Comparison between sol-gel-derived anatase- and rutile-structured TiO2 coatings in soft-tissue environment

The bioactivity of the surface reactive TiO2 coatings for medical implants can be locally modified by CO2 laser processing to match with the properties of surrounding tissues. The TiO2 coatings heat‐treated at 500°C exhibit in vitro bioactivity. With further CO2 laser treatment they exhibit enhanced...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B 2007-09, Vol.82A (4), p.965-974
Hauptverfasser: Rossi, S., Moritz, N., Tirri, T., Peltola, T., Areva, S., Jokinen, M., Happonen, R.-P., Närhi, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The bioactivity of the surface reactive TiO2 coatings for medical implants can be locally modified by CO2 laser processing to match with the properties of surrounding tissues. The TiO2 coatings heat‐treated at 500°C exhibit in vitro bioactivity. With further CO2 laser treatment they exhibit enhanced in vitro bioactivity. The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the performance of heat‐treated anatase‐structured TiO2 coatings with preheat‐treated and CO2 laser‐treated rutile‐structured coatings in terms of their ability to attach soft connective tissues. The coatings were characterized with TF‐XRD and AFM. TiO2‐coated discs were implanted in rats. The samples were analyzed with routine histology, SEM‐EDS, and TEM. In both groups, already at 3 days, soft connective tissues were in immediate contact with the surface. No thick crystalline CaP layer was detected by SEM‐EDS, but a thin amorphous CaP layer was detected by XPS. No gap between the cell membrane and the coating could be observed in TEM pictures. No differences were observed between the anatase‐ and rutile‐structured coatings in terms of tissue responses. Further studies are needed to verify if the tissues are adherent to the surface of the implant. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2007
ISSN:1549-3296
1552-4965
1552-4981
DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.31245