Documentation of the nasal nitric oxide response to humming: methods evaluation
Rationale Nitric oxide (NO) is present at higher concentrations in the nasal cavity than in the lower airway, and at even higher concentrations within the paranasal sinuses proper. When the paranasal sinus ostia are patent, acoustic activity produced by vocalization with closed lips (humming) promo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical investigation 2007-09, Vol.37 (9), p.746-752 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 752 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 746 |
container_title | European journal of clinical investigation |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Shusterman, D. J. Jansen, K. Weaver, E. M. Koenig, J. Q. |
description | Rationale Nitric oxide (NO) is present at higher concentrations in the nasal cavity than in the lower airway, and at even higher concentrations within the paranasal sinuses proper. When the paranasal sinus ostia are patent, acoustic activity produced by vocalization with closed lips (humming) promotes mixing of sinus with nasal gases, producing a further increase in nasal NO. We wished to evaluate procedures for the documentation of the nasal NO response to humming.
Materials and methods We compared two ATS‐recommended sampling methods: 1) active exhalation of lower airway gas (parallel technique) and 2) passive aspiration of nasal gas with closed velopharynx (series technique). Variables controlled for included sampling rate, external resistance (parallel method), humming frequency, humming duration, and intertrial interval. Prior to upper airway sampling, exhaled lower airway NO was determined utilizing ATS‐standardized technique.
Results Ten volunteers (seven males and three females, aged 21–58) with no history of respiratory allergies or sino‐nasal disease were studied in a single session each. The parallel technique documented an increase in nasal NO during the humming manoeuvre in all subjects (mean ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO, 4·2), whereas the series technique did so in eight of 10 subjects (mean ratio 2·1). Correcting for admixture from the lower airway, the ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO was greater with the parallel than series sampling technique (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01845.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68166598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68166598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-1a8cf90b48e79b7d8a6a032f17ac46a4719ff5cc18bf6ec3c27b36fca65036223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotOWv4C8gV2CH_EjSCzQ0E4rVXQDqsTGcjzXjIckHuyETv99k86o3XK9uJZ8vmv7IIQpKelUn7Yl5VIUjEtWMkJUSaiuRLl_hRbPB6_RghBaFaxW7ASd5rwlhGjK2Vt0QpWspyUX6PZbdGMH_WCHEHscPR42gHubbYv7MKTgcNyHNeAEeRf7DHiIeDN2Xeh_f8YdDJu4zhj-2XZ8mnCO3njbZnh37Gfo5-XFj-VVcXO7ul5-vSlcxYUoqNXO16SpNKi6UWttpSWceaqsq6StFK29F85R3XgJjjumGi69s1KQ6W-Mn6GPh7m7FP-OkAfTheygbW0PccxGaiqlqPUE6gPoUsw5gTe7FDqbHgwlZpZptmZ2ZmZnZpZpnmSa_RR9f7xjbDpYvwSP9ibgwxGw2dnWJ9u7kF84XWtJpJi4LwfuPrTw8N8PMBfL63k35YtDPuQB9s95m_4YqbgS5u77ylxW9S9Bl8Ks-CNC4J9P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68166598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Documentation of the nasal nitric oxide response to humming: methods evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Shusterman, D. J. ; Jansen, K. ; Weaver, E. M. ; Koenig, J. Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shusterman, D. J. ; Jansen, K. ; Weaver, E. M. ; Koenig, J. Q.</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale Nitric oxide (NO) is present at higher concentrations in the nasal cavity than in the lower airway, and at even higher concentrations within the paranasal sinuses proper. When the paranasal sinus ostia are patent, acoustic activity produced by vocalization with closed lips (humming) promotes mixing of sinus with nasal gases, producing a further increase in nasal NO. We wished to evaluate procedures for the documentation of the nasal NO response to humming.
Materials and methods We compared two ATS‐recommended sampling methods: 1) active exhalation of lower airway gas (parallel technique) and 2) passive aspiration of nasal gas with closed velopharynx (series technique). Variables controlled for included sampling rate, external resistance (parallel method), humming frequency, humming duration, and intertrial interval. Prior to upper airway sampling, exhaled lower airway NO was determined utilizing ATS‐standardized technique.
