Meta-analyses of Observational and Genetic Association Studies of Folate Intakes or Levels and Breast Cancer Risk

Background: Evidence from case–control studies suggests that increasing dietary folate intake is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, large cohort studies have found no such association, and animal studies suggest that folate supplementation may promote tumorigenesis. We conduct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006-11, Vol.98 (22), p.1607-1622
Hauptverfasser: Lewis, Sarah J., Harbord, Roger M., Harris, Ross, Smith, George Davey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1622
container_issue 22
container_start_page 1607
container_title JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute
container_volume 98
creator Lewis, Sarah J.
Harbord, Roger M.
Harris, Ross
Smith, George Davey
description Background: Evidence from case–control studies suggests that increasing dietary folate intake is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, large cohort studies have found no such association, and animal studies suggest that folate supplementation may promote tumorigenesis. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence from observational studies on this issue and a meta-analysis of the association between a common polymorphism in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, a key enzyme in folate metabolism, and breast cancer risk. Methods: We searched Medline and ISI Web of Knowledge databases for relevant studies that were published through May 31, 2006. We used random-effects analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for case–control studies or relative risks (RRs) for cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. Unadjusted odds ratios were calculated for the studies of MTHFR genotype based on published genotype frequencies. Results: A total of 13 case–control studies and nine cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis of folate intake and breast cancer risk. We found a summary OR of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 0.96) from the case–control studies and a summary RR of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.01) from the cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. We found evidence that the case–control studies may have suffered from substantial publication bias. The case–control and cohort studies may have been subject to measurement error, confounding, and possibly spurious associations arising from subgroup analyses; in addition, the case–control studies were potentially subject to recall bias and publication bias. Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis of MTHFR C677T genotype and breast cancer risk. We found no difference in breast cancer risk between MTHFR 677 TT homozygotes and CC homozygotes (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.25), and there was no evidence of an interaction between folate intake and MTHFR genotype on breast cancer risk. Conclusion: A lack of dietary folate intake is not associated with the risk of breast cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jnci/djj440
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68152808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68152808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-298e2f08e06c7da222614d630aa2c4fd21bca85c68607e1b9e085bffccaa445f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d9r2zAQB3AxVtas29PehxlsL8WrJMu29NiGJSlkdL8ZexFn-QxKHLvVyWX97-fEYYW9TC8C3edOcF_GXgn-XnCTXWw65y_qzUYp_oTNhCp4KgXPn7IZ57JMtS7VKXtOtOHjMVI9Y6eiHIHRasbuPmKEFDpoHwgp6ZvkpiIM9xB9Pz4m0NXJEjuM3iWXRL3zh0ryNQ61nxoWfQsRk-suwnb_EpI13mNLh96rgEAxmUPnMCRfPG1fsJMGWsKXx_uMfV98-DZfpeub5fX8cp06lfOYSqNRNlwjL1xZg5SyEKouMg4gnWpqKSoHOneFLniJojLIdV41jXMASuVNdsbeTXNvQ383IEW78-SwbaHDfiBbaJFLzfV_oTCqyI0UI3zzD9z0Qxi3RFZKbrTWho_ofEIu9EQBG3sb_A7CgxXc7vOy-7zslNeoXx9HDtUO60d7DGgEb48AyEHbhHGRnh6dzsosP3ybTs5TxN9_6xC2tiizMrern7_s8tNi9dn8WFuT_QGU0q4c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220988890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-analyses of Observational and Genetic Association Studies of Folate Intakes or Levels and Breast Cancer Risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Lewis, Sarah J. ; Harbord, Roger M. ; Harris, Ross ; Smith, George Davey</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah J. ; Harbord, Roger M. ; Harris, Ross ; Smith, George Davey</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Evidence from case–control studies suggests that increasing dietary folate intake is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, large cohort studies have found no such association, and animal studies suggest that folate supplementation may promote tumorigenesis. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence from observational studies on this issue and a meta-analysis of the association between a common polymorphism in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, a key enzyme in folate metabolism, and breast cancer risk. Methods: We searched Medline and ISI Web of Knowledge databases for relevant studies that were published through May 31, 2006. We used random-effects analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for case–control studies or relative risks (RRs) for cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. Unadjusted odds ratios were calculated for the studies of MTHFR genotype based on published genotype frequencies. Results: A total of 13 case–control studies and nine cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis of folate intake and breast cancer risk. We found a summary OR of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 0.96) from the case–control studies and a summary RR of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.01) from the cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. We found evidence that the case–control studies may have suffered from substantial publication bias. The case–control and cohort studies may have been subject to measurement error, confounding, and possibly spurious associations arising from subgroup analyses; in addition, the case–control studies were potentially subject to recall bias and publication bias. Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis of MTHFR C677T genotype and breast cancer risk. We found no difference in breast cancer risk between MTHFR 677 TT homozygotes and CC homozygotes (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.25), and there was no evidence of an interaction between folate intake and MTHFR genotype on breast cancer risk. Conclusion: A lack of dietary folate intake is not associated with the risk of breast cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2105</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17105984</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNCIEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (FADH2) - genetics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - blood ; Breast Neoplasms - enzymology ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Case-Control Studies ; Cytosine ; Dietary Supplements ; Female ; Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Folic Acid - blood ; Genetics ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Homozygote ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Metabolism ; Odds Ratio ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Thymine ; Tumors ; Vitamin B</subject><ispartof>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006-11, Vol.98 (22), p.1607-1622</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-298e2f08e06c7da222614d630aa2c4fd21bca85c68607e1b9e085bffccaa445f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-298e2f08e06c7da222614d630aa2c4fd21bca85c68607e1b9e085bffccaa445f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18373590$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17105984$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbord, Roger M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, George Davey</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-analyses of Observational and Genetic Association Studies of Folate Intakes or Levels and Breast Cancer Risk</title><title>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</title><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><description>Background: Evidence from case–control studies suggests that increasing dietary folate intake is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, large cohort studies have found no such association, and animal studies suggest that folate supplementation may promote tumorigenesis. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence from observational studies on this issue and a meta-analysis of the association between a common polymorphism in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, a key enzyme in folate metabolism, and breast cancer risk. Methods: We searched Medline and ISI Web of Knowledge databases for relevant studies that were published through May 31, 2006. We used random-effects analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for case–control studies or relative risks (RRs) for cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. Unadjusted odds ratios were calculated for the studies of MTHFR genotype based on published genotype frequencies. Results: A total of 13 case–control studies and nine cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis of folate intake and breast cancer risk. We found a summary OR of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 0.96) from the case–control studies and a summary RR of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.01) from the cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. We found evidence that the case–control studies may have suffered from substantial publication bias. The case–control and cohort studies may have been subject to measurement error, confounding, and possibly spurious associations arising from subgroup analyses; in addition, the case–control studies were potentially subject to recall bias and publication bias. Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis of MTHFR C677T genotype and breast cancer risk. We found no difference in breast cancer risk between MTHFR 677 TT homozygotes and CC homozygotes (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.25), and there was no evidence of an interaction between folate intake and MTHFR genotype on breast cancer risk. Conclusion: A lack of dietary folate intake is not associated with the risk of breast cancer.</description><subject>5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (FADH2) - genetics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - enzymology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cytosine</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Folic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Homozygote</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Genetic</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Thymine</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Vitamin B</subject><issn>0027-8874</issn><issn>1460-2105</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d9r2zAQB3AxVtas29PehxlsL8WrJMu29NiGJSlkdL8ZexFn-QxKHLvVyWX97-fEYYW9TC8C3edOcF_GXgn-XnCTXWw65y_qzUYp_oTNhCp4KgXPn7IZ57JMtS7VKXtOtOHjMVI9Y6eiHIHRasbuPmKEFDpoHwgp6ZvkpiIM9xB9Pz4m0NXJEjuM3iWXRL3zh0ryNQ61nxoWfQsRk-suwnb_EpI13mNLh96rgEAxmUPnMCRfPG1fsJMGWsKXx_uMfV98-DZfpeub5fX8cp06lfOYSqNRNlwjL1xZg5SyEKouMg4gnWpqKSoHOneFLniJojLIdV41jXMASuVNdsbeTXNvQ383IEW78-SwbaHDfiBbaJFLzfV_oTCqyI0UI3zzD9z0Qxi3RFZKbrTWho_ofEIu9EQBG3sb_A7CgxXc7vOy-7zslNeoXx9HDtUO60d7DGgEb48AyEHbhHGRnh6dzsosP3ybTs5TxN9_6xC2tiizMrern7_s8tNi9dn8WFuT_QGU0q4c</recordid><startdate>20061115</startdate><enddate>20061115</enddate><creator>Lewis, Sarah J.