Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2006-11, Vol.10 (9), p.1280-1290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1290 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1280 |
container_title | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Winter, Jordan M. Cameron, John L. Campbell, Kurtis A. Chang, David C. Riall, Taylor S. Schulick, Richard D. Choti, Michael A. Coleman, JoAnn Hodgin, Mary B. Sauter, Patricia K. Sonnenday, Christopher J. Wolfgang, Christopher L. Marohn, Michael R. Yeo, Charles J. |
description | Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% (
P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% (
P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group (
P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68163131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1091255X06003866</els_id><sourcerecordid>2790549651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVGL1DAQx4Mo3rn6DUQCgm-tM23Tpi-K3LoqHHicJ_gWsun0zNI2a5Ke3H2M-8Sm7MKJD5KHZDK_-Sczf8ZeIuQIWL_d5dc6hNnnBUCdQ5NDAY_YKcqmzKq6qB-nM7SYFUL8OGHPQtgBYAMon7ITbBArwOqU3a8dBX6hJ-NJR2v4ejaRf4s0RTtd8zUt94F4_En8Ukfirv-b3tgQ50HzjRsG93upeEi6bnYdTWSiG2_f80sK8xDDIqD5hXdhnzL2ZpGdOjfaO-r4lbd6eM6e9HoI9OK4r9j3zcers8_Z-ddPX84-nGemElXMWlH2YFoJVSulKIzuTSkr2coedN-mQMgaytQnbmsJomt1X0BNidgKIbuiXLE3B929d79mClGNNhgaBj2Rm4OqJdYlprVir_8Bd272U_qbQsSilAiNSFR1oEzqLXjq1d7bUftbhaAWx9ROHRxTi2MKGpUcS2WvjuLzdqTuoehoUQLeHQBKs7ix5FUwliZDnfVpgqpz9v8v_AFSBKoy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112381075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Winter, Jordan M. ; Cameron, John L. ; Campbell, Kurtis A. ; Chang, David C. ; Riall, Taylor S. ; Schulick, Richard D. ; Choti, Michael A. ; Coleman, JoAnn ; Hodgin, Mary B. ; Sauter, Patricia K. ; Sonnenday, Christopher J. ; Wolfgang, Christopher L. ; Marohn, Michael R. ; Yeo, Charles J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jordan M. ; Cameron, John L. ; Campbell, Kurtis A. ; Chang, David C. ; Riall, Taylor S. ; Schulick, Richard D. ; Choti, Michael A. ; Coleman, JoAnn ; Hodgin, Mary B. ; Sauter, Patricia K. ; Sonnenday, Christopher J. ; Wolfgang, Christopher L. ; Marohn, Michael R. ; Yeo, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><description>Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% (
P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% (
P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group (
P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17114014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cells ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreas ; pancreatic cancer ; Pancreatic Ducts - surgery ; pancreatic fistula ; Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology ; Pancreatic Fistula - etiology ; Pancreatic Fistula - prevention & control ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods ; Prospective Studies ; stent ; Stents</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2006-11, Vol.10 (9), p.1280-1290</ispartof><rights>2006 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jordan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kurtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riall, Taylor S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulick, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choti, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, JoAnn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgin, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Patricia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marohn, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% (
P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% (
P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group (
P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Pancreatic Ducts - surgery</subject><subject>pancreatic fistula</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - etiology</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>stent</subject><subject>Stents</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVGL1DAQx4Mo3rn6DUQCgm-tM23Tpi-K3LoqHHicJ_gWsun0zNI2a5Ke3H2M-8Sm7MKJD5KHZDK_-Sczf8ZeIuQIWL_d5dc6hNnnBUCdQ5NDAY_YKcqmzKq6qB-nM7SYFUL8OGHPQtgBYAMon7ITbBArwOqU3a8dBX6hJ-NJR2v4ejaRf4s0RTtd8zUt94F4_En8Ukfirv-b3tgQ50HzjRsG93upeEi6bnYdTWSiG2_f80sK8xDDIqD5hXdhnzL2ZpGdOjfaO-r4lbd6eM6e9HoI9OK4r9j3zcers8_Z-ddPX84-nGemElXMWlH2YFoJVSulKIzuTSkr2coedN-mQMgaytQnbmsJomt1X0BNidgKIbuiXLE3B929d79mClGNNhgaBj2Rm4OqJdYlprVir_8Bd272U_qbQsSilAiNSFR1oEzqLXjq1d7bUftbhaAWx9ROHRxTi2MKGpUcS2WvjuLzdqTuoehoUQLeHQBKs7ix5FUwliZDnfVpgqpz9v8v_AFSBKoy</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Winter, Jordan M.</creator><creator>Cameron, John L.</creator><creator>Campbell, Kurtis A.</creator><creator>Chang, David C.</creator><creator>Riall, Taylor S.</creator><creator>Schulick, Richard D.</creator><creator>Choti, Michael A.</creator><creator>Coleman, JoAnn</creator><creator>Hodgin, Mary B.</creator><creator>Sauter, Patricia K.</creator><creator>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Marohn, Michael R.