Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection

This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H 2S), carbonyl sulp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Chromatography A 2006-12, Vol.1136 (1), p.89-98
Hauptverfasser: Catalan, Lionel J.J., Liang, Victor, Jia, Charles Q.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 98
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title Journal of Chromatography A
container_volume 1136
creator Catalan, Lionel J.J.
Liang, Victor
Jia, Charles Q.
description This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H 2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO 2), methyl mercaptan (CH 3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS 2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36 ppb (v/v) up to 1.5 ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit ( x D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity ( D s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68167315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021967306018188</els_id><sourcerecordid>68167315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhn0oKhR4gwr50t422E7iJJdKaFVoJSQucLYce0y8cuJgO4v2HfrQNcpKe-M0I-ub8fwfQt8pKSih_HZXqCH4URaMEF6QriA1_4IuCGF00_GmPEffYtwRQhvSsK_oPFfetYxdoH9bP84y2Ogn7A3e59YvEWtIoJLNj86ONmGIyY4yQcTGB7z3TibrAMfFzcMSsMpL_DLpiPsDfpURr-ck_xrkPBzwu00DnhcXQWPj5Ah4HnzyI6Rg1emzK3RmZIauj_USvdz_ft7-2Tw-Pfzd3j1uVNmRtGGqblQLjOXopNKlNpWSYDro-9JUpqpaoxWrK85pWyrZcMINVFS3Uuu-0bK8RD_XvXPwb0vOJkYbFTgnJ8jpBW9plkbrDFYrqIKPMYARc8gewkFQIj7Mi51Yo4oP84J0IpvPYzfH_Us_gj4NHbVn4McRkFFJZ4KclI0nrmUdqesmc79WDrKNvYUgorIwKdA2ZGVCe_v5Jf8BINGq9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68167315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Catalan, Lionel J.J. ; Liang, Victor ; Jia, Charles Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Lionel J.J. ; Liang, Victor ; Jia, Charles Q.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H 2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO 2), methyl mercaptan (CH 3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS 2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36 ppb (v/v) up to 1.5 ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit ( x D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity ( D s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17069822</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOCRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography, Gas - methods ; Detection limit ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gas chromatographic methods ; Gas chromatography ; PFPD ; Pulsed flame photometric detector ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sulfur Compounds - analysis ; Sulphur ; Volatile sulphur compounds ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chromatography A, 2006-12, Vol.1136 (1), p.89-98</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967306018188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18290557$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17069822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Charles Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</title><title>Journal of Chromatography A</title><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><description>This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H 2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO 2), methyl mercaptan (CH 3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS 2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36 ppb (v/v) up to 1.5 ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit ( x D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity ( D s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Gas - methods</subject><subject>Detection limit</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gas chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>PFPD</subject><subject>Pulsed flame photometric detector</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Sulphur</subject><subject>Volatile sulphur compounds</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0021-9673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhn0oKhR4gwr50t422E7iJJdKaFVoJSQucLYce0y8cuJgO4v2HfrQNcpKe-M0I-ub8fwfQt8pKSih_HZXqCH4URaMEF6QriA1_4IuCGF00_GmPEffYtwRQhvSsK_oPFfetYxdoH9bP84y2Ogn7A3e59YvEWtIoJLNj86ONmGIyY4yQcTGB7z3TibrAMfFzcMSsMpL_DLpiPsDfpURr-ck_xrkPBzwu00DnhcXQWPj5Ah4HnzyI6Rg1emzK3RmZIauj_USvdz_ft7-2Tw-Pfzd3j1uVNmRtGGqblQLjOXopNKlNpWSYDro-9JUpqpaoxWrK85pWyrZcMINVFS3Uuu-0bK8RD_XvXPwb0vOJkYbFTgnJ8jpBW9plkbrDFYrqIKPMYARc8gewkFQIj7Mi51Yo4oP84J0IpvPYzfH_Us_gj4NHbVn4McRkFFJZ4KclI0nrmUdqesmc79WDrKNvYUgorIwKdA2ZGVCe_v5Jf8BINGq9w</recordid><startdate>20061208</startdate><enddate>20061208</enddate><creator>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</creator><creator>Liang, Victor</creator><creator>Jia, Charles Q.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061208</creationdate><title>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</title><author>Catalan, Lionel J.J. ; Liang, Victor ; Jia, Charles Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Gas - methods</topic><topic>Detection limit</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gas chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>PFPD</topic><topic>Pulsed flame photometric detector</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Sulphur</topic><topic>Volatile sulphur compounds</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Charles Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</au><au>Liang, Victor</au><au>Jia, Charles Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><date>2006-12-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>1136</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>89-98</pages><issn>0021-9673</issn><coden>JOCRAM</coden><abstract>This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H 2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO 2), methyl mercaptan (CH 3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS 2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36 ppb (v/v) up to 1.5 ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit ( x D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity ( D s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>17069822</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9673
ispartof Journal of Chromatography A, 2006-12, Vol.1136 (1), p.89-98
issn 0021-9673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68167315
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Analytical chemistry
Chemistry
Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography
Chromatography, Gas - methods
Detection limit
Exact sciences and technology
Gas chromatographic methods
Gas chromatography
PFPD
Pulsed flame photometric detector
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sulfur Compounds - analysis
Sulphur
Volatile sulphur compounds
Volatilization
title Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20various%20detection%20limit%20estimates%20for%20volatile%20sulphur%20compounds%20by%20gas%20chromatography%20with%20pulsed%20flame%20photometric%20detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.au=Catalan,%20Lionel%20J.J.&rft.date=2006-12-08&rft.volume=1136&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=89-98&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft.coden=JOCRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68167315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68167315&rft_id=info:pmid/17069822&rft_els_id=S0021967306018188&rfr_iscdi=true