Social and Geographic Distance in HIV Risk

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between social distance (measured as the geodesic, or shortest distance, between 2 people in a connected network) and geographic distance (measured as the actual distance between them in kilometers [km]). Study: We used data from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexually transmitted diseases 2005-08, Vol.32 (8), p.506-512
Hauptverfasser: ROTHENBERG, RICHARD, MUTH, STEPHEN Q., MALONE, SHAUNA, POTTERAT, JOHN J., WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 8
container_start_page 506
container_title Sexually transmitted diseases
container_volume 32
creator ROTHENBERG, RICHARD
MUTH, STEPHEN Q.
MALONE, SHAUNA
POTTERAT, JOHN J.
WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.
description Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between social distance (measured as the geodesic, or shortest distance, between 2 people in a connected network) and geographic distance (measured as the actual distance between them in kilometers [km]). Study: We used data from a study of 595 persons at risk for HIV and their sexual and drug-using partners (total N = 8920 unique individuals) conducted in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from 1988 to 1992—a longitudinal cohort study that ascertained sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, and network information about participants. We used place of residence as the geographic marker and calculated distance between people grouped by various characteristics of interest. Results: Fifty-two percent of all dyads were separated by a distance of 4 km or less. The closest pairs were persons who both shared needles and had sexual contact (mean = 3.2 km), and HIV-positive persons and their contacts (mean = 2.9). The most distant pairs were prostitutes and their paying partners (mean = 6.1 km). In a connected subset of 348 respondents, almost half the persons were between 3 and 6 steps from each other in the social network and were separated by a distance of 2 to 8 km. Using block group centroids, the mean distance between all persons in Colorado Springs was 12.4 km compared with a mean distance of 5.4 km between all dyads in this study (P < 0.0001). The subgroup of HIV-positive people and their contacts was drawn in real space on a map of Colorado Springs and revealed tight clustering of this group in the downtown area. Conclusion: The association of social and geographic distance in an urban group of people at risk for HIV provides demonstration of the importance of geographic clustering in the potential transmission of HIV. The proximity of persons connected within a network, but not necessarily known to each other, suggests that a high probability of partner selection from within the group may be an important factor in maintenance of HIV endemicity.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.olq.0000161191.12026.ca
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68074590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44969522</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44969522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-346b79b5b6f005f2a4a3e46a08e49e661ceb57d814a942b959c6754c34f905b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpaJy0P6FhCTSHwG5npJG0yq3kGwKB9OMqtLK2WXe9a0v2If8-Sm1iyCVzEWKeVzN6GDtGqBCM_g5Yjf2yglyoEA1WyIGryrsPbIJS6JIkx49sAkh1KTXqfXaQ0gxe7oCf2D4qIOSSJuz05-g71xdumBbXYfwb3eKx88VFl1Zu8KHohuLm9k_x0KV_n9le6_oUvmzPQ_b76vLX-U15d399e_7jrvSkzaoUpBptGtmoFkC23JETgZSDOpAJSqEPjdTTGskZ4o2RxistyQtqDcgGxCE72by7iONyHdLKzrvkQ9-7IYzrZFUNmqR5H0SthAZVZ_D4DTgb13HIn7Ccc6Gp1iJDZxvIxzGlGFq7iN3cxSeLYF-8W0Cbvdudd_vfu_Uuh4-2E9bNPEx30a3oDHzbAi5517cx2-3SjtMgcvHMfd1ws7Qa42ufyCgj867PikKSPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222374873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social and Geographic Distance in HIV Risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>ROTHENBERG, RICHARD ; MUTH, STEPHEN Q. ; MALONE, SHAUNA ; POTTERAT, JOHN J. ; WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.</creator><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERG, RICHARD ; MUTH, STEPHEN Q. ; MALONE, SHAUNA ; POTTERAT, JOHN J. ; WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between social distance (measured as the geodesic, or shortest distance, between 2 people in a connected network) and geographic distance (measured as the actual distance between them in kilometers [km]). Study: We used data from a study of 595 persons at risk for HIV and their sexual and drug-using partners (total N = 8920 unique individuals) conducted in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from 1988 to 1992—a longitudinal cohort study that ascertained sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, and network information about participants. We used place of residence as the geographic marker and calculated distance between people grouped by various characteristics of interest. Results: Fifty-two percent of all dyads were separated by a distance of 4 km or less. The closest pairs were persons who both shared needles and had sexual contact (mean = 3.2 km), and HIV-positive persons and their contacts (mean = 2.9). The most distant pairs were prostitutes and their paying partners (mean = 6.1 km). In a connected subset of 348 respondents, almost half the persons were between 3 and 