Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK)
OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Danish version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale version 2.0 (SS-QOL-DK), an instrument for evaluation of health-related quality of life. DESIGN: A correlational study. SETTING: A stroke unit that provides acute care and rehabilitatio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical rehabilitation 2007-07, Vol.21 (7), p.620-627 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 627 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 620 |
| container_title | Clinical rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Muus, Ingrid Williams, Linda S Ringsberg, Karin C |
| description | OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Danish version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale version 2.0 (SS-QOL-DK), an instrument for evaluation of health-related quality of life.
DESIGN: A correlational study.
SETTING: A stroke unit that provides acute care and rehabilitation for stroke patients in Frederiksborg County, Denmark.
SUBJECTS: One hundred and fifty-two stroke survivors participated; 24 of these performed test-retest.
INTERVENTION: Questionnaires were sent out and returned by mail. A subsequent telephone interview assessed functional level and missing items.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest was measured using Spearman's r, internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluation of floor and ceiling values in proportion of minimum and maximum scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing patients' scores on the SS-QOL-DK with those obtained by other test methods: Beck's Depression Index, the General Health Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Barthel Index and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, evaluating shared variance using coefficient of determination, r2. Comparing groups with known scores assessed known-group validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.
RESULTS: Test-retest of SS-QOL-DK showed excellent stability, Spearman's r = 0.65-0.99. Internal consistency for all domains showed Cronbach's alpha = 0.81-0.94. Missing items rate was 1.0%. Most SS-QOL-DK domains showed moderately shared variance with similar domains of other test methods, r2 = 0.03-0.62. Groups with known differences showed statistically significant difference in scores. Item-to-scale correlation coefficients of 0.37-0.88 supported convergent validity.
CONCLUSIONS: SS-QOL-DK is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring self-reported health-related quality of life on group level among people with mild to moderate stroke. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0269215507075504 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68174686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0269215507075504</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1307184751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f92ca5c38abf48c6fc32becc6219b421fbdcc8da2bbdf4d36f0d287c5fd06fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3uXUlwIbqI3plMZpKdUnxBoJSq2zBPjaZJzSRC_70TGix04WYuw_nOuZeD0CmGa4w5vwHCUoLjGDhw_9I9NMaU8xASHu2jcS-HvT5CR859AkBCKD5EI-8FwoGO0e2bKAst2qKugtoG7YcJFm1Tf_mxMqqwhQrmnUfadS9nhfWCEqUJLheLcD7Lro7RgRWlMyfDnKDXh_uX6VOYzR6fp3dZqKIkbUNmU6JE7D9CWpooZlVEpFGKEZxKSrCVWqlECyKltlRHzIImCVex1cCsjCboYpO7aurvzrg2XxZOmbIUlak7l7MEc8oS5sHzHfCz7prK35YTAB4BA-Ih2ECqqZ1rjM1XTbEUzTrHkPfV5rvVesvZkNvJpdFbw9ClB8IN4MS72S79J3A4tKobbaq_QF38CJLzOI1JHP0ChMuKiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200730602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK)</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Muus, Ingrid ; Williams, Linda S ; Ringsberg, Karin C</creator><creatorcontrib>Muus, Ingrid ; Williams, Linda S ; Ringsberg, Karin C ; Nordiska ministerrådet ; Nordic School of Public Health NHV</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Danish version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale version 2.0 (SS-QOL-DK), an instrument for evaluation of health-related quality of life.
DESIGN: A correlational study.
SETTING: A stroke unit that provides acute care and rehabilitation for stroke patients in Frederiksborg County, Denmark.
SUBJECTS: One hundred and fifty-two stroke survivors participated; 24 of these performed test-retest.
INTERVENTION: Questionnaires were sent out and returned by mail. A subsequent telephone interview assessed functional level and missing items.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest was measured using Spearman's r, internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluation of floor and ceiling values in proportion of minimum and maximum scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing patients' scores on the SS-QOL-DK with those obtained by other test methods: Beck's Depression Index, the General Health Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Barthel Index and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, evaluating shared variance using coefficient of determination, r2. Comparing groups with known scores assessed known-group validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.
