Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection
This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H 2S), carbonyl sulp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Chromatography A 2006-12, Vol.1136 (1), p.89-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Journal of Chromatography A |
container_volume | 1136 |
creator | Catalan, Lionel J.J. Liang, Victor Jia, Charles Q. |
description | This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H
2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO
2), methyl mercaptan (CH
3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS
2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36
ppb (v/v) up to 1.5
ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit (
x
D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity (
D
s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68167315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021967306018188</els_id><sourcerecordid>68167315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhn0oKhR4gwr50t422E7iJJdKaFVoJSQucLYce0y8cuJgO4v2HfrQNcpKe-M0I-ub8fwfQt8pKSih_HZXqCH4URaMEF6QriA1_4IuCGF00_GmPEffYtwRQhvSsK_oPFfetYxdoH9bP84y2Ogn7A3e59YvEWtIoJLNj86ONmGIyY4yQcTGB7z3TibrAMfFzcMSsMpL_DLpiPsDfpURr-ck_xrkPBzwu00DnhcXQWPj5Ah4HnzyI6Rg1emzK3RmZIauj_USvdz_ft7-2Tw-Pfzd3j1uVNmRtGGqblQLjOXopNKlNpWSYDro-9JUpqpaoxWrK85pWyrZcMINVFS3Uuu-0bK8RD_XvXPwb0vOJkYbFTgnJ8jpBW9plkbrDFYrqIKPMYARc8gewkFQIj7Mi51Yo4oP84J0IpvPYzfH_Us_gj4NHbVn4McRkFFJZ4KclI0nrmUdqesmc79WDrKNvYUgorIwKdA2ZGVCe_v5Jf8BINGq9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68167315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Catalan, Lionel J.J. ; Liang, Victor ; Jia, Charles Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Lionel J.J. ; Liang, Victor ; Jia, Charles Q.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H
2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO
2), methyl mercaptan (CH
3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS
2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36
ppb (v/v) up to 1.5
ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit (
x
D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity (
D
s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17069822</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOCRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Chromatography, Gas - methods ; Detection limit ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gas chromatographic methods ; Gas chromatography ; PFPD ; Pulsed flame photometric detector ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sulfur Compounds - analysis ; Sulphur ; Volatile sulphur compounds ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chromatography A, 2006-12, Vol.1136 (1), p.89-98</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967306018188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18290557$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17069822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Charles Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</title><title>Journal of Chromatography A</title><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><description>This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H
2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO
2), methyl mercaptan (CH
3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS
2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36
ppb (v/v) up to 1.5
ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit (
x
D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity (
D
s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Gas - methods</subject><subject>Detection limit</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gas chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>PFPD</subject><subject>Pulsed flame photometric detector</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Sulphur</subject><subject>Volatile sulphur compounds</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0021-9673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhn0oKhR4gwr50t422E7iJJdKaFVoJSQucLYce0y8cuJgO4v2HfrQNcpKe-M0I-ub8fwfQt8pKSih_HZXqCH4URaMEF6QriA1_4IuCGF00_GmPEffYtwRQhvSsK_oPFfetYxdoH9bP84y2Ogn7A3e59YvEWtIoJLNj86ONmGIyY4yQcTGB7z3TibrAMfFzcMSsMpL_DLpiPsDfpURr-ck_xrkPBzwu00DnhcXQWPj5Ah4HnzyI6Rg1emzK3RmZIauj_USvdz_ft7-2Tw-Pfzd3j1uVNmRtGGqblQLjOXopNKlNpWSYDro-9JUpqpaoxWrK85pWyrZcMINVFS3Uuu-0bK8RD_XvXPwb0vOJkYbFTgnJ8jpBW9plkbrDFYrqIKPMYARc8gewkFQIj7Mi51Yo4oP84J0IpvPYzfH_Us_gj4NHbVn4McRkFFJZ4KclI0nrmUdqesmc79WDrKNvYUgorIwKdA2ZGVCe_v5Jf8BINGq9w</recordid><startdate>20061208</startdate><enddate>20061208</enddate><creator>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</creator><creator>Liang, Victor</creator><creator>Jia, Charles Q.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061208</creationdate><title>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</title><author>Catalan, Lionel J.J. ; Liang, Victor ; Jia, Charles Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2c57c8e2201604d3df4caef9ebb3f4f448fdc25466183ca7606fe41d8addb7da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Gas - methods</topic><topic>Detection limit</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gas chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>PFPD</topic><topic>Pulsed flame photometric detector</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Sulphur</topic><topic>Volatile sulphur compounds</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Charles Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catalan, Lionel J.J.</au><au>Liang, Victor</au><au>Jia, Charles Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><date>2006-12-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>1136</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>89-98</pages><issn>0021-9673</issn><coden>JOCRAM</coden><abstract>This paper addresses the variations that presently exist regarding the definition, determination, and reporting of detection limits for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Gas standards containing hydrogen sulphide (H
2S), carbonyl sulphide (COS), sulphur dioxide (SO
2), methyl mercaptan (CH
3SH), dimethyl sulphide (DMS), carbon disulphide (CS
2), and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) in concentrations varying from 0.36
ppb (v/v) up to 1.5
ppm (v/v) in nitrogen were prepared with permeation tubes and introduced in the gas chromatograph using a 0.25-ml gas sampling loop. After measuring the PFPD response versus concentration, the method detection limit (MDL), the Hubaux–Vos detection limit (
x
D), the absolute instrument sensitivity (AIS), and the sulphur detectivity (
D
s) were determined for each sulphur compound. The results show that the MDL determined by the US Environmental Protection Agency procedure consistently underestimates the minimum concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds that can be practically distinguished from the background noise with the PFPD. The Hubaux–Vos detection limits and the AIS values are several times higher than the MDL, and provide more conservative estimates of the lowest concentrations that can be reliably detected. Sulphur detectivities are well correlated with AIS values but only poorly correlated with MDL values. The AIS is recommended as a reliable and cost-effective measure of detection limit for volatile sulphur compounds by GC-PFPD, since the AIS is easier and faster to determine than the MDL and the Hubaux–Vos detection limit. In addition, this study confirmed that the PFPD response is nearly quadratic with respect to concentration for all volatile sulphur compounds.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>17069822</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9673 |
ispartof | Journal of Chromatography A, 2006-12, Vol.1136 (1), p.89-98 |
issn | 0021-9673 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68167315 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Analytical chemistry Chemistry Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography Chromatography, Gas - methods Detection limit Exact sciences and technology Gas chromatographic methods Gas chromatography PFPD Pulsed flame photometric detector Sensitivity and Specificity Sulfur Compounds - analysis Sulphur Volatile sulphur compounds Volatilization |
title | Comparison of various detection limit estimates for volatile sulphur compounds by gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20various%20detection%20limit%20estimates%20for%20volatile%20sulphur%20compounds%20by%20gas%20chromatography%20with%20pulsed%20flame%20photometric%20detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.au=Catalan,%20Lionel%20J.J.&rft.date=2006-12-08&rft.volume=1136&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=89-98&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft.coden=JOCRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68167315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68167315&rft_id=info:pmid/17069822&rft_els_id=S0021967306018188&rfr_iscdi=true |