6 steps from each other in the social network and were separated by a distance of 2 to 8 km. Using block group centroids, the mean distance between all persons in Colorado Springs was 12.4 km compared with a mean distance of 5.4 km between all dyads in this study (P &lt; 0.0001). The subgroup of HIV-positive people and their contacts was drawn in real space on a map of Colorado Springs and revealed tight clustering of this group in the downtown area. Conclusion: The association of social and geographic distance in an urban group of people at risk for HIV provides demonstration of the importance of geographic clustering in the potential transmission of HIV. The proximity of persons connected within a network, but not necessarily known to each other, suggests that a high probability of partner selection from within the group may be an important factor in maintenance of HIV endemicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-5717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000161191.12026.ca</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16041254</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STRDDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cluster Analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Colorado - epidemiology ; Demography ; Female ; General aspects ; Geography ; Health risk assessment ; HIV ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - etiology ; HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Interviews as Topic ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Residence Characteristics ; Risk-Taking ; Sexual Behavior ; Sexual Partners ; Social Support ; Urban areas ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted diseases, 2005-08, Vol.32 (8), p.506-512</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-346b79b5b6f005f2a4a3e46a08e49e661ceb57d814a942b959c6754c34f905b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-346b79b5b6f005f2a4a3e46a08e49e661ceb57d814a942b959c6754c34f905b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44969522$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44969522$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,30980,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17033332$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16041254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERG, RICHARD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUTH, STEPHEN Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALONE, SHAUNA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POTTERAT, JOHN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.</creatorcontrib><title>Social and Geographic Distance in HIV Risk</title><title>Sexually transmitted diseases</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><description>Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between social distance (measured as the geodesic, or shortest distance, between 2 people in a connected network) and geographic distance (measured as the actual distance between them in kilometers [km]). Study: We used data from a study of 595 persons at risk for HIV and their sexual and drug-using partners (total N = 8920 unique individuals) conducted in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from 1988 to 1992—a longitudinal cohort study that ascertained sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, and network information about participants. We used place of residence as the geographic marker and calculated distance between people grouped by various characteristics of interest. Results: Fifty-two percent of all dyads were separated by a distance of 4 km or less. The closest pairs were persons who both shared needles and had sexual contact (mean = 3.2 km), and HIV-positive persons and their contacts (mean = 2.9). The most distant pairs were prostitutes and their paying partners (mean = 6.1 km). In a connected subset of 348 respondents, almost half the persons were between 3 and 6 steps from each other in the social network and were separated by a distance of 2 to 8 km. Using block group centroids, the mean distance between all persons in Colorado Springs was 12.4 km compared with a mean distance of 5.4 km between all dyads in this study (P &lt; 0.0001). The subgroup of HIV-positive people and their contacts was drawn in real space on a map of Colorado Springs and revealed tight clustering of this group in the downtown area. Conclusion: The association of social and geographic distance in an urban group of people at risk for HIV provides demonstration of the importance of geographic clustering in the potential transmission of HIV. The proximity of persons connected within a network, but not necessarily known to each other, suggests that a high probability of partner selection from within the group may be an important factor in maintenance of HIV endemicity.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorado - epidemiology</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - etiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Sexual Partners</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</subject><issn>0148-5717</issn><issn>1537-4521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpaJy0P6FhCTSHwG5npJG0yq3kGwKB9OMqtLK2WXe9a0v2If8-Sm1iyCVzEWKeVzN6GDtGqBCM_g5Yjf2yglyoEA1WyIGryrsPbIJS6JIkx49sAkh1KTXqfXaQ0gxe7oCf2D4qIOSSJuz05-g71xdumBbXYfwb3eKx88VFl1Zu8KHohuLm9k_x0KV_n9le6_oUvmzPQ_b76vLX-U15d399e_7jrvSkzaoUpBptGtmoFkC23JETgZSDOpAJSqEPjdTTGskZ4o2RxistyQtqDcgGxCE72by7iONyHdLKzrvkQ9-7IYzrZFUNmqR5H0SthAZVZ_D4DTgb13HIn7Ccc6Gp1iJDZxvIxzGlGFq7iN3cxSeLYF-8W0Cbvdudd_vfu_Uuh4-2E9bNPEx30a3oDHzbAi5517cx2-3SjtMgcvHMfd1ws7Qa42ufyCgj867PikKSPA</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>ROTHENBERG, RICHARD</creator><creator>MUTH, STEPHEN Q.