Results Ten volunteers (seven males and three females, aged 21–58) with no history of respiratory allergies or sino‐nasal disease were studied in a single session each. The parallel technique documented an increase in nasal NO during the humming manoeuvre in all subjects (mean ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO, 4·2), whereas the series technique did so in eight of 10 subjects (mean ratio 2·1). Correcting for admixture from the lower airway, the ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO was greater with the parallel than series sampling technique (P < 0·05).
Conclusions Documentation of the response of nasal NO to humming in subjects without sino‐nasal disease was consistently achievable by parallel sampling using commercially available equipment. Specific operational procedures are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2972</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01845.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17696966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acoustic mixing ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breath Tests - methods ; Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use ; Exhalation ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nasal Cavity ; nitric oxide ; Nitric Oxide - therapeutic use ; paranasal sinuses ; Paranasal Sinuses - physiology ; sinusitis ; Sinusitis - etiology</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical investigation, 2007-09, Vol.37 (9), p.746-752</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-1a8cf90b48e79b7d8a6a032f17ac46a4719ff5cc18bf6ec3c27b36fca65036223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-1a8cf90b48e79b7d8a6a032f17ac46a4719ff5cc18bf6ec3c27b36fca65036223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2362.2007.01845.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2362.2007.01845.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18986065$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17696966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shusterman, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, J. Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Documentation of the nasal nitric oxide response to humming: methods evaluation</title><title>European journal of clinical investigation</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Invest</addtitle><description>Rationale Nitric oxide (NO) is present at higher concentrations in the nasal cavity than in the lower airway, and at even higher concentrations within the paranasal sinuses proper. When the paranasal sinus ostia are patent, acoustic activity produced by vocalization with closed lips (humming) promotes mixing of sinus with nasal gases, producing a further increase in nasal NO. We wished to evaluate procedures for the documentation of the nasal NO response to humming.
Materials and methods We compared two ATS‐recommended sampling methods: 1) active exhalation of lower airway gas (parallel technique) and 2) passive aspiration of nasal gas with closed velopharynx (series technique). Variables controlled for included sampling rate, external resistance (parallel method), humming frequency, humming duration, and intertrial interval. Prior to upper airway sampling, exhaled lower airway NO was determined utilizing ATS‐standardized technique.
Results Ten volunteers (seven males and three females, aged 21–58) with no history of respiratory allergies or sino‐nasal disease were studied in a single session each. The parallel technique documented an increase in nasal NO during the humming manoeuvre in all subjects (mean ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO, 4·2), whereas the series technique did so in eight of 10 subjects (mean ratio 2·1). Correcting for admixture from the lower airway, the ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO was greater with the parallel than series sampling technique (P < 0·05).
