Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2006-11, Vol.10 (9), p.1280-1290
Hauptverfasser: Winter, Jordan M., Cameron, John L., Campbell, Kurtis A., Chang, David C., Riall, Taylor S., Schulick, Richard D., Choti, Michael A., Coleman, JoAnn, Hodgin, Mary B., Sauter, Patricia K., Sonnenday, Christopher J., Wolfgang, Christopher L., Marohn, Michael R., Yeo, Charles J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1290
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1280
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 10
creator Winter, Jordan M.
Cameron, John L.
Campbell, Kurtis A.
Chang, David C.
Riall, Taylor S.
Schulick, Richard D.
Choti, Michael A.
Coleman, JoAnn
Hodgin, Mary B.
Sauter, Patricia K.
Sonnenday, Christopher J.
Wolfgang, Christopher L.
Marohn, Michael R.
Yeo, Charles J.
description Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% ( P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% ( P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group ( P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68163131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1091255X06003866</els_id><sourcerecordid>2790549651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVGL1DAQx4Mo3rn6DUQCgm-tM23Tpi-K3LoqHHicJ_gWsun0zNI2a5Ke3H2M-8Sm7MKJD5KHZDK_-Sczf8ZeIuQIWL_d5dc6hNnnBUCdQ5NDAY_YKcqmzKq6qB-nM7SYFUL8OGHPQtgBYAMon7ITbBArwOqU3a8dBX6hJ-NJR2v4ejaRf4s0RTtd8zUt94F4_En8Ukfirv-b3tgQ50HzjRsG93upeEi6bnYdTWSiG2_f80sK8xDDIqD5hXdhnzL2ZpGdOjfaO-r4lbd6eM6e9HoI9OK4r9j3zcers8_Z-ddPX84-nGemElXMWlH2YFoJVSulKIzuTSkr2coedN-mQMgaytQnbmsJomt1X0BNidgKIbuiXLE3B929d79mClGNNhgaBj2Rm4OqJdYlprVir_8Bd272U_qbQsSilAiNSFR1oEzqLXjq1d7bUftbhaAWx9ROHRxTi2MKGpUcS2WvjuLzdqTuoehoUQLeHQBKs7ix5FUwliZDnfVpgqpz9v8v_AFSBKoy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112381075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Winter, Jordan M. ; Cameron, John L. ; Campbell, Kurtis A. ; Chang, David C. ; Riall, Taylor S. ; Schulick, Richard D. ; Choti, Michael A. ; Coleman, JoAnn ; Hodgin, Mary B. ; Sauter, Patricia K. ; Sonnenday, Christopher J. ; Wolfgang, Christopher L. ; Marohn, Michael R. ; Yeo, Charles J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jordan M. ; Cameron, John L. ; Campbell, Kurtis A. ; Chang, David C. ; Riall, Taylor S. ; Schulick, Richard D. ; Choti, Michael A. ; Coleman, JoAnn ; Hodgin, Mary B. ; Sauter, Patricia K. ; Sonnenday, Christopher J. ; Wolfgang, Christopher L. ; Marohn, Michael R. ; Yeo, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><description>Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% ( P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% ( P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group ( P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17114014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cells ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreas ; pancreatic cancer ; Pancreatic Ducts - surgery ; pancreatic fistula ; Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology ; Pancreatic Fistula - etiology ; Pancreatic Fistula - prevention &amp; control ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods ; Prospective Studies ; stent ; Stents</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2006-11, Vol.10 (9), p.1280-1290</ispartof><rights>2006 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jordan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kurtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riall, Taylor S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulick, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choti, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, JoAnn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgin, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Patricia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marohn, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% ( P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% ( P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group ( P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Pancreatic Ducts - surgery</subject><subject>pancreatic fistula</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>stent</subject><subject>Stents</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVGL1DAQx4Mo3rn6DUQCgm-tM23Tpi-K3LoqHHicJ_gWsun0zNI2a5Ke3H2M-8Sm7MKJD5KHZDK_-Sczf8ZeIuQIWL_d5dc6hNnnBUCdQ5NDAY_YKcqmzKq6qB-nM7SYFUL8OGHPQtgBYAMon7ITbBArwOqU3a8dBX6hJ-NJR2v4ejaRf4s0RTtd8zUt94F4_En8Ukfirv-b3tgQ50HzjRsG93upeEi6bnYdTWSiG2_f80sK8xDDIqD5hXdhnzL2ZpGdOjfaO-r4lbd6eM6e9HoI9OK4r9j3zcers8_Z-ddPX84-nGemElXMWlH2YFoJVSulKIzuTSkr2coedN-mQMgaytQnbmsJomt1X0BNidgKIbuiXLE3B929d79mClGNNhgaBj2Rm4OqJdYlprVir_8Bd272U_qbQsSilAiNSFR1oEzqLXjq1d7bUftbhaAWx9ROHRxTi2MKGpUcS2WvjuLzdqTuoehoUQLeHQBKs7ix5FUwliZDnfVpgqpz9v8v_AFSBKoy</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Winter, Jordan M.</creator><creator>Cameron, John L.</creator><creator>Campbell, Kurtis A.</creator><creator>Chang, David C.</creator><creator>Riall, Taylor S.</creator><creator>Schulick, Richard D.</creator><creator>Choti, Michael A.</creator><creator>Coleman, JoAnn</creator><creator>Hodgin, Mary B.</creator><creator>Sauter, Patricia K.</creator><creator>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Marohn, Michael R.</creator><creator>Yeo, Charles J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</title><author>Winter, Jordan M. ; Cameron, John L. ; Campbell, Kurtis A. ; Chang, David C. ; Riall, Taylor S. ; Schulick, Richard D. ; Choti, Michael A. ; Coleman, JoAnn ; Hodgin, Mary B. ; Sauter, Patricia K. ; Sonnenday, Christopher J. ; Wolfgang, Christopher L. ; Marohn, Michael R. ; Yeo, Charles J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Pancreatic Ducts - surgery</topic><topic>pancreatic fistula</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>stent</topic><topic>Stents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jordan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kurtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riall, Taylor S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulick, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choti, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, JoAnn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgin, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Patricia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marohn, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winter, Jordan M.</au><au>Cameron, John L.</au><au>Campbell, Kurtis A.</au><au>Chang, David C.</au><au>Riall, Taylor S.</au><au>Schulick, Richard D.</au><au>Choti, Michael A.</au><au>Coleman, JoAnn</au><au>Hodgin, Mary B.</au><au>Sauter, Patricia K.</au><au>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</au><au>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</au><au>Marohn, Michael R.</au><au>Yeo, Charles J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1280</spage><epage>1290</epage><pages>1280-1290</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% ( P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% ( P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group ( P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17114014</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2006-11, Vol.10 (9), p.1280-1290
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68163131
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cells
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreas
pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic Ducts - surgery
pancreatic fistula
Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology
Pancreatic Fistula - etiology
Pancreatic Fistula - prevention & control
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods
Prospective Studies
stent
Stents
title Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Pancreatic%20Duct%20Stenting%20Decrease%20the%20Rate%20of%20Pancreatic%20Fistula%20Following%20Pancreaticoduodenectomy?%20Results%20of%20a%20Prospective%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Winter,%20Jordan%20M.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1280&rft.epage=1290&rft.pages=1280-1290&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2790549651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112381075&rft_id=info:pmid/17114014&rft_els_id=S1091255X06003866&rfr_iscdi=true