EFFECTS OF VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING ON RATE OF VELOCITY DEVELOPMENT, PEAK TORQUE, AND PERFORMANCE

Little is known about the velocity-specific adaptations to training utilizing movement velocities in excess of 300°·s. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of 4 weeks of slow (60°·s) vs. fast (400°·s) velocity training on rate of velocity development (RVD), peak torque (PT)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2007-08, Vol.21 (3), p.870-874
Hauptverfasser: MURRAY, DANIEL P, BROWN, LEE E, ZINDER, STEVEN M, NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J, BERA, SAGIR G, GARRETT, NIKKI M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 874
container_issue 3
container_start_page 870
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 21
creator MURRAY, DANIEL P
BROWN, LEE E
ZINDER, STEVEN M
NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J
BERA, SAGIR G
GARRETT, NIKKI M
description Little is known about the velocity-specific adaptations to training utilizing movement velocities in excess of 300°·s. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of 4 weeks of slow (60°·s) vs. fast (400°·s) velocity training on rate of velocity development (RVD), peak torque (PT), and performance. Twenty male kinesiology students (22.0 years ± 2.72; 178.6 cm ± 7.1; 82.7 kg ± 15.5) were tested, before and after 4 weeks of training, for PT production, RVD (at 60, 180, 300, 400, and 450°·s), standing long jump (SLJ) distance, and 15- and 40-m sprint times. All participants underwent 8 training sessions, performing 5 sets of 5 repetitions of simultaneous, bilateral, concentric knee extension exercises on a Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer at either 60° or 400° per second. Two 5 (speed) X 2 (time) X 2 (group) multivariate repeated measures analyses of variance revealed no significant differences between groups on any measure. Therefore, the groups were collapsed for analysis. There was a significant (p > 0.05) main effect for RVD by time and SLJ distance by time (pre- 227.1 cm ± 21.2; post- 232.9 cm ± 20.7) but no significant change in PT or 15- or 40-m sprint times. These results offer support for the suggestion that there is a significant neural adaptation to short-term isokinetic training performed by recreationally trained males, producing changes in limb acceleration and performance with little or no change in strength. Because results were independent of training velocity, it appears as though the intention to move quickly is sufficient stimulus to achieve improvements in limb RVD. Changes in SLJ distance suggest that open kinetic chain training may benefit the performance of a closed kinetic chain activity when movement pattern specificity is optimized.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/00124278-200708000-00037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68144488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68144488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2607-5e22ac946bcdac6edc9bfc191d68e76f6c767b8965472ed5ceae440da5aab0273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtr3DAQgEVpaR7tXygih57idiTr5aNx5NRkY28dp9CTkGUteXjjxFoT-u_rZLdJKfQwzDB8MwzzIYQJfCGcJF8BCGVUqogCSFAAEM0Ryzdon_A4jhhV8u1cg2CRAkL20EEINwCUcx6_R3tECsWFUvvI6TzXWXOBqxz_0IsqK5qf0cVSZ0VeZLip06IsylNclbhOG_03hU_0U7k812VzjJc6PcNNVX-_1Mc4LU_mRp1X9XlaZvoDereyffAfd_kQXea6yb5Fi-q0yNJF5KgAGXFPqXUJE63rrBO-c0m7ciQhnVBeipVwUshWJYIzSX3HnbeeMegst7YFKuND9Hm7934cHiYfNmZ9HZzve3vnhykYoQhjTKkZPPoHvBmm8W6-zVASE5BMshlSW8iNQwijX5n78Xptx1-GgHmyYP5YMC8WzLOFefTTbv_Urn33Orh7-wywLfA49Bs_htt-evSjufK231yZ_9mNfwNetYjM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213107474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EFFECTS OF VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING ON RATE OF VELOCITY DEVELOPMENT, PEAK TORQUE, AND PERFORMANCE</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>MURRAY, DANIEL P ; BROWN, LEE E ; ZINDER, STEVEN M ; NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J ; BERA, SAGIR G ; GARRETT, NIKKI M</creator><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, DANIEL P ; BROWN, LEE E ; ZINDER, STEVEN M ; NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J ; BERA, SAGIR G ; GARRETT, NIKKI M</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about the velocity-specific adaptations to training utilizing movement velocities in excess of 300°·s. