7-uvs8LVymeCgTJW-R6USnXoeNYY13V2tpF5xoSHaKsQVqCjpTo2kYLQrvQuoZKgLVKnLKLfe8mjA8TxWR6Hx2t13agcYpGKlRSaHwXFAI56sy-B3LglcizZZDvQRfGGAN1ZhN8b8OjQTA7H2Zldj7MzocBZbKPHDo7tE-LntrXyEFABr7tAcqrbT0FE52nwVHrA7lk2tG_1f8CQ52dxg</recordid><startdate>20061130</startdate><enddate>20061130</enddate><creator>Mager, Donald E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061130</creationdate><title>Quantitative structure–pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships</title><author>Mager, Donald E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1062d129b48cf1c21515459aabfc7e3f116506ae0fe83fd793e1ab9950430aa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems - trends</topic><topic>Excretion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Absorption</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Molecular modeling</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>QSAR</topic><topic>QSPR</topic><topic>Structure-Activity Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mager, Donald E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advanced drug delivery reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mager, Donald E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative structure–pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships</atitle><jtitle>Advanced drug delivery reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Drug Deliv Rev</addtitle><date>2006-11-30</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1326</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1326-1356</pages><issn>0169-409X</issn><eissn>1872-8294</eissn><abstract>Quantitative structure–activity relationships have long been considered a vital component of drug discovery and development, providing insight into the role of molecular properties in the biological activity of similar and unrelated compounds. Recognition that in vitro bioassay and/or pre-clinical activity are insufficient for anticipating which compounds are suitable leads for further development has shifted the focus toward integrated pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) processes. Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made in constructing empirical and mechanistic quantitative structure–PK relationships (QSPKR), as well as diverse mechanism-based pharmacodynamic models of drug effects. In this review, traditional and contemporary approaches to developing QSPKR models are discussed, along with selected examples of attempts to couple QSPKR and pharmacodynamic models to anticipate the intensity and time-course of the pharmacological effects of new or related compounds, or quantitative structure–pharmacodynamic relationships modeling. Such models are in accordance with the goals of systems biology and the ideal of designing drugs and delivery systems from first principles.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>17092600</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.addr.2006.08.002</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-409X
ispartof Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2006-11, Vol.58 (12), p.1326-1356
issn 0169-409X
1872-8294
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68186391
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Absorption
Area Under Curve
Biological Availability
Distribution
Drug Delivery Systems - trends
Excretion
Humans
Intestinal Absorption
Metabolism
Models, Biological
Models, Molecular
Molecular modeling
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacology
Protein binding
QSAR
QSPR
Structure-Activity Relationship
title Quantitative structure–pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20structure%E2%80%93pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Advanced%20drug%20delivery%20reviews&rft.au=Mager,%20Donald%20E.&rft.date=2006-11-30&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1326&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1326-1356&rft.issn=0169-409X&rft.eissn=1872-8294&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.addr.2006.08.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20243276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20243276&rft_id=info:pmid/17092600&rft_els_id=S0169409X06001670&rfr_iscdi=true