Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice

Augmentation/mastopexy is of considerable interest to plastic surgeons who perform breast surgery because of its complexity as well as its high rate of legal claims. This single-surgeon, 3-year study evaluated complications, outcomes, and reoperation rates among 166 patients who underwent 171 proced...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2006-12, Vol.118 (7 Suppl), p.136S-147S; discussion 148S-149S
Hauptverfasser: Spear, Scott L, Boehmler, 4th, James H, Clemens, Mark W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147S; discussion 148S-149S
container_issue 7 Suppl
container_start_page 136S
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 118
creator Spear, Scott L
Boehmler, 4th, James H
Clemens, Mark W
description Augmentation/mastopexy is of considerable interest to plastic surgeons who perform breast surgery because of its complexity as well as its high rate of legal claims. This single-surgeon, 3-year study evaluated complications, outcomes, and reoperation rates among 166 patients who underwent 171 procedures for primary and secondary augmentation and primary and secondary augmentation/mastopexy. Aspects of the treatment plan were reviewed, including classification of ptosis, procedure selection, surgical planning, and operative technique. There were 57 primary breast augmentations, 60 secondary breast augmentations, 17 primary mastopexies, eight secondary mastopexies, 23 primary augmentation/mastopexies, and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexies. The 23 primary and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexy patients had 17 percent and 23 percent complication rates, respectively. The revision rate for augmentation mastopexy was 8.7 percent for the primary group and 16.6 percent for the secondary group. For reference, primary augmentation and secondary augmentation had complication rates of 1.7 percent and 21.6 percent, respectively. Primary augmentation had a 1.7 percent revision rate compared with 18.7 percent for secondary augmentation. The authors reviewed the most common problems leading to a revision, which were capsular contracture and asymmetry correction. Other complications included size change and rupture. Primary augmentation/mastopexy is a commonly performed procedure and has a significantly higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Secondary augmentation/mastopexy is also common and has higher revision and complication rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.prs.0000247311.12506.d7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68139864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68139864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-28ea00bb4a63a920ffada2a550670519bd4c0e3076bbe077151504e0225ca1a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81Lw0AUxBdBbK3-CxI86Cnpe_uR7XorxapQ8KLn8JK8lEi-3E3U_vdW1LkMDD-GGSGuERIEZ5eAyeBDAkdJbRVigtJAmpT2RMzRSBdrqeVMnIfwBoBWpeZMzNCCc9qpudiup33L3Uhj3XfLlsLYD_x1uIsoUvGByUeeP2r-jPrqGIW62zcchcnvue9uQzR4Ksa64AtxWlET-PLPF-J1e_-yeYx3zw9Pm_UuHiS4MZYrJoA815QqchKqikqSZI6LLRh0eakLYAU2zXMGa9GgAc0gpSkISauFuPntHXz_PnEYs7YOBTcNddxPIUtXqNwq_QGv_sApb7nMBl-35A_Z_3P1DaHgWr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68139864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Spear, Scott L ; Boehmler, 4th, James H ; Clemens, Mark W</creator><creatorcontrib>Spear, Scott L ; Boehmler, 4th, James H ; Clemens, Mark W</creatorcontrib><description>Augmentation/mastopexy is of considerable interest to plastic surgeons who perform breast surgery because of its complexity as well as its high rate of legal claims. This single-surgeon, 3-year study evaluated complications, outcomes, and reoperation rates among 166 patients who underwent 171 procedures for primary and secondary augmentation and primary and secondary augmentation/mastopexy. Aspects of the treatment plan were reviewed, including classification of ptosis, procedure selection, surgical planning, and operative technique. There were 57 primary breast augmentations, 60 secondary breast augmentations, 17 primary mastopexies, eight secondary mastopexies, 23 primary augmentation/mastopexies, and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexies. The 23 primary and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexy patients had 17 percent and 23 percent complication rates, respectively. The revision rate for augmentation mastopexy was 8.7 percent for the primary group and 16.6 percent for the secondary group. For reference, primary augmentation and secondary augmentation had complication rates of 1.7 percent and 21.6 percent, respectively. Primary augmentation had a 1.7 percent revision rate compared with 18.7 percent for secondary augmentation. The authors reviewed the most common problems leading to a revision, which were capsular contracture and asymmetry correction. Other complications included size change and rupture. Primary augmentation/mastopexy is a commonly performed procedure and has a significantly higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Secondary augmentation/mastopexy is also common and has higher revision and complication rates.