Conclusions Documentation of the response of nasal NO to humming in subjects without sino‐nasal disease was consistently achievable by parallel sampling using commercially available equipment. Specific operational procedures are proposed.</description><subject>Acoustic mixing</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breath Tests - methods</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Exhalation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nasal Cavity</subject><subject>nitric oxide</subject><subject>Nitric Oxide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>paranasal sinuses</subject><subject>Paranasal Sinuses - physiology</subject><subject>sinusitis</subject><subject>Sinusitis - etiology</subject><issn>0014-2972</issn><issn>1365-2362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotOWv4C8gV2CH_EjSCzQ0E4rVXQDqsTGcjzXjIckHuyETv99k86o3XK9uJZ8vmv7IIQpKelUn7Yl5VIUjEtWMkJUSaiuRLl_hRbPB6_RghBaFaxW7ASd5rwlhGjK2Vt0QpWspyUX6PZbdGMH_WCHEHscPR42gHubbYv7MKTgcNyHNeAEeRf7DHiIeDN2Xeh_f8YdDJu4zhj-2XZ8mnCO3njbZnh37Gfo5-XFj-VVcXO7ul5-vSlcxYUoqNXO16SpNKi6UWttpSWceaqsq6StFK29F85R3XgJjjumGi69s1KQ6W-Mn6GPh7m7FP-OkAfTheygbW0PccxGaiqlqPUE6gPoUsw5gTe7FDqbHgwlZpZptmZ2ZmZnZpZpnmSa_RR9f7xjbDpYvwSP9ibgwxGw2dnWJ9u7kF84XWtJpJi4LwfuPrTw8N8PMBfL63k35YtDPuQB9s95m_4YqbgS5u77ylxW9S9Bl8Ks-CNC4J9P</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Shusterman, D. J.</creator><creator>Jansen, K.</creator><creator>Weaver, E. M.</creator><creator>Koenig, J. Q.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Documentation of the nasal nitric oxide response to humming: methods evaluation</title><author>Shusterman, D. J. ; Jansen, K. ; Weaver, E. M. ; Koenig, J. Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4355-1a8cf90b48e79b7d8a6a032f17ac46a4719ff5cc18bf6ec3c27b36fca65036223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Acoustic mixing</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breath Tests - methods</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Exhalation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nasal Cavity</topic><topic>nitric oxide</topic><topic>Nitric Oxide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>paranasal sinuses</topic><topic>Paranasal Sinuses - physiology</topic><topic>sinusitis</topic><topic>Sinusitis - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shusterman, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, J. Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical investigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shusterman, D. J.</au><au>Jansen, K.</au><au>Weaver, E. M.</au><au>Koenig, J. Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Documentation of the nasal nitric oxide response to humming: methods evaluation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical investigation</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Invest</addtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>746</spage><epage>752</epage><pages>746-752</pages><issn>0014-2972</issn><eissn>1365-2362</eissn><abstract>Rationale Nitric oxide (NO) is present at higher concentrations in the nasal cavity than in the lower airway, and at even higher concentrations within the paranasal sinuses proper. When the paranasal sinus ostia are patent, acoustic activity produced by vocalization with closed lips (humming) promotes mixing of sinus with nasal gases, producing a further increase in nasal NO. We wished to evaluate procedures for the documentation of the nasal NO response to humming.
Materials and methods We compared two ATS‐recommended sampling methods: 1) active exhalation of lower airway gas (parallel technique) and 2) passive aspiration of nasal gas with closed velopharynx (series technique). Variables controlled for included sampling rate, external resistance (parallel method), humming frequency, humming duration, and intertrial interval. Prior to upper airway sampling, exhaled lower airway NO was determined utilizing ATS‐standardized technique.
Results Ten volunteers (seven males and three females, aged 21–58) with no history of respiratory allergies or sino‐nasal disease were studied in a single session each. The parallel technique documented an increase in nasal NO during the humming manoeuvre in all subjects (mean ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO, 4·2), whereas the series technique did so in eight of 10 subjects (mean ratio 2·1). Correcting for admixture from the lower airway, the ratio of humming‐to‐quiet NO was greater with the parallel than series sampling technique (P < 0·05).
Conclusions Documentation of the response of nasal NO to humming in subjects without sino‐nasal disease was consistently achievable by parallel sampling using commercially available equipment. Specific operational procedures are proposed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17696966</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01845.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-2972 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical investigation, 2007-09, Vol.37 (9), p.746-752 |
issn | 0014-2972 1365-2362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68166598 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Acoustic mixing Adult Biological and medical sciences Breath Tests - methods Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use Exhalation Female General aspects Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nasal Cavity nitric oxide Nitric Oxide - therapeutic use paranasal sinuses Paranasal Sinuses - physiology sinusitis Sinusitis - etiology |
title | Documentation of the nasal nitric oxide response to humming: methods evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T11%3A03%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Documentation%20of%20the%20nasal%20nitric%20oxide%20response%20to%20humming:%20methods%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20investigation&rft.au=Shusterman,%20D.%20J.&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=746&rft.epage=752&rft.pages=746-752&rft.issn=0014-2972&rft.eissn=1365-2362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01845.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68166598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68166598&rft_id=info:pmid/17696966&rfr_iscdi=true |