What Do Pediatric Primary Care Providers Think Are Important Research Questions? A Perspective From PROS Providers

To describe what pediatric primary care providers involved in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) research network think are important yet inadequately addressed questions in pediatric primary care research. A total of 1785 pediatric primary care providers in the PROS network were asked...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association 2006-11, Vol.6 (6), p.352-355
Hauptverfasser: Chien, Alyna, Coker, Tumaini, Choi, Lillian, Slora, Eric, Bodnar, Paul, Weiley, Victoria, Wasserman, Richard, Johnson, Julie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 355
container_issue 6
container_start_page 352
container_title Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association
container_volume 6
creator Chien, Alyna
Coker, Tumaini
Choi, Lillian
Slora, Eric
Bodnar, Paul
Weiley, Victoria
Wasserman, Richard
Johnson, Julie
description To describe what pediatric primary care providers involved in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) research network think are important yet inadequately addressed questions in pediatric primary care research. A total of 1785 pediatric primary care providers in the PROS network were asked what they thought were important yet inadequately addressed areas of primary care research. We used a single, open-ended question in a mail survey. Written answers to this question were analyzed by qualitative methods to determine the main themes of interest to pediatric primary care providers. Overall survey response rate was 48.7%; the open-ended question yielded 1109 individual answers. Six lines of inquiry were identified as being important to these providers: (1) effective counseling techniques to use in anticipatory guidance; (2) strategies to prevent and treat obesity; (3) the effectiveness of well-child care; (4) ongoing management of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; (5) the role of the primary care provider in caring for children with mental health needs; and (6) optimal organization of office practices. The translation of research into practice may be improved by a better understanding of the needs and interests of those who see pediatric patients in the primary care setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.07.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68166267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1530156706001602</els_id><sourcerecordid>1180639901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-2c581bc54b21c6c1f8d238ec0f70e58a77015e9ba7cab19a0cfa6c65d535e0d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpaP60X6CHInrobTczsiWtoVCM27SBQJw0pUeh1c5iud7VRlob-u0j14ZAD7lopOE3T8N7jL1HKBFQXa5L29VDKQBUCboEEK_YGcrJrJhOYfb63x0KlEqfsvOU1gAoKhBv2ClqRKUQzlj8vbIj_xr4khpvx-gdX0bf2fiXL2yk_Ag731BM_GHl-z98nnvX3RDiaPuR31MiG92K320pjT706QufZ6mYBnKj3xG_iqHjy_vbn89Kb9lJazeJ3h3rBft19e1h8aO4uf1-vZjfFG5S4VgIJyusnZzWAp1y2FaNmFTkoNVAsrJaA0qa1VY7W-PMgmutcko2ciIJ8nnBPh10hxge9_uZzidHm43tKWyTUVX2QCidwY__geuwjX3ezQiopBL5qwyJA-RiSClSa4aDTwbB7OMwa7OPw-zjMKBNjiMPfTgqb-uOmueRo_8Z-HwAKBux8xRNcp56l8OI2UHTBP-S_hMPS5tx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208562770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Do Pediatric Primary Care Providers Think Are Important Research Questions? A Perspective From PROS Providers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chien, Alyna ; Coker, Tumaini ; Choi, Lillian ; Slora, Eric ; Bodnar, Paul ; Weiley, Victoria ; Wasserman, Richard ; Johnson, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Chien, Alyna ; Coker, Tumaini ; Choi, Lillian ; Slora, Eric ; Bodnar, Paul ; Weiley, Victoria ; Wasserman, Richard ; Johnson, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>To describe what pediatric primary care providers involved in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) research network think are important yet inadequately addressed questions in pediatric primary care research. A total of 1785 pediatric primary care providers in the PROS network were asked what they thought were important yet inadequately addressed areas of primary care research. We used a single, open-ended question in a mail survey. Written answers to this question were analyzed by qualitative methods to determine the main themes of interest to pediatric primary care providers. Overall survey response rate was 48.7%; the open-ended question yielded 1109 individual answers. Six lines of inquiry were identified as being important to these providers: (1) effective counseling techniques to use in anticipatory guidance; (2) strategies to prevent and treat obesity; (3) the effectiveness of well-child care; (4) ongoing management of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; (5) the role of the primary care provider in caring for children with mental health needs; and (6) optimal organization of office practices. The translation of research into practice may be improved by a better understanding of the needs and interests of those who see pediatric patients in the primary care setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-1567</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1876-2859</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-4409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-2867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17116610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Appointments and Schedules ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Breast Feeding ; Child Psychiatry ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Pediatrics ; Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Postal Service ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Professional Practice ; Studies ; Telephone ; translational research ; United States</subject><ispartof>Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association, 2006-11, Vol.6 (6), p.352-355</ispartof><rights>2006 Ambulatory Pediatric Association</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Nov/Dec 2006</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-2c581bc54b21c6c1f8d238ec0f70e58a77015e9ba7cab19a0cfa6c65d535e0d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-2c581bc54b21c6c1f8d238ec0f70e58a77015e9ba7cab19a0cfa6c65d535e0d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17116610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chien, Alyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Tumaini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slora, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodnar, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiley, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>What Do Pediatric Primary Care Providers Think Are Important Research Questions? A Perspective From PROS Providers</title><title>Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association</title><addtitle>Ambul Pediatr</addtitle><description>To describe what pediatric primary care providers involved in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) research network think are important yet inadequately addressed questions in pediatric primary care research. A total of 1785 pediatric primary care