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of 4 weeks of slow (60°·s) vs. fast (400°·s) velocity training on rate of velocity development (RVD), peak torque (PT), and performance. Twenty male kinesiology students (22.0 years ± 2.72; 178.6 cm ± 7.1; 82.7 kg ± 15.5) were tested, before and after 4 weeks of training, for PT production, RVD (at 60, 180, 300, 400, and 450°·s), standing long jump (SLJ) distance, and 15- and 40-m sprint times. All participants underwent 8 training sessions, performing 5 sets of 5 repetitions of simultaneous, bilateral, concentric knee extension exercises on a Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer at either 60° or 400° per second. Two 5 (speed) X 2 (time) X 2 (group) multivariate repeated measures analyses of variance revealed no significant differences between groups on any measure. Therefore, the groups were collapsed for analysis. There was a significant (p &gt; 0.05) main effect for RVD by time and SLJ distance by time (pre- 227.1 cm ± 21.2; post- 232.9 cm ± 20.7) but no significant change in PT or 15- or 40-m sprint times. These results offer support for the suggestion that there is a significant neural adaptation to short-term isokinetic training performed by recreationally trained males, producing changes in limb acceleration and performance with little or no change in strength. Because results were independent of training velocity, it appears as though the intention to move quickly is sufficient stimulus to achieve improvements in limb RVD. Changes in SLJ distance suggest that open kinetic chain training may benefit the performance of a closed kinetic chain activity when movement pattern specificity is optimized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/00124278-200708000-00037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17685688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Changes ; Exercise ; Human performance ; Humans ; Kinesiology ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Male ; Movement ; Movement - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Physical Education and Training - methods ; Physical Endurance - physiology ; Running - physiology ; Space life sciences ; Sports injuries ; Sports training ; Testing ; Torque ; Track &amp; field ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2007-08, Vol.21 (3), p.870-874</ispartof><rights>2007 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Aug 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17685688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, DANIEL P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, LEE E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZINDER, STEVEN M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERA, SAGIR G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARRETT, NIKKI M</creatorcontrib><title>EFFECTS OF VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING ON RATE OF VELOCITY DEVELOPMENT, PEAK TORQUE, AND PERFORMANCE</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Little is known about the velocity-specific adaptations to training utilizing movement velocities in excess of 300°·s. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of 4 weeks of slow (60°·s) vs. fast (400°·s) velocity training on rate of velocity development (RVD), peak torque (PT), and performance. Twenty male kinesiology students (22.0 years ± 2.72; 178.6 cm ± 7.1; 82.7 kg ± 15.5) were tested, before and after 4 weeks of training, for PT production, RVD (at 60, 180, 300, 400, and 450°·s), standing long jump (SLJ) distance, and 15- and 40-m sprint times. All participants underwent 8 training sessions, performing 5 sets of 5 repetitions of simultaneous, bilateral, concentric knee extension exercises on a Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer at either 60° or 400° per second. Two 5 (speed) X 2 (time) X 2 (group) multivariate repeated measures analyses of variance revealed no significant differences between groups on any measure. Therefore, the groups were collapsed for analysis. There was a significant (p &gt; 0.05) main effect for RVD by time and SLJ distance by time (pre- 227.1 cm ± 21.2; post- 232.9 cm ± 20.7) but no significant change in PT or 15- or 40-m sprint times. These results offer support for the suggestion that there is a significant neural adaptation to short-term isokinetic training performed by recreationally trained males, producing changes in limb acceleration and performance with little or no change in strength. Because results were independent of training velocity, it appears as though the intention to move quickly is sufficient stimulus to achieve improvements in limb RVD. Changes in SLJ distance suggest that open kinetic chain training may benefit the performance of a closed kinetic chain activity when movement pattern specificity is optimized.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinesiology</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Education and Training - methods</subject><subject>Physical Endurance - physiology</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Track &amp; field</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtr3DAQgEVpaR7tXygih57idiTr5aNx5NRkY28dp9CTkGUteXjjxFoT-u_rZLdJKfQwzDB8MwzzIYQJfCGcJF8BCGVUqogCSFAAEM0Ryzdon_A4jhhV8u1cg2CRAkL20EEINwCUcx6_R3tECsWFUvvI6TzXWXOBqxz_0IsqK5qf0cVSZ0VeZLip06IsylNclbhOG_03hU_0U7k812VzjJc6PcNNVX-_1Mc4LU_mRp1X9XlaZvoDereyffAfd_kQXea6yb5Fi-q0yNJF5KgAGXFPqXUJE63rrBO-c0m7ciQhnVBeipVwUshWJYIzSX3HnbeeMegst7YFKuND9Hm7934cHiYfNmZ9HZzve3vnhykYoQhjTKkZPPoHvBmm8W6-zVASE5BMshlSW8iNQwijX5n78Xptx1-GgHmyYP5YMC8WzLOFefTTbv_Urn33Orh7-wywLfA49Bs_htt-evSjufK231yZ_9mNfwNetYjM</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>MURRAY, DANIEL P</creator><creator>BROWN, LEE