Defining a natural tooth color space based on a 3-dimensional shade system

Statement of problem The natural tooth color space reported by a manufacturer may not represent the comprehensive spectrum of natural teeth for all population groups. Purpose The purpose of this study was to define a natural tooth color space within the Greater Buffalo, New York population and to co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2007-08, Vol.98 (2), p.110-119
Hauptverfasser: Yuan, Judy Chia-Chun, DDS, MS, Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS, Monaco, Edward A., DDS, Davis, Elaine L., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Statement of problem The natural tooth color space reported by a manufacturer may not represent the comprehensive spectrum of natural teeth for all population groups. Purpose The purpose of this study was to define a natural tooth color space within the Greater Buffalo, New York population and to compare that to the color space determined by a manufacturer. Material and methods Nine hundred and thirty-three maxillary central incisors (501 patients) were measured with a shade-taking device (Vita Easyshade). For each tooth, L*, a*, b* values, chroma, hue, and the closest shade (Vita 3D-Master) were recorded. A linear regression analysis was performed to determine how well the manufacturer's values predict actual values for L*, a*, and b*. Color differences (ΔE*) between the Buffalo population and the closest shade were also calculated. A 1-sample t test was used to determine whether the color differences seen in the sample were statistically different from the perceptibility threshold, ΔE*=3.7 (α=.05). Results All 3 attributes of the Buffalo population displayed a broader range than those from the shade guide. However, the regression analysis revealed a significantly positive relationship between the L*, a*, and b* values of the 2 methods ( P
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60044-4