The precision of the panoramic mandibular index
This study evaluates the precision of the panoramic mandibular index (PMI). Measurements were made by two observers on both of the left and right sides of the mandible on the radiographs taken from 41 young individuals and the inferior and superior PMI were calculated. Two weeks later the same obser...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology 2006-11, Vol.35 (6), p.442-446 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 446 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 442 |
| container_title | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Güngör, K Akarslan, Zz Akdevelioglu, M Erten, H Semiz, M |
| description | This study evaluates the precision of the panoramic mandibular index (PMI).
Measurements were made by two observers on both of the left and right sides of the mandible on the radiographs taken from 41 young individuals and the inferior and superior PMI were calculated. Two weeks later the same observers repeated their measurements to assess intrarater reliability. Paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficients and precision values were calculated to assess levels of association.
There was a significant difference between the first rater's first and second measurements (intrarater repeatability) for both the inferior and superior PMI, while no significant difference was observed for the second rater. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the inferior PMI were calculated as 0.005319 and 0.005594 for the first rater and 0.005663 and 0.005594 for the second, respectively. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the superior PMI were similar for both observers, calculated as 0.002558, 0.002766; and 0.003046, 0.002766, respectively. The precision of both inferior and superior indices was not very good, but precision figures for the superior PMI demonstrated consistency almost twice better than those for the inferior PMI for both observers.
The precision values for the PMI seem to be sufficient according to the results of this study, but they are still questionable and more studies need to be done on this aspect. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1259/dmfr/25346328 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68103586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68103586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7ac6bc17f98a50c72538a591f0b8f98dd5400edf111d6c961191d2c53cf0ff363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMotlaXbmVW7sbem0wymaUUq0LBTYXuQiYPjMyjJh3Qf-8Mrbi6h8PH4fIRcovwgJRXS9v6uKScFYJReUbmWJQi5wXdnZM5UA65ZHQ3I1cpfQJAwbi4JDMsQVLGxJwstx8u20dnQgp9l_U-O0yF7vqo22CyVnc21EOjYxY6676vyYXXTXI3p7sg7-un7eol37w9v64eN7mhFR7yUhtRGyx9JTUHU44PjqFCD7UcO2t5AeCsR0QrTCUQK7TUcGY8eM8EW5D74-4-9l-DSwfVhmRc0-jO9UNSQiIwLicwP4Im9ilF59U-hlbHH4WgJkNqMqT-DI383Wl4qFtn_-mTEvYLGCJhCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68103586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The precision of the panoramic mandibular index</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Güngör, K ; Akarslan, Zz ; Akdevelioglu, M ; Erten, H ; Semiz, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Güngör, K ; Akarslan, Zz ; Akdevelioglu, M ; Erten, H ; Semiz, M</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluates the precision of the panoramic mandibular index (PMI).
Measurements were made by two observers on both of the left and right sides of the mandible on the radiographs taken from 41 young individuals and the inferior and superior PMI were calculated. Two weeks later the same observers repeated their measurements to assess intrarater reliability. Paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficients and precision values were calculated to assess levels of association.
There was a significant difference between the first rater's first and second measurements (intrarater repeatability) for both the inferior and superior PMI, while no significant difference was observed for the second rater. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the inferior PMI were calculated as 0.005319 and 0.005594 for the first rater and 0.005663 and 0.005594 for the second, respectively. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the superior PMI were similar for both observers, calculated as 0.002558, 0.002766; and 0.003046, 0.002766, respectively. The precision of both inferior and superior indices was not very good, but precision figures for the superior PMI demonstrated consistency almost twice better than those for the inferior PMI for both observers.
The precision values for the PMI seem to be sufficient according to the results of this study, but they are still questionable and more studies need to be done on this aspect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-542X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/25346328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17082336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Resorption - diagnostic imaging ; Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Observer Variation ; Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2006-11, Vol.35 (6), p.442-446</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7ac6bc17f98a50c72538a591f0b8f98dd5400edf111d6c961191d2c53cf0ff363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7ac6bc17f98a50c72538a591f0b8f98dd5400edf111d6c961191d2c53cf0ff363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17082336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Güngör, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akarslan, Zz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdevelioglu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erten, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semiz, M</creatorcontrib><title>The precision of the panoramic mandibular index</title><title>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</title><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><description>This study evaluates the precision of the panoramic mandibular index (PMI).
Measurements were made by two observers on both of the left and right sides of the mandible on the radiographs taken from 41 young individuals and the inferior and superior PMI were calculated. Two weeks later the same observers repeated their measurements to assess intrarater reliability. Paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficients and precision values were calculated to assess levels of association.
