Use of Itemized Till Receipts to Adjust for Correlated Dietary Measurement Error

Recent studies suggest that measurement error in food frequency questionnaires includes a person-specific component correlated with that of other self-reported dietary assessments. Use of biomarkers has been recommended to adequately calibrate dietary assessment tools for unbiased estimation of asso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of epidemiology 2006-11, Vol.164 (10), p.1012-1018
Hauptverfasser: Greenwood, D. C., Ransley, J. K., Gilthorpe, M. S., Cade, J. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1018
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1012
container_title American journal of epidemiology
container_volume 164
creator Greenwood, D. C.
Ransley, J. K.
Gilthorpe, M. S.
Cade, J. E.
description Recent studies suggest that measurement error in food frequency questionnaires includes a person-specific component correlated with that of other self-reported dietary assessments. Use of biomarkers has been recommended to adequately calibrate dietary assessment tools for unbiased estimation of associations between diet and disease. Data on biomarkers of intake are often collected only in small subsamples, because collection of biomarker data can be expensive and inconvenient for participants. In this paper, the authors propose a novel approach using itemized household grocery till receipts to calibrate dietary assessment. Till receipts are not self-recorded and the data obtained from them are not subject to person-specific bias, but the data need to be supported by self-completed diaries for foods eaten away from home. Till receipts may also prove cheaper to collect in larger samples. The authors discuss the many methodological challenges of using household-level data and discuss how till receipts might be used in practice, with or without the use of biomarkers.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/aje/kwj308
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68112339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1163331681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b5967ec9709222d57d83b62b1d13941c5e0bb93c20105a0c65aa13e84a3c2df73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0dFqFDEUBuAgit1Wb3wACYJeFKY9SSbJ5LKsta1dUWQLpTchkzkDM53Z2SYZrD69KbtY8CqQfPyc84eQdwxOGBhx6no8vf_VC6hekAUrtSoUl-olWQAALwxX_IAcxtgDMGYkvCYHTJkSQOgF-XETkU4tvUo4dn-woetuGOhP9NhtU6RpomdNP8dE2ynQ5RQCDi5l9rnD5MJv-g1dnAOOuEn0PIQpvCGvWjdEfLs_j8jNl_P18rJYfb-4Wp6tCl8ylYpaGqXRGw2Gc95I3VSiVrxmDROmZF4i1LURngMD6cAr6RwTWJUu3zWtFkfk0y53G6aHGWOyYxc9DoPb4DRHqyrGuBAmww__wX6awybPZrmQFVRG8YyOd8iHKcaArd2GbswLWgb2qWSbS7a7kjN-v0-c6xGbZ7pvNYOPe-Cid0Mb3MZ38dlVIv-MeAoqdq6LCR__vbtwb5UWWtrL2zur767Xt-ZrZVfiLz1fkxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235808962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Itemized Till Receipts to Adjust for Correlated Dietary Measurement Error</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Greenwood, D. C. ; Ransley, J. K. ; Gilthorpe, M. S. ; Cade, J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, D. C. ; Ransley, J. K. ; Gilthorpe, M. S. ; Cade, J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies suggest that measurement error in food frequency questionnaires includes a person-specific component correlated with that of other self-reported dietary assessments. Use of biomarkers has been recommended to adequately calibrate dietary assessment tools for unbiased estimation of associations between diet and disease. Data on biomarkers of intake are often collected only in small subsamples, because collection of biomarker data can be expensive and inconvenient for participants. In this paper, the authors propose a novel approach using itemized household grocery till receipts to calibrate dietary assessment. Till receipts are not self-recorded and the data obtained from them are not subject to person-specific bias, but the data need to be supported by self-completed diaries for foods eaten away from home. Till receipts may also prove cheaper to collect in larger samples. The authors discuss the many methodological challenges of using household-level data and discuss how till receipts might be used in practice, with or without the use of biomarkers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj308</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16940037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis. Health state ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological markers ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Data Collection - methods ; Diet ; diet surveys ; Diseases of the digestive system ; epidemiologic methods ; Epidemiology ; Errors ; Feeding Behavior ; FFQ ; food frequency questionnaire ; Food Preferences ; General aspects ; Humans ; Measurement techniques ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Models, Statistical ; Nutrition Surveys ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Questionnaires ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Receipts ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 2006-11, Vol.164 (10), p.1012-1018</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Nov 15, 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b5967ec9709222d57d83b62b1d13941c5e0bb93c20105a0c65aa13e84a3c2df73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b5967ec9709222d57d83b62b1d13941c5e0bb93c20105a0c65aa13e84a3c2df73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18300038$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16940037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ransley, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilthorpe, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cade, J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Itemized Till Receipts to Adjust for Correlated Dietary Measurement Error</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am. J. Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Recent studies suggest that measurement error in food frequency questionnaires includes a person-specific component correlated with that of other self-reported dietary assessments. Use of biomarkers has been recommended to adequately calibrate dietary assessment tools for unbiased estimation of associations between diet and disease. Data on biomarkers of intake are often collected only in small subsamples, because collection of biomarker data can be expensive and inconvenient for participants. In this paper, the authors propose a novel approach using itemized household grocery till receipts to calibrate dietary assessment. Till receipts are not self-recorded and the data obtained from them are not subject to person-specific bias, but the data need to be supported by self-completed diaries for foods eaten away from home. Till receipts may also prove cheaper to collect in larger samples. The authors discuss the many methodological challenges of using household-level data and discuss how till receipts might be used in practice, with or without the use of biomarkers.</description><subject>Analysis. Health state</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>diet surveys</subject><subject>Diseases of the digestive system</subject><subject>epidemiologic methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>FFQ</subject><subject>food frequency questionnaire</subject><subject>Food Preferences</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Nutrition Surveys</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Receipts</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0dFqFDEUBuAgit1Wb3wACYJeFKY9SSbJ5LKsta1dUWQLpTchkzkDM53Z2SYZrD69KbtY8CqQfPyc84eQdwxOGBhx6no8vf_VC6hekAUrtSoUl-olWQAALwxX_IAcxtgDMGYkvCYHTJkSQOgF-XETkU4tvUo4dn-woetuGOhP9NhtU6RpomdNP8dE2ynQ5RQCDi5l9rnD5MJv-g1dnAOOuEn0PIQpvCGvWjdEfLs_j8jNl_P18rJYfb-4Wp6tCl8ylYpaGqXRGw2Gc95I3VSiVrxmDROmZF4i1LURngMD6cAr6RwTWJUu3zWtFkfk0y53G6aHGWOyYxc9DoPb4DRHqyrGuBAmww__wX6awybPZrmQFVRG8YyOd8iHKcaArd2GbswLWgb2qWSbS7a7kjN-v0-c6xGbZ7pvNYOPe-Cid0Mb3MZ38dlVIv-MeAoqdq6LCR__vbtwb5UWWtrL2zur767Xt-ZrZVfiLz1fkxY</recordid><startdate>20061115</startdate><enddate>20061115</enddate><creator>Greenwood, D. C.</creator><creator>Ransley, J. K.</creator><creator>Gilthorpe, M. S.</creator><creator>Cade, J. E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061115</creationdate><title>Use of Itemized Till Receipts to Adjust for Correlated Dietary Measurement Error</title><author>Greenwood, D. C. ; Ransley, J. K. ; Gilthorpe, M. S. ; Cade, J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b5967ec9709222d57d83b62b1d13941c5e0bb93c20105a0c65aa13e84a3c2df73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Analysis. Health state</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>diet surveys</topic><topic>Diseases of the digestive system</topic><topic>epidemiologic methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>FFQ</topic><topic>food frequency questionnaire</topic><topic>Food Preferences</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Nutrition Surveys</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Receipts</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ransley, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilthorpe, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cade, J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenwood, D. C.</au><au>Ransley, J. K.</au><au>Gilthorpe, M. S.</au><au>Cade, J. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Itemized Till Receipts to Adjust for Correlated Dietary Measurement Error</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am. J. Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2006-11-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1012</spage><epage>1018</epage><pages>1012-1018</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>Recent studies suggest that measurement error in food frequency questionnaires includes a person-specific component correlated with that of other self-reported dietary assessments. Use of biomarkers has been recommended to adequately calibrate dietary assessment tools for unbiased estimation of associations between diet and disease. Data on biomarkers of intake are often collected only in small subsamples, because collection of biomarker data can be expensive and inconvenient for participants. In this paper, the authors propose a novel approach using itemized household grocery till receipts to calibrate dietary assessment. Till receipts are not self-recorded and the data obtained from them are not subject to person-specific bias, but the data need to be supported by self-completed diaries for foods eaten away from home. Till receipts may also prove cheaper to collect in larger samples. The authors discuss the many methodological challenges of using household-level data and discuss how till receipts might be used in practice, with or without the use of biomarkers.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16940037</pmid><doi>10.1093/aje/kwj308</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9262
ispartof American journal of epidemiology, 2006-11, Vol.164 (10), p.1012-1018
issn 0002-9262
1476-6256
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68112339
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis. Health state
Biological and medical sciences
biological markers
Biomarkers - analysis
Data Collection - methods
Diet
diet surveys
Diseases of the digestive system
epidemiologic methods
Epidemiology
Errors
Feeding Behavior
FFQ
food frequency questionnaire
Food Preferences
General aspects
Humans
Measurement techniques
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Models, Statistical
Nutrition Surveys
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Questionnaires
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Receipts
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Use of Itemized Till Receipts to Adjust for Correlated Dietary Measurement Error
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Itemized%20Till%20Receipts%20to%20Adjust%20for%20Correlated%20Dietary%20Measurement%20Error&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Greenwood,%20D.%20C.&rft.date=2006-11-15&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1012&rft.epage=1018&rft.pages=1012-1018&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aje/kwj308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1163331681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235808962&rft_id=info:pmid/16940037&rfr_iscdi=true