</creator><creator>Yeo, Charles J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</title><author>Winter, Jordan M. ; Cameron, John L. ; Campbell, Kurtis A. ; Chang, David C. ; Riall, Taylor S. ; Schulick, Richard D. ; Choti, Michael A. ; Coleman, JoAnn ; Hodgin, Mary B. ; Sauter, Patricia K. ; Sonnenday, Christopher J. ; Wolfgang, Christopher L. ; Marohn, Michael R. ; Yeo, Charles J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-953f0c980498852cafc384898f0af9fc3586031141b6805d9af206e489b558d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Pancreatic Ducts - surgery</topic><topic>pancreatic fistula</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - etiology</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>stent</topic><topic>Stents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jordan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kurtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riall, Taylor S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulick, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choti, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, JoAnn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgin, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Patricia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marohn, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winter, Jordan M.</au><au>Cameron, John L.</au><au>Campbell, Kurtis A.</au><au>Chang, David C.</au><au>Riall, Taylor S.</au><au>Schulick, Richard D.</au><au>Choti, Michael A.</au><au>Coleman, JoAnn</au><au>Hodgin, Mary B.</au><au>Sauter, Patricia K.</au><au>Sonnenday, Christopher J.</au><au>Wolfgang, Christopher L.</au><au>Marohn, Michael R.</au><au>Yeo, Charles J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1280</spage><epage>1290</epage><pages>1280-1290</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Pancreatic duct stenting remains an attractive strategy to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with encouraging results in both retrospective and prospective studies. We performed a prospective randomized trial to test the hypothesis that internal pancreatic duct stenting reduces the development of pancreatic fistulas following PD. Two hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to either receive a pancreatic stent (S) or no stent (NS), and stratified according to the texture of the pancreatic remnant (soft/normal versus hard). Four patients were excluded from the study; in three instances due to a pancreatic duct that was too small to cannulate and in the other instance because a total pancreatectomy was performed. Patients who randomized to the S group had a 6-cm-long segment of a plastic pediatric feeding tube used to stent the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. In patients with a soft pancreas, 57 randomized to the S group and 56 randomized to the NS group. In patients with a hard pancreas, 58 randomized to the S group and 63 randomized to the NS group. The S and NS groups for the entire study population, as well as for the subgroup of high-risk patients with soft pancreata, were similar as regard to demographics, past medical history, preoperative symptoms, preoperative procedures, and intraoperative data. The pancreatic fistula rate for the entire study population was 9.4%. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with hard pancreata were similar, at 1.7% and 4.8% (
P = 0.4), respectively. The fistula rates in the S and NS subgroups with soft pancreata were also similar, at 21.1% and 10.7% (
P = 0.1), respectively. A nonstatistically significant increase in the pancreatic fistula rate in the S group persisted after adjusting for the operating surgeon and technical details of the operation (e.g., anastomotic technique, anastomotic orientation, pancreatic duct size, and number of intra-abdominal drains placed). In patients with soft pancreata, 63% percent of the pancreatic fistulas in stented patients required adjustment to the clinical pathway (including two deaths), compared to 47% of the pancreatic fistulas in patients in the NS group (
P = 0.3). Internal pancreatic duct stenting does not decrease the frequency or the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17114014</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-255X |
ispartof | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2006-11, Vol.10 (9), p.1280-1290 |
issn | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68163131 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cells Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pancreas pancreatic cancer Pancreatic Ducts - surgery pancreatic fistula Pancreatic Fistula - epidemiology Pancreatic Fistula - etiology Pancreatic Fistula - prevention & control Pancreaticoduodenectomy Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods Prospective Studies stent Stents |
title | Does Pancreatic Duct Stenting Decrease the Rate of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Pancreatic%20Duct%20Stenting%20Decrease%20the%20Rate%20of%20Pancreatic%20Fistula%20Following%20Pancreaticoduodenectomy?%20Results%20of%20a%20Prospective%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Winter,%20Jordan%20M.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1280&rft.epage=1290&rft.pages=1280-1290&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2790549651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112381075&rft_id=info:pmid/17114014&rft_els_id=S1091255X06003866&rfr_iscdi=true |