RESULTS: Test-retest of SS-QOL-DK showed excellent stability, Spearman's r = 0.65-0.99. Internal consistency for all domains showed Cronbach's alpha = 0.81-0.94. Missing items rate was 1.0%. Most SS-QOL-DK domains showed moderately shared variance with similar domains of other test methods, r2 = 0.03-0.62. Groups with known differences showed statistically significant difference in scores. Item-to-scale correlation coefficients of 0.37-0.88 supported convergent validity.
CONCLUSIONS: SS-QOL-DK is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring self-reported health-related quality of life on group level among people with mild to moderate stroke.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269215507075504</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17702704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Consent ; Cultural Characteristics ; Denmark ; Female ; Folkhälsomedicinska forskningsområden ; Folkhälsovetenskap ; Health services ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Language ; Male ; Medical and Health Sciences ; MEDICIN ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; MEDICINE ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Patients ; Postal Service ; Public health ; Public health medicine research areas ; Public health science ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Sickness Impact Profile ; Social medicine ; Socialmedicin ; Stroke ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Test methods ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Clinical rehabilitation, 2007-07, Vol.21 (7), p.620-627</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications © Jul 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f92ca5c38abf48c6fc32becc6219b421fbdcc8da2bbdf4d36f0d287c5fd06fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f92ca5c38abf48c6fc32becc6219b421fbdcc8da2bbdf4d36f0d287c5fd06fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269215507075504$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269215507075504$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17702704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muus, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Linda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringsberg, Karin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordiska ministerrådet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordic School of Public Health NHV</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK)</title><title>Clinical rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Danish version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale version 2.0 (SS-QOL-DK), an instrument for evaluation of health-related quality of life.
DESIGN: A correlational study.
SETTING: A stroke unit that provides acute care and rehabilitation for stroke patients in Frederiksborg County, Denmark.
SUBJECTS: One hundred and fifty-two stroke survivors participated; 24 of these performed test-retest.
INTERVENTION: Questionnaires were sent out and returned by mail. A subsequent telephone interview assessed functional level and missing items.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest was measured using Spearman's r, internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluation of floor and ceiling values in proportion of minimum and maximum scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing patients' scores on the SS-QOL-DK with those obtained by other test methods: Beck's Depression Index, the General Health Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Barthel Index and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, evaluating shared variance using coefficient of determination, r2. Comparing groups with known scores assessed known-group validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.
RESULTS: Test-retest of SS-QOL-DK showed excellent stability, Spearman's r = 0.65-0.99. Internal consistency for all domains showed Cronbach's alpha = 0.81-0.94. Missing items rate was 1.0%. Most SS-QOL-DK domains showed moderately shared variance with similar domains of other test methods, r2 = 0.03-0.62. Groups with known differences showed statistically significant difference in scores. Item-to-scale correlation coefficients of 0.37-0.88 supported convergent validity.
CONCLUSIONS: SS-QOL-DK is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring self-reported health-related quality of life on group level among people with mild to moderate stroke.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Folkhälsomedicinska forskningsområden</subject><subject>Folkhälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical and Health Sciences</subject><subject>MEDICIN</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>MEDICINE</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postal Service</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health medicine research areas</subject><subject>Public health science</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sickness Impact Profile</subject><subject>Social medicine</subject><subject>Socialmedicin</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0269-2155</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3uXUlwIbqI3plMZpKdUnxBoJSq2zBPjaZJzSRC_70TGix04WYuw_nOuZeD0CmGa4w5vwHCUoLjGDhw_9I9NMaU8xASHu2jcS-HvT5CR859AkBCKD5EI-8FwoGO0e2bKAst2qKugtoG7YcJFm1Tf_mxMqqwhQrmnUfadS9nhfWCEqUJLheLcD7Lro7RgRWlMyfDnKDXh_uX6VOYzR6fp3dZqKIkbUNmU6JE7D9CWpooZlVEpFGKEZxKSrCVWqlECyKltlRHzIImCVex1cCsjCboYpO7aurvzrg2XxZOmbIUlak7l7MEc8oS5sHzHfCz7prK35YTAB4BA-Ih2ECqqZ1rjM1XTbEUzTrHkPfV5rvVesvZkNvJpdFbw9ClB8IN4MS72S79J3A4tKobbaq_QF38CJLzOI1JHP0ChMuKiQ</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Muus, Ingrid</creator><creator>Williams, Linda