There was a significant difference between the first rater's first and second measurements (intrarater repeatability) for both the inferior and superior PMI, while no significant difference was observed for the second rater. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the inferior PMI were calculated as 0.005319 and 0.005594 for the first rater and 0.005663 and 0.005594 for the second, respectively. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the superior PMI were similar for both observers, calculated as 0.002558, 0.002766; and 0.003046, 0.002766, respectively. The precision of both inferior and superior indices was not very good, but precision figures for the superior PMI demonstrated consistency almost twice better than those for the inferior PMI for both observers.
The precision values for the PMI seem to be sufficient according to the results of this study, but they are still questionable and more studies need to be done on this aspect.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0250-832X</issn><issn>1476-542X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMotlaXbmVW7sbem0wymaUUq0LBTYXuQiYPjMyjJh3Qf-8Mrbi6h8PH4fIRcovwgJRXS9v6uKScFYJReUbmWJQi5wXdnZM5UA65ZHQ3I1cpfQJAwbi4JDMsQVLGxJwstx8u20dnQgp9l_U-O0yF7vqo22CyVnc21EOjYxY6676vyYXXTXI3p7sg7-un7eol37w9v64eN7mhFR7yUhtRGyx9JTUHU44PjqFCD7UcO2t5AeCsR0QrTCUQK7TUcGY8eM8EW5D74-4-9l-DSwfVhmRc0-jO9UNSQiIwLicwP4Im9ilF59U-hlbHH4WgJkNqMqT-DI383Wl4qFtn_-mTEvYLGCJhCg</recordid><startdate>200611</startdate><enddate>200611</enddate><creator>Güngör, K</creator><creator>Akarslan, Zz</creator><creator>Akdevelioglu, M</creator><creator>Erten, H</creator><creator>Semiz, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200611</creationdate><title>The precision of the panoramic mandibular index</title><author>Güngör, K ; Akarslan, Zz ; Akdevelioglu, M ; Erten, H ; Semiz, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-7ac6bc17f98a50c72538a591f0b8f98dd5400edf111d6c961191d2c53cf0ff363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Güngör, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akarslan, Zz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdevelioglu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erten, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semiz, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Güngör, K</au><au>Akarslan, Zz</au><au>Akdevelioglu, M</au><au>Erten, H</au><au>Semiz, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The precision of the panoramic mandibular index</atitle><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><date>2006-11</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>442</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>442-446</pages><issn>0250-832X</issn><eissn>1476-542X</eissn><abstract>This study evaluates the precision of the panoramic mandibular index (PMI).
Measurements were made by two observers on both of the left and right sides of the mandible on the radiographs taken from 41 young individuals and the inferior and superior PMI were calculated. Two weeks later the same observers repeated their measurements to assess intrarater reliability. Paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficients and precision values were calculated to assess levels of association.
There was a significant difference between the first rater's first and second measurements (intrarater repeatability) for both the inferior and superior PMI, while no significant difference was observed for the second rater. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the inferior PMI were calculated as 0.005319 and 0.005594 for the first rater and 0.005663 and 0.005594 for the second, respectively. The intrarater and inter-rater precision values for the superior PMI were similar for both observers, calculated as 0.002558, 0.002766; and 0.003046, 0.002766, respectively. The precision of both inferior and superior indices was not very good, but precision figures for the superior PMI demonstrated consistency almost twice better than those for the inferior PMI for both observers.
The precision values for the PMI seem to be sufficient according to the results of this study, but they are still questionable and more studies need to be done on this aspect.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>17082336</pmid><doi>10.1259/dmfr/25346328</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0250-832X |
| ispartof | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2006-11, Vol.35 (6), p.442-446 |
| issn | 0250-832X 1476-542X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68103586 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Adult Bone Density - physiology Bone Resorption - diagnostic imaging Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data Dentistry Female Humans Male Mandible - diagnostic imaging Observer Variation Radiography, Panoramic - statistics & numerical data Reproducibility of Results |
| title | The precision of the panoramic mandibular index |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A44%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20precision%20of%20the%20panoramic%20mandibular%20index&rft.jtitle=Dento-maxillo-facial%20radiology&rft.au=G%C3%BCng%C3%B6r,%20K&rft.date=2006-11&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=442&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=442-446&rft.issn=0250-832X&rft.eissn=1476-542X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/dmfr/25346328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68103586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68103586&rft_id=info:pmid/17082336&rfr_iscdi=true |