providers in the PROS network were asked what they thought were important yet inadequately addressed areas of primary care research. We used a single, open-ended question in a mail survey. Written answers to this question were analyzed by qualitative methods to determine the main themes of interest to pediatric primary care providers. Overall survey response rate was 48.7%; the open-ended question yielded 1109 individual answers. Six lines of inquiry were identified as being important to these providers: (1) effective counseling techniques to use in anticipatory guidance; (2) strategies to prevent and treat obesity; (3) the effectiveness of well-child care; (4) ongoing management of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; (5) the role of the primary care provider in caring for children with mental health needs; and (6) optimal organization of office practices. The translation of research into practice may be improved by a better understanding of the needs and interests of those who see pediatric patients in the primary care setting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Appointments and Schedules</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Child Psychiatry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Postal Service</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Professional Practice</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>translational research</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1530-1567</issn><issn>1876-2859</issn><issn>1539-4409</issn><issn>1876-2867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpaP60X6CHInrobTczsiWtoVCM27SBQJw0pUeh1c5iud7VRlob-u0j14ZAD7lopOE3T8N7jL1HKBFQXa5L29VDKQBUCboEEK_YGcrJrJhOYfb63x0KlEqfsvOU1gAoKhBv2ClqRKUQzlj8vbIj_xr4khpvx-gdX0bf2fiXL2yk_Ag731BM_GHl-z98nnvX3RDiaPuR31MiG92K320pjT706QufZ6mYBnKj3xG_iqHjy_vbn89Kb9lJazeJ3h3rBft19e1h8aO4uf1-vZjfFG5S4VgIJyusnZzWAp1y2FaNmFTkoNVAsrJaA0qa1VY7W-PMgmutcko2ciIJ8nnBPh10hxge9_uZzidHm43tKWyTUVX2QCidwY__geuwjX3ezQiopBL5qwyJA-RiSClSa4aDTwbB7OMwa7OPw-zjMKBNjiMPfTgqb-uOmueRo_8Z-HwAKBux8xRNcp56l8OI2UHTBP-S_hMPS5tx</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Chien, Alyna</creator><creator>Coker, Tumaini</creator><creator>Choi, Lillian</creator><creator>Slora, Eric</creator><creator>Bodnar, Paul</creator><creator>Weiley, Victoria</creator><creator>Wasserman, Richard</creator><creator>Johnson, Julie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>What Do Pediatric Primary Care Providers Think Are Important Research Questions? A Perspective From PROS Providers</title><author>Chien, Alyna ; Coker, Tumaini ; Choi, Lillian ; Slora, Eric ; Bodnar, Paul ; Weiley, Victoria ; Wasserman, Richard ; Johnson, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-2c581bc54b21c6c1f8d238ec0f70e58a77015e9ba7cab19a0cfa6c65d535e0d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Appointments and Schedules</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Child Psychiatry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Postal Service</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Professional Practice</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>translational research</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chien, Alyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Tumaini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slora, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodnar, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiley, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chien, Alyna</au><au>Coker, Tumaini</au><au>Choi, Lillian</au><au>Slora, Eric</au><au>Bodnar, Paul</au><au>Weiley, Victoria</au><au>Wasserman, Richard</au><au>Johnson, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Do Pediatric Primary Care Providers Think Are Important Research Questions? A Perspective From PROS Providers</atitle><jtitle>Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association</jtitle><addtitle>Ambul Pediatr</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>352-355</pages><issn>1530-1567</issn><issn>1876-2859</issn><eissn>1539-4409</eissn><eissn>1876-2867</eissn><abstract>To describe what pediatric primary care providers involved in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) research network think are important yet inadequately addressed questions in pediatric primary care research. A total of 1785 pediatric primary care providers in the PROS network were asked what they thought were important yet inadequately addressed areas of primary care research. We used a single, open-ended question in a mail survey. Written answers to this question were analyzed by qualitative methods to determine the main themes of interest to pediatric primary care providers. Overall survey response rate was 48.7%; the open-ended question yielded 1109 individual answers. Six lines of inquiry were identified as being important to these providers: (1) effective counseling techniques to use in anticipatory guidance; (2) strategies to prevent and treat obesity; (3) the effectiveness of well-child care; (4) ongoing management of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; (5) the role of the primary care provider in caring for children with mental health needs; and (6) optimal organization of office practices. The translation of research into practice may be improved by a better understanding of the needs and interests of those who see pediatric patients in the primary care setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17116610</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ambp.2006.07.002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-1567
ispartof Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association, 2006-11, Vol.6 (6), p.352-355
issn 1530-1567
1876-2859
1539-4409
1876-2867
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68166267
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Appointments and Schedules
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Attitude of Health Personnel
Breast Feeding
Child Psychiatry
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Male
Medical research
Middle Aged
Obesity
Pediatrics
Pediatrics - statistics & numerical data
Polls & surveys
Postal Service
Primary care
Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Professional Practice
Studies
Telephone
translational research
United States
title What Do Pediatric Primary Care Providers Think Are Important Research Questions? A Perspective From PROS Providers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T21%3A34%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Do%20Pediatric%20Primary%20Care%20Providers%20Think%20Are%20Important%20Research%20Questions?%20A%20Perspective%20From%20PROS%20Providers&rft.jtitle=Ambulatory%20pediatrics%20:%20the%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20Ambulatory%20Pediatric%20Association&rft.au=Chien,%20Alyna&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=352-355&rft.issn=1530-1567&rft.eissn=1539-4409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ambp.2006.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1180639901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208562770&rft_id=info:pmid/17116610&rft_els_id=S1530156706001602&rfr_iscdi=true