Is Discordance in Bone Measurements Affected by Body Composition or Anthropometry? A Comparative Study Between Peripheral and Central Devices

Abstract Screening of osteoporosis using peripheral bone measurements has become more common, even though diagnostic discrepancies are known to exist between peripheral dual-energy X-ray (pDXA) or quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and central DXA measurements. Values of diagnostic parameters such as bone mineral density, speed of (ultra)sound, and broadband ultrasound attenuation are affected by bone size and soft tissue composition. However, their significance for the discordance between peripheral and central techniques is unclear. In this study, bone status and total body composition of 139 women (mean age 68.3 yr [1.7 SD], mean body mass index 26.5 kg/m2 [3.6 SD]) were assessed by 3 GE Lunar devices. Heel pDXA and heel QUS were conducted using peripheral instantaneous X-ray imaging (PIXI) and Achilles, respectively, and central DXA measurements were taken at the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L2–L4) and at the left femoral neck using Prodigy. Positive significant associations were found between body height or fat (%) and most DXA or QUS parameters. The discordance between the site-dependent DXA or QUS T-score values typically increased ( p < 0.05) as a function of body weight or fat (%), but not with body height. On an average, body adiposity accounted for less than 11% of the differences between the techniques; however, increase of total body fat from 20% to 45% led to a discrepancy of one T-score between DXAHEEL and QUSHEEL . To avoid diagnostic bias, comparative assessment of the devices using the same population is recommended.