E</creator><creator>ZINDER, STEVEN M</creator><creator>NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J</creator><creator>BERA, SAGIR G</creator><creator>GARRETT, NIKKI M</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>EFFECTS OF VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING ON RATE OF VELOCITY DEVELOPMENT, PEAK TORQUE, AND PERFORMANCE</title><author>MURRAY, DANIEL P ; BROWN, LEE E ; ZINDER, STEVEN M ; NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J ; BERA, SAGIR G ; GARRETT, NIKKI M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2607-5e22ac946bcdac6edc9bfc191d68e76f6c767b8965472ed5ceae440da5aab0273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinesiology</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Education and Training - methods</topic><topic>Physical Endurance - physiology</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Track &amp; field</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, DANIEL P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, LEE E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZINDER, STEVEN M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERA, SAGIR G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARRETT, NIKKI M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MURRAY, DANIEL P</au><au>BROWN, LEE E</au><au>ZINDER, STEVEN M</au><au>NOFFAL, GUILLERMO J</au><au>BERA, SAGIR G</au><au>GARRETT, NIKKI M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EFFECTS OF VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING ON RATE OF VELOCITY DEVELOPMENT, PEAK TORQUE, AND PERFORMANCE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>870</spage><epage>874</epage><pages>870-874</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Little is known about the velocity-specific adaptations to training utilizing movement velocities in excess of 300°·s. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of 4 weeks of slow (60°·s) vs. fast (400°·s) velocity training on rate of velocity development (RVD), peak torque (PT), and performance. Twenty male kinesiology students (22.0 years ± 2.72; 178.6 cm ± 7.1; 82.7 kg ± 15.5) were tested, before and after 4 weeks of training, for PT production, RVD (at 60, 180, 300, 400, and 450°·s), standing long jump (SLJ) distance, and 15- and 40-m sprint times. All participants underwent 8 training sessions, performing 5 sets of 5 repetitions of simultaneous, bilateral, concentric knee extension exercises on a Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer at either 60° or 400° per second. Two 5 (speed) X 2 (time) X 2 (group) multivariate repeated measures analyses of variance revealed no significant differences between groups on any measure. Therefore, the groups were collapsed for analysis. There was a significant (p &gt; 0.05) main effect for RVD by time and SLJ distance by time (pre- 227.1 cm ± 21.2; post- 232.9 cm ± 20.7) but no significant change in PT or 15- or 40-m sprint times. These results offer support for the suggestion that there is a significant neural adaptation to short-term isokinetic training performed by recreationally trained males, producing changes in limb acceleration and performance with little or no change in strength. Because results were independent of training velocity, it appears as though the intention to move quickly is sufficient stimulus to achieve improvements in limb RVD. Changes in SLJ distance suggest that open kinetic chain training may benefit the performance of a closed kinetic chain activity when movement pattern specificity is optimized.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>17685688</pmid><doi>10.1519/00124278-200708000-00037</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2007-08, Vol.21 (3), p.870-874
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68144488
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Acceleration
Adaptation, Physiological
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Biomechanical Phenomena
Changes
Exercise
Human performance
Humans
Kinesiology
Knee
Knee Joint - physiology
Male
Movement
Movement - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Physical Education and Training - methods
Physical Endurance - physiology
Running - physiology
Space life sciences
Sports injuries
Sports training
Testing
Torque
Track & field
Velocity
title EFFECTS OF VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING ON RATE OF VELOCITY DEVELOPMENT, PEAK TORQUE, AND PERFORMANCE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T00%3A27%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EFFECTS%20OF%20VELOCITY-SPECIFIC%20TRAINING%20ON%20RATE%20OF%20VELOCITY%20DEVELOPMENT,%20PEAK%20TORQUE,%20AND%20PERFORMANCE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=MURRAY,%20DANIEL%20P&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=870&rft.epage=874&rft.pages=870-874&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/00124278-200708000-00037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68144488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213107474&rft_id=info:pmid/17685688&rfr_iscdi=true