</creator><creator>MALONE, SHAUNA</creator><creator>POTTERAT, JOHN J.</creator><creator>WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Social and Geographic Distance in HIV Risk</title><author>ROTHENBERG, RICHARD ; MUTH, STEPHEN Q. ; MALONE, SHAUNA ; POTTERAT, JOHN J. ; WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-346b79b5b6f005f2a4a3e46a08e49e661ceb57d814a942b959c6754c34f905b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorado - epidemiology</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - etiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Sexual Partners</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERG, RICHARD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUTH, STEPHEN Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALONE, SHAUNA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POTTERAT, JOHN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROTHENBERG, RICHARD</au><au>MUTH, STEPHEN Q.</au><au>MALONE, SHAUNA</au><au>POTTERAT, JOHN J.</au><au>WOODHOUSE, DONALD E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social and Geographic Distance in HIV Risk</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>506-512</pages><issn>0148-5717</issn><eissn>1537-4521</eissn><coden>STRDDM</coden><abstract>Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between social distance (measured as the geodesic, or shortest distance, between 2 people in a connected network) and geographic distance (measured as the actual distance between them in kilometers [km]). Study: We used data from a study of 595 persons at risk for HIV and their sexual and drug-using partners (total N = 8920 unique individuals) conducted in Colorado Springs, Colorado, from 1988 to 1992—a longitudinal cohort study that ascertained sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, and network information about participants. We used place of residence as the geographic marker and calculated distance between people grouped by various characteristics of interest. Results: Fifty-two percent of all dyads were separated by a distance of 4 km or less. The closest pairs were persons who both shared needles and had sexual contact (mean = 3.2 km), and HIV-positive persons and their contacts (mean = 2.9). The most distant pairs were prostitutes and their paying partners (mean = 6.1 km). In a connected subset of 348 respondents, almost half the persons were between 3 and 6 steps from each other in the social network and were separated by a distance of 2 to 8 km. Using block group centroids, the mean distance between all persons in Colorado Springs was 12.4 km compared with a mean distance of 5.4 km between all dyads in this study (P &lt; 0.0001). The subgroup of HIV-positive people and their contacts was drawn in real space on a map of Colorado Springs and revealed tight clustering of this group in the downtown area. Conclusion: The association of social and geographic distance in an urban group of people at risk for HIV provides demonstration of the importance of geographic clustering in the potential transmission of HIV. The proximity of persons connected within a network, but not necessarily known to each other, suggests that a high probability of partner selection from within the group may be an important factor in maintenance of HIV endemicity.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>16041254</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.olq.0000161191.12026.ca</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-5717
ispartof Sexually transmitted diseases, 2005-08, Vol.32 (8), p.506-512
issn 0148-5717
1537-4521
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68074590
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cluster Analysis
Cohort Studies
Colorado - epidemiology
Demography
Female
General aspects
Geography
Health risk assessment
HIV
HIV Infections - epidemiology
HIV Infections - etiology
HIV Infections - prevention & control
Human immunodeficiency virus
Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models
Human viral diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Interviews as Topic
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medical sciences
Residence Characteristics
Risk-Taking
Sexual Behavior
Sexual Partners
Social Support
Urban areas
Viral diseases
Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids
title Social and Geographic Distance in HIV Risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A28%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20and%20Geographic%20Distance%20in%20HIV%20Risk&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20diseases&rft.au=ROTHENBERG,%20RICHARD&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=506-512&rft.issn=0148-5717&rft.eissn=1537-4521&rft.coden=STRDDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.olq.0000161191.12026.ca&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44969522%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222374873&rft_id=info:pmid/16041254&rft_jstor_id=44969522&rfr_iscdi=true