</creator><creator>Harbord, Roger M.</creator><creator>Harris, Ross</creator><creator>Smith, George Davey</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061115</creationdate><title>Meta-analyses of Observational and Genetic Association Studies of Folate Intakes or Levels and Breast Cancer Risk</title><author>Lewis, Sarah J. ; Harbord, Roger M. ; Harris, Ross ; Smith, George Davey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-298e2f08e06c7da222614d630aa2c4fd21bca85c68607e1b9e085bffccaa445f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (FADH2) - genetics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - enzymology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cytosine</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Folic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Folic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Homozygote</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Genetic</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Thymine</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Vitamin B</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbord, Roger M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, George Davey</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Sarah J.</au><au>Harbord, Roger M.</au><au>Harris, Ross</au><au>Smith, George Davey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-analyses of Observational and Genetic Association Studies of Folate Intakes or Levels and Breast Cancer Risk</atitle><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><date>2006-11-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1622</epage><pages>1607-1622</pages><issn>0027-8874</issn><eissn>1460-2105</eissn><coden>JNCIEQ</coden><abstract>Background: Evidence from case–control studies suggests that increasing dietary folate intake is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, large cohort studies have found no such association, and animal studies suggest that folate supplementation may promote tumorigenesis. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence from observational studies on this issue and a meta-analysis of the association between a common polymorphism in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, a key enzyme in folate metabolism, and breast cancer risk. Methods: We searched Medline and ISI Web of Knowledge databases for relevant studies that were published through May 31, 2006. We used random-effects analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for case–control studies or relative risks (RRs) for cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. Unadjusted odds ratios were calculated for the studies of MTHFR genotype based on published genotype frequencies. Results: A total of 13 case–control studies and nine cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis of folate intake and breast cancer risk. We found a summary OR of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 0.96) from the case–control studies and a summary RR of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.98 to 1.01) from the cohort studies for a 100-μg/d increase in folate intake. We found evidence that the case–control studies may have suffered from substantial publication bias. The case–control and cohort studies may have been subject to measurement error, confounding, and possibly spurious associations arising from subgroup analyses; in addition, the case–control studies were potentially subject to recall bias and publication bias. Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis of MTHFR C677T genotype and breast cancer risk. We found no difference in breast cancer risk between MTHFR 677 TT homozygotes and CC homozygotes (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.25), and there was no evidence of an interaction between folate intake and MTHFR genotype on breast cancer risk. Conclusion: A lack of dietary folate intake is not associated with the risk of breast cancer.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17105984</pmid><doi>10.1093/jnci/djj440</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8874
ispartof JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006-11, Vol.98 (22), p.1607-1622
issn 0027-8874
1460-2105
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68152808
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (FADH2) - genetics
Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - blood
Breast Neoplasms - enzymology
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control
Case-Control Studies
Cytosine
Dietary Supplements
Female
Folic Acid - administration & dosage
Folic Acid - blood
Genetics
Genotype & phenotype
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Homozygote
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Meta-analysis
Metabolism
Odds Ratio
Polymorphism, Genetic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Thymine
Tumors
Vitamin B
title Meta-analyses of Observational and Genetic Association Studies of Folate Intakes or Levels and Breast Cancer Risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A26%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-analyses%20of%20Observational%20and%20Genetic%20Association%20Studies%20of%20Folate%20Intakes%20or%20Levels%20and%20Breast%20Cancer%20Risk&rft.jtitle=JNCI%20:%20Journal%20of%20the%20National%20Cancer%20Institute&rft.au=Lewis,%20Sarah%20J.&rft.date=2006-11-15&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1622&rft.pages=1607-1622&rft.issn=0027-8874&rft.eissn=1460-2105&rft.coden=JNCIEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djj440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68152808%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220988890&rft_id=info:pmid/17105984&rfr_iscdi=true