S</creator><creator>Ringsberg, Karin C</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>L4W</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)</title><author>Muus, Ingrid ; Williams, Linda S ; Ringsberg, Karin C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f92ca5c38abf48c6fc32becc6219b421fbdcc8da2bbdf4d36f0d287c5fd06fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Folkhälsomedicinska forskningsområden</topic><topic>Folkhälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical and Health Sciences</topic><topic>MEDICIN</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>MEDICINE</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postal Service</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health medicine research areas</topic><topic>Public health science</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sickness Impact Profile</topic><topic>Social medicine</topic><topic>Socialmedicin</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muus, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Linda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringsberg, Karin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordiska ministerrådet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordic School of Public Health NHV</creatorcontrib><collection>Norden Publikationer</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muus, Ingrid</au><au>Williams, Linda S</au><au>Ringsberg, Karin C</au><aucorp>Nordiska ministerrådet</aucorp><aucorp>Nordic School of Public Health NHV</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK)</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Rehabil</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>620-627</pages><issn>0269-2155</issn><eissn>1477-0873</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability and validity of the Danish version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale version 2.0 (SS-QOL-DK), an instrument for evaluation of health-related quality of life.
DESIGN: A correlational study.
SETTING: A stroke unit that provides acute care and rehabilitation for stroke patients in Frederiksborg County, Denmark.
SUBJECTS: One hundred and fifty-two stroke survivors participated; 24 of these performed test-retest.
INTERVENTION: Questionnaires were sent out and returned by mail. A subsequent telephone interview assessed functional level and missing items.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest was measured using Spearman's r, internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluation of floor and ceiling values in proportion of minimum and maximum scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing patients' scores on the SS-QOL-DK with those obtained by other test methods: Beck's Depression Index, the General Health Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Barthel Index and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, evaluating shared variance using coefficient of determination, r2. Comparing groups with known scores assessed known-group validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed.
RESULTS: Test-retest of SS-QOL-DK showed excellent stability, Spearman's r = 0.65-0.99. Internal consistency for all domains showed Cronbach's alpha = 0.81-0.94. Missing items rate was 1.0%. Most SS-QOL-DK domains showed moderately shared variance with similar domains of other test methods, r2 = 0.03-0.62. Groups with known differences showed statistically significant difference in scores. Item-to-scale correlation coefficients of 0.37-0.88 supported convergent validity.
CONCLUSIONS: SS-QOL-DK is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring self-reported health-related quality of life on group level among people with mild to moderate stroke.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>17702704</pmid><doi>10.1177/0269215507075504</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-2155 |
| ispartof | Clinical rehabilitation, 2007-07, Vol.21 (7), p.620-627 |
| issn | 0269-2155 1477-0873 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68174686 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cohort Studies Consent Cultural Characteristics Denmark Female Folkhälsomedicinska forskningsområden Folkhälsovetenskap Health services Health surveys Humans Interviews as Topic Language Male Medical and Health Sciences MEDICIN Medicin och hälsovetenskap MEDICINE Middle Aged Neurology Patients Postal Service Public health Public health medicine research areas Public health science Quality of Life Questionnaires Rehabilitation Sickness Impact Profile Social medicine Socialmedicin Stroke Stroke - complications Stroke Rehabilitation Surveys and Questionnaires Test methods Validity |
| title | Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T22%3A15%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Stroke%20Specific%20Quality%20of%20Life%20Scale%20(SS-QOL):%20test%20of%20reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20the%20Danish%20version%20(SS-QOL-DK)&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Muus,%20Ingrid&rft.aucorp=Nordiska%20ministerr%C3%A5det&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=620-627&rft.issn=0269-2155&rft.eissn=1477-0873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269215507075504&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1307184751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200730602&rft_id=info:pmid/17702704&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0269215507075504&rfr_iscdi=true |