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000247311.12506.d7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17099493</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - adverse effects ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Nipples - surgery ; Patient Selection ; Postoperative Complications ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-12, Vol.118 (7 Suppl), p.136S-147S; discussion 148S-149S</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17099493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spear, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehmler, 4th, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Mark W</creatorcontrib><title>Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Augmentation/mastopexy is of considerable interest to plastic surgeons who perform breast surgery because of its complexity as well as its high rate of legal claims. This single-surgeon, 3-year study evaluated complications, outcomes, and reoperation rates among 166 patients who underwent 171 procedures for primary and secondary augmentation and primary and secondary augmentation/mastopexy. Aspects of the treatment plan were reviewed, including classification of ptosis, procedure selection, surgical planning, and operative technique. There were 57 primary breast augmentations, 60 secondary breast augmentations, 17 primary mastopexies, eight secondary mastopexies, 23 primary augmentation/mastopexies, and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexies. The 23 primary and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexy patients had 17 percent and 23 percent complication rates, respectively. The revision rate for augmentation mastopexy was 8.7 percent for the primary group and 16.6 percent for the secondary group. For reference, primary augmentation and secondary augmentation had complication rates of 1.7 percent and 21.6 percent, respectively. Primary augmentation had a 1.7 percent revision rate compared with 18.7 percent for secondary augmentation. The authors reviewed the most common problems leading to a revision, which were capsular contracture and asymmetry correction. Other complications included size change and rupture. Primary augmentation/mastopexy is a commonly performed procedure and has a significantly higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Secondary augmentation/mastopexy is also common and has higher revision and complication rates.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Nipples - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j81Lw0AUxBdBbK3-CxI86Cnpe_uR7XorxapQ8KLn8JK8lEi-3E3U_vdW1LkMDD-GGSGuERIEZ5eAyeBDAkdJbRVigtJAmpT2RMzRSBdrqeVMnIfwBoBWpeZMzNCCc9qpudiup33L3Uhj3XfLlsLYD_x1uIsoUvGByUeeP2r-jPrqGIW62zcchcnvue9uQzR4Ksa64AtxWlET-PLPF-J1e_-yeYx3zw9Pm_UuHiS4MZYrJoA815QqchKqikqSZI6LLRh0eakLYAU2zXMGa9GgAc0gpSkISauFuPntHXz_PnEYs7YOBTcNddxPIUtXqNwq_QGv_sApb7nMBl-35A_Z_3P1DaHgWr0</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Spear, Scott L</creator><creator>Boehmler, 4th, James H</creator><creator>Clemens, Mark W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice</title><author>Spear, Scott L ; Boehmler, 4th, James H ; Clemens, Mark W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-28ea00bb4a63a920ffada2a550670519bd4c0e3076bbe077151504e0225ca1a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Nipples - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spear, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehmler, 4th, James H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Mark W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spear, Scott L</au><au>Boehmler, 4th, James H</au><au>Clemens, Mark W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>7 Suppl</issue><spage>136S</spage><epage>147S; discussion 148S-149S</epage><pages>136S-147S; discussion 148S-149S</pages><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Augmentation/mastopexy is of considerable interest to plastic surgeons who perform breast surgery because of its complexity as well as its high rate of legal claims. This single-surgeon, 3-year study evaluated complications, outcomes, and reoperation rates among 166 patients who underwent 171 procedures for primary and secondary augmentation and primary and secondary augmentation/mastopexy. Aspects of the treatment plan were reviewed, including classification of ptosis, procedure selection, surgical planning, and operative technique. There were 57 primary breast augmentations, 60 secondary breast augmentations, 17 primary mastopexies, eight secondary mastopexies, 23 primary augmentation/mastopexies, and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexies. The 23 primary and 30 secondary augmentation/mastopexy patients had 17 percent and 23 percent complication rates, respectively. The revision rate for augmentation mastopexy was 8.7 percent for the primary group and 16.6 percent for the secondary group. For reference, primary augmentation and secondary augmentation had complication rates of 1.7 percent and 21.6 percent, respectively. Primary augmentation had a 1.7 percent revision rate compared with 18.7 percent for secondary augmentation. The authors reviewed the most common problems leading to a revision, which were capsular contracture and asymmetry correction. Other complications included size change and rupture. Primary augmentation/mastopexy is a commonly performed procedure and has a significantly higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Secondary augmentation/mastopexy is also common and has higher revision and complication rates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>17099493</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.prs.0000247311.12506.d7</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1529-4242
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-12, Vol.118 (7 Suppl), p.136S-147S; discussion 148S-149S
issn 1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68139864
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty - adverse effects
Mammaplasty - methods
Nipples - surgery
Patient Selection
Postoperative Complications
Reoperation
Treatment Outcome
title Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year review of a single surgeon's practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A26%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Augmentation/mastopexy:%20a%203-year%20review%20of%20a%20single%20surgeon's%20practice&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Spear,%20Scott%20L&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=7%20Suppl&rft.spage=136S&rft.epage=147S;%20discussion%20148S-149S&rft.pages=136S-147S;%20discussion%20148S-149S&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.prs.0000247311.12506.d7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68139864%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68139864&rft_id=info:pmid/17099493&rfr_iscdi=true